Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable
  Version PDF

Treatment of multiple, multiform actinic keratoses on the head with imiquimod 5% cream


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 19, Numéro 4, 355-9, July-August 2009, Therapy

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2009.0692

Summary  

Auteur(s) : Eggert Stockfleth, Claas Ulrich, Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt, Hans-Joachim Kremer, Ulrike Drecoll, Joachim Maus, Joachim Röwert-Huber , Skin Cancer Centre Charité, Clinic of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany, Medical Writing Service, Alemannenstraße 101, 79117 Freiburg, Germany, Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Benzstr. 1, 61352 Bad Homburg, Germany.

Illustrations

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Eggert Stockfleth1, Claas Ulrich1, Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt1, Hans-Joachim Kremer2, Ulrike Drecoll1, Joachim Maus3, Joachim Röwert-Huber1

1Skin Cancer Centre Charité, Clinic of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2Medical Writing Service, Alemannenstraße 101, 79117 Freiburg, Germany
3Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Benzstr. 1, 61352 Bad Homburg, Germany

accepté le 31 Janvier 2009

In the US, imiquimod has already had marketing authorisation for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) since 2005. This decision was primarily based on vehicle controlled trials which investigated twice or thrice per week application of 5% imiquimod cream over 16 weeks [1-3]. However, clinical research with imiquimod in AK went on, leading to a modified treatment scheme, namely the application of one or two courses of treatment (COTs) [4]. One COT consists of a 4 week treatment period with 3 applications per week, followed by a 4 week treatment pause. A second COT may follow if complete lesion clearance was not achieved. During the treatment pause, the clinical inflammation induced by imiquimod subsides, but AK lesions continue to clear. An additional positive effect is the uncovering and subsequent eradication of invisible (subclinical) AKs in the treatment area. This schedule minimises drug exposure, yielding improved safety, tolerability, and thus, patient compliance [4]. As in the US scheme, the scheme with 1-2 COTS was studied in vehicle controlled trials [5, 6]. Imiquimod also received marketing authorisation for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) in the EU in 2006, primarily based on these two trials. However, all controlled clinical trials with imiquimod had restrictions concerning the type of AK lesions, the size of the treatment area, and other aspects to achieve optimal and standardised conditions for demonstrating a significant difference between active and vehicle. As translated now in the official labelling [7], they appear artificial and only partly reflecting the usual dermatological situations in daily practice. Indeed, many patients might also suffer from hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic AK lesions. Moreover, the restriction of the treatment area to a contiguous one of only 25 cm2, as studied in all controlled trials with imiquimod, might be unrealistic in daily practice. Therefore, our aim was to confirm the efficacy of the European imiquimod regimen (1 or 2 COTs) under conditions much closer to dermatological practice than those of controlled trials.

The main results of this trial are already published elsewhere [8]. However, that manuscript neither presented data on multiple nor multiform AK lesions nor on the influence of locations nor on the relationship between local skin reactions and clearance. Hence, the present paper firstly focuses on these important aspects.

Methods

As details on methods and patients are already published [8], only the key points are repeated in the following and amended if required. This was an open label non-controlled interventional clinical study. Patients were eligible if they had clinically typical, visible AK lesions located anywhere on the head, excluding the upper and lower eyelids, nostrils, lip vermilion, and inside the ears. The size of the treatment area was not restricted. It did not have to be a contiguous area. All forms of AK lesions, including hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic, in the treatment area were allowed. Patients were advised to apply imiquimod 5% cream (one or two sachets) 3 times per week for 4 weeks (first course of treatment, COT). The first COT was followed by a 4 week treatment-free interval. If lesions remained, a second COT could be started, which again should be followed by 4 week treatment-free interval; patients not completely cleared 4 weeks after COT 2 were additionally assessed 4 weeks later.

If, at any time, the investigator believed any lesion located within the treatment or surrounding area to be suspicious of invasive malignancy, the investigator was to remove the lesion according to standard medical practice.

Safety documentation and statistical evaluations were exhaustively described previously [8].

