ARTICLE
ejd.2012.1711
Auteur(s) : Zafer Turkoglu1 cemzalu@gmail.com, Ilkin Zindanci1, Ozlem Turkoglu2, Burce Can1, Mukaddes Kavala, Gonca Tamer3, Vasfiye Ulucay1, Erdal Akyer3
1 Department of Dermatology,
Istanbul Medeniyet University,
Goztepe Training and Research Hospital
2 Department of Radiology,
Istanbul Dr Lutfi Kirdar Kartal
Education and Reserach Hospital
3 Department of Endocrinology,
Istanbul Medeniyet University,
Goztepe Training and Research Hospital
Atifbey sok.Sermiha k. 63/2 C-16
Acibadem Uskudar
346662 Istanbul, Turkey
Reprints: Z. Turkoglu
The positive relationship between ASST(+) autoreactive chronic
urticaria (ACU) patients and autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATD) with
thyroid autoantigen positivity is well known [1, 2]. In CU
patients, these autoantigens, anti-TPO and anti-Tg, have been
detected to be more common, with a ratio of 5-34% compared with
normal populations (5-10%) [3, 4]. Autoreactivity related with
ASST positivity has been searched for in association with
autoimmune diseases, drug allergy and hypersensitivity. But the
effect of ATD on mast cell autoreactivity has not yet been
investigated. Inflammatory connections between autoantigen overload
of thyroid autoantigens [5, 6], toll-like receptors (TLR), Fc
receptor pathways and mast cells remind us that IgE functional
autoantibodies and/or histamine releasing IgG autoantibodies can
occur at any stage of the pathogenesis of ATD [5, 7-12].
Current studies of autoimmunity have pointed out the controversial
issue of whether overload of autoantigens in HT patients makes
people candidates for urticaria, or whether there is coexistence of
urticaria with autoimmune thyroiditis [5].
The aim of this study was to detect the effects of thyroid gland
mass and thyroid hormone levels on mast cell autoreactivity and at
which stage this sensitization was effective in HT patients without
any urticarial symptoms and history of urticaria. We used ASST,
which is the best in vivo method for detecting the
autoreactivity of mast cells in blood via the Fc receptor pathways.
We compared the two forms of ASST results with thyroid hormone
levels and ultrasonographic thyroid patterns in both HT and non-ATD
patients.
Subjects and methods
Study population
Subjects were recruited from endocrinology and internal medicine
clinics at the Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and
Research Hospital. This prospective study included 154 HT patients.
A diagnosis of HT was made in the presence of elevated anti-TPO,
anti-Tg and ultrasound patterns suggestive of HT. There were two
control groups; the first control group included 100 healthy
volunteers without HT, classified as the “healthy control group”,
and whose anti-TPO and anti-Tg levels were normal. The second
control group included multinodular goitre (MNG) without ATD, the
patients were assesed by sonography and their anti-TPO and anti-Tg
levels were normal. These 46 patients with MNG were classified as
the “patient control group”. Exclusion criteria from the study
included previous symptoms and diagnosis of any clinical form of
urticaria, autoimmune diseases, allergic or non-allergic
respiratory diseases (asthma, allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis),
pregnancy, smoking, NSAID hypersensitivity, drug allergy, intake of
antihistaminic treatment, antithyroid drugs, immunosuppressive
treatments, high serum immunoglobulin levels, personal history of
stool test positivity and laboratory data. All groups were
classified according to gender and age range. There were three age
ranges were 17-30, 31-50 and 51-70.
Laboratory measurements
All individuals underwent an extensive laboratory work-up that
included complete blood count, biochemistry profile, fT3, fT4, TSH,
anti-TPO and anti-Tg levels before the intradermal tests. 113 of
154 patients who accepted radiological evaluation in the
thyroiditis study group and all of the 46 patients in patient
control group were assesed sonographically for disease activity one
day before intradermal tests by radiologist (OT) (Ultrasound System
GE LOGIQ 3, GE Medical Systems, Solingen, Germany, with GE
7.5L75G Ultrasound Transducer, 7.5-MHz linear array probe). The
following US characteristics were examined: 1) thyroid gland volume
as low, normal, high (normal values: 17.5±3.2 mL for women and
19.6±4.7 mL for men) [13]; 2) echogenicity of the solid
portion (grade 1=normal:similar to submandibular gland,
hyperechoic to neck muscles, grade 2: hypoechoic to submandibular
gland and hyperechoic to neck muscles, grade 3: iso-/hypoechoic to
neck muscles) [14].
