ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Eggert Stockfleth1, Claas
Ulrich1, Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt1, Hans-Joachim
Kremer2, Ulrike Drecoll1, Joachim
Maus3, Joachim Röwert-Huber1
1Skin Cancer Centre Charité, Clinic
of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology,
Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin,
Germany
2Medical Writing Service, Alemannenstraße 101, 79117
Freiburg, Germany
3Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Benzstr. 1, 61352 Bad
Homburg, Germany
accepté le 31 Janvier 2009
In the US, imiquimod has already had marketing authorisation for
the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) since 2005. This decision
was primarily based on vehicle controlled trials which investigated
twice or thrice per week application of 5% imiquimod cream over 16
weeks [1-3]. However, clinical research with imiquimod in AK went
on, leading to a modified treatment scheme, namely the application
of one or two courses of treatment (COTs) [4]. One COT consists of
a 4 week treatment period with 3 applications per week, followed by
a 4 week treatment pause. A second COT may follow if complete
lesion clearance was not achieved. During the treatment pause, the
clinical inflammation induced by imiquimod subsides, but AK lesions
continue to clear. An additional positive effect is the uncovering
and subsequent eradication of invisible (subclinical) AKs in the
treatment area. This schedule minimises drug exposure, yielding
improved safety, tolerability, and thus, patient compliance [4]. As
in the US scheme, the scheme with 1-2 COTS was studied in vehicle
controlled trials [5, 6]. Imiquimod also received marketing
authorisation for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) in the EU
in 2006, primarily based on these two trials. However, all
controlled clinical trials with imiquimod had restrictions
concerning the type of AK lesions, the size of the treatment area,
and other aspects to achieve optimal and standardised conditions
for demonstrating a significant difference between active and
vehicle. As translated now in the official labelling [7], they
appear artificial and only partly reflecting the usual
dermatological situations in daily practice. Indeed, many patients
might also suffer from hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic AK lesions.
Moreover, the restriction of the treatment area to a contiguous one
of only 25 cm2, as studied in all controlled trials
with imiquimod, might be unrealistic in daily practice. Therefore,
our aim was to confirm the efficacy of the European imiquimod
regimen (1 or 2 COTs) under conditions much closer to
dermatological practice than those of controlled trials.
The main results of this trial are already published elsewhere
[8]. However, that manuscript neither presented data on multiple
nor multiform AK lesions nor on the influence of locations nor on
the relationship between local skin reactions and clearance. Hence,
the present paper firstly focuses on these important aspects.
Methods
As details on methods and patients are already published [8], only
the key points are repeated in the following and amended if
required. This was an open label non-controlled interventional
clinical study. Patients were eligible if they had clinically
typical, visible AK lesions located anywhere on the head, excluding
the upper and lower eyelids, nostrils, lip vermilion, and inside
the ears. The size of the treatment area was not restricted. It did
not have to be a contiguous area. All forms of AK lesions,
including hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic, in the treatment area
were allowed. Patients were advised to apply imiquimod 5% cream
(one or two sachets) 3 times per week for 4 weeks (first course of
treatment, COT). The first COT was followed by a 4 week
treatment-free interval. If lesions remained, a second COT could be
started, which again should be followed by 4 week treatment-free
interval; patients not completely cleared 4 weeks after COT 2 were
additionally assessed 4 weeks later.
If, at any time, the investigator believed any lesion located
within the treatment or surrounding area to be suspicious of
invasive malignancy, the investigator was to remove the lesion
according to standard medical practice.
Safety documentation and statistical evaluations were
exhaustively described previously [8].
Results
Patient disposition, demographics, compliance
829 patients were enrolled, each centre enrolled 1 to 5 patients.
Twenty-nine patients (3.5%) discontinued the study prematurely
during COT 1. Thirteen of the 464 patients (2.8%) who started COT 2
discontinued prematurely during this course. Overall, the most
frequent reasons for discontinuation were personal reasons (1.9%)
and adverse events (1.8%) (table 1).