Results

Patient disposition, demographics, compliance

829 patients were enrolled, each centre enrolled 1 to 5 patients. Twenty-nine patients (3.5%) discontinued the study prematurely during COT 1. Thirteen of the 464 patients (2.8%) who started COT 2 discontinued prematurely during this course. Overall, the most frequent reasons for discontinuation were personal reasons (1.9%) and adverse events (1.8%) (table 1).

80% of patients had undergone a previous treatment for AK with the most frequently reported treatments being cryosurgery (32%) and surgical excision (28%). The mean number of AK lesions was 9.5. 523 of 829 patients (63%) had one or more hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions at baseline (mean 4.4, median 3, range 1-40 lesions). For further details on background and baseline data cf. [8].

90% of patients applied at least 80% of the expected doses of study cream. Dosing compliance was similar for COT 1 and COT 2. Only 33 patients (4.0%) were considered noncompliant i.e. they had applied less than 60% of the expected doses of study cream. 134 patients (16.2%) took rest periods during the study, 122 during COT 1 (14.7%) and 23 (of 464, 5.0%) during COT 2 (of which 11 during both COTs). Patients taking a rest period during COT 1 and COT 2 missed on average 3.3 and 3.5 of the 12 scheduled doses, respectively.
Table 1 Premature discontinuations

COT

Reason

N

%

COT 1

Adverse event

11

1.3

Local skin reaction

2

0.2

Protocol violation

2

0.2

Intercurrent disease

1

0.1

Personal

13

1.6

Total

29

3.5

COT 2

Adverse event

4

0.5

Deceased

2

0.2

Protocol violation

1

0.1

Non-compliance

3

0.4

Personal

3

0.4

Total

13

1.6

Total

Total

42

5.1

Efficacy

The complete clearance rate after COT 1 was 40.5%. This proportion increased to the final overall complete clearance rate of 68.9% when adding the outcome of the first and second COTs (table 2).

Compliance rates between 60% and 100% were marginally, if at all, predictive for the outcome, however, the subset of patients (33) with a compliance below 60% showed a considerably decreased overall clearance rate of only 39.4%.

Females, patients younger than 65, and patients with skin type III or IV showed a slightly better overall outcome (table 2). Some imbalances, in particular the difference between male and female, might be explained by the localisation of the lesion (table 3). The overall complete clearance rate in patients with lesions confined to the scalp (66%) was lower than in patients with lesions confined to the forehead (81%) or the face (81%). This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that patients with multiple AK areas including the scalp had a worse outcome than patients with multiple affected areas excluding the scalp.

The number of baseline lesions was not predictive for the outcome up to a count of 8 (table 2). Patients with 1 to 8 baseline lesions showed complete clearance rates of approximately 80%. This proportion was reduced in patients with 9 to 16 baseline lesions to 61% and further to 47% in patients with more lesions. Nonetheless, even in patients with baseline lesion counts above 8 (252 patients), most lesions could be cleared. Non-existence of hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions at baseline was only marginally predictive of a better outcome, or vice versa, patients with such lesions at baseline showed nearly the same complete clearance rate as those without. There was also no relevant difference in the time course of the lesion counts of any lesion and hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesions (figure 1). In fact, hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesons showed the same clearance kinetics as the non-hyperkeratotic/hypertrophic lesions (table 4).
Table 2 Complete clearance rates and subgroups

Course 1

Overall

N

%

N

%

All patients

336

40.5

571

68.9

Subgroup analyses:

