ARTICLE
Auteur(s) :, Marie-Anne Bouldouyre1,
Marie-Françoise Avril2, Alain Gaulier3, Michèle
Sigal-Grinberg1,*
1Department of dermatology, Victor Dupouy Hospital,
69 rue du Lieutenant colonel Prudhon, 95 107 Argenteuil, France
2Department of dermatology, Gustave Roussy Institute,
Villejuif, France
3Department of pathology, Victor Dupouy Hospital, 69 rue
du Lieutenant colonel Prudhon, 95 107 Argenteuil, France
accepté le 8 Octobre 2004
Cutaneous side-effects of long term use of hydroxyurea (HU) are now
well described. We report the first case of a neuroendocrine
carcinoma located on the finger associated with other cutaneous
changes of the hands due to this antimetabolic drug.
Case report
Our patient, born in 1932, skin type 2 according to Fitzpatrick’s
classification, lived in Algeria during her childhood. She had no
contact with arsenic. An asymptomatic essential thrombocytemia was
discovered in 1989, and she was treated with HU. This treatment was
stopped after 2 years (cumulated dose: 624 g) because of
adverse cutaneous manifestations typically known as a
dermatomyositis-like eruption. Then, she received busulfan for few
months (cumulated dose: 232 mg), discontinued for bad
hematologic tolerance. The blood cell count remained normal for 8
years, without any additional treatment: this evolution is unusual
for a myeloproliferative syndrome, so the diagnosis may have been
wrong.
She was seen again in 1994 because of multiple keratotic lesions
on the dorsum of both hands. Biopsies of the most important lesions
showed four intra-epithelial carcinomas and an invasive one.
Surgical excisions of all five carcinomas were pathologically
complete. Retinoic acid (acitretine) was given for two years, and
did not prevent development of new keratotic lesions.
In fact, she came back in 1996 with 15 new keratosic lesions:
the lesions were located on the dorsum of the fingers, and the
dorsum of the hands; some on them were on the border of previous
scars, and the others on the poikilodermic skin, spared before.
Surgical excision was considered difficult, and local chemotherapy
by 5 fluoro-uracile (5-FU) was applied until 1999 with
stabilization.
In January 2000, she came in emergency because of two suspicious
lesions. The first lesion, located on the back of the left hand,
was circular, thick and scabby, with local inflammation: the biopsy
revealed an actinic keratosis. The second lesion, which grew up
quickly in 4 months was located on the lateral side of the
3rd left finger and had a similar aspect: a scabby thick
lesion about 1.5 cm in diameter ( (figure 1) ), and appeared
to be a neuroendocrine carcinoma. Pathologic examination of the
biopsy showed a tumoral trabecular proliferation, close to a
hyperplasic epithelium ( (figure 2) ). The
trabecular proliferation was composed of small cells expressing
neuron specific enolase and pancytokeratin AE1-AE3 after
immunohistochemical staining, with typical dot-like paranuclear
reactivity ( (figure
3) ). Chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound did not show any
visceral involvement. Regional nodes (i.e. axillary) were not
palpable. A trans-metacarpus amputation was performed.
During 2001, she presented new actinic keratosis and a squamous
cell carcinoma which were removed. She also developed an
epitrochlear lymph-node metastasis of the neuroendocrine
carcinoma.This lymph-node was treated by surgical excision followed
by radiotherapy (50 Grays). In March 2002, 3 metastasis were
detected in the liver: they were not biopsed, but were supposed and
treated as if they were Merckel cell carcinoma metastasis. Serum
neuron specific enolase was increased. Systemic chemotherapy by
cysplatin and etoposide was administered. Unfortunately, she died
in March 2003.
Discussion
This is the first description of a Merkel cell carcinoma associated
to well known cutaneous side-effects of long term use of HU.
HU is an effective antimitotic drug used in myeloproliferative
syndromes, such as chronic myelogenous leukemia, polycythemia rubra
vera and thrombocytemia. This useful drug is usually well tolerated
with few hematological side-effects, and is easily dosed,
relatively inexpensive, presenting few contraindications and
subjective side-effects [1].
Cutaneous manifestations have been reported: partial alopecia,
increased pigmentation, scaling, dryness, nail changes, erythema of
the face and hands, atrophy of the skin and subcutaneous tissues
[2], dermatomyositis like eruption [3, 4], plantar keratoderma
[5].
More recently, many authors described the association of HU
toxidermia and development of multiple actinic keratosis and
squamous cell carcinoma, and less frequently basal cell carcinoma.
About 14 patients have been reported [6-13].
