ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Risa
Tamagawa-Mineoka1, Norito Katoh1,
Kazuhito Yoneda2, Yuko Cho2, Saburo
Kishimoto1
1Department of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural
University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical
Science, 465, Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto
602-8566, Japan
2Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural
University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical
Science, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
We read with interest the article by Nosbaum et al. [1]
concerning the pathophysiology and clinical findings of allergic
contact dermatitis. Allergic contact dermatitis is sometimes
elicited by a topical drug, and systemic administration of a drug
to which an individual has been sensitized may cause systemic
allergic contact dermatitis. Here, we report the first case of
systemic allergic contact dermatitis that spread over the face,
neck and chest due to phenylephrine in eyedrops and was associated
with a long-lasting allergic patch test reaction (LLAPTR).
The patient was a 53-year-old Japanese woman without a personal
or family history of atopy who developed periocular oedema and
erythema with pruritus within 24 hours after an operation for
retinal detachment. From the following day, pruritic erythema,
papules and vesicles spread over the face, neck and chest. We
suspected allergic contact dermatitis caused by items used
perioperatively, such as antiseptics or eyedrops. Systemic
treatment was not administered during the operation. Her symptoms
were not responsive to treatment with topical corticosteroids, but
addition of systemic corticosteroids led to a significant
improvement of the symptoms after two weeks.
Patch testing was performed with the baseline series of the
Japanese Contact Dermatitis Society, antiseptics, local anesthetics
and Cravit®, Tarivid®,
Flumetholon®, Rinderon®-A and
Mydrin®-P eyedrops. The results were assessed after 48
hours, 72 hours and 7 days, based on the recommendations of the
International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. A positive
reaction occurred with Mydrin®-P (as is; day 2: +++; day
3: +++; day 7: +++). To identify the precise allergens, further
patch testing was carried out with ingredients provided by the
manufacturer, and a positive reaction occurred with phenylephrine
hydrochloride (5% pet.; day 2: +++; day 3: +++; day 7: +++).
Reactivation of the initial lesions did not occur on patch testing.
The positive reactions with Mydrin®-P and phenylephrine
both persisted for two months and left residual pigmentation. The
patient had previously used eyedrops containing phenylephrine, but
she had not shown any symptoms. Therefore, repeated use of
phenylephrine in the eyedrops may have caused the sensitization. We
recommended that the patient should avoid the use of medications
containing phenylephrine and there has been no recurrence of her
problem.
Phenylephrine hydrochloride is a sympathomimetic drug with
α-receptor stimulatory activity that is frequently used as a
mydriatic and decongestant in ophthalmology. Contact dermatitis due
to an ophthalmic preparation usually induces inflammation in the
periocular region. There have been several reports of allergic
contact blepharoconjunctivitis caused by phenylephrine [2-5], but
systemic allergic contact dermatitis due to ophthalmic use of this
drug has not been reported. Systemic absorption of ophthalmic
solutions of phenylephrine can occur [6], and therefore the
dermatitis in our case might have spread to areas other than the
periocular region due to systemic exposure to phenylephrine. Thus,
phenylephrine in eyedrops should be considered as a possible
allergen in systemic allergic contact dermatitis. As seen in our
patient, three previous reports have described LLAPTR to
phenylephrine that persisted for 2 to 7 months [2-4]. The mechanism
of this phenomenon is unclear. However, since contact dermatitis
usually resolves after a decrease in the local concentration of the
allergen and/or immunoregulatory actions by regulatory cells and
cytokines [1], the LLAPTR may be associated with a defect in these
mechanisms or an active sensitization effect caused by patch
testing.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Nosbaum A, Vocanson M, Rozieres A, Hennino A,
Nicolas JF. Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J
Dermatol 2009; 19: 325-32.
2 Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Staffa M. Long-lasting
allergic patch test reaction to phenylephrine. Contact Dermatitis
1997; 36: 110-1.
3 Rafael M, Pereira F, Faria MA. Allergic contact
blepharoconjunctivitis caused by phenylephrine, associated with
persistent patch test reaction. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 39:
143-4.
4 Akita H, Akamatsu H, Matsunaga K. Allergic
contact dermatitis due to phenylephrine hydrochloride, with an
unusual patch test reaction. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 49:
232-5.
5 Thomas P, Rueff F, Przybilla B. Severe allergic
contact blepharoconjunctivitis from phenylephrine in eyedrops, with
corresponding T-cell hyper-responsiveness in vitro. Contact
Dermatitis 1998; 38: 41-3.
6 Kumar V, Schoenwald RD, Chien DS,
Packer AJ, Choi WW. Systemic absorption and
cardiovascular effects of phenylephrine eyedrops. Am J Ophthalmol
1985; 99: 180-4.
|