Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable

Scleromyxedema is a scleroderma-like disorder and not a coexistance of scleroderma with papular mucinosis


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 9, Numéro 7, 551-4, October - November 1999, Cas cliniques


Summary  

Auteur(s) : S. Jablonska, M. Blaszczyk, Department of Dermatology, Warsaw School of Medicine, Koszykowa 82a, 02-008 Warsaw, Poland..

Illustrations

ARTICLE

Scleroderma-like disorders can present diagnostic difficulties since not infrequently they imitate scleroderma to such an extent that the diagnosis is quite arbitrary. However the causative factors and pathogenesis of scleroderma and scleroderma-like diseases differ considerably. The familiarity with pseudosclerodermatous diseases is of practical importance for establishing the association with internal involvement, thus for application of an appropriate therapy [1, 2]. One of such controversial scleroderma-like diseases is scleromyxedema, regarded by some authors as a coexistence of papular mucinosis and scleroderma [3].

The term scleromyxedema was coined by Gottron [4] to emphasize the clinical similarity to scleroderma (SSc): masklike facies and sclerodactyly, and, on the other hand, mucoid deposits in the skin. The cutaneous lesions are composed of small, often perifollicular erythematous papules of papular mucinosis type, not infrequently in a characteristic linear arrangement, forming confluent plaques with marked thickening of the skin. Clinically the folded, pendulous and thickened skin gives the impression of being too ample, in contrast to the sclerotic skin in scleroderma, which seems to be too tight, bound closely to the underlying tissue.

In contrast to scleroderma, histological examination reveals abundant fibroblasts in the dermis, often also surrounding hair follicles, with mucin deposits pushing aside the collagen bundles. A large number of the reported cases were associated with paraproteinemia of IgG class, mostly of lambda type, with no symptoms of myeloma [5]. Although the disease in several instances is limited to the skin, systemic manifestations (neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal) are not uncommon, however usually differing from the abnormalities in SSc [5-9]. Of special significance for differentiation from scleroderma could be a not-infrequent central nervous system involvement, sometimes acute psychosis [3, 10].

The disease is easily recognized, although in some longlasting cases skin indurations may be as pronounced as in diffuse scleroderma with sclerodactyly, masklike facies, esophageal involvement, myositis, etc. [7, 11]. Vascular changes, mainly of atherosclerosis type, might cause hyperesthesia and paresthesia of the limbs, mimicking Raynaud's phenomenon. However the course of the disease, with possible spontaneous resolution, the type of systemic involvement, and the therapies differ considerably from scleroderma. In spite of some reports of good results with the therapies also used in scleroderma: cyclophosphamide [12], corticosteroids [10] and melphalan [13], all these treatment modalities are frequently disappointing. However, in our experience intravenous immunoglobulins proved to be highly effective, especially in cases associated with paraproteinemia. Therefore the differentiation between scleromyxedema and systemic scleroderma is of practical significance, and is both necessary and feasible.

The patients

We observed 4 cases of scleromyxedema with advanced skin sclerosis: 2 males and 2 females, followed-up for several, up to more than ten, years. Overall, sclerosis developed progressively, with striking similarity to scleroderma, however without osteolysis and the visceral involvement characteristic of SSc.

In the first patient, a male, 53-year-old, in whom the disease started 10 years previously, the skin of the trunk was thickened and typically folded, in spite of pronounced sclerodactyly and sclerosis of the face (Fig. 1a, b). The second patient, a male, 56-year-old, had widespread cystic lesions on the face and ears, an important sign, of diagnostic significance (Fig. 2). In both patients paraproteinemia was of IgG lambda type, revealed in the second case several years after the onset of the disease.

The third patient, a 42-year-old female, in whom the erythematous lesions had appeared at the age of 29 years and skin sclerosis at the age of 32 years, was previously recognized and treated as diffuse SSc in spite of masklike facies with ectropion and elevated, skin-colored papules and cysts on the forehead (Fig. 3a, b). She complained of swallowing difficulties, but esophagus did not show abnormal peristalsis. She had also moderate myositis confirmed by electromyography. No paraproteinemia was detected within 10 years of her illness.

In the fourth patient, a female 62-year-old, sclerotic changes present for 7 years involved the whole trunk, facies and hands, with nodules characteristic of scleromyxedema in the retroauricular area. For one year she had also myositis confirmed by quantitative EMG, histology and high levels of CPK. The therapy with corticosteroids was only effective for the muscle involvement but did not affect the cutaneous lesions. Also in this patient, paraproteinemia was not revealed within 7 years of illness.

In all four patients skin biopsies showed proliferation of fibroblasts and mucin deposits in the dermis positive for Alcian blue stain 2.5 pH and almost negative after digestion with hyaluronidase (Fig. 4).