Patient and control group thyroid profiles were evaluated with
thyroid function tests and thyroid autoantibody levels by an
endocrinologist (GT). The thyroid functions of all patients were
grouped into four groups: euthyroid, subclinical hypothyroid,
overtly hypothyroid, hyperthyroid. Anti-TPO and anti-Tg levels
grouped in three groups by titrations: for anti-TPO levels
34-100 IU/ml was accepted as low (+), 100-1,000 IU/mL
moderate (+), >1,000 IU/mL high (+) titers and for anti-Tg
115-200 IU/mL was accepted as low (+), 200-1,000 IU/mL
moderate (+), >1,000 IU/mL high (+) titers. Normal ranges
of thyroid hormones were 0-34 IU/mL for anti-TPO,
0-115 IU/mL for anti-Tg, 0.27-4.2 IU/ml for TSH,
2-4.4 nq/mL for fT3, 0.8-1.76 ng/mL for fT4. Levels of
fT3, fT4, TSH, anti-TPO and anti-Tg were measured with
electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method by using Rosh firms’
Elecsis 170 device.
Intradermal tests
We performed intradermal tests, ASST, with both autologous
serum, normal saline (negative control) and histamine (positive
control). Venous bloods of patients both from the study group and
control groups were taken in sterile tubes which did not contain
coagulation activator factors. Samples were kept at room
temperature for 30 mn and centrifuged with 500 g for
15 mn; 3 cm apart, three injections of 0.05 mL
autologous serum, normal saline and histamine were given
intradermally to the anterior of the left forearm and the wheal and
erythema reaction was awaited. Two ASST criteria were used: new and
old. According to ASST(new) criteria [15], an autologous serum red
wheal response 1.5 mm bigger than the negative control was
accepted as positive, after waiting 30 mn and according to
ASST(old) criteria [16], a serum red wheal response 5 mm
bigger than the negative control was accepted as positive after
waiting for both 30 and 60 mn. None of the patients was taking
systemic steroids, immunosuppressive or antihistaminic treatment
during the tests. The patients and controls gave informed consent
and the study was approved by the local Ethics committee.
Statistics
Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation),
student T test, Chi-squared test (χ2) and Spearman rank
correlation analysis were used for interpretation of the results,
comparison of groups, comparing quantitative data and correlation
of groups, respectively. The results were evaluated within p values
of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95%. NCSS 2007&PASS and
2008 Statistical Software (Utah, USA) programme were used for
statistical analysis.
Results
Study group
There were no differences between ages and genders of HT
patients and control groups (p>0.05) (table
1). Thyroid US was performed in 113 of 154 HT
patients and thyroid volumes of 90 patients (81.1%) were found low,
of 16 patients (57.1%) were found normal size and of
7 patients (35%) were found high. Thyroid volumes of HT
patients were significantly lower than thyroid volumes in the
patient control group (p<0.01) (table
2). According to thyroid US echogenicities, HT
patients in the thyroiditis study group and MNG patients in the
patient control group were determined as grade 1 at 38.9% and
65.2%, as grade 2 at 45.1% and 30.4%, as grade 3 at 15.9%
and 4.3%, respectively.
