ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Salih ÇETINER, Turna ILKNUR, Şebnem ÖZKAN
Dokuz Eyll niversitesi Tip Fakltesi Dermatoloji Anabilim Dali
Inciraltý, 35340, Izmir, Trkiye
Article accepted on 19/04/2004
Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin diseases, seen
primarily in adolescents, involving the pilosebaceous unit. The
lesions in acne vulgaris are seen frequently on sun exposed areas
such as the face [1, 2]. Sunburn is due to acute overexposure of
ultraviolet irradiation. The doses of UVA required to produce
erythema are approximately 1000 times greater than UVB but
because natural sunlight contains 100 times more UVA than UVB,
UVA represents only 10% of sunburn producing rays. Therefore, the
relatively small UVB component of solar ultraviolet radiation
accounts for the majority of sunburn reactions [3].
There are few studies which have investigated the interaction
between topical agents and UVB penetration. In these studies,
topical agents used for psoriasis treatment have usually been
chosen since they could be used in conjunction with UVB therapy.
Some studies have shown blocking effects of topical agents on UVB
penetration [4-11]. However, the use of some lubricants applied
prior to UVB treatment have been found to have enhancing effects on
the penetration of light into psoriatic plaques [4, 12].
Since acne vulgaris is frequently localized on sun exposed
areas, the enhancing effects of topical agents on UVB penetration
are important. In this study, we tried to investigate whether
azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide and adapalene have either blocking
or enhancing effects on UVB penetration.
Material and methods
In this single-blind study, phototesting was performed on
30 volunteers to determine the minimal erythema dose (MED) for
UVB. This protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of
the Dokuz Eyll University Faculty of Medicine. All participants
were informed and consent forms were obtained. The patients were
untanned and not taking any medication. Waldmann 8001 K
(Waldmann Lichttecnik Gmbtt, Schwenningen, Germany) cabin was used
for the light source of UVB.
The beginning doses of UVB phototesting were determined according
to Fitzpatrick skin types: 2 volunteers had skin phototype II,
19 volunteers had skin phototype III, 8 volunteers had
skin phototype IV, 1 volunteer had skin phototype V. The
irradiated doses for UVB were up to 120 mJ/cm2 for
skin types I and II, 140 mJ/cm2 for skin types III
and IV and 200 mJ/cm2 for skin type V [13]. MED
values were determined by irradiating 4 cm2 of
uninvolved skin on the back of each patient at increments of
20 mJ/cm2 in one row. In addition, seven parallel
rows of skin were tested after application of different topical
agents. The first rows were only irradiated by UVB without
application of any topical agent to determine the MED. A thin
(0.1 cc/25 cm2) and a thick
(0.3 cc/25 cm2) layer of 20% azelaic acid
cream (Skinoren cream®), a thin
(0.1 cc/25 cm2) and a thick
(0.3 cc/25 cm2) layer of 5% benzoyl peroxide
gel (5% Benzac AC gel®), a thin
(0.1 cc/25 cm2) and a thick
(0.3 cc/25 cm2) layer of 0.1% adapalene gel
(Differin gel®) were applied respectively to the
adjacent parallel rows. In each patient the rows of topical agent
applications were exchanged. Then all the rows were irradiated with
UVB at increments of 20 mJ/cm2 immediately after
the application of the agents without waiting. The results were
evaluated after 24 hrs by a blinded investigator and MED
values were determined (Fig. 1). Wilcoxon
signed ranks test was used for statistical analysis.
Bonferroni-corrected significance level of
p < 0.0033 was considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
The results of phototesting of all patients with pure UVB, with
the application of thin and thick layers of azelaic acid cream,
thin and thick layers of benzoyl peroxide gel and thin and thick
layers of adapalene gel are shown in Table I.
Table I. MEDs of
volunteers (n = 30)
| |
MED
(mJ/cm2) |
| Preparation |
Range |
Mean ± SD |
| UVB without any agent |
60-160 |
74.7 ± 24.6 |
| Thin azelaic acid cream |
60-160 |
75.3 ± 23.3 |
| Thick azelaic acid cream |
60-160 |
74.0 ± 21.8 |
| Thin benzoylperoxide gel |
60-160 |
74.0 ± 21.8 |
| Thick benzoylperoxide gel |
60-160 |
74.7 ± 23.4 |
| Thin adapalen gel |
60-160 |
75.3 ± 23.3 |
| Thick adapalen gel |
60-160 |
76.7 ± 23.5 |
SD, Standard deviation
The MED values detected after the application of thin and thick
layers of azelaic acid cream, thin and thick layers of benzoyl
peroxide gel and thin and thick layers of adapalene gel have not
been found significantly different from the MED values after pure
UVB (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, p > 0.0033). These
results indicated that MED values were unaffected by azelaic acid
cream, benzoyl peroxide gel and adapalene gel.
