Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable
  Version PDF

Is facial involvement a sign of severe psoriasis?


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 18, Numéro 2, 169-71, march-april 2008, Clinical report

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2008.0363

Summary  

Auteur(s) : Filiz Canpolat, Bengü Çevirgen Cemil, Fatma Eskioğlu, Havva Kaya Akis , Ministry of Health Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training Hospital, Department of Dermatology.

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Filiz Canpolat, Bengü Çevirgen Cemil, Fatma Eskioğlu, Havva Kaya Akis

Ministry of Health Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training Hospital, Department of Dermatology

accepté le 23 Octobre 2007

Psoriasis is a relapsing scaly and hyperproliferative disorder that affects 1-3% of the world’s population. Although the definite reason is still unknown, some authors have suggested that the continuing sub clinical streptococcal infection might be responsible for refractory chronic plaque psoriasis [1]. As we know, psoriasis characteristically involves the trunk and extensor surfaces of the extremities in a symmetrical fashion [2]. Facial involvement in psoriasis receives little attention in standard descriptions of the disease. Clinicians have long noted that the face is rarely involved in psoriasis [3]. Although some authors have even commented on the rarity of facial involvement, others have reported that facial involvement with psoriasis is much more common than generally appreciated [4, 5]. It is well known that psoriasis may cause significant psycho-social problems and stress. Optimism, belief-in-oneself and confrontational coping strategies have most frequently been used to evaluate coping and quality of life in psoriasis patients [6]. Facial involvement of the disease leads to more emotional stress related to poorer quality of life. Some authors have suggested that facial involvement may be a sign of severe psoriasis [3, 7, 8]. Is facial involvement really a sign of severe psoriasis? The purpose of this study was to define the prevalence and characteristics of facial involvement, and to compare the severity of psoriasis between patients with and without facial involvement.

Materials and methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients (53 females, 67 males) with psoriasis were included in the study. They were categorized into patients with and without facial psoriasis. The age of onset, family history, nail involvement, joint involvement, disease duration, associated skin or systemic disease, history of phototherapy or systemic therapy, admission history, extent of involvement, the effect of external factors, different therapies prescribed for psoriasis throughout the patient’s entire lifetime, hospitalization for psoriasis and the involved facial areas were recorded. The effects of sunlight and occupation on facial psoriasis were also recorded. To learn about the effects of season, stress, infection and trauma, the following questions were asked: ‘Does your psoriasis get better or worse? in which season or at times of sun exposure, psychological stress, infection or trauma?’ The severity of psoriasis on the whole body evaluated according to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Patients who had a PASI score lower than 5 were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS for WINDOWS® VER 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) on a personal computer, where p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using comparative t test and the chi-square test.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic data of both groups (with or without facial involvement) and table 2 summarizes the clinical details of the patients. Facial involvement was found to be present in 49.2% of the patients and was equally common in both males and females, but was unrelated to the type of psoriasis lesions.

As to the age of onset, psoriasis occurred earlier in facial psoriasis than in patients without facial involvement (p < 0.05). The patients with facial psoriasis have a positive family history (p < 0.05). The areas of the face most often affected were upper forehead (52.5%), malar area (49.2%), lower forehead (37.2%), and periauricular area (35.6%).

When all patients with facial involvement were classified by age at onset of facial occurrence into 5-year groups, most patients were in the 20 to 25-year-old group, and the mean age of onset of psoriasis was 21.72 ± 8.33 years. When all the patients were classified by the age at onset of psoriasis on other areas into 5-year groups, most patients were in the 26 to 30-year-old group, and the mean age of onset of psoriasis was 26.89 ± 12.9 years.

Table 2 delineates the mean PASI score on the whole body, along with several other clinical manifestations in the two groups. The PASI score on the whole body was higher in the group with facial involvement (p < 0.05). The Koebner response was more frequently associated with the group with facial psoriasis (p < 0.05). The nail and joint involvement and pruritus did not appear to influence the presence of facial psoriasis (p > 0.05).