80% of patients had undergone a previous treatment for AK with
the most frequently reported treatments being cryosurgery (32%) and
surgical excision (28%). The mean number of AK lesions was 9.5. 523
of 829 patients (63%) had one or more hyperkeratotic or
hypertrophic lesions at baseline (mean 4.4, median 3, range 1-40
lesions). For further details on background and baseline data cf.
[8].
90% of patients applied at least 80% of the expected doses of
study cream. Dosing compliance was similar for COT 1 and COT 2.
Only 33 patients (4.0%) were considered noncompliant i.e. they had
applied less than 60% of the expected doses of study cream. 134
patients (16.2%) took rest periods during the study, 122 during COT
1 (14.7%) and 23 (of 464, 5.0%) during COT 2 (of which 11 during
both COTs). Patients taking a rest period during COT 1 and COT 2
missed on average 3.3 and 3.5 of the 12 scheduled doses,
respectively.
Table 1 Premature discontinuations
|
COT
|
Reason
|
N
|
%
|
|
COT 1
|
Adverse event
|
11
|
1.3
|
|
Local skin reaction
|
2
|
0.2
|
|
Protocol violation
|
2
|
0.2
|
|
Intercurrent disease
|
1
|
0.1
|
|
Personal
|
13
|
1.6
|
|
Total
|
29
|
3.5
|
|
COT 2
|
Adverse event
|
4
|
0.5
|
|
Deceased
|
2
|
0.2
|
|
Protocol violation
|
1
|
0.1
|
|
Non-compliance
|
3
|
0.4
|
|
Personal
|
3
|
0.4
|
|
Total
|
13
|
1.6
|
|
Total
|
Total
|
42
|
5.1
|
Efficacy
The complete clearance rate after COT 1 was 40.5%. This proportion
increased to the final overall complete clearance rate of 68.9%
when adding the outcome of the first and second COTs (table 2).
Compliance rates between 60% and 100% were marginally, if at
all, predictive for the outcome, however, the subset of patients
(33) with a compliance below 60% showed a considerably decreased
overall clearance rate of only 39.4%.
Females, patients younger than 65, and patients with skin type
III or IV showed a slightly better overall outcome (table 2). Some imbalances, in particular the
difference between male and female, might be explained by the
localisation of the lesion (table 3).
The overall complete clearance rate in patients with lesions
confined to the scalp (66%) was lower than in patients with lesions
confined to the forehead (81%) or the face (81%). This hypothesis
is further supported by the observation that patients with multiple
AK areas including the scalp had a worse outcome than patients with
multiple affected areas excluding the scalp.
The number of baseline lesions was not predictive for the
outcome up to a count of 8 (table 2).
Patients with 1 to 8 baseline lesions showed complete clearance
rates of approximately 80%. This proportion was reduced in patients
with 9 to 16 baseline lesions to 61% and further to 47% in patients
with more lesions. Nonetheless, even in patients with baseline
lesion counts above 8 (252 patients), most lesions could be
cleared. Non-existence of hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions at
baseline was only marginally predictive of a better outcome, or
vice versa, patients with such lesions at baseline showed nearly
the same complete clearance rate as those without. There was also
no relevant difference in the time course of the lesion counts of
any lesion and hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesions (figure 1). In fact,
hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesons showed the same clearance
kinetics as the non-hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesions (table 4).