Table 1 Clinical characteristics and ASST results of
the patients and controls.
|
|
| Healthy control group (n=100) |
Patient control group (n=46) |
Thyroiditis study group (n=154) |
(Student T) |
| Age(17-70) |
| 40.22±14.25 |
41.65±14.17 |
40.65±13.44 |
p=0.884 |
| Gender |
Female |
88(88.0%) |
41(89.1%) |
143(92.9%) |
p=0.398 |
| (Chi-square) |
Male |
12(12.0%) |
5(10.9%) |
11 (7.1%) |
|
| ASST(old) |
(-) |
85 (%85.0) |
39(%84.8) |
75 (%48.7) |
(Chi-square)
p=0.001** |
| (+) |
15 (%15.0) |
7 (%15.2) |
79 (%51.3) |
| ASST(new) |
(-) |
77 (%77.0) |
33 (%71.7) |
61 (%39.6) |
(Chi-square)
p=0.001** |
|
| (+) |
23 (%23.0) |
13 (%28.3) |
93 (%60.4) |
|
Table 2 The association between thyroid functions,
volumes and the results of ASST (old)/(new).
|
|
| ASST (old) |
ASST(new) |
| Thyroid functions |
(-) |
(+) |
(-) |
(+) |
|
|
| n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
| Patient control group
(n=46) |
Hypothyroidy |
1 (2.6%) |
0 |
1 (3%) |
0 |
| Subclinical Hypothyroidy |
6(15.4%) |
0 |
4 (12.1%) |
2 (15.4%) |
| Euthyroidy |
29(74.3%) |
7 (100%) |
25 (75.8%) |
11 (84.6%) |
| Hyperthyroidy |
3 (7.7%) |
0 |
3 (9.1%) |
0 |
| P |
0.549 |
0.059 |
| Thyroiditis study group
(n=154) |
Hypothyroidy |
14 (14.7%) |
6 (7.6%) |
10 (16.4%) |
10 (10.8%) |
| Subclinical Hypothyroidy |
25 (26.3%) |
32 (40.5%) |
22 (36.1%) |
35 (37.6%) |
| Euthyroidy |
31 (32.7%) |
35 (44.3%) |
27 (44.3%) |
39 (41.9%) |
| Hyperthyroidy |
25 (26.3%) |
6 (7.6%) |
2 (3.3%) |
9 (9.7%) |
| P chi-square |
0.627 |
0.379 |
|
|
| ASST(old) |
ASST(new) |
| Thyroid Volume Grade |
(-) |
(++) |
(-) |
(+) |
|
|
| n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
| Patient control group |
Normal |
9(23.1%) |
3 (42.9%) |
7 (21.2%) |
5 (38.5%) |
| Low |
19 (48.7%) |
2 (%8.6%) |
18 (54.5%) |
3 (23.1%) |
| High |
11 (28.2%) |
2 (28.6%) |
8 (24.2%) |
5 (38.5%) |
| P |
0.344 |
0.128 |
Thyroiditis study group
(n=113)*
*USG performed |
Normal |
9 (17.7%) |
7 (11.3%) |
9 (20.5%) |
7 (10.1%) |
| Low |
37 (72.5%) |
53 (85.5%) |
30 (68.2%) |
60 (87%) |
| High |
5 (9.8%) |
2 (3.2%) |
5 (11.4%) |
2 (2.9%) |
| p chi-square |
0.153 |
0.043* |
ASST test
ASST(old) were positive in 79 (51.3%) of the thyroiditis study
group and were statistically significant compared to healthy (15%)
and patient (15.2%) control groups (p<0.01) (table 1).
ASST(new) were positive in 93 (60.4%) of the thyroiditis study
group and were statistically significant compared to the healthy
control group (23%) and the patient control group (28.2%)
(p<0.01) (table 1). The
patient control group and study groups’ ASST(old) and ASST(new)
results were not related to thyroid functions and thyroid US grades
(p>0.05). Ratios of ASST(old) and ASST(new) cases, regarding
thyroid functions, were respectively as follows, with decreasing
incidence: euthyroid, subclinical hypothyroid, overtly hypothyroid
and hyperthyroid (table
2).
