ARTICLE
ejd.2011.1279
Auteur(s) : Surekha TIPPISETTY1, Mohammed ISHAQ1, Prasanna Latha KOMARAVALLI2, Parveen JAHAN1 parveenjahan_dr@yahoo.in
1 Osmania University, Dept. of Genetics, Hyderabad,
Andhra Pradesh, Hyd -12, India
2 Shadan Institute for PG studies, Dept. of Genetics,
Hyd -04, India
Reprints: P. JAHAN
Vitiligo (leucoderma) is a common skin disorder in which
depigmented macules appear on the skin, due to destruction of
melanocytes. It is usually bilateral, rarely unilateral, developing
anywhere on the body and may gradually enlarge. Irrespective of
sex, race and age, ∼1-2% of the world population suffer from this
disorder. It is reported that 18-20% of vitiligo probands exhibit
familial incidence of the disease [1, 2]. The aetiology of
vitiligo is multifactorial, involving both genetic and the
environmental triggers; however, it remains ambiguous whether
oxidative stress and autoimmunity are implicated as important
factors in the pathogenesis of this disease. Genetic marker
analysis has revealed a number of candidate genes such as AIRE,
CTLA4, GCH1, VIT1, MHC, CAT, COMT and SLEV1 in the susceptibility
to vitiligo [3-8]. However, heterogeneity is observed with respect
to loci in different ethnic groups.
Inter-individual variation is commonly observed with respect to
rate-of-progression and clinical variants of the disease.
Understanding the inter-individual variation in the progression of
the disease helps in predicting the vitiligo from the very onset.
Progression of the disease may be defined as enlargement of the
existing depigmented macules or appearance of new lesions over a
period of time. If the area of depigmentation is more than three
quarters of the total body surface area (TBSA) within one year of
disease onset, it is referred to as fast progression; on the other
hand, if the depigmented macules cover less than one quarter of the
total body surface area it is termed slow progression. The above
classification is defined based on few criteria laid down by some
authors with slight modifications [9-11].
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a regulator of the renin-
angiotensin system that plays an important role in the physiology
of the vasculature, blood pressure, inflammation and adipocyte
distribution of various diseases, of which vitiligo is one of them
[12]. An insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of a 287bp
repetitive sequence in intron 16 of the ACE gene gives two
co-dominant alleles. The gene product is a monomeric,
membrane-bound, zinc and chloride dependent peptidyl dipeptidase
that catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II,
by removing a carboxy terminal dipeptide. The gene codes for this
enzyme is located on chromosome 17q23. The expression and activity
of ACE in blood and tissue depends on insertion and deletion
polymorphism [13, 14]. The DD (deletion homozygote)
genotype exhibits two fold higher plasma and tissue levels than the
II (insertion homozygote) genotype and with ID
(insertion/deletion heterozygote) having intermediate levels of the
enzyme [14, 15]. It has been reported that these genotypes
exhibit variations with respect to oxidative stress, angiogenesis,
vasoconstriction and distribution of subcutaneous fat
[16, 17].
In view of existing literature on ACE insertion/deletion
polymorphism, it was felt that ACE was a relevant polymorphic
marker for oxidative stress and angiogenesis as well as body fat
distribution. We aimed to investigate the role of ACE
insertion/deletion polymorphism not only in susceptibility to
vitiligo but also in the progression of the depigmentation process,
a novel aspect which has not been dealt in other studies.
Materials and method
Our study enrolled 243 vitiligo cases from South India, which
were examined in the vitiligo unit at the Central Research
Institute of Unani Medicine (CRIUM, Hyderabad, India). These cases
were not suffering from any other skin or autoimmune disorder. As a
control group, 205 healthy age and sex matched volunteers without
any clinical evidence of vitiligo or other skin disorders were
recruited. This study was approved by the ethical committee of
CRIUM and Department of genetics, Osmania University (Hyderabad).
All subjects were included only after informed consent for clinical
and demographical data was obtained. Based on the progression of
the depigmentation, patients were categorized as fast or slow
progressive types. If the patients showed depigmentation of more
than three quarters of the total body surface area within one year
of the disease manifestation, they were categorized as fast
progressive type and if it was less than one quarter of the total
body surface area they were categorized as slow progressive type.
