JLE

Médecine de la Reproduction

MENU

Les préoccupations relatives aux tests génétiques préimplantatoires pour les aneuploïdies: analyse et perspectives Volume 20, numéro 4, Octobre-Novembre-Décembre 2018

  • [1] Capalbo A., Hoffmann E.R., Cimadomo D., Maria Ubaldi F., Rienzi L. Human female meiosis revised: new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation and aneuploidies from advanced genomics and time-lapse imaging. Hum Reprod Update. 20171-17. 10.1093/humupd/dmx026
  • [2] Capalbo A., Rienzi L. Mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1098-1106. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.023 5
  • [3] Braude P., Bolton V., Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459-461. 10.1038/332459a0 6163
  • [4] McCoy R.C., Demko Z.P., Ryan A. Evidence of selection against complex mitotic-origin aneuploidy during preimplantation development. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005601. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005601 10
  • [5] Mastenbroek S., Twisk M., van der Veen F., Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:454-466. 10.1093/humupd/dmr003 4
  • [6] Scott R.T. Jr., Upham K.M., Forman E.J., Zhao T., Treff N.R. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624-630. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039 3
  • [7] Treff N.R., Su J., Tao X., Northrop L.E., Scott R.T. Jr. Single-cell whole-genome amplification technique impacts the accuracy of SNP microarray-based genotyping and copy number analyses. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011;17:335-343. 10.1093/molehr/gaq103 6
  • [8] Van der Aa N., Cheng J., Mateiu L. Genome-wide copy number profiling of single cells in S-phase reveals DNA-replication domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e66. 10.1093/nar/gks1352 6
  • [9] Rubio C., Bellver J., Rodrigo L. fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1122-1129. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011 In vitro5
  • [10] Verpoest W., Staessen C.P.M.B., Goossens V. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1767-1776. 10.1093/humrep/dey262 9
  • [11] Capalbo A., Bono S., Spizzichino L. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:509-518. 10.1093/humrep/des394 2
  • [12] Handyside A.H., Montag M., Magli M.C. Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing fertilisation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:742-747. 10.1038/ejhg.2011.272 in vitro7
  • [13] McArthur S.J., Leigh D., Marshall J.T., de Boer K.A., Jansen R.P. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1628-1636. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.063 6
  • [14] Capalbo A., Rienzi L., Cimadomo D. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173-1181. 10.1093/humrep/deu033 6
  • [15] Kokkali G., Vrettou C., Traeger-Synodinos J. Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocysts for PGD of beta-thalassaemia major. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1855-1859. 10.1093/humrep/deh893 7
  • [16] Cimadomo D., Capalbo A., Ubaldi F.M. The impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7193075. 10.1155/2016/7193075
  • [17] Cimadomo D., Rienzi L., Romanelli V. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1839-1846. 10.1093/humrep/dey282 10
  • [18] Capalbo A., Ubaldi F.M., Cimadomo D. Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:199-208. 10.1093/humrep/dev294 1
  • [19] Cimadomo D., Capalbo A., Levi-Setti P.E. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1992-2001. 10.1093/humrep/dey291 11
  • [20] Dahdouh E.M., Balayla J., Garcia-Velasco J.A. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1503-1512. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038 6
  • [21] Chen M., Wei S., Hu J., Quan S. Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140779. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140779 10
  • [22] Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive M, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:429-436. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002 3
  • [23] Kim M.S., Kim J., Youm H.W., Park J.Y., Choi H.Y., Jee B.C. Embryonic development in human oocytes fertilized by split insemination. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58:217-222. 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.217 3
  • [24] Johnson L.N., Sasson I.E., Sammel M.D., Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:704-711. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.038 3
  • [25] Bhattacharya S., Hamilton M.P., Shaaban M. Conventional fertilisation intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357:2075-2079. in-vitroversus9274
  • [26] Boulet S.L., Mehta A., Kissin D.M., Warner L., Kawwass J.F., Jamieson D.J. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313:255-263. 10.1001/jama.2014.17985 3
  • [27] Nelson S.M., Lawlor D.A. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000386. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000386 in vitro1