In the thyroiditis study group, while thyroid volumes were low
in 53 of 62 (85.5%) HT patients with ASST(old)(+), the thyroid
volumes of 2 (3.2%) and 7 (11.3%) patients were elevated and
normal, respectively. In ASST(old)(-) cases, only the thyroid
volumes of 37 (72.5%) HT patients were low and there was a negative
correlation between thyroid volumes and ASST positivity
(↑ASST(+)→thyroid volume↓), although it was not statistically
significant (p>0.05). In the patient control group, there was no
correlation among ASST(old)/ASST(new) results and thyroid volumes.
In the thyroiditis study group, in contrast to the patient control
group, ASST(new)(+) patient thyroid volumes were significantly
lower than those of the ASST(new)(-) patients (p<0.05).
In the thyroiditis study group, there was no statistically
significant difference between either ASST(old) and anti-TPO titers
or ASST(new) and anti-TPO titers (p>0.05). However, moderate
titers of anti-Tg in ASST(old)(+) cases, moderate and high titers
of anti-Tg in ASST(new)(+) cases were significantly higher than the
same titers of ASST(old) and (new) (-) cases. (p<0.05)
(table 3). The prevalence
of ASST positivity in HT patients was not affected by the following
factors: gender, age at screening, laboratory measurements of
thyroid function tests, anti-TPO antibodies and thyroid
echogenicity.
Table 3 Anti-TPO/anti-Tg titres correlation with ASST
results.
| Titers |
| ASST (old) |
ASST(new) |
|
| (-) (n=75) |
(+) (n=79) |
(-) (n=61) |
(+) (n=93) |
|
| n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
| Anti TPO |
Negative (n=20) |
10(13.3%) |
10 (12.7%) |
9 (14.8%) |
11 (11.8%) |
| Low(+) (n=26) |
13 (17.3%) |
13 (16.5%) |
12 (19.7%) |
14 (15.1%) |
| Moderate(+) (n=108) |
52 (69.3%) |
56 (70.9%) |
40 (65.6%) |
68 (73.1%) |
| P chi-square |
0.686 |
0.604 |
| Anti Tg |
Negative(n=51) |
24 (32%) |
27 (34.2%) |
20 (32.8%) |
31 (33.3%) |
| Low(+) (n=17) |
13 (17.3%) |
4 (5.1%) |
12 (19.7%) |
5 (5.4%) |
| Moderate(+) (n=70) |
31 (41.3%) |
39 (49.4%) |
25 (41.0%) |
45 (48.4%) |
| High(+) (n=16) |
7 (9.3%) |
9 (11.4%) |
4 (6.6%) |
12 (12.9%) |
| P chi-square |
0120 |
0.034* |
Discussion
In this study we found that in HT patients, ASST results were
distinctly positive and this positivity was inversely proportional
with thyroid gland mass. Besides, the relationship between ASST,
thyroid hormone levels and the sonographic grading of thyroiditis
were investigated but we did not observe any relationship among
them. This is the first study to show skin mast cell autoreactivity
with ASST positivity in autoimmune thyroiditis patients without
urticaria.
O’Donnell et al. demonstrated a relationship between
anti-TPO and ASST(+), as they reported ASST positivity in 82%
urticaria patients with thyroid autoantibody [7]. Positive
reactions to intradermal injections of autologous serum, which show
functional IgG autoantibodies against the α subunit of high
affinity IgE receptors (FcεRIα) and IgE itself in vivo,
simply and quickly, is seen in approximately 60% of CU [17].
Autoreactivity related to ASST positivity has been searched for in
association with nasal polyposis (55%) [18], autoimmune diseases
(lupus erythematosus, scleroderma) (30-40%) [19], seasonal allergic
rhinitis (29.8%) [20], intrinsic asthma (45%) [21], multiple
intolerance to NSAID (30%) [22], multiple drug allergy syndrome
(94%) [23], allergic rhinitis (29%) [24], non-allergic asthma and
rhinitis (20%), allergic rhinitis/allergic bronchial asthma (17.5%)
[25].
