Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable
  Version PDF

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism in vitiligo: protective and predisposing effects of genotypes in disease


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 21, Numéro 2, 173-7, March-April 2011, Genes and skin

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2011.1279

Résumé  

Auteur(s) : Surekha TIPPISETTY, Mohammed ISHAQ, Prasanna Latha KOMARAVALLI, Parveen JAHAN, Osmania University, Dept. of Genetics, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Hyd -12, India, Shadan Institute for PG studies, Dept. of Genetics, Hyd -04, India.

Résumé :

Vitiligo is a depigmenting skin disorder with profound heterogenity in its aetio-pathophysiology, and is associated with inter-individual variation in progression of disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a regulator of renin angiotensin system (RAS) that plays an important role in the physiology of the vasculature, blood pressure, inflammation, adipocyte distribution of various diseases. The present study was carried out in 243 vitiligo patients (132 males and 111 females), aged between 3-62 years with a mean age at onset of 21.6 ± 13.6 yrs, and in 205 healthy controls of south Indian origin. The main objectives of the present study were to evaluate the ACE I/D (insertion/deletion) polymorphism in the patient and control groups. Further, I/D genotypes were compared among the patients with and without the family history of vitiligo as well as the progression of the disease, through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods.

The results revealed a highly significant association of DD genotype with disease susceptibility (p <\; 0.01) in patients with a family history of vitiligo (p <\; 0.05) in terms of early age at onset. Further, the pre-dominance of ID genotype among patients revealed its association with a slow progression of the disease (p <\; 0.05). The present study is the first report to highlight the protective role of II genotype and the significant association of ID genotype with slow progression of the disease.


Illustrations

ARTICLE

ejd.2011.1279

Auteur(s) : Surekha TIPPISETTY1, Mohammed ISHAQ1, Prasanna Latha KOMARAVALLI2, Parveen JAHAN1 parveenjahan_dr@yahoo.in

1 Osmania University, Dept. of Genetics, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Hyd -12, India

2 Shadan Institute for PG studies, Dept. of Genetics, Hyd -04, India

Reprints: P. JAHAN

Vitiligo (leucoderma) is a common skin disorder in which depigmented macules appear on the skin, due to destruction of melanocytes. It is usually bilateral, rarely unilateral, developing anywhere on the body and may gradually enlarge. Irrespective of sex, race and age, ∼1-2% of the world population suffer from this disorder. It is reported that 18-20% of vitiligo probands exhibit familial incidence of the disease [1, 2]. The aetiology of vitiligo is multifactorial, involving both genetic and the environmental triggers; however, it remains ambiguous whether oxidative stress and autoimmunity are implicated as important factors in the pathogenesis of this disease. Genetic marker analysis has revealed a number of candidate genes such as AIRE, CTLA4, GCH1, VIT1, MHC, CAT, COMT and SLEV1 in the susceptibility to vitiligo [3-8]. However, heterogeneity is observed with respect to loci in different ethnic groups.

Inter-individual variation is commonly observed with respect to rate-of-progression and clinical variants of the disease. Understanding the inter-individual variation in the progression of the disease helps in predicting the vitiligo from the very onset. Progression of the disease may be defined as enlargement of the existing depigmented macules or appearance of new lesions over a period of time. If the area of depigmentation is more than three quarters of the total body surface area (TBSA) within one year of disease onset, it is referred to as fast progression; on the other hand, if the depigmented macules cover less than one quarter of the total body surface area it is termed slow progression. The above classification is defined based on few criteria laid down by some authors with slight modifications [9-11].

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a regulator of the renin- angiotensin system that plays an important role in the physiology of the vasculature, blood pressure, inflammation and adipocyte distribution of various diseases, of which vitiligo is one of them [12]. An insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of a 287bp repetitive sequence in intron 16 of the ACE gene gives two co-dominant alleles. The gene product is a monomeric, membrane-bound, zinc and chloride dependent peptidyl dipeptidase that catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, by removing a carboxy terminal dipeptide. The gene codes for this enzyme is located on chromosome 17q23. The expression and activity of ACE in blood and tissue depends on insertion and deletion polymorphism [13, 14]. The DD (deletion homozygote) genotype exhibits two fold higher plasma and tissue levels than the II (insertion homozygote) genotype and with ID (insertion/deletion heterozygote) having intermediate levels of the enzyme [14, 15]. It has been reported that these genotypes exhibit variations with respect to oxidative stress, angiogenesis, vasoconstriction and distribution of subcutaneous fat [16, 17].