As there is no standard classification of the rate of progression
of disease, our categorization is based on the long term
observation of CRIUM dermatologists (unpublished) and from studies
on treatment response in vitiligo [9-11].
ACE gene polymorphism
Blood samples were collected from patients and controls and were
subjected to DNA isolation by standard procedure. ACE genotyping
was carried out by polymerase chain reaction using oligonucleotide
sense primer 5′-CTG GAG ACC ACT CCC ATC CTT TCT-3′, and the
antisense primer 5′-GAT GTG GCC ATC ACA TTC GTC AGA T-3′. DNA
samples (100 ng) were subjected to 35 cycles of PCR
amplification in eppendorf thermocycler under the following
conditions; initial denaturation 94 °C for 5 min, denaturation
94 °C for 45 sec; annealing 58 °C for 1 min;
extension 72 °C for 45 sec and final extension of 72 °C
for 7 min. PCR products were analyzed with 2% agarose gel
electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining in order to identify
three patterns: II (a 490 bp fragment), DD (a 190 bp
fragment) and ID (both 490 and190 bp fragments).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis for relative risk was done by Odds ratio
with 95% confidence interval. ANOVA was carried out for association
of ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism and age at onset in relation
to familial history. The statistical package for social sciences
(SPSS, 15th version) was used to perform the analysis.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was evaluated by χ2 test for
genotypic and allelic frequencies in the patient and control
groups.
Results and discussion
We analyzed the polymorphism of ACE gene in 243 patients and 205
healthy volunteers. Based on CRIUM observation (unpublished) 50
(20.6%) patients were categorized as fast progressive and the
remaining 193 (79.4%) as slow progressive types. The age at onset
was 1-59 yrs of the patients and it was lower in the fast
progressive (1-49yrs) compared to the slow progressive group
(1-59yrs). The overall mean age at onset was 21.6 ± 13.6 yrs.
However, it was found to be 22.3 ± 14.7 yrs and 21.4 ± 13.3 yrs in
the fast progressive and slow progressive types, respectively. Of
the 243 vitiligo patients, 54 (22.2%) individuals showed a family
history of the disease.
ACE I/D polymorphism in disease susceptibility
The frequencies of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients and
controls are given in table 1 and figure 1.
Analysis of genotype frequencies revealed an over-representation of
DD and ID among patients, compared to that of the control
group (p < 0.05). This observation indicates increased
susceptibility of the DD genotype to vitiligo. However, the
apparent difference of the ID genotype between patients and
controls was not significant.
Table 1 Distribution of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients
and controls.
|
|
|
|
|
| Allele frequency |
|
| Groups |
II (%) |
ID (%) |
DD (%) |
χ2 (p value) |
I |
D |
χ2 (p value) |
| Patients |
54 (22.3) |
115 (47.3) |
74 (30.4) |
18.2 (0.000) |
0.45 |
0.55 |
4.51 (0.03) |
| Controls |
83 (40.5) |
80 (39) |
42 (20.5) |
| 0.60 |
0.40 |
|
| OR (95% CI) |
p value |
|
| II vs DD |
0.369 (0.227-0.644) |
0.000 |
| ID vs DD |
0.816 (0.509-1.309) |
NS |
| DD vs II |
2.708 (1.627-4.506) |
0.000 |
| I vs D |
0.545 (0.312-0.955) |
0.04 |
Note: NS is not significant.
ACE, being a pleiotropic gene, may be involved in susceptibility
to vitiligo, due to its multiple effects. The role of the ACE gene
is implicated in oxidative stress, angiogenesis and the
distribution of body fat. Earlier reports on ACE insertion/deletion
polymorphism in disease association have suggested the role of
angiogenesis in vitiligo, while in some other diseases its role is
suggested in enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and fat
distribution [16, 17]. Of the 3 ACE I/D genotypes, DD
is considered to be associated with relatively enhanced ROS
generation mediated by angiotensin II, compared to other genotypes
[17]. Moreover, individuals with this homozygous genotype DD
have also been reported to have greater accumulated visceral fat,
which may be contributing to the disease manifestations associated
with high oxidative stress like diabetes and cardiovascular disease
[18-21]. These adverse pathophysiological effects of the DD
genotype, along with other susceptible genes, may predispose
individuals to a dermatological condition like vitiligo. The
aetiopathogenesis of vitiligo involves not only oxidative stress
but also angiogenesis, which may facilitate the access of cells of
the immune system and of auto-antibodies to the site of melanocyte
destruction.