Comment

The clinical similarity of all our patients to scleroderma was quite striking, however there were no vascular changes, and sclerodactyly with no osteolysis and digital ulcers was secondary to the fibrosis. Histopathology showed proliferation of fibroblasts and mucin deposition, whereas in scleroderma sclerosis of the connective tissue stroma is due to compact collagen bundles and is preceded by inflammatory and vascular changes. Sera of patients with scleromyxedema stimulate fibroblast proliferation [14], but not the glycosaminoglycan synthesis [15], whereas mucin appears to be produced mainly locally by fibroblasts. Also the internal involvement in scleromyxedema is due to mucopolysaccharide (mainly hyaluronic acid) deposition between interweaving bundles of spindle shaped fibroblasts and thick collagen bundles, while in scleroderma there is no proliferation of fibroblasts. Nevertheless some clinical signs, e.g. pulmonary hypertension, restrictive pulmonary disease and decreased motility of the esophagus might be indistinguishable. The fatal case described as coexistence of scleromyxedema and kidney scleroderma [10] showed renal glomerular changes characteristic of scleroderma. However, at autopsy no signs of scleroderma were disclosed in internal organs. The patient had uncontrolled hypertension and acute psychosis which could be related to hypertension since no pathological brain changes were revealed at the autopsy. It should be stressed that pathological features of the kidney in malignant hypertension may display a striking similarity to scleroderma kidney [16]. Therefore the pattern of renal changes may not be decisive in the differentiation between scleroderma and hypertension. In a case also recognized as the coexistence of papular mucinosis and scleroderma [3] slight cutaneous changes at the onset of the disease were accompanied by psychic disturbances. Raynaud's phenomenon with capillaroscopic abnormalities, some dilatation of the esophagus and ANA of speckled pattern and unknown specificity were interpreted as compatible with scleroderma. However clinical and histological features were characteristic of scleromyxedema. Importantly, both central nervous system involvement and a mild course would favor the diagnosis of scleromyxedema with pronounced sclerodermatous changes. Even in cases mimicking scleroderma the main pathological process remains unchanged: proliferation of stellate fibroblasts, mucin deposition in the skin, sometimes also in internal organs and in the vessel walls.

Paraproteinemia without symptoms of myeloma is a most characteristic finding although not present in all cases. The skin morphology and pathology, the type of visceral involvement, if present, association with monoclonal protein in the majority of cases, a possible central nervous system involvement, a chronic unpredictable course of the disease with reported spontaneous remissions [17, 18] provide the basis for differentiation from scleroderma. Thus scleromyxedema should be regarded as a separate entity with more or less pronounced scleroderma-like features.

REFERENCES

1. Jablonska S, Blaszczyk M. Differential diagnosis of scleroderma-like disorders. In: Clements PJ, Furst DE, eds. Systemic sclerosis. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1995: 99-120.

2. Jablonska S, Blaszczyk M. Scleroderma-like disorders. Sem Cutaneous Med Surg 1998; 17: 65-76.

3. Sawada Y, Seishima M, Funabashi M, Noda T, Maeda M, Kitajima Y. Papular mucinosis associated with scleroderma. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 8: 497-500.

4. Gottron HA. Skleromyxedem (eine eigenartige Erscheinungsform von Myxothesaurodermie). Arch Dermatol 1954; 199: 71-91.

5. Harris AO, Altman AR, Tschen JA, Wolf JE. Scleromyxedema: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 1989; 28: 661-7.

6. Verity MA, Toop J, McAdam LP, Pearson CM. Scleromyxedema myopathy: histochemical and electron microscopic observations. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69: 446-51.

7. Fudman EJ, Golbus J, Ike RW. Scleromyxedema with systemic involvement mimics rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 913-7.

8. Gabriel SE, Perry HO, Oleson GB, Bowles CA. Scleromyxedema: a scleroderma-like disorder with systemic manifestations. Medicine 1988; 67: 58-65.

9. Goodby A, Bergstresser PR, Chaker B, Pandya AG. Fatal scleromyxedema: report of a case and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 289-94.

10. Kantor GR, Bergfeld WF, Katzin WE, Reynolds OD, Biscardi AP, Lobur DM, et al. Scleromyxedema associated with scleroderma renal disease and acute psychosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 14: 879-88.

11. McAdam LP, Pearson CM, Pitts WH, Sadoff L, Verity MA. Papular mucinosis with myopathy, arthritis, and eosinophilia: a histopathologic study. Arthritis Rheum 1977; 20: 989-95.

12. Howsden SM, Herndon JH Jr, Freeman RG. Lichen myxedematosus: a dermal infiltrative disorder responsive to cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch Dermatol 1975; 111: 1325-30.

13. Harris RB, Perry HO, Kyle RA, Winkelmann RK. Treatment of scleromyxedema with melphalan. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115: 295-9.

14. Harper RA, Rispler J. Lichen myxedematosus serum stimulates human skin fibroblast proliferation. Science 1978; 188: 545-7.

15. Ferrarini M, Helfrich DJ, Walker ER, Medsger TA, Whiteside TL. Scleromyxedema serum increases proliferation but not the glycosaminoglycan synthesis of dermal fibroblasts. J Rheumatol 1989; 16: 837-41.

16. Jablonska S. Scleroderma and Pseudoscleroderma. Warsaw : Polish Med Publ, English edition (Dowden Hutchinson Ross Inc. Stroudsburg Pa), 1975.

17. Hardie RA, Hunter JAA, Urbaniak S, Habeshaw JA. Spontaneous resolution of lichen myxoedematosus. Br J Dermatol 1979; 100: 727-30.

18. Boffa MJ, Ead RD. Spontaneous improvement of scleromyxedema. Clin Exp Dermatol 1995; 20: 157-60.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]