Table 2 Complete clearance rates and subgroups
|
Course 1
|
Overall
|
|
N
|
%
|
N
|
%
|
|
All patients
|
|
336
|
40.5
|
571
|
68.9
|
|
Subgroup analyses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex
|
Male
|
266
|
38.6
|
463
|
67.1
|
|
Female
|
70
|
50.4
|
108
|
77.7
|
|
Age
|
< 65 years
|
62
|
38.8
|
119
|
74.4
|
|
≥ 65 years
|
274
|
41.0
|
452
|
67.6
|
|
Skin type
|
Type I or II
|
180
|
39.3
|
302
|
65.9
|
|
Type III to VI
|
156
|
42.0
|
269
|
72.5
|
|
Type of lesion
|
Patients without HK/HT AK lesions
|
145
|
48.0
|
226
|
74.8
|
|
Patients with at least 1 HK/HT AK lesion
|
191
|
36.5
|
343
|
65.6
|
|
N of lesions
|
1 or 2 AK lesions
|
69
|
55.2
|
103
|
82.4
|
|
3 or 4 AK lesions
|
65
|
47.4
|
106
|
77.4
|
|
5 AK lesions
|
37
|
43.5
|
62
|
72.9
|
|
6 AK lesions
|
26
|
45.6
|
46
|
80.7
|
|
7 AK lesions
|
27
|
50.0
|
42
|
77.8
|
|
8 AK lesions
|
16
|
44.4
|
28
|
77.8
|
|
9-16 AK lesions
|
65
|
32.5
|
121
|
60.5
|
|
> 16 AK lesions
|
31
|
23.7
|
61
|
46.6
|
|
Not countable
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
50.0
|
Table 3 Complete clearance rates by localisation
|
Course 1
|
Overall
|
|
N
|
%
|
N
|
%
|
|
Scalp
|
76
|
35.3
|
142
|
66.0
|
|
Forehead
|
78
|
54.5
|
116
|
81.1
|
|
Forehead/scalp
|
50
|
35.2
|
86
|
60.6
|
|
Face left
|
13
|
36.1
|
28
|
77.8
|
|
Face left/scalp
|
4
|
44.4
|
7
|
77.8
|
|
Face left/forehead
|
16
|
61.5
|
20
|
76.9
|
|
Face left/forehead/scalp
|
1
|
9.1
|
8
|
72.7
|
|
Face right
|
19
|
57.6
|
29
|
87.9
|
|
Face right/scalp
|
3
|
50.0
|
5
|
83.3
|
|
Face right/forehead
|
16
|
61.5
|
20
|
76.9
|
|
Face right/forehead/scalp
|
2
|
25.0
|
5
|
62.5
|
|
Face right/face left
|
17
|
44.7
|
30
|
78.9
|
|
Face right/face left/scalp
|
5
|
31.3
|
7
|
43.8
|
|
Face right/face left/forehead
|
22
|
31.9
|
44
|
63.8
|
|
Face right/face left/forehead/scalp
|
13
|
27.7
|
22
|
46.8
|
Table 4 Reduction of lesions during study
|
|
Mean N of lesions
|
In % of Week 0
|
|
Week
|
Patients at risk
|
Any lesions
|
Non-HK/HT lesions
|
HK/HT lesions
|
Any lesions
|
Non-HK/HT lesions
|
HK/HT lesions
|
|
0
|
825
|
9.5
|
6.8
|
2.7
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
8
|
798
|
3.3
|
2.3
|
1.0
|
34.7
|
34.0
|
36.6
|
|
16
|
785
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
0.4
|
15.7
|
16.6
|
13.3
|
|
20
|
782
|
1.2
|
0.8
|
0.3
|
12.2
|
12.1
|
12.3
|
Safety and tolerability
Details on adverse events are presented in the previous paper [8].
The LSRs most frequently reported as severe by the investigator
were erythema (32%), scabbing/crusting (28%), and
flaking/scaling/dryness (15%, table 5).
LSRs were more intense during COT 1 than during COT 2 [8]. LSRs
were the reason for discontinuation in only 4 patients (2
classified as such in table 1, 2 further
classified primarily as adverse events). Among the patients who
discontinued the study due to adverse events, 2 complained of both
LSRs and systemic reactions considered related to imiquimod, 4
complained of systemic reactions (fever, headache, myalgia,
fatigue, shivering) considered related to imiquimod, and 11
experienced adverse events considered not related to imiquimod.