In our study, we detected statistically significant positivity
of both old and new criteria of ASST in HT patients without
urticaria, 51.3% and 60.4%, respectively, compared with the
positivities of ASST in two control groups (table 1). We aimed to increase the
scientific value of our study by planning to work with two control
groups, healthy volunteers and non–ATD patients. We also used two
ASST criterias; 1) ASST (new) which was formed from the 2009
consensus report (the latest published criteria) [14], 2) The
method of Grattan et al. (the first published criteria) [15]
to reduce false positivity of ASST. Unfortunately, we could not
afford basophil histamine release tests, to show correlation with
ASST, and this is the weak point of our study. The ratios of ASST
positivity in ATD overlapped interestingly with ASST ratios of
autoimmune urticaria in the literature [17].
In ATD (including HT and Graves’ diseases) autoantibodies are
against TSH receptors, TPO and Tg [9-12]. Tg might be involved in
the pathogenesis through initiating a T cell immune response to
develop ATD, that then spreads to involve other autoantigens like
TPO. Tg also reflects thyroid cell mass [11, 26, 27]. TPO
is a sequestered antigen but appears in the case of thyroid tissue
damage. Antibodies to thyroid peroxidase arise spontaneously with
age and appear after thyroglobulin antibodies
[9, 26, 28]. It is also known that the extracellular
domain of TPO has a similarity of around 45% with myeloperoxidases
from eosinophils [5, 9].
In recent years, studies on mast cell biology and Fc receptor
associations have demonstrated that there is a hidden
autoreactivity in many systems of our body. The thyroid is one of
the important organs that shares autoimmune process with the other
systems [12, 26]. Mozena et al. reported the lack of a
role for cross-reacting anti-thyroid antibodies in urticaria in a
study on 20 patients, as in older studies planned with small
patient groups. These subsequent studies, using classic ELISA or
RAST, were unable to show IgE autoantibodies to thyroid antigens in
patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and thyroid
autoimmunity [29, 30], probably due to interferring IgG
autoantibodies [31] and the limited sensitivity of these assays.
Altrichter et al. demonstrated the relationship between
thyroid, skin and thyroid autoantibodies which had been unproven
for so many years. Additionally, they determined that mast cell
autoreactivity could be present with systemic involvement in IgE
anti-TPO (+) patients, as we pointed out in our study, autoantigen
overload of thyroiditis resulted in ASST positivity. In their
study, they were able to detect IgE specific for TPO by two
methods: classical ELISA and the new human-IgE-capturing-enzyme
immunoassay. They demonstrated that the IgE autoantibodies detected
in their study were directed against an extracutaneous antigen
(=autoallergen), ie TPO, which could be released from the thyroid
into the circulation. IgE-anti-TPO is, therefore, likely to be
bound to mast cells, basophils and FcεRI-expressing cells
throughout the body [5]. This may explain the ASST positivity we
found in HT patients.
In our study, the diagnosis of HT was made according to textbook
data: Elevated thyroid autoantibody levels (anti-TPO and/or
anti-Tg), heterogeneous and (other known) parencymal alterations in
thyroid tissue on sonographic examination [11, 14]. Graves’
diseases and Graves’ disease + HT were excluded clinically or
sonographically by an endocrinologist. HT was mirrored by a
hypoechoic ultrasound pattern. Thyroid US measurements were
reported to have equal sensitivities and specificities with
anti-TPO [14]. Because of that, thyroid US was chosen to confirm
whether the severity of thyroid inflammation was related with the
positivity of ASST in varying titers of anti-TPO (+) HT
patients.
We found no differences between the positivity and negativity of
ASST in HT patients with respect to US echogenity grades. In our
study, while 85.5% of ASST(old)(+) HT patients’ thyroid volumes
were low, in ASST(old)(-) cases, 72.5% of HT patients’ thyroid
volumes were low and there was an negative correlation with ASST
positivity and thyroid volume. In contrast, ASST(new)(+) HT
patients’ thyroid volumes were significantly lower than those of
ASST(new)(-) patients in the thyroiditis study group, when we
compared them with the patient control group. These findings showed
that, during the chronic stage of HT, thyroid volume gets smaller
and, conversely, ASST positivity increases.