In view of existing literature on ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism, it was felt that ACE was a relevant polymorphic marker for oxidative stress and angiogenesis as well as body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the role of ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism not only in susceptibility to vitiligo but also in the progression of the depigmentation process, a novel aspect which has not been dealt in other studies.

Materials and method

Our study enrolled 243 vitiligo cases from South India, which were examined in the vitiligo unit at the Central Research Institute of Unani Medicine (CRIUM, Hyderabad, India). These cases were not suffering from any other skin or autoimmune disorder. As a control group, 205 healthy age and sex matched volunteers without any clinical evidence of vitiligo or other skin disorders were recruited. This study was approved by the ethical committee of CRIUM and Department of genetics, Osmania University (Hyderabad). All subjects were included only after informed consent for clinical and demographical data was obtained. Based on the progression of the depigmentation, patients were categorized as fast or slow progressive types. If the patients showed depigmentation of more than three quarters of the total body surface area within one year of the disease manifestation, they were categorized as fast progressive type and if it was less than one quarter of the total body surface area they were categorized as slow progressive type. As there is no standard classification of the rate of progression of disease, our categorization is based on the long term observation of CRIUM dermatologists (unpublished) and from studies on treatment response in vitiligo [9-11].

ACE gene polymorphism

Blood samples were collected from patients and controls and were subjected to DNA isolation by standard procedure. ACE genotyping was carried out by polymerase chain reaction using oligonucleotide sense primer 5′-CTG GAG ACC ACT CCC ATC CTT TCT-3′, and the antisense primer 5′-GAT GTG GCC ATC ACA TTC GTC AGA T-3′. DNA samples (100 ng) were subjected to 35 cycles of PCR amplification in eppendorf thermocycler under the following conditions; initial denaturation 94 °C for 5 min, denaturation 94 °C for 45 sec; annealing 58 °C for 1 min; extension 72 °C for 45 sec and final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were analyzed with 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining in order to identify three patterns: II (a 490 bp fragment), DD (a 190 bp fragment) and ID (both 490 and190 bp fragments).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis for relative risk was done by Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. ANOVA was carried out for association of ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism and age at onset in relation to familial history. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS, 15th version) was used to perform the analysis. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was evaluated by χ2 test for genotypic and allelic frequencies in the patient and control groups.

Results and discussion

We analyzed the polymorphism of ACE gene in 243 patients and 205 healthy volunteers. Based on CRIUM observation (unpublished) 50 (20.6%) patients were categorized as fast progressive and the remaining 193 (79.4%) as slow progressive types. The age at onset was 1-59 yrs of the patients and it was lower in the fast progressive (1-49yrs) compared to the slow progressive group (1-59yrs). The overall mean age at onset was 21.6 ± 13.6 yrs. However, it was found to be 22.3 ± 14.7 yrs and 21.4 ± 13.3 yrs in the fast progressive and slow progressive types, respectively. Of the 243 vitiligo patients, 54 (22.2%) individuals showed a family history of the disease.

ACE I/D polymorphism in disease susceptibility

The frequencies of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients and controls are given in table 1 and figure 1. Analysis of genotype frequencies revealed an over-representation of DD and ID among patients, compared to that of the control group (p < 0.05). This observation indicates increased susceptibility of the DD genotype to vitiligo. However, the apparent difference of the ID genotype between patients and controls was not significant.

Table 1 Distribution of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients and controls.

Allele frequency
Groups II (%) ID (%) DD (%) χ2 (p value) I D χ2 (p value)
Patients 54 (22.3) 115 (47.3) 74 (30.4) 18.2 (0.000) 0.45 0.55 4.51 (0.03)
Controls 83 (40.5) 80 (39) 42 (20.5) 0.60 0.40
OR (95% CI) p value
II vs DD 0.369 (0.227-0.644) 0.000
ID vs DD 0.816 (0.509-1.309) NS
DD vs II 2.708 (1.627-4.506) 0.000
I vs D 0.545 (0.312-0.955) 0.04

Note: NS is not significant.

