Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable
  Version PDF

The role of lesional T cells in recalcitrant psoriasis during infliximab therapy


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 15, Numéro 6, 454-8, November-December 2005, Investigative report


Summary  

Auteur(s) : HJ Bovenschen, PCM Van De Kerkhof, WJ Gerritsen, MMB Seyger , Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Illustrations

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : HJ Bovenschen, PCM Van De Kerkhof, WJ Gerritsen, MMB Seyger

Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

accepté le 30 Juin 2005

Psoriasis is a disease characterized by the infiltration of predominantly T cells, epidermal hyperproliferation and disturbed keratinisation [1]. Secondly, psoriatic plaques contain elevated levels of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors [2]. One of the key players in the pathogenesis of psoriasis is one of these cytokines: tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) [2, 3]. As in other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease, elevated levels of this cytokine have been associated with T-cell infiltration in the diseased tissue [3]. With infliximab therapy (anti-TNF-α) for plaque psoriasis, over 80% of patients reach ≥ 75% PASI improvement in 10 weeks of treatment [4, 5]. We treated a patient with severe psoriasis, recalcitrant to conventional systemic therapies, with infliximab (Schering-Plough, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and analyzed five serial skin biopsies for lesional T cells, NK-T cells and epidermal growth and differentiation, using standard immunohistochemistry [6].

Case report

A 53-year-old Dutch woman had suffered from generalized recalcitrant plaque psoriasis for almost 20 years. As the psoriatic lesions often became erythrodermic and as conventional systemic treatments were either not successful or contraindicated, she was treated at our in-patient clinic for several months each year. Previously, she had been treated with numerous anti-psoriatic agents, including topical corticosteroids and vitamin D3 derivatives, coal tar preparations and dithranol, photo-(chemo)therapy: UVB and PUVA, systemic treatments, including salazopyrin, acitretin, cyclosporin, fumaric acid, methotrexate and various combinations of these therapies. All treatments had either no effect, or were poorly tolerated due to severe side-effects. The most recent treatment period was from August 2003 until April 2004 with methotrexate, which was still the only treatment option with some success. Unfortunately, a liver biopsy performed in April 2004 revealed progress to grade IV on the Roenigk scale (liver cirrhosis), forcing her to stop methotrexate treatment and leaving no regular systemic treatment to treat her psoriasis.

Clinical examination

At this point, on examination she had widespread well-demarcated and characteristic erythematosquamous plaques of the trunk and limbs, the scalp and intertriginous areas, as well as nail involvement and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis ( (figure 1A) ). The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) [7] was 25.4. The involved “body surface area” was 18%. One plaque on the right lower arm was selected as a “target lesion”, from where five serial biopsies were taken. The SUM-score, ranging 0-12, is a cumulative clinical severity measure for erythema (0-4), induration (0-4) and desquamation (0-4) of one single target lesion [6]. Before the start of therapy this score was 10.

Clinical results

It was decided to treat her with infliximab 500 mg (5 mg/kg) intravenously over 2 hours, at week 0, 2, 6 and then with maintenance infusions every 8 weeks. The treatment was well tolerated, but the clinical results did not meet our high expectations. During treatment the lesions enlarged to near erythroderma. Involved “body surface area” was 18% at week 0, increasing to 85% at week 22 ( (figure 1) ). ( Figure 2 ) illustrates the PASI- and SUM-scores during infliximab treatment. The SUM-score only decreased by 2 points and PASI increased from 25.4 to 38.8 with the most impressive aggravation during the first two weeks. After the fourth infusion (week 14) the treatment with infliximab was terminated due to the lack of efficacy. Follow-up was performed up to week 22.

Immunohistochemistry and image analysis

Immunohistochemical staining

A non-lesional biopsy, taken at baseline, together with five lesional biopsies, taken at week 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 of infliximab treatment, were embedded in Tissue Tek OCT compound (Miles Scientific, Naperville, USA), instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Staining of the following T-cell subsets was performed: CD4+, CD8+, CD45RO+, CD45RA+, CD2+ and CD25+. Furthermore, cells expressing NK-receptors CD94 and CD161 (NK-T cells), epidermal proliferation (Ki67 positive nuclei) and epidermal differentiation (keratin 10) were assessed.

