Auteur(s) : Hetal TALATI, Dina EL DEMELLAWY, Jan JANSEN, Salem ALOWAMI, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, William Osler Health Centre, Brampton, Ontario, Canada. |
ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Hetal TALATI1,
Dina EL DEMELLAWY2 eldemeld@gmail.com, Jan JANSEN1, Salem ALOWAMI1
1 Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine,
McMaster Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, William Osler Health Centre,
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
We report a case of a healthy 9-year-old girl who presented with
a small, well circumscribed lesion on the posterior parietal scalp.
The lesion was asymptomatic but grew larger two years later. There
was no history of trauma, allergies or insect bite. Complete blood
count and differential count was normal. The lesion was excised in
elliptical fashion and sent for histopathological examination.
Gross examination showed a 1.6 × 0.9 × 0.6 cm circumscribed firm
nodule with a homogenous yellow-brown cut surface. Microscopic
examination revealed epidermal hyperplasia. The reticular dermis
and subcutis showed an ill-defined nodule composed of spindle cell
proliferation, entrapped collagen fibres, foam cells, occasional
lymphoid aggregates and diffuse eosinophilic infiltrate (figures 1A, B).
Immunohistochemistry stains were performed. Lesional cells were
negative for CD34, S-100, CD1a, CD15, CD30, AE1/AE3 and CAM 5.2 and
positive for factor XIIIa, CD68 and vimentin, confirming the
diagnosis of dermatofibroma. The patient required no further
therapy and is doing well with no evidence of recurrence during the
follow-up one year period.
Eosinophilic infiltrate is highly uncommon in dermatofibroma.
Only three cases have been described in the literature [1-3](table 1). Differential diagnosis of dense
dermal eosinophilic infiltrate includes history of insect bite,
allergies and hypereosinophilic syndrome, which was not present in
our case. Other histological differential diagnoses include
angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia, Kimura's disease,
eosinophilic cellulitis, langerhans cell histiocytosis and
Hodgkin's disease.
Table 1 Summary of clinical findings of cases of dermatofibroma
with diffuse eosinophilia reported in the English literature.
| No. |
Case report |
Site |
Age (Yrs) |
Sex |
Treatment |
Follow up |
| 1 |
Aiba S, et al. |
Pretibial |
8 |
M |
Local excision |
NA |
| 2 |
Fletcher CDM, et al. |
Penis |
62 |
M |
Local excision |
Recurred after 8 months |
| 3 |
Eduardo S, et al. |
Right arm |
17 |
F |
Local excision |
No recurrence (36 months) |
| 4 |
Talati H, et al. |
Parietal Scalp |
9 |
F |
Local excision |
No recurrence (12 months) |
NA: Information not available
Factor XIIIa, vimentin and CD-68 positivity, associated with
negativity for CD1a, S100, CD30 and CD15 confirmed the diagnosis of
dermatofibroma.
Disclosure
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 S Aiba, T Terui, H. Tagami Dermatofibroma with diffuse
eosinophilic infiltrate Am J Dermatopathol 2000; 22:
281-284.
2 CDM Fletcher, D. Lowe Inflammatory fibrous histiocytoma of the
penis Histopathology 1984; 8: 1079-1084.
3 S Eduardo, M Amalia, R Beatriz et al. Benign fibrous
histiocytoma with intermediate cells and eosinophils Am J
Dematopathol 2004; 26: 237-241.
|