There was no statistically significant difference between the MED
values of thin and thick applications of azelaic acid cream,
between the MED values of thin and thick applications of benzoyl
peroxide gel and between the MED values of thin and thick
applications of adapalene gel. In addition the differences between
the MED values after the applications of thin azelaic acid cream
and thin benzoyl peroxide gel, thin azelaic acid cream and thin
adapalene gel, thin benzoyl peroxide gel and thin adapalene gel,
thick azelaic acid cream and thick benzoyl peroxide gel, thick
azelaic acid cream and thick adapalene gel, thick benzoyl peroxide
gel and thick adapalene gel were not found to be statistically
significant. The results of the “Wilcoxon signed ranks test” of all
the paired groups are shown in Table II.
Table II. Wilcoxon signed
ranks test (p < 0.0033)
|
Paired groups
|
Mean ± SD |
t |
Significance |
| UVB-AA |
– 0.667 ± 6.397 |
– 0.571 |
0.573 |
| UVB-TAA |
0.667 ± 8.277 |
0.441 |
0.662 |
| UVB-BP |
0.667 ± 9.803 |
0.372 |
0.712 |
| UVB-TBP |
0.000 ± 11.744 |
0.000 |
1.000 |
| UVB-AP |
– 0.667 ± 14.368 |
– 0.254 |
0.801 |
| UVB-TAP |
– 2.000 ± 14.240 |
– 0.769 |
0.448 |
| AA-TAA |
1.333 ± 5.074 |
1.439 |
0.161 |
| BP-TBP |
– 0.667 ± 6.397 |
– 0.571 |
0.573 |
| AP-TAP |
– 1.333 ± 7.303 |
– 1.000 |
0.326 |
| AA-BP |
1.333 ± 5.074 |
1.439 |
0.161 |
| AA-AP |
0.000 ± 12.865 |
0.000 |
1.000 |
| BP-AP |
– 1.333 ± 11.666 |
– 0.626 |
0.536 |
| TAA-TBP |
– 667 ± 8.277 |
– 0.441 |
0.662 |
| TAA-TAP |
– 2.667 ± 11.427 |
– 1.278 |
0.211 |
| TBP-TAP |
– 2.000 ± 12.148 |
– 0.902 |
0.375 |
(UVB: UVB without any agent, AA: Thin azelaic acid cream, TAA:
Thick azelaic acid cream, BP: Thin benzoyl peroxide gel, TBP: Thick
benzoyl peroxide gel, AP: Thin adapalene gel, TAP: Thick adapalene
gel)
SD, Standard deviation
Discussion
Retinoids including tretinoin, isotretinoin, adapalene and
tazarotene, azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid and
antibiotics such as erythromycin, clindamycin and tetracycline are
major topical agents for treating acne vulgaris. The lesions in
acne vulgaris are frequently localized on sun exposed areas such as
the face [1, 2]. Thus, the effects of these topical agents on UVB
penetration can be important since they are used on sunlight
exposed areas.
Products containing salicylic acid which is a keratolytic agent,
can also be used for the treatment of acne vulgaris [1, 2]. The
potential effects of salicylic acid at different concentrations (2,
3, 5, 6, 10, 20%) on UVB penetration have been investigated in
several in vitro and in vivo studies. These studies
have shown that salicylic acid blocked transmission of UVB light at
all concentrations when applied prior to irradiation [4, 5, 7, 11].
In an in vivo study, Kristensen et al. [4] showed
that salicylic acid had a dose-dependent inhibiting influence on
UVB. In the same study, the duration of photoprotection after
application of salicylic acid was found to be for at least
12 hrs, sometimes more than 24 hrs. According to these
studies, salicylic acid can be used on sun exposed areas in day
time since it had a blocking effect on UVB.
Jeanmougin and Civatte [14] investigated benzoyl peroxide
phototoxicity by photoepidermotests after repeated applications.
They found 10% benzoyl peroxide gel to be phototoxic in eight out
of 18 subjects tested. On the other hand, we could not detect
any phototoxic effect with 5% benzoyl peroxide gel when applied
immediately before UVB. Two reasons might be responsible for this
result. The difference might be because of the lower concentration
of benzoyl peroxide (5%) used in our study and the possibility of
phototoxicity for a substance in higher concentration is also
higher. Also, in their study Jeanmougin and Civatte performed
repeated applications of benzoyl peroxide while in our study we
applied the substance only once before UVB.