Cochran-Armitage trend tests indicated statistically significant
relationships between severity of LSRs (except for
flaking/scaling/dryness) and complete clearance rates, most
pronounced for the COT 1 (table 6).
Table 5 Local skin reactions
|
None
|
Mild
|
Moderate
|
Severe
|
|
N
|
%
|
N
|
%
|
N
|
%
|
N
|
%
|
|
Erythema
|
7
|
0.8
|
106
|
12.8
|
452
|
54.6
|
263
|
31.8
|
|
Oedema
|
231
|
27.9
|
353
|
42.6
|
202
|
24.4
|
42
|
5.1
|
|
Weeping/exudate
|
311
|
37.6
|
278
|
33.6
|
178
|
21.5
|
61
|
7.4
|
|
Vesicles
|
509
|
61.5
|
193
|
23.3
|
106
|
12.8
|
20
|
2.4
|
|
Erosion/ulceration
|
162
|
19.6
|
275
|
33.2
|
293
|
35.4
|
98
|
11.8
|
|
Flaking/scaling/dryness
|
40
|
4.8
|
284
|
34.3
|
376
|
45.4
|
128
|
15.5
|
|
Scabbing/crusting
|
42
|
5.1
|
196
|
23.7
|
356
|
43.0
|
234
|
28.3
|
Table 6 Correlations between clearance and LSRs
|
COT 1
|
Overall
|
|
Erythema
|
0.0002
|
0.0089
|
|
Oedema
|
< 0.0001
|
0.0305
|
|
Weeping/exudate
|
< 0.0001
|
0.0382
|
|
Vesicles
|
0.0031
|
0.0559
|
|
Erosion/ulceration
|
0.0016
|
0.5200
|
|
Flaking/scaling/dryness
|
0.8580
|
0.3891
|
|
Scabbing/crusting
|
0.0092
|
0.1341
|
Discussion
Our study differed from those vehicle-controlled studies with
imiquimod in AK using the same treatment regimen [5, 6] in two main
aspects. It had broader, less stringent selection criteria and the
sample size was much larger. These features allowed for the
investigation of the effects of various factors on the clearances
rates with topical imiquimod.
The general factors, female, age below 65, and skin type III and
IV were correlated with slightly higher clearance rates. While the
latter two might be obvious, the lower response in the male
patients might have been related to the number of lesions, which
might have been considerably higher in males, who have a bald head
much more often than females. The area affected by solar damage
might typically be much larger in males, leading to an increased
number of lesions.
More interesting are the findings on the lesion count. Although
our data indicate that the number of baseline lesions is inversely
correlated with the clearance rate, this correlation is rather
weak. Even patients with a high number of lesions (field
cancerisation) benefit from the treatment with imiquimod. It should
be noted that a considerable number of patients had a baseline
lesion count above 16 and many of them could be totally cleared. At
least, the number of lesions could be dramatically reduced in these
patients.
With respect to hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions, our data
indicate that patients with such lesions have somewhat lower
clearance rates than those without (66 vs. 75%). However, our data
suggest that this lower success rate is not caused by the type of
lesion (figure
1). This graph shows that hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic
lesions may be treated with imiquimod as well as normal AK
lesions.
The overall complete clearance rate of 68.9% found in our study
was slightly above the estimates recently reported from vehicle
controlled studies using the same regimen [5, 6]. Such a pattern,
namely a better outcome in an uncontrolled setting than in a
placebo-controlled setting, is often seen in many therapeutic areas
and might be to some extent explained by the higher scepticism of
investigators and patients when faced with the possibility of
having been treated with placebo. Other important aspects may be
more stringent selection criteria used for vehicle controlled
trials. However, many of the relinquished selection criteria of our
study as compared to vehicle controlled studies were expected to
work rather in the contrary direction: We set no upper limit for
the number of AK lesions, while the above mentioned studies allowed
only 8 [5] or 9 [6] baseline lesions maximally. Furthermore, both
controlled studies excluded patients with hyperkeratotic or
hypertrophic AK lesions, which we included. Our data indicate that
these factors cannot explain the higher success rates in our
study.
