Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable
  Version PDF

Self-reported screening for skin cancer in Austria


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 19, Numéro 6, 607-10, November-December 2009, Clinical report

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2009.0775

Summary  

Auteur(s) : Gerald Haidinger, Thomas Waldhoer, Nikolaus Duschek, Christian Vutuc , Department of Epidemiology, Centre of Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Illustrations

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Gerald Haidinger, Thomas Waldhoer, Nikolaus Duschek, Christian Vutuc

Department of Epidemiology, Centre of Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, 1090 Vienna, Austria

accepté le 22 Juin 2009

The Austrian Cancer Society started the first campaign in 1988, informing the public about skin cancer, and has repeated it every year since then [1]. The campaigns entitled “sun without remorse” (“Sonne ohne Reue”) inform about skin cancer and its primary and secondary prevention. The target population is encouraged to see a doctor for a whole body skin examination, to determine the person’s individual risk and to receive information on primary prevention and self-screening. Because primary prevention is a major target of the campaign, younger age groups are especially addressed.

We report for the first time on the prevalence of knowledge about and of self-reported participation and frequency of screening for skin cancer in Austrian men and women aged 15-79 years, sampled in the years 1995 and 2005.

Materials and methods

The data analysed were extracted from two population-based representative cross-sectional studies “Attitudes Towards Cancer” conducted in 1995 and repeated in 2005, using the same selection criteria, sample size, methods, and questionnaire. The aim of both studies was to survey the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of the Austrian population with respect to various aspects of cancer. The studies covered all parts of Austria and are described in detail elsewhere [2-8]. In short: both studies (1995 and 2005) were conducted in cooperation with a public opinion survey institute. A quota sample of 2400 Austrians aged 15 years or over was selected for each survey. The samples comprised 0.04% of the population ≥ 15 years of age and were representative in terms of age, sex, occupational status, and area of residence (source: population census 1991 and 2001). The samples of respondents were weighted (“post-stratified”) to resemble the respective census population.

This analysis was restricted to men and women aged 15-79 years. The study groups comprised of 966 men and 1,081 women in 1995 and of 951 men and 1,021 women in 2005.

In the questionnaire, screening for skin cancer in asymptomatic persons was explicitly asked for, but not for the diagnostic examination in patients with symptoms. Men and women were asked if they had ever heard of early detection of skin cancer and if so, whether they had ever had a whole body examination during their lifetime, and if so, the number of screenings. Respondents who had never heard of early detection of skin cancer (1995: men: n = 392, 40.6%, women: n = 459, 42.5%; 2005 men: n = 438, 46.1%, women: n = 367, 35.9%) were included in our calculations and counted as never-screened.

The following categories were defined for age: 15-39 years, 40-59 years and 60-79 years and for frequency of screenings: once, 2-3 times, 4+ times, number not specified, and never had. Subsequently the respondents were asked whether the screening was performed by a dermatologist or by a general practitioner, by another specialist or at an out-patient clinic.

Besides the screening-specific information, socio-demographic variables concerning sex, age, marital status, residence, education and income were collected. Education was categorized as being “high” when respondents answered to having completed general qualification for university entrance or having completed a university study (which – in Austria – corresponds to 12 years of school or more). Frequencies and confidence limits were calculated in SAS [9]. Statistics comprised of chi-square tests of differences in prevalence between the 1995 and the 2005 survey, and between educational levels, as well as between areas of residence.

Results

In the 1995 survey 59.4% of men and 57.5% of women knew about early detection of skin cancer by screening, compared to 53.9% of men and 64.1% of women in 2005. The prevalence of knowledge by age groups is given in table 1. Knowledge differed significantly in relation to educational level, better educated persons more often knew about screening for skin cancer (table 1).

The prevalence of screening for skin cancer increased in men from 8.1% in 1995 to 13.3% in 2005 (table 2) and in women from 11.2% to 22.4% (table 3). In all age groups, the prevalence increased in all frequency categories except in men in the age group 60-79 years where in the category “2-3 screenings” the prevalence decreased slightly. Regarding education, differences were found between poorly educated and highly educated persons, showing that higher education leads to an increase of screening usage, although statistically non significant. Statistically significant differences were only found in males in the 1995 survey: 21.1% (95% CI: 20.9-21.3) of the highly educated men made use of screening, compared to 11.3% (95% CI: 11.2-11.4) of the men with lower education levels.