Analysis of the II genotype frequency revealed an almost
50% reduction in the frequency of this genotype among the patients
compared to controls. It suggests a protective role of the
II homozygous condition against the development of vitiligo,
as the II genotype is suggested to be less ROS-generating
compared to other genotypes. Hence, the suggestive protective role
of II in susceptibility to vitiligo.
A few reports on vitiligo dealing with ACE I/D genotypes
have emphasized the predisposing effects of the DD genotype.
Our results go in accordance with a Korean and another Indian study
[12, 19, 22] were generalized and localized vitiligo
patients were included. However, in contrast to Akhtar et al
and Dwivedi et al restricted their studies to generalized
vitiligo [23, 24]. The present study revealed not only the
predisposition of DD individuals to vitiligo but also
reported a considerable protection conferred by the II
genotype against this depigmenting condition. The current study
appears to be the first report highlighting the protective role of
II genotypes.
ACE I/D genotypes in relation to family history of vitiligo and
influence on age at onset of the disease
Of the total 243 patients, 22.2% (n = 54) show a positive family
history of vitiligo, whereas 77.8% (n = 189) were without family
history of vitiligo. When the ACE I/D polymorphism was analyzed,
16.7%, 46.3% and 37% of the familial cases showed II,
ID and DD genotypes respectively. However, 23.8%,
47.6% and 28.6% of non-familial cases revealed the above genotypes.
When genotype vs family history of vitiligo with age at
onset was analyzed by ANOVA, it was observed that the individuals
with a family history and the DD genotype had an early age
at onset of the disease, indicating that the DD genotype may
be contributing to early age at onset of vitiligo (Fisher's value
32.95, p < 0.01).
ACE I/D polymorphism in disease progression
In addition to disease susceptibility, another important factor
to be noted is disease progression, which is defined as enlargement
of the existing depigmented lesions and/or appearance of new
depigmented areas. Inter-individual variations in disease
progression among patients are frequently observed, warranting
genetic marker association analysis that may help to predict
disease progression in patients. In view of this variation, we
analyzed ACE I/D polymorphism in two groups of patients, namely
fast progression and slow progression types of the disease.
Out of 50 cases observed in the fast progressive group, 13 (26%)
showed II genotype and 18 (36%) had ID genotypes. The
DD genotype was observed in 19 (38%) cases. In the slow
progressive group, which comprised of 193 patients, 41(21.2%)
individuals were of II genotype, 97(50.2%) individuals with
ID genotype and the remaining 55(28.4%) were of DD
genotype.
Analysis of the proportion of II and DD
homozygotes in the fast progressive and slow progressive groups
revealed no significant differences. However, there was an about
9.6% increase in the frequency of the DD genotype among the
fast progressive group compared to the slow progressive group.
Further, it was observed that the percentage of individuals with an
ID genotype was significantly reduced in the fast
progressive compared to the slow progressive group (36% vs
50.2%) (table 2, figure
2).
Table 2 Distribution of ACE I/D genotypes in vitiligo patients
with fast progressive and slow progressive type.
|
|
|
|
| Allele frequency |
| Groups |
II (%) |
ID (%) |
DD (%) |
I |
D |
| Fast progressive |
13 (26) |
18 (36) |
19 (38) |
0.44 |
0.56 |
| Slow progressive |
41 (21.2) |
97 (50.2) |
55 (28.4) |
0.46 |
0.54 |
|
| OR (95% CI) |
p value |
| DD vs other |
1.538 (0.807-2.933) |
NS |
| ID vs DD |
0.537 (0.281-1.100) |
0.05 |
| ID vs others |
0.558 (0.317-0.981) |
0.05 |
| I vs D |
0.92 (0.11-1.60) |
NS |
Note: NS is not significant.