We found no differences between the (+)/(-) results of ASST(old)
and ASST(new) with respect to thyroid function groups comparing the
thyroiditis study group and the control group patients. Many of the
HT patients with positive ASST(new) and ASST(old) were euthyroid
(table 2). Besides other
findings, in ASST(new)(+) cases, especially moderate and high (+)
titers of anti-Tg were significantly higher but there was no
relation between anti-TPO titers and ASST. This finding was not
compatible with our knowledge of anti-TPO and mast cell relation
studies in the literature. We found that moderate anti-Tg titers
correlated with ASST(old) and (new). Tg and thyroid volumes were
inversely proportional in our patients (table 3). In a previous study, Buchanan
et al. demonstrated an intradermal skin test with an extract
of human thyroid gland. Moreover, in this study, Tg antibodies were
demonstrated by the passive cutaneous anaphylaxis technique [32].
The anti-Tg and thyroid volume relationships to each other and to
ASST that we observed in our study may be due to inflammation seen
with ASST(+) ATD and the presence of circulating TPO, IgE-anti-TPO,
basophils and eosinophils [5-7].
Pathophysiologically, disorders of cellular immunity exist in HT
initially because of a genetic defect of T supressor cells,
CD4+CD25+-regulatory T cells
(CD25+Treg) [33]. As shown by in vivo studies,
CD25+ Treg cells cause supression of switching IgG class
to IgE anti-TPO of B cells but in HT this supression of switching
is not seen. IgE production increases. IL4, in the beginning, and
the other ILs are secreted from Th2 cells [33-36]. Moreover, IL-4
increases the number of FcεRI receptors [37, 38]. In summary,
FcεRI expression and the switching of IgG anti-TPO to IgE anti-TPO
are increased by the reduction of CD25+Treg levels
[35-38]. In brief, TPO and Tg are higher allergenic proteins that
start the circle of thyroid-skin mast cell-humoral/cellular
immunity with an excessive autoantigen load, resulting in ASST(+).
Maurer et al. demonstrated the “Ag overload” to be the main
disorder in the pathogenesis of autoreactive urticaria and they
defined better results with omalizumab in urticaria through the
presence of anti-TPO positivity [39]. Altrichter et al.
reported in their study that IgG-anti-TPO-positive patients were
more likely to express potentially urticaria-inducing (ASST
positivity inducing) than IgE-anti-TPO patients [5]. We would like
to point out that ASST helps us to show the excessive autoantigen
overload that affects mast cells. Our results on ASST(+)
autoreactivity in HT patients were not suprising as we previously
knew that TPO binds to C4 and leads to complement, mast cell
activation and mast cell stimulation threshold decreases when an
inflammatory process takes place in the thyroid, and IgE-anti-TPO
comes later by circulation [5, 36, 40, 41].
Our study supports the study of Altrichter et al. on the
thyroid–Fc receptor-mast cell circle, which demonstrates that the
autoantigen=autoallergen excess which plays an active role in the
pathogenesis of urticaria is formed by thyroid antigens, TPO,
IgE-anti-TPO [5, 39]. Our results show that ASST is an in
vivo marker of autoimmnity that could point out the overload of
functionally active autoantibodies like IgG anti-TPO (correlated
with IgE-anti-TPO), anti-Tg, especially binding to FcεRIα
antibodies [5]. Our results determine that ASST is a test peculiar
to the mast cell-related autoimmune disease complex, rather than to
ACU diagnosis.
In conclusion we have demonstrated the link between the thyroid
gland and skin mast cells through ASST and sonographical findings
of thyroid. We believe that ASST will be a widely used skin test to
understand potential upregulation of autoreactivity of other
systemic diseases related with mast cells.
Disclosure
Financial support : none. Conflict of
interest : none
References
1. Levy Y, Segal N, Weintrob N, Danon YL. Chronic
urticaria: association with thyroid autoimmunity. Arch Dis
Child 2003; 88: 517-19.
2. Leznoff A, Josse RG, Denburg J, Dolovich J.
Association of chronic urticaria and angioedema with thyroid
autoimmunity. Arch Dermatol 1983; 119: 636-640.