ACE, being a pleiotropic gene, may be involved in susceptibility to vitiligo, due to its multiple effects. The role of the ACE gene is implicated in oxidative stress, angiogenesis and the distribution of body fat. Earlier reports on ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism in disease association have suggested the role of angiogenesis in vitiligo, while in some other diseases its role is suggested in enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and fat distribution [16, 17]. Of the 3 ACE I/D genotypes, DD is considered to be associated with relatively enhanced ROS generation mediated by angiotensin II, compared to other genotypes [17]. Moreover, individuals with this homozygous genotype DD have also been reported to have greater accumulated visceral fat, which may be contributing to the disease manifestations associated with high oxidative stress like diabetes and cardiovascular disease [18-21]. These adverse pathophysiological effects of the DD genotype, along with other susceptible genes, may predispose individuals to a dermatological condition like vitiligo. The aetiopathogenesis of vitiligo involves not only oxidative stress but also angiogenesis, which may facilitate the access of cells of the immune system and of auto-antibodies to the site of melanocyte destruction.

Analysis of the II genotype frequency revealed an almost 50% reduction in the frequency of this genotype among the patients compared to controls. It suggests a protective role of the II homozygous condition against the development of vitiligo, as the II genotype is suggested to be less ROS-generating compared to other genotypes. Hence, the suggestive protective role of II in susceptibility to vitiligo.

A few reports on vitiligo dealing with ACE I/D genotypes have emphasized the predisposing effects of the DD genotype. Our results go in accordance with a Korean and another Indian study [12, 19, 22] were generalized and localized vitiligo patients were included. However, in contrast to Akhtar et al and Dwivedi et al restricted their studies to generalized vitiligo [23, 24]. The present study revealed not only the predisposition of DD individuals to vitiligo but also reported a considerable protection conferred by the II genotype against this depigmenting condition. The current study appears to be the first report highlighting the protective role of II genotypes.

ACE I/D genotypes in relation to family history of vitiligo and influence on age at onset of the disease

Of the total 243 patients, 22.2% (n = 54) show a positive family history of vitiligo, whereas 77.8% (n = 189) were without family history of vitiligo. When the ACE I/D polymorphism was analyzed, 16.7%, 46.3% and 37% of the familial cases showed II, ID and DD genotypes respectively. However, 23.8%, 47.6% and 28.6% of non-familial cases revealed the above genotypes. When genotype vs family history of vitiligo with age at onset was analyzed by ANOVA, it was observed that the individuals with a family history and the DD genotype had an early age at onset of the disease, indicating that the DD genotype may be contributing to early age at onset of vitiligo (Fisher's value 32.95, p < 0.01).

ACE I/D polymorphism in disease progression

In addition to disease susceptibility, another important factor to be noted is disease progression, which is defined as enlargement of the existing depigmented lesions and/or appearance of new depigmented areas. Inter-individual variations in disease progression among patients are frequently observed, warranting genetic marker association analysis that may help to predict disease progression in patients. In view of this variation, we analyzed ACE I/D polymorphism in two groups of patients, namely fast progression and slow progression types of the disease.

Out of 50 cases observed in the fast progressive group, 13 (26%) showed II genotype and 18 (36%) had ID genotypes. The DD genotype was observed in 19 (38%) cases. In the slow progressive group, which comprised of 193 patients, 41(21.2%) individuals were of II genotype, 97(50.2%) individuals with ID genotype and the remaining 55(28.4%) were of DD genotype.

Analysis of the proportion of II and DD homozygotes in the fast progressive and slow progressive groups revealed no significant differences. However, there was an about 9.6% increase in the frequency of the DD genotype among the fast progressive group compared to the slow progressive group. Further, it was observed that the percentage of individuals with an ID genotype was significantly reduced in the fast progressive compared to the slow progressive group (36% vs 50.2%) (table 2, figure 2).

Table 2 Distribution of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients with fast progressive and slow progressive type.