Table 3 shows the effect of external factors and the therapeutic history. The patients with facial psoriasis said sunlight had improved their psoriasis (p < 0.05) and described a worsening of psoriasis with trauma, infection and seasonal change, especially in winter (p < 0.05). The group with facial psoriasis had multiple previous systemic therapies and phototherapy (p < 0.05). 37.3% of patients with facial psoriasis and 24.6% of patients without facial involvement had been hospitalized at least one time (p < 0.05).
Table 1 Demographic data of the evaluated patients

  • No facial
  • Involvement


Facial involvement

  • Total
  • population


No

50.8% (n = 61)

49.2% (n = 59)

n = 120

Age (years ± SD)*

38.30 ± 19.062

36.42 ± 14.983

37.38 ± 17.165

Age at onset (years ± SD)*

26.67 ± 16.320

22.80 ± 13.426

24.77 ± 15.238

Disease duration (years ± SD)*

11.62 ± 11.323

13.63 ± 12.060

12.61 ± 11.743

Female/Male

25/36

28/31

53/67

Positive family history*

37.93%

62.07%

24.17%


Table 2 Clinical features of patients

No facial involvement

Facial involvement

Whole body PASI score*

6.85 ± 5.885

15.59 ± 9.029

Nail involvement

50.0%

50.0%

Psoriatic arthritis

41.7%

58.3%

Pruritus

50.5%

49.5%

Koebner response*

29.8%

70.2%


Table 3 The effect of external factors and the therapeutic history

No facial involvement

Facial involvement

Worsening

Seasonal*

42.7%

57.3%

Winter*

34.0%

66.0%

Stress

46.7%

53.3%

Infection*

38.1%

61.9%

Trauma*

31.9%

68.1%

Others

50.0%

50.0%

Therapeutic history

Phototherapy*

30.3%

69.7%

Systemic*

38.2%

61.8%

Topical

50.0%

50.0%

Hospitalization*

24.6%

37.3%

Discussion

Facial involvement may cause considerable concern to the patient. Although Hellegren and Farber & Nall found low incidences of facial involvement in the large series of patients, other investigators have reported that a larger portion of patients with psoriasis had facial involvement [9, 10]. Harrison & Walker found that 57% of 100 patients hospitalized with psoriasis had facial lesions [4]. Park et al. showed that 67.7% of patients had facial involvement [7]. In our research, we found that 49.2% of 120 outpatients with psoriasis had facial involvement.

The importance of facial involvement is that it may be a marker of severe psoriasis [3, 7, 8]. Some investigators have suggested that early age of onset is associated with a severe course, the extent of lesions, recalcitrance to treatment, positive family history or frequency of relapse [3, 7, 8, 11]. In the report of Cardoso et al., it was shown that there was positive association of the HLA-DRB1*0102/DQB1*05 and HLA-DRB1*0701/DQB1*03 haplotypes and psoriasis vulgaris patients with early onset of the disease [12]. In concordance with these findings, in our series the disease tends to appear earlier in the group with facial involvement. A high incidence of facial involvement has also been found in children [13]. This may also be taken as an indication that it is a marker for patients with early age-at-onset. As has been previously pointed out [7], our series confirms that family occurrence seems to be more frequent in patients with facial psoriasis. In addition to the demographic evidence, a more extensive body surface involvement and higher PASI scores were observed in patients with facial psoriasis in comparison with those without facial psoriasis. Results from a recently published study by Van de Kerkhof et al. [14] suggest that a standardized protocol for the evaluation of psoriasis severity based on established severity scores (PASI, % Body Surface Area Score) appears to be unrealistic in day-to-day clinical practice. So, in clinical practice, a host of factors must be evaluated alongside possible metric measures. Disease severity is dependent not only on area involvement and sign scores, but also on the location of the disease, response to previous treatment, patient history, and the patient’s perception of his disease and quality of life. [14]. In addition, Feng et al. [15] found that the expression of retinoid x receptor alpha (RXR-α) which is a retinoic acid receptor, was lower in the progressive stage of the psoriasis than in the stable stage. So, RXR-α can also be used as severity index of psoriasis. The number of patients necessitating hospital admission was higher in the group with facial psoriasis. Although nail involvement and pruritus are suggested to be associated with an aggressive clinical course and facial involvement [7, 11], we found no significant differences between our two groups.