Sex

Male

266

38.6

463

67.1

Female

70

50.4

108

77.7

Age

< 65 years

62

38.8

119

74.4

≥ 65 years

274

41.0

452

67.6

Skin type

Type I or II

180

39.3

302

65.9

Type III to VI

156

42.0

269

72.5

Type of lesion

Patients without HK/HT AK lesions

145

48.0

226

74.8

Patients with at least 1 HK/HT AK lesion

191

36.5

343

65.6

N of lesions

1 or 2 AK lesions

69

55.2

103

82.4

3 or 4 AK lesions

65

47.4

106

77.4

5 AK lesions

37

43.5

62

72.9

6 AK lesions

26

45.6

46

80.7

7 AK lesions

27

50.0

42

77.8

8 AK lesions

16

44.4

28

77.8

9-16 AK lesions

65

32.5

121

60.5

> 16 AK lesions

31

23.7

61

46.6

Not countable

0

0

2

50.0


Table 3 Complete clearance rates by localisation

Course 1

Overall

N

%

N

%

Scalp

76

35.3

142

66.0

Forehead

78

54.5

116

81.1

Forehead/scalp

50

35.2

86

60.6

Face left

13

36.1

28

77.8

Face left/scalp

4

44.4

7

77.8

Face left/forehead

16

61.5

20

76.9

Face left/forehead/scalp

1

9.1

8

72.7

Face right

19

57.6

29

87.9

Face right/scalp

3

50.0

5

83.3

Face right/forehead

16

61.5

20

76.9

Face right/forehead/scalp

2

25.0

5

62.5

Face right/face left

17

44.7

30

78.9

Face right/face left/scalp

5

31.3

7

43.8

Face right/face left/forehead

22

31.9

44

63.8

Face right/face left/forehead/scalp

13

27.7

22

46.8


Table 4 Reduction of lesions during study

Mean N of lesions

In % of Week 0

Week

Patients at risk

Any lesions

Non-HK/HT lesions

HK/HT lesions

Any lesions

Non-HK/HT lesions

HK/HT lesions

0

825

9.5

6.8

2.7

100.0

100.0

100.0

8

798

3.3

2.3

1.0

34.7

34.0

36.6

16

785

1.5

1.1

0.4

15.7

16.6

13.3

20

782

1.2

0.8

0.3

12.2

12.1

12.3

Safety and tolerability

Details on adverse events are presented in the previous paper [8].

The LSRs most frequently reported as severe by the investigator were erythema (32%), scabbing/crusting (28%), and flaking/scaling/dryness (15%, table 5). LSRs were more intense during COT 1 than during COT 2 [8]. LSRs were the reason for discontinuation in only 4 patients (2 classified as such in table 1, 2 further classified primarily as adverse events). Among the patients who discontinued the study due to adverse events, 2 complained of both LSRs and systemic reactions considered related to imiquimod, 4 complained of systemic reactions (fever, headache, myalgia, fatigue, shivering) considered related to imiquimod, and 11 experienced adverse events considered not related to imiquimod.

Cochran-Armitage trend tests indicated statistically significant relationships between severity of LSRs (except for flaking/scaling/dryness) and complete clearance rates, most pronounced for the COT 1 (table 6).
Table 5 Local skin reactions

None

Mild

Moderate

Severe

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Erythema

7

0.8

106

12.8

452

54.6

263

31.8

Oedema

231

27.9

353

42.6

202

24.4

42

5.1

Weeping/exudate

311

37.6

278

33.6

178

21.5

61

7.4

Vesicles

509

61.5

193

23.3

106

12.8

20

2.4

Erosion/ulceration

162

19.6

275

33.2

293

35.4

98

11.8

Flaking/scaling/dryness

40

4.8

284

34.3

376

45.4

128

15.5

Scabbing/crusting

42

5.1

196

23.7

356

43.0

234

28.3


Table 6 Correlations between clearance and LSRs

COT 1

Overall

Erythema

0.0002

0.0089

Oedema

< 0.0001

0.0305

Weeping/exudate

< 0.0001

0.0382

Vesicles

0.0031

0.0559

Erosion/ulceration

0.0016

0.5200

Flaking/scaling/dryness

0.8580

0.3891

Scabbing/crusting

0.0092

0.1341

Discussion

Our study differed from those vehicle-controlled studies with imiquimod in AK using the same treatment regimen [5, 6] in two main aspects. It had broader, less stringent selection criteria and the sample size was much larger. These features allowed for the investigation of the effects of various factors on the clearances rates with topical imiquimod.

The general factors, female, age below 65, and skin type III and IV were correlated with slightly higher clearance rates. While the latter two might be obvious, the lower response in the male patients might have been related to the number of lesions, which might have been considerably higher in males, who have a bald head much more often than females. The area affected by solar damage might typically be much larger in males, leading to an increased number of lesions.