Local skin reactions are common during treatment with imiquimod
and are an indication that there is an increase in the cutaneous
immune response at the site of treatment, triggered by increases in
activated dendritic cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [9]. Earlier
studies have associated an increase in LSR intensity with higher
complete clearance rates of AK lesions [1, 2, 5, 6, 9]. Exactly
this relationship was carefully explained to all investigators in
investigators’ meetings before start of the trial. This might have
contributed not only to the high clearance rates, but also to the
low drop-out rates due to adverse events. In fact, the rate of
discontinuations during this study due to local skin reactions (4
out of 828 = 0.5%) was very low when compared to vehicle-controlled
studies with the same regimen (4 out of 252 imiquimod recipients =
1.6% [5, 6]) or compared with other regimens investigated in
earlier studies (3.9% of the imiquimod recipients [10]). We
considered essential for the therapeutic success that physicians
carefully explain to their patients the positive relationship
between LSRs and clearance rate before starting therapy with
imiquimod. This is important for achieving high compliance and
subsequently optimum therapeutic success.
Future studies in AK should allow for a stratification of the
long-term risk by the type of AK lesion. Such classification of
lesions should, however, be based not only on clinical features
such as hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions, but also on
histological characteristics of the most suspicious lesions. An
ideal histological classification system should incorporate
qualitative as well as quantitative aspects. A respective
proposal considering all AK lesions as early in situ SCC because of
the presence of atypical keratinocytes in all AK lesions has
recently been made [12].
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by 3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN, USA. The
publication was funded by MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Bad
Homburg, Germany, which took over the European rights on
Aldara® (imiquimod).
The following investigators recruited patients: Eggert
Stockfleth, Berlin, Thomas Arnold, Geithain, Thomas Baur, Berlin,
Babette Boehr, Oranienburg, Linda Duhn, Bernau, Olga Dürpisch,
Frankfurt/Oder, Birgit Göhre, Templin, Steffi-Kathrin Grelke,
Lübbenau, Michaela Jumar, Magdeburg, Brunhild-Ch. Junge, Magdeburg,
Ralf Struß, Berlin, Gunhild Kratzsch, Leipzig, Andrea Kreß,
Altenburg, Beate Kuchheuser, Magdeburg, Meike Kuckert,
Gräfenhainichen, Martin Kuppinger, Potsdam, Hans-Joachim Lüdcke,
Potsdam, Christian Münzberger, Döbeln, Axel Mussmann, Wolfen,
Kathrin Neubert, Burgstädt, Volker Neumann, Bad Saarow, Simone
Neumann, Bernau, Reinhard Pettker, Berlin, Manuela Randow, Berlin,
Katja Schubert, Dresden, Ulrike Schuchardt, Meißen, Margrit Simon,
Berlin, Frauke Trautvetter, Dessau, Peter Uhl, Berlin, Gabriele
Wolz, Hoyerswerda, Annemarie Zobel, Spremberg, Elke Auerswald,
Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Rainer Burdinski, Paderborn, Manfred Derr,
Mergentheim, Eberhard Dielmann, Limburg, Kay Dirting, Hanau,
Karl-Armin Döhnel, Braunschweig, Jürgen Fried, Aschaffenburg,