An Italian retrospective study identified 5 squamous cell
carcinomas in 21 patients with severe cutaneous and mucosal
changes, among a sample of 158 followed because of long term HU
therapy [14]. A prospective French study involving 26 patients who
had been treated by HU, identified 25 patients with cutaneous
lesions (including xerosis) related to HU including 8 keratosis and
2 squamous cell carcinoma [15]. Keratoses usually appear 2 to 6
years after introduction of HU, they are multiple and extend very
rapidly.
The lesions seem to result from the cumulative toxicity of HU on
the basal layer of the epidermis. HU is a potent inhibitor of DNA
synthesis and in vitro it induces chromosome damage and inhibition
of DNA repair in ultraviolet-irradiated human cell [16]. Skin
atrophy induced by HU (due to increased sensitivity of the skin to
antimetabolites because of high turn over) may increase the action
of ultraviolets on the basal layer [17].
Conclusion
The association of a Merkel cell carcinoma to well known cutaneous
side-effects of HU (dermatomyositis-like changes, multiple
keratosis and squamous cell carcinomas) has not been previously
reported. The Merckel cell carcinoma was not histologically
associated with squamous cell carcinoma or actinic changes but only
with hyperkeratotic changes of the epidermis.
The role of HU remains speculative, either on well known actinic
keratosis or cutaneous carcinoma. Concerning the Merckel cell
carcinoma, imputing an inducing role of HU has to be very carefully
speculated.
References
1 Boyd A, Nelder K. Hydroxyurea therapy. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1991; 25: 518-24.
2 Kennedy B, Smith L, Goltz R. Skin changes
secondary to hydroxyurea therapy. Arch Dermatol 1975; 111:
183-7.
3 Senet P, Aractingi S, Porneuf M, Perrin P,
Duterque M. Hydroxyurea-induced dermatomyositis-like eruption.
Br J Dermatol 1995; 133: 455-9.
4 Oskay T, Kutluay L, Ozyilkan O.
Dermatomyositis-like eruption after long-term hydroxyurea therapy
for polycythemia vera. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 586-8.
5 Sigal M, Crickx B, Blanchet P, Perron J,
Simony J, Belaich S. Lésions cutanées induites par
l’utilisation au long cours de l’hydroxyurée. Ann Dermatol Venereol
1984; 111: 895-900.
6 Grange F, Couillet D, Audhuy B, Krzisch S,
Schlecht P, Guillaume JC. Keratoses multiples induites
par l’hydroxyurée. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1995; 122: 16-8.
7 Salmon-Ehr V, Grosieux C, Potron G. Multiple
actinic keratosis and skin tumors secondary to hydroxyurea
treatment. Dermatology 1998; 196: 274.
8 Papi M, Didona B, DePita O, Abruzzesz E,
Stasi R, Papa G, et al. Multiple skin tumors on
light-exposed areas during long-term treatment with hydroxyurea. J
Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 485-6.
9 Best P, Petitt R. Multiple skin cancers associated
with hydroxyurea therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 961-3.
10 Callot-Mellot C, Bodemer C, Chosidow O,
Frances C, Azgui Z, Varet B, et al. Cutaneous
carcinoma during long term hydroxyurea therapy: A report of 5
cases. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 1395-7.
11 De Simone C, Guerriero C, Guidi B,
Rotoli M, Venier A, Tartaglione R. Multiple squamous
cell carcinomas of the skin during long term treatment with
hydroxyurea. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 8: 114-5.
12 Esteve E, Georgescu V, Heitzman P,
Martin L. Carcinomes cutanés et buccaux multiples après
traitement par hydroxyurée. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2001; 128:
919-21.
13 Kelly R, Bull R, Marsden A. Cutaneous
manifestations of long-term hydroxyurea therapy. Australas J
Dermatol 1994; 35: 61-4.
14 Vassallo C, Passamonti F, Merante S,
Ardigo M, Nolli G, Mangiacavalli S, et al.
Muco-cutaneous changes during long-term therapy with hydroxyurea in
chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26: 141-8.
15 Salmon-Ehr V, Leborgne G, Vilque JP,
Potron G, Bernard P. Effets secondaires de l’hydroxyurée:
étude prospective de 26 patients consultant dans un service de
dermatologie. Rev Med Interne 2000; 21: 30-4.
16 Francis A, Blevins R, Carrier W. Inhibition of
DNA repair in ultraviolet-irradiated human cells by hydroxyurea.
Biochim Biophys Acta 1979; 563: 385-92.
17 Stasi R, Cantonetti M, Abruzzese E,
Papi M, Didona B, Cavalieri R. Multiple squamous
cell carcinomas of the skin during long term treatment with
hydroxyurea. Eur J Haematol 1992; 48: 121-2.
|