Based on our results, it is likely that disease progression may
be more due to an angiogenic effect as it facilitates access of
cells of the immune system, as well as auto-antibodies, to the site
of melanocyte destruction. The observations made in the present
study, like the substantial increase in the frequency of the
DD genotype in the fast progressive group (9.6%) compared to
the slow progressive group, are suggestive of angiogenic effects of
the D allele in a homozygous condition. This assumption is
supported by reports of a DD homozygote association with
diabetic nephropathy, which is explained on the basis of enhanced
neovascularization in the kidney [25, 26], progression of
sarcoidosis [27] and severity of systemic lupus erythematosus [28].
Moreover, metastasis is observed in cancers more frequently in
DD individuals, which is mainly attributed to angiogenic
effects [29-31].
The patterns of genotype association with vitiligo
susceptibility and progression are different. The DD
genotype is observed to be associated with a significantly
increased susceptibility (p - 0.000). Contrary to this, in
disease progression we observed a 14% decrease in the frequency of
ID in fast progression, indicating that a heterozygous
condition slows down the disease progression. As vitiligo
pathogenesis involves both oxidative stress and autoimmunity, it
appears that autoimmune mechanism(s) have a decisive role in
progression, while in disease susceptibility oxidative stress
mechanisms play a relatively more important role.
Converse to our expectation, the ID genotype was
associated with a reduced risk of disease progression compared to
the other two genotypes (p < 0.05). It appears that an as
yet not understood mechanism of allelic interaction is associated
with this pleiotropic gene; the oxidative stress-inducing role of D
allele predominates in the susceptibility and the angiogenic role
in disease progression. However, II in the homozygous
condition is more prominent in a protective role. Though these two
alleles are co-dominant in their expression, their product
interaction seems to be complex. It is suggested that, in order to
understand the role of ACE (a pleiotropic marker on susceptibility
and progression of disease), certain markers of angiogenicity and
adipocyte distribution could be studied with respect to vitiligo in
different populations.
Disclosure
Acknowledgements: We thank all the vitiligo subjects for
their co-operation in giving consent for blood samples and the
clinical information. And we would also like to thank Dr. M.A.
Waheed, Deputy Director of Central Research Institute for Unani
Medicine, Hyderabad, for his extended help in understanding the
disease of vitiligo and its progression. Financial support: none.
Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 T Surekha, M Ishaq, KP Latha, PH Rao, P. Jahan Do clinical
variants of vitiligo involve X-chromosomal gene(s) too? J Med
Sci 2008; 8: 728-733.
2 JJ Nordlund, J.P. Ortonne Vitiligo vulgaris JJ Nordlund The
Pigmentary System. Physiology and Pathophysiology 1998; Oxford
University Press New York 513-551.
3 RF Pamela, G Katherine, SL Gregory et al. A genomewide
screen for generalised vitiligo: Conformation of AIS1 on chromosome
1p31 and evidence for additional susceptibility loci Am J Hum
Genet 2003; 72: 1560-1564.
4 AS Richard, G Katherine, CB Dorothy, R.F. Pamela Novel
vitiligo susceptibility loci on chromosome 7(AIS2) and 8 (AIS3),
conformation of SLEV1 on chromosome 17 and their roles in
autoimmune diathesis Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 188-191.
5 JC Jian, H Wei, PG Jin et al. A novel linkage to
generalised vitiligo on 4q13-q21 identified in genomewide linkage
analysis of Chinese families Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76:
1057-1065.
6 S Pehlivan, F Ozkinay, S Alper et al. Association
Between Il4 (-590), Ace (I)/(D), Ccr5 (Delta32), Ctla4 (+49) And
Il1-Rn (Vntr In Intron 2) Gene Polymorphisms And Vitiligo Eur J
Dermatol 2009; 19: 126-128.
7 Sn Aksoy, Z Erbagci, Ei Saygili, T Sever, Ab Erbagci, S.
Pehlivan Analysis Of Myeloperoxidase Promotor Polymorphism And
Enzyme Activity In Turkish Patients With Vitiligo Eur J
Dermatol 2009; 19: 576-580.
8 Hj Kim, Yk Uhm, Jy Yun et al. Association Between
Polymorphisms Of Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (Ddr1)
And Non-Segmental Vitiligo In The Korean Population Eur J
Dermatol 2010; 20: 231-232.
9 I Dammak, S Boudaya, F Ben Abdallah, H Turki, H Attia, B.
Hentati Antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation at the tissue
level in patients with stable and active vitiligo Int J
Dermatol 2009; 48: 476-480.