3. Dreskin S, Andrews K. The thyroid and urticaria.
Curr Opin Allergy Immunol 2005; 3: 408-12.
4. Zauli D, Deleonardi G, Foderaro S, et al.
Thyroid autoimmunity in chronic urticaria. Allergy Asthma
Proc 2001; 22: 93-95.
5. Altrichter S, Peter HJ, Pisarevskaja D et al.
Ig E mediated autoallergy against thyroid peroxidase- A novel
pathomechanism of chronic spontaneous urticaria? PLoS ONE
6(4):e 14794.
6. Appenzeller U, Meyer C, Menz G, Blaser K, Crameri R.
IgE-mediated reactions to autoantigens in allergic diseases. Int
Arch Allergy Immunol 118:193-6.
7. O’Donnell BF, Francis DM, Swana GT, Seed PT, Kobza
Black A, Greaves MW. Thyroid autoimmunity in chronic urticaria.
Br J Dermatol 2005 ;153(2):331-5.
8. Grattan CEH, Wallington TB, Warin RP et al. A
serological mediator in chronic idiopathic urticaria- a clinical,
immunological and histological evaluation. Br J Dermatol
1986; 114: 583-90.
9. McLachlan S, Rapoport B. Autoimmune response to the
thyroid in humans: thyroid peroxidase- the common autogenic
denominator. Int Rev Immunol 2000; 19:587-618.
10. Heymann WR, ed.Thyroid disorders with cutaneous
manifestations.1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag; 2008;
11:(27,121-144).
11. Caturegli P, Kimura H, Rocchi R, et al.
Autoimmune thyroid diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007; 19:
44-8.
12. Malbec O, Daëron M. The mast cell IgG receptors and
their roles in tissue inflammation. Immunol Rev
2007 ;217:206-21.
13. Hegedus L, Perrild H, Poulsen LR, et al. The
determination of thyroid volume by ultrasound and its relationship
to body weight, age and sex in normal subjects. Journal of
Clinical Endocrineology and Metabolism 1983; 56: 260-263.
14. Raber W, Gessl A, Nowotny P, Vierhapper H. Thyroid
ultrasound versus antithyroid peroxidase antibody determination: A
cohort study of 451 subjects. Thyroid 2002; 12(8):
725-31.
15. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Maurer M, Sabroe RA,
Schmid-Grendelmier P. EAACI/GALEN task force consensus report: the
autogous serum skin test in urtcaria. Allergy 2009; 64:
1256-68.
16. Grattan CE, Wallington TB, Warin R, Kennedy C,
Bradfield J. A serological mediator in chronic idiopathic
urticaria- a clinical, immunological and histological evaluation.
Br J Dermatol 1986; 114: 583-90.
17. Belot V, Desbois I, Martin L, Valat C, Lorette G
Machet L. Assessment of the usefulness of autologous serum skin
testing in chronic urticaria: a retrospective single-centre study
of 74 patients. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2010;
137(6-7):444-50.
18. Zambetti G, Ciofalo A, Soldo P, et al.
Autologous serum skin test reactivity and basophil histamine
release test in patients with nasal polyposis: preliminary results.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2010 ;23(2):641-7.
19. Husz SMihalyi L, Kemeny L. Diagnostic value of
autologous serum skin test in autoimmune urticaria. J Eur Acad
Dermatol Venereol 2008; 22(8): 1023-4.
20. Guttman-Yassky E, Bergman R, Maor C et al. The
autologous serum skin test in a cohort of chronic idiopathic
urticaria patients compared to respiratory allergy patients and
healthy individuals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21:
35-9.
21. Comi AL, Tedeschi A Lorini M, Miadonna A. Novel
clinical and serological aspects in non-allergic asthma. Respir
Med 2007; 101: 2526-33.
22. Asero R, Tedeschi A, Lorini M. Autoreactivity is
highly prevalent in patients with multiple intolerances to NSAIDS.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002; 88: 468-72.