With regards to external factors, seasonal exacerbations and Koebner response are considered to be markers of severe psoriasis [5, 7, 16, 17]. In concordance with this data, in our research more patients in facial psoriasis group had Koebner responses and seasonal variation. Our patients with facial involvement described a significant improvement of their psoriasis following sun exposure. We suggested that ambient ultraviolet radiation may provide maintenance phototherapy. Although psoriasis does usually improve with sunlight, some patients may be adversely affected. Harrison and Walker suggested that sunlight had more of an adverse than beneficial effect on the facial psoriasis of hospitalized female patients [4].

In conclusion, facial involvement of psoriasis is much more common than generally appreciated. Due to its significance as a marker of severe disease, extra care must be taken during treatment to ensure clearance from this site.

Acknowledgments

Financial support: none, conflict of interest: none.

References

1 Saxena VN, Dogra J. Long-term use o penicillin for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15(5): 359-62.

2 Wang G, Li C, Gao T, Lıu Y. Clinical analysis of 48 cases of inverse psoriasis: a hospital-based study. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15(3): 176-8.

3 Fullerton SH, Orenberg EK. Facial involvement as a marker of severe psoriasis. Cutis 1987; 40(4): 309-10.

4 Harrison PV, Walker GB. Facial psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1985; 10: 41-4.

5 Bernard JD. Facial sparing in psoriasis. Int J Dermatol 1983; 5: 291.

6 Wahl AK, Mork C, Hanestad BR, Helland S. Coping with exacerbation in psoriasis and eczema prior to admission in a dermatological ward. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16(3): 271-5.

7 Park JY, Rim JH, Choe YB, Youn JI. Facial psoriasis: Comparison of patients with and without facial involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50(4): 582-4.

8 Bernard JD. Facial involvement is a sign of severe psoriasis. In: Farber EM, Nall ML, Morhenn V, eds. Psoriasis: proceedings of the fourth international symposium. New York: Elsevier, 1987: 405-6.

9 Farber EM, Nall ML. The natural history of psoriasis in 5600 patients. Dermatologica 1974; 1481: 1-18.

10 Hellegren L. Psoriasis. A statistical, clinical and laboratory investigation of 255 psoriatics and matched healthy controls. Acta Derm Venereol 1964; 44: 191-207.

11 Ferrandiz C, Pujol RM, Patos VG, Bordas X, Smandia JO. Psoriasis of early and late onset: A clinical and epidemiologic study from Spain. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 863-73.

12 Cardoso CB, Uthida-Tanaka AM, Magalhaes RF, Magna LA, Helena M, Kramer S. Association between psoriasis vulgaris and MHC-DRB, -DQB genes as a contribution to disease diagnosis. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15(3): 159-63.

13 Nyfor SA. Psoriasis in children. Characteristics, prognosis and therapy. A review. Acta Derm Venereol 1981; 95(suppl): 47-53.

14 Van De Kerkhof PCM, Kragballe K, Austad J, et al. Psoriasis: severity assessment in clinical practice. Conclusions from workshop discussions and a prospective multicentre survey of psoriasis severity. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16(2): 167-71.

15 Feng S, Lin L, Wu Q, Zhou W, Shao C. Study on the expression of RXRα in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16(1): 33-8.

16 Melski JE, Bernard JD, Stem RS. The Koebner (isomorphic) response in psoriasis: association with early age of onset and multipl previous therapies. Arch Dermatol 1983; 12: 655-9.

17 Baker AJ, Wilkinson DS. Psoriasis. In: Rook AJ, Wilkinson DS, Ebling FJ, eds. Textbook of dermatology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1979: 1315.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]