  • [28] Bonduelle M., Van Assche E., Joris H. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2600-2614. 10
  • [29] Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive M, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive T. Genetic considerations related to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S103-S105. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1489 5 Suppl. 1
  • [30] Hansen M., Kurinczuk J.J., Bower C., Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725-730. 10.1056/NEJMoa010035 in vitro10
  • [31] Bonduelle M., Wennerholm U.B., Loft A. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:413-419. 10.1093/humrep/deh592 in vitro2
  • [32] Cox G.F., Burger J., Lip V. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:162-164. 10.1086/341096 1
  • [33] Nikolettos N., Asimakopoulos B., Papastefanou I.S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection--an assisted reproduction technique that should make us cautious about imprinting deregulation. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006;13:317-328. 10.1016/j.jsgi.2006.04.002 5
  • [34] Glujovsky D., Farquhar C., Quinteiro Retamar A.M., Alvarez Sedo C.R., Blake D. Cleavage stage blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD002118. 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5 versus
  • [35] Wale P.L., Gardner D.K. The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:2-22. 10.1093/humupd/dmv034 1
  • [36] Sfontouris I.A., Martins W.P., Nastri C.O. Blastocyst culture using single sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1261-1272. 10.1007/s10815-016-0774-5 versus10
  • [37] Pennetta F., Lagalla C., Borini A. Embryo morphokinetic characteristics and euploidy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30:185-196. 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000453 3
  • [38] Armstrong S., Bhide P., Jordan V., Pacey A., Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD011320. 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3
  • [39] Bontekoe S., Mantikou E., van Wely M., Seshadri S., Repping S., Mastenbroek S. Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD008950. 10.1002/14651858.CD008950.pub2
  • [40] Nastri C.O., Nobrega B.N., Teixeira D.M. Low atmospheric oxygen tension for embryo culture in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:95-104 e17. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037 versus1
  • [41] Dar S., Lazer T., Shah P.S., Librach C.L. Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:439-448. 10.1093/humupd/dmu001 versus3
  • [42] Ginstrom Ernstad E., Bergh C., Khatibi A. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:378 e1-e10. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.040 3
  • [43] Wang X., Du M., Guan Y., Wang B., Zhang J., Liu Z. Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15:36. 10.1186/s12958-017-0255-4 1
  • [44] Martins W.P., Nastri C.O., Rienzi L., van der Poel S.Z., Gracia C.R., Racowsky C. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2561-2569. 10.1093/humrep/dew244 11
  • [45] Christianson M.S., Zhao Y., Shoham G. Embryo catheter loading and embryo culture techniques: results of a worldwide Web-based survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1029-1036. 10.1007/s10815-014-0250-z 8
  • [46] Oron G., Nayot D., Son W.Y., Holzer H., Buckett W., Tulandi T. Obstetric and perinatal outcome from single cleavage transfer and single blastocyst transfer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:469-472. 10.3109/09513590.2015.1006615 6
  • [47] Chambers G.M., Chughtai A.A., Farquhar C.M., Wang Y.A. Risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer: a large population study using contemporary registry data from Australia and New Zealand. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:997-1003. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1130 4
  • [48] European IVFMCftESoHR, Embryology, Calhaz-Jorge C. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1638-1652. 10.1093/humrep/dew151 8
  • [49] Edgar D.H., Gook D.A. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:536-554. 10.1093/humupd/dms016 versus5
  • [50] Rienzi L., Gracia C., Maggiulli R. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139-155. 10.1093/humupd/dmw038 versus2
  • [51] Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive M, Society for Assisted Reproductive T. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37-43. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028 1
  • [52] Lee H., McCulloh D.H., Olivares R., Goldstein-Tufaro A., McCaffrey C., Grifo J. Live births after transfer of rebiopsy and revitrification of blastocyst that had “no diagnosis” following trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:e164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.483 3
  • [53] Wong K.M., van Wely M., Mol F., Repping S., Mastenbroek S. Fresh frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD011184. 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub2 versus