23. Asero R, Tedeschi A, Lorini M, Caldironi G, Barocci
F. Seras from patients with multiple drug allergy syndrome contain
circulating histamine* releasing factors. Int Arch Allergy
Immunol 2003; 31: 195-200.
24. Mari A. Allergy like asthma and rhinitis: A cross
sectional survey of a respiratory cohort and diagnostic appproach
using the autologous serum skin test. Int Arch Allergy
Immunol 2004; 133: 29-39.
25. Taskapan O, Kutlu A, Karabudak O. Evaluation of
autologous serum skin test results in patients with chronic
idiopathic urticaria, allergic/non-allergic asthma or rhinitis and
healthy people. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33(6): 754-8.
26. Menconi F, Huber A, Osman R et al. Tg 2098 is
major human thyroglobulin T-cell epitope. J Autoimmun 2010;
35: 45-51.
27. Vali M, Rose NR, Caturegli P. Thyroglobulin as
autoantigen: Structure-function relationships. Revs Endocr Met
Dis 2000; 1:69-77.
28. Chen Cr, Hamdi S, Braley-Mullen H et al.
Antibodies to thyroid peroxidase arise spontaneously with age in
NOD.H-2h4 mice and appear after thyroglobulin antibodies.
Endocrinol 2010; 151:4583-93.
29. Mozena JD, Tiñana A, Negri J, Steinke JW, Borish L.
Lack of a role for cross-reacting anti-thyroid antibodies in
chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Invest Dermatol
2010 ;130(7):1860-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
30. Tedeschi A, Lorini M, Asero R. Anti-thyroid
peroxidase Ig E in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy
Clin Immunol 2001; 108: 467-8.
31. Kadooka Y, Idota T, Gunji H, et al. (2000) A
method for measuring specific IgE in sera by direct ELISA without
interference by Ig G competition or IgG autoantibodies to IgE.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol 122: 264-9.
32. Buchanan WW, Anderson JR, Goudie RB, Gray KG. A skin
test in thyroid disease. Lancet 1958; 2:928.
33. Wing K, Suri-Payer E, Rudin A.
CD4+CD25+-regulatory T cells from mouse to man. Scand J
Immunol. 2005 Jul;62(1):1-15.
34. Zhao W, SchwartzLB.[Mast cells]. In: Kaplan AP,
Greaves MW,neds. Urticaria and Angioedema. 2nd ed.London:
Informa;2009;3:31-53.
35. Qiao H, Andrade MV, Lisboa FA, Morgan K, Beaven MA.
FcepsilonR1 and toll-like receptors mediate synergistic signals to
markedly augment production of inflammatory cytokines in murine
mast cells. Blood 2006 ;107(2):610-8.
36. Curotto de Lafaille MA, Muriglan S, Sunshine MJ et
al. Hyper immunoglobulin E response in mice with monoclonal
populations of B and T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 2001;
194:1349-59.
37. Xia Hz, Du Z, Craig S et al. Effect of
recombinant human IL-4 on tryptase, chymase and Fc epsilon reseptor
type I expression in recombinant human stem cell factor dependent
fetal liver-derived human mast cells. J Immunol 1997;
159(6): 2911-21.
38. Yamaguchi M, Sayama K, Yano K, et al. Ig E
enchanches Fc epsilon receptor I expression and IgE-dependent
release of histamine and lipid mediators from human umbilical cord
blood derived mast cells: synergistic effect of IL-4 and IgE on
human mast cell Fc receptor I expression and mediator release. J
Immunol 1999; 96(14): 8080-8085.
39. Maurer M, Altrichter S, Bieber T et al.
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic urticara
who exhibit Ig E against thyroperoxidase. J allergy Clin
ımmunol 2011; 128(1): 202-9.
40. Rumbyrt JS, Katz JL, Schocket AL. Resolution of
chronic urticaria in patients with thyroid autoimmunity. J
Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 96: 901-5.
41. Rumbyrt JS, Schocket AL. Chronic urticaria and
thyroid disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2004; 24:
215-23.
|