In the literature, we could not find any study investigating the
interaction between topical azelaic acid, adapalene and UVB.
However, there were a few studies dealing with topical tretinoin
and tazarotene belonging to synthetic retinoid family which can be
used for acne vulgaris treatment [1, 2]. Kornreich et al.
[7] measured the absorbance of tretinoin cream in different
concentrations (0.025, 0.05, 0.1%) and 0.01% tretinoin gel between
the wavelengths 260 to 400 nm, with an ex vivo
technique. They found that tretinoin had substantial absorption in
the UVA range. In addition they determined that the absorbance of
tretinoin preparations was concentration-dependent, with higher
values for more concentrated formulations. Smit et al. [15]
evaluated the MED for UVB on 0.05% tretinoin cream in an in
vivo study. They showed that topical treatment with 0.05%
tretinoin cream for several days before UVB, did not change the
MED. Hecker et al. [16] showed that while thin application
of 0.1% tazarotene gel immediately before phototherapy had no
significant effect on MED, thick application of the gel increased
MED values slightly. They also reported that pretreatment with 0.1%
tazarotene gel 3 times per week for 2 weeks before UVB
had significantly reduced the MED. In our study, 0.1% adapalene gel
both in thin and thick forms applied immediately before UVB did not
show any significant effects on UVB.
In this study, we did not observe any blocking or enhancing
effects of azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide and adapalene on UVB
penetration when applied immediately before UVB. On the other hand
further studies examining the effects of UVB on skin pretreated
with these topical agents for different periods in clinical trials
is necessary. n
References
1. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH, Burgdorf WHC.
Dermatology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000: 1051-81.
2. Strauss JS, Thiboutot DM. Diseases of the
sebaceous glands. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF,
Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Fitzpatrick TB, eds. Fitzpatrick’s
Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York: Mc Graw
Hill, 1999: 769-84.
3. Wharton JR, Cockerell CJ. The sun: a friend and
enemy. Clin Dermatol 1998; 16: 415-9.
4. Kristensen B, Kristensen O. Topical salicylic
acid interferes with UVB therapy for psoriasis. Acta Derm
Venereol (Stockh) 1991; 71: 37-40.
5. Lebwohl M, Martinez J, Weber P, DeLuca R. Effects
of topical preparations on the erythemogenicity of UVB:
implications for psoriasis phototherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol
1995; 32: 469-71.
6. Marsico RE, Dijkstra JWE. UVB blocking effect of
calcipotriene ointment 0.005%. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 36:
539-40.
7. Kornreich C, Zheng ZS, Xue GZ, Prystowsky JH. A
simple method to predict whether topical agents will interfere with
phototherapy. Cutis 1996; 57: 113-8.
8. Lebwohl M, Hecker D, Martinez J, Sapadin A, Patel
B. Interactions between calcipotriene and ultraviolet light. J
Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 93-5.
9. Youn JI, Park BS, Chung JH, Lee JH.
Photoprotective effect of calcipotriol upon skin photoreaction to
UVA and UVB. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1997; 13:
109-14.
10. De Rie MA, Di Nuzzo S, Brands S, Hansen AB, Bos
JD. Calcipotriol ointment and cream or their vehicles applied
immediately before irradiation inhibit ultraviolet B-induced
erythema. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 1160-5.
11. Fetil E, Özkan Ş, Soyal MC, Ýlknur T, Erdem Y,
Gneş AT. Effects of topical petrolatum and salicylic acid on the
erythemogenicity of UVB. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 154-6.
12. Berne B, Blom I, Spangberg S. Enhanced response
of psoriasis to UVB therapy after pretreatment with a lubricating
base. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1990; 70: 474-7.
13. Nee TS. Phototherapy. Clin Dermatol 1997;
15: 753-67.
14. Jeanmougin M, Civatte J. Prediction of benzoyl
peroxide phototoxicity by photoepidermotests after repeated
applications. Preventive value of a UVB filter. Arch Dermatol
Res 1988; 280 (Suppl.): 90-3.
15. Smit JV, de Jong EMGJ, de Jong GJ, van de
Kerkhof PCM. Topical all-trans retinoic acid does not influence
minimal erythema doses for UVB light in normal skin. Acta Derm
Venereol 2000; 80: 66-7.
16. Hecker D, Worsley J, Yueh G, Kuroda K, Lebwohl
M. Interactions between tazarotene and ultraviolet light. J Am
Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 927-30.
|