Matthias Gebhardt, Zwickau, Klaus Gissler, Darmstadt, Matthias
Herbst, Darmstadt, Heinz-Jürgen Hübner, Paderborn, Claus Gruss,
Passau, Sabine Kallenberger, Hannover, Frank Karches, Hannover,
Marie-Francoise Kiesel-Mayerus, Höxter, Lieselotte Klose, Northeim,
Anja Langrock, Wetzlar, Karin Lindner, Erfurt, Gisbert Paul, Gera,
Henning Platschek, Hannover, Karin Prifert, Rudolstadt, Günter
Reimer, Bad Homburg, Daniel Schaefer, Öhringen, Peter
Samuel-Schleussner, Bad Vilbel, Heinrich Stirn, Paderborn, Gerald
Wandel, Paderborn, Stefan Weidmann, Buchen, Wolfgang Weiß, Erfurt,
Waldemar Zapf, Rudolstadt, Sven Zedlitz, Darmstadt, Ann
Baumgartner, Freiburg, Gudrun Besing, Gauting, H.W. Beuschel,
Schwabach, Ulf Detmar, Bad Wörishofen, Norbert Eich, Schweinfurt,
Stephan Friedel, Freiburg, Alexander Glaessl, Ulm, Rainer
Gollhausen, Dachau, Stefan Golsch, München, Manfred Groß, Bamberg,
Martin Hahn, Rottweil, Torsten Hauschild, Rheinfelden, Thomas
Hebel, München, Viktor Heimbuch, Wertingen, Mechtild
Hofbauer-Schmelzer, Weil am Rhein, Claus Jung, Germering, Peter
Kostka, Nürnberg, Christoph Kuhn, Günzburg, Irmela Martius,
Forchheim, Volker Lungershausen, Singen, Margarita Meisel-Stosiek,
Neumarkt, Lorenz Pfaff, Waldkirch, Georg Schuhmachers, München,
Edgar Selvaag, Dachau, Ulrich Speer, Ravensburg, Thomas Titzmann,
Augsburg, Stefan Uhlich, Kempten/Allgäu, Michael Weidmann,
Augsburg, Cosima Weiß, Freiburg, Oliver Zimmer, Lahr, Magnus Bell,
Andernach, Werner Bender, Wiesbaden, Werner Beyl, Koblenz, Irmgard
Brändle, Stuttgart, Winfried Breustedt, Koblenz, Christoph Fedel,
Böblingen, Vitali Franzen, Mayen, Klaus Fritz, Landau, Folke
Habermann, Koblenz, Ulrich Heidbüchel, Mainz, Dieter Hirzel,
Stuttgart, Klaus Jäger, Wörth, Stefan John, Püttlingen, Jürgen
Kloos, Neuwied, Jürgen Knauber, Pirmasens, Martin Knüchel,
Mannheim, Rainer Kopner, Köln, Hubert Krautheim, Kaiserslautern,
Alfhild Nadji, Köln, Arndt Poswig, Köln, Kay-Peter Rehders,
Wiesbaden, Peter Rein, Dillingen, Marion Sahlfeld-Frey, Backnang,
Barbara Steimer, St. Ingbert, Christoph Trennheuser, Saarlouis,
Klaus Trinkaus, Kaiserslautern, Roland Weber, Koblenz, Hanspeter
Welters, Neckargemünd, Stefan Altmeyer, Oer-Erkenschwick, Theo
Bergenthal, Iserlohn, Joachim Bockhorst, Dülmen, Jörg Bohmeyer,
Lüdenscheid, Thomas Dirschka, Wuppertal, Rolf Dominicus, Dülmen,
Peter Dorittke, Mönchengladbach, Marco Fuchs, Kamp-Lintfort, Gerold
Gerhards, Krefeld, Virginia Große, Kleve, Roland Hartwig,
Wuppertal, Matthias Hoffmann, Witten, Franz Hübinger, Wuppertal,
Tristan Ionescu, Krefeld, Bernd Kardorff, Mönchengladbach,Volker
Kingreen, Hagen, Ulrich Klein, Witten, Arnold Köllner, Duisburg,
Eugen Lang, Essen, Frank Moschner-Kunert, Herten, Claus Nüchel,
Mönchengladbach, Herbert Onstein, Borken, Peter Pierchalla,
Recklinghausen, Beate Pilz, Arnsberg, Andreas Reipen, Olpe,
Wolfgang Riepe, Münster, Hermann Rudolphi, Oberhausen, Peter
Ruppert, Bocholt, Sibylle Schaller, Mülheim, Dorle Schlebes,
Bocholt, Hans-Heinz Schrooten, Moers, Markward Ständer, Bad
Bentheim, Magdalena Uszynska-Jast, Wetter, Zafer Aboutara,
Oldenburg, Manfred Börries, Hamburg, Stephanie Denzer-Fürst, Kiel,
Peter Drieschner, Lüneburg, Hans Engelke, Husum, Gunther Frings,
Hamburg, Peter Giesenberg, Varel, Andreas Götze, Norden, Hans-H.