More interesting are the findings on the lesion count. Although our data indicate that the number of baseline lesions is inversely correlated with the clearance rate, this correlation is rather weak. Even patients with a high number of lesions (field cancerisation) benefit from the treatment with imiquimod. It should be noted that a considerable number of patients had a baseline lesion count above 16 and many of them could be totally cleared. At least, the number of lesions could be dramatically reduced in these patients.

With respect to hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions, our data indicate that patients with such lesions have somewhat lower clearance rates than those without (66 vs. 75%). However, our data suggest that this lower success rate is not caused by the type of lesion (figure 1). This graph shows that hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions may be treated with imiquimod as well as normal AK lesions.

The overall complete clearance rate of 68.9% found in our study was slightly above the estimates recently reported from vehicle controlled studies using the same regimen [5, 6]. Such a pattern, namely a better outcome in an uncontrolled setting than in a placebo-controlled setting, is often seen in many therapeutic areas and might be to some extent explained by the higher scepticism of investigators and patients when faced with the possibility of having been treated with placebo. Other important aspects may be more stringent selection criteria used for vehicle controlled trials. However, many of the relinquished selection criteria of our study as compared to vehicle controlled studies were expected to work rather in the contrary direction: We set no upper limit for the number of AK lesions, while the above mentioned studies allowed only 8 [5] or 9 [6] baseline lesions maximally. Furthermore, both controlled studies excluded patients with hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic AK lesions, which we included. Our data indicate that these factors cannot explain the higher success rates in our study.

Local skin reactions are common during treatment with imiquimod and are an indication that there is an increase in the cutaneous immune response at the site of treatment, triggered by increases in activated dendritic cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [9]. Earlier studies have associated an increase in LSR intensity with higher complete clearance rates of AK lesions [1, 2, 5, 6, 9]. Exactly this relationship was carefully explained to all investigators in investigators’ meetings before start of the trial. This might have contributed not only to the high clearance rates, but also to the low drop-out rates due to adverse events. In fact, the rate of discontinuations during this study due to local skin reactions (4 out of 828 = 0.5%) was very low when compared to vehicle-controlled studies with the same regimen (4 out of 252 imiquimod recipients = 1.6% [5, 6]) or compared with other regimens investigated in earlier studies (3.9% of the imiquimod recipients [10]). We considered essential for the therapeutic success that physicians carefully explain to their patients the positive relationship between LSRs and clearance rate before starting therapy with imiquimod. This is important for achieving high compliance and subsequently optimum therapeutic success.

Future studies in AK should allow for a stratification of the long-term risk by the type of AK lesion. Such classification of lesions should, however, be based not only on clinical features such as hyperkeratotic or hypertrophic lesions, but also on histological characteristics of the most suspicious lesions. An ideal histological classification system should incorporate qualitative as well as quantitative aspects. A respective proposal considering all AK lesions as early in situ SCC because of the presence of atypical keratinocytes in all AK lesions has recently been made [12].

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by 3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN, USA. The publication was funded by MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Homburg, Germany, which took over the European rights on Aldara® (imiquimod).