10 D.M. Thappa Vitiligo Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol
2002; 68: 227-228.
11 Warwick L. Morison-Laser therapy, Puva therapy.
http://www.lightandlaser.com/vitiligo.html.
12 SY Jin, HH Park, GZ Li et al. Association of
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme gene I/D polymorphism of Vitiligo In
korean population Pigment Cell Research 2004; 17: 84-86.
13 WP Koh, JM Yuan, CL Sun et al. Angiotensin
I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk
among Chinese women in Singapore Cancer Res 2003; 63:
573-578.
14 B Rigat, C Hubert, F Alhenc-Gelas, F Cambien, P Corvol, F.
Soubrier An Insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin
I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum
enzyme levels J Clin Invest 1990; 86: 1343-1346.
15 C Hubert, AM Houot, P Corvol, F. Soubrier Structure of
angiotensin I converting enzyme gene: two alternate promoters
corresponds to evolutionary steps of a duplicated gene J Biol
Chem 1991; 266: 15377-15383.
16 The Skinny-Fat Ectomorph - Part I- Kelly Baggett.
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/node/226?page=all.
17 MY Jian, PK Woon, LS Can, PL Hin, C.Y. Mimi Green tea intake.
ACE gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk among Chinese women in
Singapore Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 1389-1394.
18 GA Molnar, Z Wagner, L Wagner et al. Effect of ACE
gene polymorphism on carbohydrate metabolism, on oxidative stress
and on end-organ damage in type-2 diabetes mellitus Orv
Hetil 2004; 145: 855-859.
19 MG Nicholls, AM Richards, M. Agarwal The importance of the
renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular disease J Hum
Hypertens 1998; 12: 295-299.
20 L Mykkanen, J Kuusisto, K Pyorala, M. Laakso Cardiovascular
disease risk factors as predictors of type 2 (noninsulin-dependent)
diabetes mellitus in elderly subjects Diabetologia 1993; 36:
553-559.
21 SM Haffner, RA Valdez, HP Hazuda, BD Mitchell, PA Morales,
M.P. Stern Prospective analysis of the insulin resistance syndrome
(Syndrome X) Diabetes 1992; 41: 715-722.
22 F Deeba, Jamil k, R Syed, MA Waheed, P.H. Rao Association of
angiotensin converting enzyme gene I/D polymorphism with vitiligo
in South Indian population Int J Med Med Sci 2009; 1:
009-12.
23 S Akhtar, NG Gavalas, DJ Gawkrodger et al. An
insertion/deletion polymorphism in the gene encoding angiotensin
converting enzyme is not associated with generalised vitiligo in an
English Population Arch Dermatol Res 2005; 297: 94-98.
24 M Dwivedi, CL Naresh, EM Shajil, BJ Shah, R. Begum The
ACE gene I/D polymorphism is not associated with generalized
vitiligo susceptibility in Gujarat population Pigment Cell &
Melanoma Research 2008; 21: 407-408.
25 L. Groop Genetics of the metabolic syndrome Br J Nutri
2000; 83: Suppl. 1 S39-S84.
26 T Matsusaka, J Hymes, I. Ichikawa Angiotensin in progressive
renal disease: theory and practice J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7:
2025-2043.
27 A Pietinalho, K Furuya, E Yamaguchi, K Kawakami, O. Selroos
The angiotensin - converting enzyme DD gene is associated with poor
prognosis in Finnish Sarcoidosis patients Eur Respir J 1999;
13: 723-726.
28 AR Malik, MM Saeed, FM Sabeen, M.F. Philippe Association of
Angiotensin-Converting enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of
Lupus disease Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 2008; 19:
761-766.
29 C Rocken, U Lendeckel, J Dierkes et al. The number of
lymph node metastases in gastric cancer correlates with the
angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion
polymorphism Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 2526-2530.
30 R Medeiros, A Vasconcelos, S Costa et al. Linkage of
angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion
polymorphism to the progression of human prostate cancer J
Pathol 2004; 202: 330-335.
31 CA Haiman, SO Henderson, P Bretsky, LN Kolonel, B.E.
Henderson Genetic variation in angiotensin I-converting enzyme
(ACE) and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort Cancer
Res 2003; 63: 6984-6987.
|