Hagemeier, Löhne, Günther Heidbreder, Norderstedt, Jörg Hermann,
Bremen, Hartmut Kietzmann, Kiel, Maria Kosinski, Bielefeld, Oliver
Kreft, Papenburg, Andreas Krisch, Norderstedt, Bernd Lange-Cordes,
Papenburg, Werner Löntz, Bad Schwartau, Waltraut Maronde, Winsen,
Hartwig Mensing, Hamburg, Andreas Montag, Hamburg, Kirsten
Prepeneit, Buchholz, Bruno Schmolke, Hamburg, Stefan Schröpfer,
Glückstadt, Rainer Sempell, Itzehoe, Anke Thierfelder, Lübeck,
Volker Streit, Buchholz,Markus Wehmeier, Verl, Klaus Welp,
Buxtehude. Prof. Dr. med. Eggert Stockfleth acted as co-ordinating
investigator. Medical managers: Elena Rizova, MD, and Jens Bichel,
MD. Study manager: Marion Carey-Yard. Monitoring, data management,
statistics: Ecron, Frankfurt.
References
1 Lebwohl M, Dinehart S, Whiting D, et al. Fox
T. Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis:
Results from two phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel
group, vehicle-controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50:
714-21.
2 Korman N, Moy R, Ling M, et al. Dosing
with 5% imiquimod cream 3 times per week for the treatment of
actinic keratosis. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 467-73.
3 Szeimies R, Gerritsen M, Gupta G, et al.
Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results
from a phase III, randomized.double-blind, vehicle-controlled
clinical trial with histology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:
547-55.
4 Salasche SJ, Levine N, Morrison L. Cycle
therapy of actinic keratoses of the face and scalp with 5% topical
imiquimod cream: an open label trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47:
571-7.
5 Jorizzo J, Dinehart S, Matheson R, et al.
Vehicle-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of imiquimod 5%
cream applied 3 days per week in one or two courses of treatment
for actinic keratoses on the head. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57:
265-8.
6 Alomar A, Bichel J, McRae S.
Vehicle-controlled, randomized, double-blind study to assess safety
and efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream applied once daily 3 days per
week in one or two courses of treatment of actinic keratoses on the
head. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 133-41.
7 European summary of product characteristics of
Aldara®. E.g. Germany: www.fachinfo.de, e.g. United
Kingdom: www.emc.medicines.org.uk
8 Stockfelth E, Sterry W, Carey-Yard M,
Bichel J. Multicentre, open-label study using imiquimod 5%
cream in one or two 4-week courses of treatment for multiple
actinic keratoses on the head. Brit J Dermatol 2007; 157 (suppl 2):
41-6.
9 Ooi T, Barnetson RS, Zhuang L, et al.
Imiquimod-induced regression of actinic keratosis is associated
with infiltration by T lymphocytes and dendritic cells: a
randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 72-8.
10 Hadley G, Derry S, Moore RA. Imiquimod for
actinic keratosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest
Dermatol 2006; 126: 1251-5.
11 Röwert-Huber J, Patel MJ, Forschner T, et al. Actinic
keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal
for reclassification. Br J Dermato 2007; 156 (suppl 3): 8-12.
|