Allele frequency
Groups II (%) ID (%) DD (%) I D
Fast progressive 13 (26) 18 (36) 19 (38) 0.44 0.56
Slow progressive 41 (21.2) 97 (50.2) 55 (28.4) 0.46 0.54
OR (95% CI) p value
DD vs other 1.538 (0.807-2.933) NS
ID vs DD 0.537 (0.281-1.100) 0.05
ID vs others 0.558 (0.317-0.981) 0.05
I vs D 0.92 (0.11-1.60) NS

Note: NS is not significant.

Based on our results, it is likely that disease progression may be more due to an angiogenic effect as it facilitates access of cells of the immune system, as well as auto-antibodies, to the site of melanocyte destruction. The observations made in the present study, like the substantial increase in the frequency of the DD genotype in the fast progressive group (9.6%) compared to the slow progressive group, are suggestive of angiogenic effects of the D allele in a homozygous condition. This assumption is supported by reports of a DD homozygote association with diabetic nephropathy, which is explained on the basis of enhanced neovascularization in the kidney [25, 26], progression of sarcoidosis [27] and severity of systemic lupus erythematosus [28]. Moreover, metastasis is observed in cancers more frequently in DD individuals, which is mainly attributed to angiogenic effects [29-31].

The patterns of genotype association with vitiligo susceptibility and progression are different. The DD genotype is observed to be associated with a significantly increased susceptibility (p - 0.000). Contrary to this, in disease progression we observed a 14% decrease in the frequency of ID in fast progression, indicating that a heterozygous condition slows down the disease progression. As vitiligo pathogenesis involves both oxidative stress and autoimmunity, it appears that autoimmune mechanism(s) have a decisive role in progression, while in disease susceptibility oxidative stress mechanisms play a relatively more important role.

Converse to our expectation, the ID genotype was associated with a reduced risk of disease progression compared to the other two genotypes (p < 0.05). It appears that an as yet not understood mechanism of allelic interaction is associated with this pleiotropic gene; the oxidative stress-inducing role of D allele predominates in the susceptibility and the angiogenic role in disease progression. However, II in the homozygous condition is more prominent in a protective role. Though these two alleles are co-dominant in their expression, their product interaction seems to be complex. It is suggested that, in order to understand the role of ACE (a pleiotropic marker on susceptibility and progression of disease), certain markers of angiogenicity and adipocyte distribution could be studied with respect to vitiligo in different populations.

Disclosure

Acknowledgements: We thank all the vitiligo subjects for their co-operation in giving consent for blood samples and the clinical information. And we would also like to thank Dr. M.A. Waheed, Deputy Director of Central Research Institute for Unani Medicine, Hyderabad, for his extended help in understanding the disease of vitiligo and its progression. Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.

References

1 T Surekha, M Ishaq, KP Latha, PH Rao, P. Jahan Do clinical variants of vitiligo involve X-chromosomal gene(s) too? J Med Sci 2008; 8: 728-733.

2 JJ Nordlund, J.P. Ortonne Vitiligo vulgaris JJ Nordlund The Pigmentary System. Physiology and Pathophysiology 1998; Oxford University Press New York 513-551.

3 RF Pamela, G Katherine, SL Gregory et al. A genomewide screen for generalised vitiligo: Conformation of AIS1 on chromosome 1p31 and evidence for additional susceptibility loci Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 1560-1564.

4 AS Richard, G Katherine, CB Dorothy, R.F. Pamela Novel vitiligo susceptibility loci on chromosome 7(AIS2) and 8 (AIS3), conformation of SLEV1 on chromosome 17 and their roles in autoimmune diathesis Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 188-191.

5 JC Jian, H Wei, PG Jin et al. A novel linkage to generalised vitiligo on 4q13-q21 identified in genomewide linkage analysis of Chinese families Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76: 1057-1065.

6 S Pehlivan, F Ozkinay, S Alper et al. Association Between Il4 (-590), Ace (I)/(D), Ccr5 (Delta32), Ctla4 (+49) And Il1-Rn (Vntr In Intron 2) Gene Polymorphisms And Vitiligo Eur J Dermatol 2009; 19: 126-128.

7 Sn Aksoy, Z Erbagci, Ei Saygili, T Sever, Ab Erbagci, S. Pehlivan Analysis Of Myeloperoxidase Promotor Polymorphism And Enzyme Activity In Turkish Patients With Vitiligo Eur J Dermatol 2009; 19: 576-580.