The following investigators recruited patients: Eggert Stockfleth, Berlin, Thomas Arnold, Geithain, Thomas Baur, Berlin, Babette Boehr, Oranienburg, Linda Duhn, Bernau, Olga Dürpisch, Frankfurt/Oder, Birgit Göhre, Templin, Steffi-Kathrin Grelke, Lübbenau, Michaela Jumar, Magdeburg, Brunhild-Ch. Junge, Magdeburg, Ralf Struß, Berlin, Gunhild Kratzsch, Leipzig, Andrea Kreß, Altenburg, Beate Kuchheuser, Magdeburg, Meike Kuckert, Gräfenhainichen, Martin Kuppinger, Potsdam, Hans-Joachim Lüdcke, Potsdam, Christian Münzberger, Döbeln, Axel Mussmann, Wolfen, Kathrin Neubert, Burgstädt, Volker Neumann, Bad Saarow, Simone Neumann, Bernau, Reinhard Pettker, Berlin, Manuela Randow, Berlin, Katja Schubert, Dresden, Ulrike Schuchardt, Meißen, Margrit Simon, Berlin, Frauke Trautvetter, Dessau, Peter Uhl, Berlin, Gabriele Wolz, Hoyerswerda, Annemarie Zobel, Spremberg, Elke Auerswald, Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Rainer Burdinski, Paderborn, Manfred Derr, Mergentheim, Eberhard Dielmann, Limburg, Kay Dirting, Hanau, Karl-Armin Döhnel, Braunschweig, Jürgen Fried, Aschaffenburg, Matthias Gebhardt, Zwickau, Klaus Gissler, Darmstadt, Matthias Herbst, Darmstadt, Heinz-Jürgen Hübner, Paderborn, Claus Gruss, Passau, Sabine Kallenberger, Hannover, Frank Karches, Hannover, Marie-Francoise Kiesel-Mayerus, Höxter, Lieselotte Klose, Northeim, Anja Langrock, Wetzlar, Karin Lindner, Erfurt, Gisbert Paul, Gera, Henning Platschek, Hannover, Karin Prifert, Rudolstadt, Günter Reimer, Bad Homburg, Daniel Schaefer, Öhringen, Peter Samuel-Schleussner, Bad Vilbel, Heinrich Stirn, Paderborn, Gerald Wandel, Paderborn, Stefan Weidmann, Buchen, Wolfgang Weiß, Erfurt, Waldemar Zapf, Rudolstadt, Sven Zedlitz, Darmstadt, Ann Baumgartner, Freiburg, Gudrun Besing, Gauting, H.W. Beuschel, Schwabach, Ulf Detmar, Bad Wörishofen, Norbert Eich, Schweinfurt, Stephan Friedel, Freiburg, Alexander Glaessl, Ulm, Rainer Gollhausen, Dachau, Stefan Golsch, München, Manfred Groß, Bamberg, Martin Hahn, Rottweil, Torsten Hauschild, Rheinfelden, Thomas Hebel, München, Viktor Heimbuch, Wertingen, Mechtild Hofbauer-Schmelzer, Weil am Rhein, Claus Jung, Germering, Peter Kostka, Nürnberg, Christoph Kuhn, Günzburg, Irmela Martius, Forchheim, Volker Lungershausen, Singen, Margarita Meisel-Stosiek, Neumarkt, Lorenz Pfaff, Waldkirch, Georg Schuhmachers, München, Edgar Selvaag, Dachau, Ulrich Speer, Ravensburg, Thomas Titzmann, Augsburg, Stefan Uhlich, Kempten/Allgäu, Michael Weidmann, Augsburg, Cosima Weiß, Freiburg, Oliver Zimmer, Lahr, Magnus Bell, Andernach, Werner Bender, Wiesbaden, Werner Beyl, Koblenz, Irmgard Brändle, Stuttgart, Winfried Breustedt, Koblenz, Christoph Fedel, Böblingen, Vitali Franzen, Mayen, Klaus Fritz, Landau, Folke Habermann, Koblenz, Ulrich Heidbüchel, Mainz, Dieter Hirzel, Stuttgart, Klaus Jäger, Wörth, Stefan John, Püttlingen, Jürgen Kloos, Neuwied, Jürgen Knauber, Pirmasens, Martin Knüchel, Mannheim, Rainer Kopner, Köln, Hubert Krautheim, Kaiserslautern, Alfhild Nadji, Köln, Arndt Poswig, Köln, Kay-Peter Rehders, Wiesbaden, Peter Rein, Dillingen, Marion Sahlfeld-Frey, Backnang, Barbara Steimer, St. Ingbert, Christoph Trennheuser, Saarlouis, Klaus Trinkaus, Kaiserslautern, Roland Weber, Koblenz, Hanspeter Welters, Neckargemünd, Stefan Altmeyer, Oer-Erkenschwick, Theo Bergenthal, Iserlohn, Joachim Bockhorst, Dülmen, Jörg Bohmeyer, Lüdenscheid, Thomas Dirschka, Wuppertal, Rolf Dominicus, Dülmen, Peter Dorittke, Mönchengladbach, Marco Fuchs, Kamp-Lintfort, Gerold Gerhards, Krefeld, Virginia Große, Kleve, Roland Hartwig, Wuppertal, Matthias Hoffmann, Witten, Franz Hübinger, Wuppertal, Tristan Ionescu, Krefeld, Bernd Kardorff, Mönchengladbach,Volker Kingreen, Hagen, Ulrich Klein, Witten, Arnold Köllner, Duisburg, Eugen Lang, Essen, Frank Moschner-Kunert, Herten, Claus Nüchel, Mönchengladbach, Herbert Onstein, Borken, Peter Pierchalla, Recklinghausen, Beate Pilz, Arnsberg, Andreas Reipen, Olpe, Wolfgang Riepe, Münster, Hermann Rudolphi, Oberhausen, Peter Ruppert, Bocholt, Sibylle Schaller, Mülheim, Dorle Schlebes, Bocholt, Hans-Heinz Schrooten, Moers, Markward Ständer, Bad Bentheim, Magdalena Uszynska-Jast, Wetter, Zafer Aboutara, Oldenburg, Manfred Börries, Hamburg, Stephanie Denzer-Fürst, Kiel, Peter Drieschner, Lüneburg, Hans Engelke, Husum, Gunther Frings, Hamburg, Peter Giesenberg, Varel, Andreas Götze, Norden, Hans-H. Hagemeier, Löhne, Günther Heidbreder, Norderstedt, Jörg Hermann, Bremen, Hartmut Kietzmann, Kiel, Maria Kosinski, Bielefeld, Oliver Kreft, Papenburg, Andreas Krisch, Norderstedt, Bernd Lange-Cordes, Papenburg, Werner Löntz, Bad Schwartau, Waltraut Maronde, Winsen, Hartwig Mensing, Hamburg, Andreas Montag, Hamburg, Kirsten Prepeneit, Buchholz, Bruno Schmolke, Hamburg, Stefan Schröpfer, Glückstadt, Rainer Sempell, Itzehoe, Anke Thierfelder, Lübeck, Volker Streit, Buchholz,Markus Wehmeier, Verl, Klaus Welp, Buxtehude. Prof. Dr. med. Eggert Stockfleth acted as co-ordinating investigator. Medical managers: Elena Rizova, MD, and Jens Bichel, MD. Study manager: Marion Carey-Yard. Monitoring, data management, statistics: Ecron, Frankfurt.