In both surveys, in men and in women, most of the screenings were performed by dermatologists, in 2005 more than 70% of the screenings (table 4). Classification by area of residence did not produce statistically significant differences between groups.
Table 1 Prevalence of knowledge about skin cancer screening in Austria

Men, % (95% CI)a

Women, % (95% CI)a

1995 (n = 966)

2005 (n = 951)

1995 (n = 1081)

2005 (n = 1021)

Age

15-39

56.7 (52.1-61.1)

53.4 (48.8-58.0)

57.7 (53.3-62.1)

61.1 (56.6-65.4)

40-59

61.3 (55.7-66.7)

59.0 (53.5-64.3)

62.3 (56.7-67.6)

70.6 (65.4-75.3)

60-79

62.9 (56.0-69.3)

46.4 (39.3-53.7)

52.2 (46.5-57.9)

60.9 (54.4-67.0)

Education

Low

56.8 (56.3-57.4)

51.3 (50.8-51.8)

54.9 (54.4-55.5)

61.5 (60.9-62.2)

High

72.6 (72.0-73.4)b

66.7 (66.1-67.4)b

74.0 (73.3-74.8)b

76.0 (75.3-76.8)b

Total

59.4 (56.3-62.5)

53.9 (50.8-57.1)

57.5 (54.6-60.5)

64.1 (61.1-66.9)


Table 2 Men, prevalence of self-reported skin cancer screening by age group and by number of screenings in 1995 and in 2005

Total sample n

Never had % (95% CI)a

Number of screenings ever had, % (95% CI)a

Ever had (%)

Age

1

2-3

4+

Not specified

1995

15-39

464

93.3 (90.7-95.3)

4.5 (3.0-6.8)

0.9 (0.3-2.3)

0.4 (0.1-1.7)

0.9 (0.3-2.3)

6.7 (4.7-9.3)

40-59

300

90.7 (86.8-93.5)

6.0 (3.8-9.3)

1.3 (0.5-3.5)

1.0 (0.3-3.1)

1.0 (0.3-3.1)

9.2 (6.5-13.2)

60-79

202

90.6 (85.7-93.9)

3.5 (1.7-7.1)

3.9 (2.0-7.7)

1.5 (0.5-4.5)

0.5 (0.1-3.4)

9.4 (6.1-14.3)

All ages

966

91.1 (90.0-93.5)

4.8 (3.6-6.3)

1.6 (1.0-2.7)

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

8.1 (6.5-10.0)

2005

15-39

451

88.7 (85.4-91.3)

7.3 (5.2-10.1)

2.7 (1.5-4.6)

0.9 (0.3-2.3)

0.4 (0.1-1.8)

11.3 (8.7-14.6)

40-59

317

82.9 (78.4-86.7)

8.2 (5.6-11.8)

3.8 (2.2-6.5)

4.7 (2.9-7.7)

0.3 (0.0-2.2)

17.0 (13.3-21.6)

60-79

183

87.9 (82.4-92.0)

4.9 (2.6-9.2)

2.7 (1.1-6.4)

2.7 (1.1-6.4)

1.6 (0.5-5.0)

12.0 (8.0-17.6)

All ages

951

86.6 (84.3-88.7)

7.1 (5.7-9.0)

3.0 (2.1-4.4)

2.5 (1.7-3.7)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

13.3 (11.3-15.7)


Table 3 Women, prevalence of self-reported skin cancer screening by age group and by number of screenings in 1995 and in 2005

Total sample n

Never had % (95% CI)a

Number of screenings ever had, % (95% CI)a

Ever had (%)

Age

1

2-3

4+

Not specified

1995

15-39

485

88.9 (85.7-91.4)

6.6 (4.7-9.2)

2.5 (1.4-4.3)

0.8 (0.3-2.2)

1.2 (0.6-2.7)

11.1 (8.6-14.3)

40-59

305

90.8 (87.0-93.6)

4.3 (2.5-7.2)

2.9 (1.5-5.6)

1.0 (0.3-3.0)

1.0 (0.3-3.0)

9.3 (6.4-13.0)

60-79

291

86.6 (82.2-90.1)

4.1 (2.4-7.1)

6.2 (3.9-9.6)

3.1 (1.6-5.8)

0 (0-1.2)

13.4 (9.9-17.8)

All ages

1081

88.8 (96.8-90.6)

5.3 (4.1-6.8)

3.6 (2.6-4.9)

1.5 (0.9-2.4)

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

11.2 (9.4-13.2)

2005

15-39

468

78.4 (74.5-81.9)

11.1 (8.6-14.3)

5.3 (3.6-7.8)

4.5 (2.9-6.8)

0.6 (0.2-2.0)

21.6 (18.1-25.5)

40-59

323

74.0 (68.9-78.5)

13.6 (10.3-17.8)

4.9 (3.1-7.9)

5.6 (3.5-8.7)

1.8 (0.8-4.1)

26.0 (21.5-31.1)

60-79

230

80.9 (75.3-85.4)

6.1 (3.6-10.0)

6.9 (4.3-11.1)

4.8 (2.7-8.4)

1.3 (0.4-4.0)

19.1 (14.6-24.7)

All ages

1021

77.6 (74.9-80.0)

10.8 (9.0-12.8)

5.6 (4.3-7.2)

