ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Samuel Ho Yew Ming,
Nallanthamby Vigneswaran, Marcus Wong Thien Chong
Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic
Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng,
Singapore 308433, Singapore
We present a 48-year-old man who initially underwent an
excisional biopsy for what was thought to be an epidermal cyst on
the left cheek. Eventual histology showed a circumscribed nodule of
invasive mucinous carcinoma.
CT scans of the neck, PNS, salivary glands, thorax and abdomen,
and a PET scan of the whole body showed no significant
abnormalities. The patient declined secondary surgery and opted for
surveillance. He missed subsequent appointments.
The patient presented again with a left cheek lump
of increasing size at the same site 10 months later. He
underwent a wide resection with 10 mm radial margins and primary
closure.
Primary mucinous carcinoma of the skin (PMC) is an uncommon
sweat gland tumour subtype. Since Lennox's initial description,
infrequent reports have centered on the exclusion of a metastatic
mucinous tumour to the skin, the difficulty with histological
identification of PMC of the skin, the low rate of metastases, and
the high rate of local recurrence despite best efforts at
local wide resection [1, 2].
PMC has an incidence rate of 0.07 per million and usually occurs
in the 7th decade of life [3]. Common sites for PMC
include the head and neck regions, with the eyelid the most common
site (~41%). Less common sites include the face, scalp, axilla and
trunk.
PMC is characterised by large amounts of small cord- or
nest-like clusters of epithelial cells amidst pools of
extracellular periodic acid-Schiff-positive, diastase-resistant
mucin [4]. The importance is the exclusion of a mucin-secreting
metastatic tumour to the skin. Common sites to exclude are the
breast, gastrointestinal tract, salivary glands, prostate and
ovaries. Histopathologically, it is difficult to differentiate
between a metastatic tumour and PMC. However, immunohistochemistry
would be useful. The basis is that PMC express low molecular weight
cytokeratins (CK 7, CAM 5.2), carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial
membrane antigen, human milk factor globulins (HMFGI and II), gross
cystic disease fluid protein, s-100 protein, alpha-lactalbumin,
TFF1 (mucous-associated peptides of the trefoil factor family) and
oestrogen/progesterone receptors. Other chemical characteristics
that would distinguish PMC from a metastatic mucin-secreting tumour
would include positive staining of the mucin with colloidal iron,
periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and mucicarmine (figure 1). Alcian blue is
positive at pH 2.5 but negative at pH 0.4 or in the presence of
sialidase. This histochemical profile is consistent with the
presence of a non-sulphated mucoprotein, most likely
sialomucin. Furthermore, it resists breakdown by hyaluronidase and
diastase [5, 6]. These would importantly help to differentiate PMC
from metastatic mucin-secreting breast carcinomas that express many
similar proteins and receptors. The absence of epithelial cells
with goblet-cell differentiation, the low molecular weight
cytokeratin CK20 and dirty necrosis in combination would help in
excluding a gastrointestinal source of metastasis [5].
Imaging (CT, MRI or PET scan) is an important modality in
excluding other sources of metastatic mucin-secreting carcinomas to
the skin before arriving at the diagnosis of PMC.
Wide local excision (WLE) is the treatment of choice [2].
Dissection of the loco-regional lymph nodes remains controversial
if there is no suggestion of lymphatic spread [1, 2]. Mohs
micrographic surgery is an alternative, allowing closer control of
tissue excision – an important consideration in facial surgery.
Adjunctive therapy could be used to reduce recurrence in
first-instance PMC – hormonal therapy when oestrogen/progesterone
receptor positive, radiotherapy in combination with WLE, and
chemotherapy. However, in recurrent PMC, the efficacy of these
therapies drops considerably.
PMC remains a diagnostic trap for the unsuspecting surgeon due
to its benign-looking nature. It is vital to exclude metastasis to
the skin. Once certain, WLE, whether in combination with lymph node
dissection, and/or adjunctive therapy, should be undertaken. The
patient then requires long-term follow-up due to the high
recurrence rate.
Disclosure
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Martinez SR, Young SE. Primary mucinous carcinoma of
the skin: a review. Int J Oncol 2005; 2: 432-7.
2 Abe S, Matsumoto Y, Fujita T. Primary mucinous
carcinoma of the skin. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1997; 99:
1160-4.
3 Breiting L, Christensen L, Dahlstrom K,
et al. Primary mucinous carcinoma of the skin: a
population-based study. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: 242-5.
4 Headington JT. Primary mucinous carcinoma of skin:
histochemistry and electron microscopy. Cancer 1977; 39:
1055-63.
5 Levy G, Finkelstein A, McNiff JM.
Immunohistochemical techniques to compare primary vs. metastatic
mucinous carcinoma of the skin. J Cutan Pathol 2010; 37: 411-5.
6 Kazakov DV, Suster S, LeBoit PE, et al.
Mucinous carcinoma of the skin, primary and secondary: a
clinicopathologic study of 63 cases with emphasis on the
morphologic spectrum of primary cutaneous forms: homologies with
mucinous lesions in the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:
764-82.
|