References

1 Lebwohl M, Dinehart S, Whiting D, et al. Fox T. Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis: Results from two phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, vehicle-controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 714-21.

2 Korman N, Moy R, Ling M, et al. Dosing with 5% imiquimod cream 3 times per week for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 467-73.

3 Szeimies R, Gerritsen M, Gupta G, et al. Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results from a phase III, randomized.double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial with histology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 547-55.

4 Salasche SJ, Levine N, Morrison L. Cycle therapy of actinic keratoses of the face and scalp with 5% topical imiquimod cream: an open label trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 571-7.

5 Jorizzo J, Dinehart S, Matheson R, et al. Vehicle-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of imiquimod 5% cream applied 3 days per week in one or two courses of treatment for actinic keratoses on the head. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57: 265-8.

6 Alomar A, Bichel J, McRae S. Vehicle-controlled, randomized, double-blind study to assess safety and efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream applied once daily 3 days per week in one or two courses of treatment of actinic keratoses on the head. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 133-41.

7 European summary of product characteristics of Aldara®. E.g. Germany: www.fachinfo.de, e.g. United Kingdom: www.emc.medicines.org.uk

8 Stockfelth E, Sterry W, Carey-Yard M, Bichel J. Multicentre, open-label study using imiquimod 5% cream in one or two 4-week courses of treatment for multiple actinic keratoses on the head. Brit J Dermatol 2007; 157 (suppl 2): 41-6.

9 Ooi T, Barnetson RS, Zhuang L, et al. Imiquimod-induced regression of actinic keratosis is associated with infiltration by T lymphocytes and dendritic cells: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 72-8.

10 Hadley G, Derry S, Moore RA. Imiquimod for actinic keratosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 1251-5.

11 Röwert-Huber J, Patel MJ, Forschner T, et al. Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal for reclassification. Br J Dermato 2007; 156 (suppl 3): 8-12.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]