  • [54] Maheshwari A., Pandey S., Shetty A., Hamilton M., Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed fresh embryos generated through fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:368-77 e1-9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019 versusin vitro2
  • [55] Evans J., Hannan N.J., Edgell T.A. Fresh frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:808-821. 10.1093/humupd/dmu027 versus6
  • [56] Haouzi D., Assou S., Mahmoud K. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1436-1445. 10.1093/humrep/dep039 6
  • [57] Johnson A., Wapner R.J., Davis G.H., Jackson L.G. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:573-577. 4
  • [58] Wapner R.J., Simpson J.L., Golbus M.S. Chorionic mosaicism: association with fetal loss but not with adverse perinatal outcome. Prenat Diagn. 1992;12:347-355. 5
  • [59] Wilkins-Haug L., Roberts D.J., Morton C.C. Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine growth retardation: a case-control analysis of placentas at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:44-50. 1 Pt 1
  • [60] Malvestiti F., Agrati C., Grimi B. Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow-up amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1117-1127. 10.1002/pd.4656 11
  • [61] Taylor T.H., Gitlin S.A., Patrick J.L., Crain J.L., Wilson J.M., Griffin D.K. The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:571-581. 10.1093/humupd/dmu016 4
  • [62] Capalbo A., Ubaldi F.M., Rienzi L., Scott R., Treff N. Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities. Hum Reprod. 2016;32:492-498. 10.1093/humrep/dew250 3
  • [63] Mertzanidou A., Wilton L., Cheng J. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:256-264. 10.1093/humrep/des362 1
  • [64] Vanneste E., Voet T., Le Caignec C. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577-583. 10.1038/nm.1924 5
  • [65] Capalbo A., Rienzi L., Ubaldi F.M. Diagnosis and clinical management of duplications and deletions. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:12-18. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.002 1
  • [66] Greco E., Minasi M.G., Fiorentino F. Healthy Babies after Intrauterine Transfer of Mosaic Aneuploid Blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2089-2090. 10.1056/NEJMc1500421 21
  • [67] Spinella F., Fiorentino F., Biricik A. Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of fertilization treatments. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:77-83. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.025 in vitro1
  • [68] Capalbo A., Treff N.R., Cimadomo D. Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:901-906. 10.1038/ejhg.2014.222 7
  • [69] Goodrich D., Tao X., Bohrer C. A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1473-1480. 10.1007/s10815-016-0784-3 11
  • [70] Treff N.R., Franasiak J.M. Detection of segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism in the human preimplantation embryo: technical considerations and limitations. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:27-31. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.039 1
  • [71] Johnson D.S., Cinnioglu C., Ross R. Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:944-949. 10.1093/molehr/gaq062 12
  • [72] Northrop L.E., Treff N.R., Levy B., Scott R.T. Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:590-600. 10.1093/molehr/gaq037 8
  • [73] Fragouli E., Alfarawati S., Daphnis D.D. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:480-490. 10.1093/humrep/deq344 2
  • [74] Capalbo A., Wright G., Elliott T., Ubaldi F.M., Rienzi L., Nagy Z.P. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2298-2307. 10.1093/humrep/det245 8
  • [75] Huang J., Yan L., Lu S., Zhao N., Qiao J. Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:487-493. 10.1007/s10815-017-0875-9 4
  • [76] Popovic M., Dheedene A., Christodoulou C. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate challenge of preimplantation genetic testing? Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1342-1354. 10.1093/humrep/dey106 7
  • [77] Victor A.R., Griffin D.K., Brake A.J. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:181-192. 10.1093/humrep/dey327 1
  • [78] Munne S., Blazek J., Large M. Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:62-71 e8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.002 1
  • [79] Huang A., Adusumalli J., Patel S., Liem J., Williams J. 3rd., Pisarska M.D. Prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism in pregnancies from couples with infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2355-2360. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.044 6
  • [80] Scott R.T. Jr., Ferry K., Su J., Tao X., Scott K., Treff N.R. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:870-875. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104 4
  • [81] Ubaldi F.M., Capalbo A., Colamaria S. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2097-2106. 10.1093/humrep/dev159 9