8 Hj Kim, Yk Uhm, Jy Yun et al. Association Between Polymorphisms Of Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (Ddr1) And Non-Segmental Vitiligo In The Korean Population Eur J Dermatol 2010; 20: 231-232.

9 I Dammak, S Boudaya, F Ben Abdallah, H Turki, H Attia, B. Hentati Antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation at the tissue level in patients with stable and active vitiligo Int J Dermatol 2009; 48: 476-480.

10 D.M. Thappa Vitiligo Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002; 68: 227-228.

11 Warwick L. Morison-Laser therapy, Puva therapy. http://www.lightandlaser.com/vitiligo.html.

12 SY Jin, HH Park, GZ Li et al. Association of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme gene I/D polymorphism of Vitiligo In korean population Pigment Cell Research 2004; 17: 84-86.

13 WP Koh, JM Yuan, CL Sun et al. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk among Chinese women in Singapore Cancer Res 2003; 63: 573-578.

14 B Rigat, C Hubert, F Alhenc-Gelas, F Cambien, P Corvol, F. Soubrier An Insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels J Clin Invest 1990; 86: 1343-1346.

15 C Hubert, AM Houot, P Corvol, F. Soubrier Structure of angiotensin I converting enzyme gene: two alternate promoters corresponds to evolutionary steps of a duplicated gene J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 15377-15383.

16 The Skinny-Fat Ectomorph - Part I- Kelly Baggett. http://www.mindandmuscle.net/node/226?page=all.

17 MY Jian, PK Woon, LS Can, PL Hin, C.Y. Mimi Green tea intake. ACE gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk among Chinese women in Singapore Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 1389-1394.

18 GA Molnar, Z Wagner, L Wagner et al. Effect of ACE gene polymorphism on carbohydrate metabolism, on oxidative stress and on end-organ damage in type-2 diabetes mellitus Orv Hetil 2004; 145: 855-859.

19 MG Nicholls, AM Richards, M. Agarwal The importance of the renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular disease J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 295-299.

20 L Mykkanen, J Kuusisto, K Pyorala, M. Laakso Cardiovascular disease risk factors as predictors of type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in elderly subjects Diabetologia 1993; 36: 553-559.

21 SM Haffner, RA Valdez, HP Hazuda, BD Mitchell, PA Morales, M.P. Stern Prospective analysis of the insulin resistance syndrome (Syndrome X) Diabetes 1992; 41: 715-722.

22 F Deeba, Jamil k, R Syed, MA Waheed, P.H. Rao Association of angiotensin converting enzyme gene I/D polymorphism with vitiligo in South Indian population Int J Med Med Sci 2009; 1: 009-12.

23 S Akhtar, NG Gavalas, DJ Gawkrodger et al. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the gene encoding angiotensin converting enzyme is not associated with generalised vitiligo in an English Population Arch Dermatol Res 2005; 297: 94-98.

24 M Dwivedi, CL Naresh, EM Shajil, BJ Shah, R. Begum The ACE gene I/D polymorphism is not associated with generalized vitiligo susceptibility in Gujarat population Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 2008; 21: 407-408.

25 L. Groop Genetics of the metabolic syndrome Br J Nutri 2000; 83: Suppl. 1 S39-S84.

26 T Matsusaka, J Hymes, I. Ichikawa Angiotensin in progressive renal disease: theory and practice J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 2025-2043.

27 A Pietinalho, K Furuya, E Yamaguchi, K Kawakami, O. Selroos The angiotensin - converting enzyme DD gene is associated with poor prognosis in Finnish Sarcoidosis patients Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 723-726.

28 AR Malik, MM Saeed, FM Sabeen, M.F. Philippe Association of Angiotensin-Converting enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of Lupus disease Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 2008; 19: 761-766.

29 C Rocken, U Lendeckel, J Dierkes et al. The number of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer correlates with the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 2526-2530.

30 R Medeiros, A Vasconcelos, S Costa et al. Linkage of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism to the progression of human prostate cancer J Pathol 2004; 202: 330-335.

31 CA Haiman, SO Henderson, P Bretsky, LN Kolonel, B.E. Henderson Genetic variation in angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort Cancer Res 2003; 63: 6984-6987.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]