Accueil > Revues > Médecine > European Journal of Dermatology > Texte intégral de l'article
 
      Recherche avancée    Panier    English version 
 
Nouveautés
Catalogue/Recherche
Collections
Toutes les revues
Médecine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Numéro en cours
- Archives
- S'abonner
- Commander un       numéro
- Plus d'infos
Biologie et recherche
Santé publique
Agronomie et Biotech.
Mon compte
Mot de passe oublié ?
Activer mon compte
S'abonner
Licences IP
- Mode d'emploi
- Demande de devis
- Contrat de licence
Commander un numéro
Articles à la carte
Newsletters
Publier chez JLE
Revues
Ouvrages
Espace annonceurs
Droits étrangers
Diffuseurs



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Version imprimable

Generalized granuloma annulare and hepatitis B vaccination


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 8, Numéro 6, 435-6, September 1998, Cas cliniques


Summary  

Auteur(s) : François WOLF, Pierre GREZARD, Frédéric BERARD, Gilles CLAVEL, Henri PERROT, Dermatology department, Hôpital de l’Antiquaille, rue de l’Antiquaille, 69321 Lyon Cedex 05, France..

Illustrations

ARTICLE

Tolerance of the hepatitis B vaccination is usually good. The most frequent skin complications are short-lived, local reactions. Severe general reactions occur in less than 1/1,000 cases [1]. Since 1995, the generalization of vaccination to the whole of the French population, with the aim of eradicating hepatitis B, has increased the incidence of these side effects. Many cutaneous side effects connected with hepatitis B vaccination have been reported in the literature [2]. We report a case of generalized granuloma annulare (GGA), occurring following hepatitis B vaccination with the recombinant vaccine GenHevac B Pasteur®.

Observation

Mrs M-F.S, born in 1946, a hospital auxiliary, with no previous remarkable medical history, received into the right deltoid area, at monthly intervals, the three prescribed injections of the hepatitis B vaccination in 1986 and one year later the booster injection with the GenHevac B Pasteur® vaccine. One month after the last booster, a disseminated, non-pruriginous eruption with small, orange/flesh coloured, non-annular papules appeared on the upper extremities then on the trunk and the lower extremities (Fig. 1 and 2). The lesions persisted until June 1991. Two skin biopsies carried out respectively in September 1988 and June 1991 led to a diagnosis of granuloma annulare (GA). They showed, under a normal epidermis, areas of necrobiosis and a dense infiltrate composed of histiocytes and many giant cells. A lymphocytic infiltrate which was sometimes nodular surrounded the vessels, the walls of which were not altered. These abnormalities involved all of the upper and middle dermis (Fig. 3). With fasting glycemia, the thyroid hormones were normal and there was good immunity against hepatitis B (anti-Hbs antibodies > 10 I.U. Ag HbS < 0. Ag HbC < 0). HIV serodiagnosis was negative. Treatment with Dapsone at doses of 50 mg was started in June 91. This brought about a complete regression of the lesions within 4 months and was continued until April 1992 with no relapse when it was stopped. In April 1993, another injection of Genhevac B Pasteur® was given (5 year booster). Three weeks later an eruptive relapse of GA appeared on the central chest and back and the upper limbs. Fifty mg of Dapsone per day for two months, then 100 mg per day, was not effective. The lesions then regressed slowly and had completely disappeared by December 1994.

Discussion

GGA has been studied by Dabski and Winkelmann [3]. It is distinguished from the localized form by its extent and, its axial topography. GGA affects older patients with a more chronic course which is resistant to treatment, and an association with diabetes mellitus in 21% of cases. To our knowledge, the association of GGA and hepatitis B vaccination, or even GA and hepatitis B, has never been reported.

The pathogenesis and the etiology of GA are still not well understood. Morhenn suggests that GA, like sarcoidosis, is an autoimmune disease originating from a delayed hypersensitivity reaction, mediated by T lymphocytes [4]. Considering the similarity of the histopathological vessel changes in lesions of GA, the Arthus reaction and the presence of circulating immune complexes, Dahl et al. think that GA could be an immune-mediated type III reaction [5]. The activation of T lymphocytes by a foreign antigen may, by means of its molecular similarity to an antigen of the skin, lead to autoimmunization The antigenic stimulus which initiates this immunological response in GA is not always identified or unique. Isolated observations of GGA have been reported after insect bites, viral infections (Epstein Barr virus, chickenpox-shingles, HIV), intradermal reaction to tuberculin or in a context of immunodeficiency: AIDS, thyroiditis, autologous bone marrow transplantation, malignant blood diseases, PUVA therapy [6].

When a vaccination is carried out, the association of antigenic inoculation and trauma linked to the injection could initiate an immunological response leading to the appearance of cutaneous disorders such as GA in predisposed subjects. In the literature, we have found two observations of GGA after a BCG vaccination and in one of these observation, the GGA appeared one month after the injection [7]. In our observation, the delay to relapse of one month could be explained by an immune type III reaction which could correspond to the delayed antibody response to vaccination. Given the relapse after the 5 year booster injection, the hepatitis B vaccination involvment in the appearance of this GGA is credible. The case that we have reported may lead to other publications in order to better identify the physiopathological mechanisms of GA. Other new side-effects, as a consequence of hepatitis B vaccination, have yet to be reported but we should not forget that this vaccination still has a very favourable benefit/risk ratio. Worldwide, each year there are 2 million deaths from cirrhosis or primary cancer of the liver in 250 million chronic carriers of the hepatitis B virus [8, 9].

REFERENCES

1. MacMahon BJ, Helminiak C, Wainwright RB, Bulkow L, Trimble BA, Wainwright K. Frequency of adverse reactions to hepatitis B vaccine in 43,618 persons. Am J Med 1992; 92: 254-6.

2. Grézard P, Philippot V, Perrot H. Incidents et accidents de la vaccination contre l'hépatite B. J Med Lyon 1995; 1502: 1133-6.

3. Dabski K, Winkelmann RK. Generalized granuloma annulare: clinical and laboratory findings in 100 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 20/1: 39-47.

4. Morhenn VB. Cell-mediated autoimmune diseases of the skin: some hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses 1997; 49: 241-5.

5. Dahl MV, Ullman S, Goltz RW. Vasculitis in granuloma annulare. Histopathology and direct immunofluorescence. Arch Dermatol 1977; 113: 463-7.

6. Studer EM, Calza AM, Saurat JH. Precipiting factors and associated disease in 84 patients with granuloma annulare: a retrospective study. Dermatology 1996: 364-8.

7. Catteau B, Delaporte E, Piette F, Bergoend H. Granulome annulaire généralisé après vaccination par le BCG. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996; (JDP) p. 217.

8. Lilic D, Ghosh SK. Liver dysfunction and DNA antibodies after hepatitis B vaccination. Lancet 1994; 344: 1292-3.

9. Erlinger S. Vaccination against hepatitis B. Many more advantages than disadvantages. Press Med 1997; 74: 441.


 

Qui sommes-nous ? - Contactez-nous - Conditions d'utilisation - Paiement sécurisé
Actualités - Les congrès
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés
[ Informations légales - Powered by Dolomède ]