Sections were sliced 7 μm thick and were air-dried for 30 minutes. Then the sections were fixed in cold acetone for 10 minutes. After blocking 5 minutes for endogenous peroxidase, using 0.2% sodium azide, they were washed in PBS for 10 minutes. Subsequently, they were incubated with the primary antibodies for 1 hour. The following primary antibodies (mouse anti-human) were used, diluted in 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St Louis, USA)/PBS: anti-CD4 (clone MT310) (1:200), anti-CD8 (clone DK25) (1:200), anti-CD45RO (clone UCHL1) (1:100), anti-CD45RA (clone 4KB5) (1:200), anti-CD2 (1:200) (clone MT910), anti-CD25 (clone ACT-1) (1:200), anti-CD94 (clone HP-3D9) (1:100), Ki67 (clone MIB-1) (1:200), (all obtained from DAKO, Copenhagen Denmark), keratin 10 (clone RKSE60) (1:100) (Monosan Laboratories Uden Netherlands) and anti-CD161 (clone 191B8) (1:100) obtained from Immunotech, Marseille, France. Sections were washed in PBS for 15 minutes. Secondary IgG labeled polymer, HRP anti-mouse EnVision+ (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) was added for 30 minutes. The sections were washed again for 15 minutes in PBS. To visualize the staining we used AEC + High Sensitivity Substrate Chromogen for 10 minutes (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark). Counterstaining was performed with Mayer’s Haematoxylin (Sigma, St Louis, USA). The sections were washed in tap water, dried and mounted in glycerol gelatin (Sigma, St Louis, USA).

From each biopsy, we performed a hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. After dehydration in alcohol and histosafe, these sections were mounted in Permount. With these HE-sections, we verified that the histology of biopsies under study were psoriasis-specific.

Quantification

Quantification of T-cell subsets was performed at 200X magnification. In three sections at each time-point, CD4, CD8, CD45RO, CD45RA, CD2, CD25, CD94 and CD161 positive cells in the epidermis were counted from the basement membrane up to the stratum corneum across the whole section (4 mm). Cells in the dermis were counted from the basement membrane down to 100 μm under the basement membrane also across the whole section. The mean cell counts were expressed in “Positive cells per mm skin length” and displayed with standard error of the mean (SEM).

Image analysis

In order to analyze Ki67 positive cells, three representative digital photographs were made at 100× magnification. Each photograph was analyzed using IP-lab software. A line, with known length and following the stratum basale, was drawn after choosing a representative “region of interest” (ROI). All positive cells above this line were counted and expressed in the unit “Positive cells per mm length of basement membrane” (mean ± SEM).

For quantification of K10 positive cells, digital photographs were taken at 50× magnification. Using IP-lab software a defined window (ROI) was set for the analysis of K10, in a representative area of the analyzed sections. The ROI was chosen only in the epidermal compartment and possible dermal tissue in the ROI was subtracted. The total area of the epidermal compartment in the ROI and the K10 positive area were measured using IP-lab software. Epidermal differentiation was defined as: “% K10 positive epidermal surface”. Epidermal thickness was measured in HE sections with the help of IP-lab software, by calculating the means of the 3 smallest and 3 largest vertical lengths of the epidermis, without the stratum corneum.

Immunohistochemical results

T cells

The serial skin biopies revealed conflicting data on T cell subsets. At baseline, all lesional T-cell subsets were more abundantly present in contrast to their non-lesional counterparts. Overall, lesional T cell subsets declined at 2 and 6 weeks after start of treatment, but then rose again towards week 22. The reduction of T cells in lesional skin never reached the values of the non-lesional T-cell counts. The most marked temporary decrease (72-74%) was observed for CD4+ T-helper cells in the dermis at week 2 and 6. At week 2 and 6 a less substantial, but clear reduction was observed in the dermis and epidermis for CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells, CD45RO+ (memory effector) T cells, CD45RA+ (naive) T cells, CD25+ (expressing the interleukin-2 receptor) T cells in the dermis and CD2+ cells (all T cells, but more expression on activated T cells) [1, 6-9].

NK-T cells

In the untreated lesions, cells expressing NK-receptors (NK-T cells) [9-11] were present, whereas these were virtually absent in the non-lesional skin. NK-T cells (CD94+) in the dermis showed a transient decrease at weeks 2 and 6. In the epidermis, however, these cells remarkably increased. The CD161+ cells in the dermis were maximally reduced at week 14, whereas in the epidermis these cells were reduced from week 2 onward ( (figure 3) ).

Epidermal growth and differentiation

Epidermal proliferation and differentiation, as measured by Ki67+ nuclei and keratin 10 positive epidermal area, never reached non-lesional skin values during treatment. In the first two weeks of treatment, an increase in Ki67+ nuclei was observed, together with an increase in K10 expression. After that, these parameters did not show a consistent change during the study. However, in accordance with the reduction of T cells, epidermal thickness substantially decreased from week 0 to week 2 (0.26-0.13 mm) and then gradually increased again toward week 22 (0.21 mm) ( (figure 4) ).

Discussion

In the present case study we observed a clinical deterioration of psoriasis, during 22 weeks of treatment with infliximab (5 mg/kg) given as intravenous infusion at week 0, 2, 6, and 14. Grosso modo, the SUM-score did not change during 22 weeks of treatment, whereas the PASI and in particular the affected “body surface area” increased up to near erythroderma, with the most marked increase during the phase of decrease of T cell subsets. Several studies have shown that as many as 82-88% of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis reach ≥ 75% PASI improvement in 10 weeks of treatment [4, 5]. The clinical response of our patient is in sharp contrast to the response of the vast majority of patients in these clinical studies. This might be due to the facts that (I) this patient has recalcitrant psoriasis of the utmost severity, with poor responses to all treatments, (II) the discontinuation of methotrexate 2 weeks before the institution of infliximab may have accounted for the poor response to the treatment, with aggravation up to near erythroderma, and (III) this patient might have created antibodies against infliximab, neutralizing the infliximab effect.