4.9 (3.7-6.4)

1.2 (0.7-2.1)

22.4 (20.0-25.1)


Table 4 Proportion of skin cancer screening performed by dermatologist, general practitioner, other specialist, or outpatient clinic

Men, % (95% CI)a

Women, % (95% CI)a

1995 (n = 78)

2005 (n = 127)

1995 (n = 121)

2005b (n = 229)

Dermatologist

62.8

73.2

53.7

78.6

General practitioner

23.0

14.2

25.6

9.2

Other specialist

3.8

3.9

4.9

4.4

Outpatient clinic

10.2

8.7

15.7

7.9

Total

100

100

100

100

Discussion

In Austria, since 1988 when the program “sun without remorse” was implemented, skin cancer screening has been available free of charge. Compared to other free-of-charge (opportunistic) screenings for cancer, knowledge about this screening (table 1) is low: awareness about colon cancer screening (2005: men 80%, women 82%), prostate cancer screening (2005: men 85%), and breast and cervical cancer screening (women 1995 and 2005: > 95%) is much higher [5-8]. From 1995 to 2005 knowledge about early detection of skin cancer by screening even decreased in men by 5.5% but increased in women by 6.6% (table 1). One of the reasons for a decrease in men and an increase in women may be that women have a higher awareness for skin specific irritations which may even be emphasized by the Austrian Cancer Society’s campaigns about ageing of the skin caused by sun exposure. Furthermore, women fear cancer more than men [2]. This may also explain the higher self-reported prevalence of having ever had a skin cancer screen and the higher frequency of screenings in women compared to men in both surveys (tables 2, 3). Based on our findings, future campaigns could be more targeted towards males and towards less educated persons.

The proportion of screenings by dermatologists increased in men as well as in women from 1995 to 2005. This trend towards seeing a specialist is desirable although in rural areas the general practitioner remains the primary care provider.

In the literature we found only very view studies on this topic: in the 1998 National Health Interview Survey in the age group 18-65 + years, 20% of male and 21.9% of female respondents reported having ever had a skin examination; in the year 2000 survey this prevalence decreased to 14.2% in men and 15.0% in women [10]. The numbers found in our 2005 survey are lower in men but higher in women, although with an increase in both sexes since 1995.

Our prevalence rates are based on self-reports. Nevertheless these data may reflect under-reporting because respondents may be unaware of having received a skin cancer screening along the way during any consultation of a doctor. However, a validation study in Australia reported a sensitivity of 90.5% [11]. This may not easily be comparable to Austria because of the high incidence of melanoma in Australia and thus a much higher awareness in that population. A high awareness is desirable from the view point of public health and can be expected for Austria, too, because of trends in incidence (figure 1).

Meanwhile, effectiveness of screening seems to be proven by a reduction of tumour thickness [12] and by the trends in mortality where a levelling-off in males and even a slight reduction in females can be observed (figure 1).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Austrians who participated in this survey for providing the data and the Austrian Cancer Society (Prof. Paul Sevelda, President, Prof. Michael Micksche, Past Vice-President) for financial support in funding the population-based cross-sectional studies on Attitudes Towards Cancer in 1995 and 2005. Conflict of interest: none.

References

1 Austrian Cancer Society: http://www.krebshilfe.net/information/sonne/sonne.shtm (accessed 15 April 2009)

2 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Janda M, Poetter M, Vutuc C. Die Selbsteinschätzung der Bedrohtheit durch Krankheiten. Gesundh Wes 1998; 60: 127-31.

3 Vutuc C, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T. Prevalence of self-reported screening mammography and impact on breast cancer mortality in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1998; 110: 485-90.

4 Vutuc C, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Ahmad F, Breitenecker G. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1999; 111: 354-9.

5 Vutuc C, Waldhoer T, Sevelda P, Micksche M, Haidinger G. Self-reported prostate cancer screening in Austria. J Med Screening 2006; 13: 148-51.

6 Vutuc C, Waldhoer T, Sevelda P, Micksche M, Haidinger G. Self-reported opportunistic screening mammography in Austria. Breast Care 2007; 2: 313-6.

7 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Vutuc C. Self-reported colonoscopy screening in Austria. Eur J Cancer Prev 2008; 17: 354-7.

8 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Vutuc C. Self-reported Pap smear screening in Austria. Wien Med Wochenschr 2008; 158: 222-6.

9 SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide,Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1999.

10 Saraiya M, Hall I, Thompson T, et al. Skin cancer screening among U.S. adults from 1992, 1998, and 2000 National Health Interview Surveys. Prev Med 2004; 39: 308-14.

11 Aitken JF, Youl PH, Janda M, et al. Validity of self-reported skin screening histories. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 1098-105.

12 Pehamberger H, Binder M, Knollmayer S, Wolff K. Immediate effects of a public education campaign on prognostic features of melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29: 106-8.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]