In contrast to the poor clinical response, a decrease of lesional T cell populations reached minimal levels after 2 and 6 weeks treatment and the most prominent decrease (72-74%) was observed for the CD4+ T-helper subset. Remarkably, the number of epidermal NK-T cells fairly correlated with the lack of clinical efficacy. It was previously reported that anti-TNF-α therapies target CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and natural killer cells [3]. In psoriasis, Gottlieb et al. described a substantial decrease of epidermal CD3+ T cells and a subsequent decrease in keratin 16, for infliximab responders [12]. Also in rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and ankylosing spondylitis significant and fast reductions of CD8+, but mostly CD4+ T cells, was observed in blood following a course of either infliximab or etanercept [3]. In addition, in synovial and colonic biopsies of these patients, infliximab was shown to reduce the (T cell) infiltrate, mainly CD4+ T cells [13, 14]. The differential effects of infliximab on T cells versus NK-T cells has never been studied before.

Nickoloff et al. first described NK-T cells (CD94, CD161) in psoriasis [10, 11]. The CD94 receptors are expressed on most NK-cells and some T cells, whereas CD161 is an obligate NK-T cell marker. It has been shown that a significantly higher number of NK-T cells are present in the psoriatic lesion in comparison to the uninvolved or normal skin. However, it is not clear whether these cells (I) mainly initiate psoriasis, (II) have regulatory properties that might in fact stabilize the psoriatic process, or (III) are just bystander cells. This case report is an independent confirmation that T cells bearing NK-receptors (e.g. NK-T cells) such as CD94 and CD161 are in-fact present within both dermal and epidermal compartments of active psoriatic plaques. The relative impact of infliximab appears to have differential effects on conventional CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells compared to unconventional NK-T cells. The increase in epidermal CD94+ NK-T cells suggest this subset has a pathogenic role, since this finding is accompanied by a lack of clinical improvement. As the present report is a single case, confirmation of our data by larger studies is necessary. Furthermore, a confirmation of another target plaque might be appropriate to interpret the role of lesional T cells. Larger studies might also include the assessment of functional tests and cytokine profiles, both in psoriatic plaques and in peripheral blood. In conclusion, the discrepancy between the clinical aggravation and marked reductions of T cells suggests that a reduction of these cells in the psoriatic plaque might not be a guarantee for positive clinical outcomes. Differences between responders and non-responders to anti-psoriatic therapy, with respect to lesional T cells, NK-T cells and epidermal parameters, might contribute to clarify the ambiguous role of these cells in plaque psoriasis.

References

1 Krueger JG. The immunologic basis for the treatment of psoriasis with new biologic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 1-23.

2 Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariotti, Dattilo C, Girolomoni G. Chemokine networks in inflammatory skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14(4): 203-8.

3 Schottelius AJ, Moldawer LL, Dinarello CA, Asadullah K, Sterry W, Edwards III CK. Biology of tumor necrosis factor-α – implications for psoriasis. Exp Dermatol 2004; 13: 193-222.

4 Chaudhari U, Romano P, Mulcahy LD, et al. Efficacy and safety of infliximab monotherapy for plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1842-7.

5 Gottlieb AB, Evans R, Li S, et al. Infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 534-42.

6 Bovenschen HJ, Seyger MM, van de Kerkhof PC. Plaque psoriasis versus atopic dermatitis and lichen planus: A comparison for lesional T cell subsets, epidermal proliferation and differentiation. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153(1): 72-8.

7 Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis – oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica 1978; 157: 238-44.

8 Bos JD, Zonneveld I, Das PK, et al. The skin immune system (SIS): distribution and immunophenotype of lymphocyte subpopulations in normal human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1987; 88: 569-73.

9 Vissers WH, Roelofzen J, De Jong EM, Van Erp PE, Van de Kerkhof PC. Flexural versus plaque lesions in psoriasis: an immunohistochemical differentiation. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15(1): 13-7.

10 Nickoloff BJ, Wrone-Smith T, Bonish B, Porcelli SA. Response of murine and normal skin to injection of allogeneic blood-derived psoriatic immunocytes: detection of T cells expressing receptors typically present on natural killer cells including CD94, CD158, and CD161. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 546-52.

11 Nickoloff BJ. Skin innate immune system in psoriasis: friend or foe? J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 1161-4.

12 Gottlieb AB, Masud S, Ramamurthi R, et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody (infliximab) treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 68-75.

13 Van Deventer SJ. Transmembrane TNF-alpha, induction of apoptosis, and the efficacy of TNF-targeting therapies in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1242-6.

14 Smeets TJ, Kraan MC, van Loon ME, Tak PP. Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade reduces the synovial cell infiltrate early after initiation of treatment, but apparently not by induction of apoptosis in synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 2155-62.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]