ARTICLE
Epoxy resins (ER) belong to the list of common causes of occupational
allergic contact dermatitis [1, 2]. Only a few cases of immediate type
allergy to ER compounds have been reported [3] although both diglycidyl
ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) (Fig.
1) ER [4, 5] and organic acid anhydride epoxy hardeners [6] are
potential causes of contact urticaria and bronchial asthma. In a recent
occupational asthma textbook DGEBA was not mentioned among the causes
of occupational asthma [7]. Here we report a patient with both occupational
asthma and contact dermatitis from DGEBA.
Case report and methods
A 26-year-old non-atopic concrete worker had worked for 10 years in
the same precast concrete factory, when he was accidentally exposed to
a 2-component epoxy resin. He was filling concrete cracks with a two-component
epoxy resin product when the resin product accidentally splashed on his
clothes, right lower arm and left thigh. The patient continued to use
the same ER contaminated working clothes for the next two working days.
Erythema developed on the exposed lower arm and thigh, and within two
weeks an eczematous reaction developed on the exposed skin, indicating
active sensitization [8, 9]. Further exposure to ER products at work resulted
in relapsing contact dermatitis.
Patch testing was performed, according to the suggestions of ICDRG,
two months after the accident, revealing allergy to DGEBA (1% pet, 3+)
and diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM). DDM was the hardener used in the ER
system. Good protective clothing enabled the patient to continue his work
although he suffered from relapsing contact dermatitis which gradually
worsened.
Five years later, the patient started to have
respiratory symptoms related to work, and two years after this, the diagnosis
of bronchial asthma was established. After one further year, the patient
came for investigations suspected of having occupational asthma. Prick
tests with standard environmental allergens were negative, total IgE was
normal 62 kU/l. Spirometry was normal. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second
(FEV1) was 3.88, 91% of predicted, without significant response
in the bronchodilation test. A mild bronchial hyperreactivity was recorded
in a histamine provocation test. A bronchial provocation test with the
epoxy resin without the hardener was performed as previously described
[10, 11]. PEF was followed up with a Wright peak flow meter (Clement Clarke
M286, Ferraris Medical) [11]. The patient spread the ER (DGEBA according
to the material safety data sheet) he used at work on a plate continuously
for 30 minutes. 8 hours after the epoxy provocation the PEF value had
dropped 22% and wheezing rales were heard. Inhalation of a beta2-sympathomimetic
temporarily relieved the symptoms but the lowest peak flow value (36%)
was recorded 17h after the provocation, reflecting a delayed type of bronchial
asthma. This 36% drop of the PEF value was considered diagnostic for occupational
DGEBA induced asthma. The control provocation test with lactose powder
was negative.
A scratch test with DGEBA [3, 12] was negative. On re-patch testing,
the patient was revealed to have a 3+ allergic patch test reaction
to DGEBA (1% pet) in the standard series, a 2+ allergic patch
test reaction to diaminodiphenyl methane (DDM, 0.5% pet) in a plastic
and glue series, and a 2+ allergic patch test reaction to 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]-propane
(BIS-GMA; 2% pet, Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmö, Sweden) in a
dental screening series [13]. The BIS-GMA reaction probably reflected
cross-reactivity between epoxy acrylates and DGEBA [14].
The bronchial provocation test also provoked an undesired strong allergic
contact dermatitis reaction of the exposed skin, namely the face, neck,
the auricles and the hands (Fig.
2) indicating airborne allergic contact dermatitis from DGEBA
[1]. Erythema of the face had already started 3.5 h after the ER provocation.
The patient was advised to change to a job where no further ER exposure
would occur. In a follow-up control 10 months later the patient's skin
was symptomless. He was still on asthma medication but had no more bronchial
hyperreactivity.
Discussion
Few cases of immediate allergy from DGEBA have been reported. In 1974,
a patch test with an epoxy resin was reported to induce generalized urticaria
and an asthmatic reaction [15]. Suhonen [16] reported two patients who
in a patch test showed immediate urticarial reactions, probably due to
an impure DGEBA epoxy resin used in a ski pole factory. Kanerva et
al. [3] described two patients with both immediate and delayed allergy
to DGEBA epoxy resin [3]. In these patients the specific IgE-mediated
immediate sensitization from DGEBA with a MW of 340 was revealed [3].
According to the history, exposure, and sensitization to DGEBA it was
concluded that those two patients had occupational asthma from DGEBA although
bronchial provocation tests with DGEBA could not be performed [3]. In
the present patient we performed the bronchial provocation test but were
not able to make determinations of specific IgE to DGEBA. Lambourn and
coworkers reported occupational asthma from an epoxy resin hardening agent,
EPO 60 [17], but the causative agent was considered to be a polyamine
hardening system. Recently, Sasseville [18] reported a patient who presented
with contact urticaria while working in an aircraft factory. On patch
testing, at the 30-min reading, he had urticarial reactions both to epoxy
resin (1% pet), and to two reactive epoxy diluents, phenylglycidyl ether
(0.25% pet) and cresylglycidyl ether (0.25% pet). No delayed reactions
were seen. Similarly, Miyamoto and Okumura [19] reported on contact urticaria
confirmed by a 15-minute open test and a 15-minute closed patch test for
epoxy resin at 1% in petrolatum. We recently had a patient with contact
urticaria from DGEBA (to be reported). In addition, contact urticaria
and asthma can be caused by amine epoxy hardeners [1, 20, 21]. Another
epoxy compound, triglycidyl isocyanurate has caused occupational asthma
[22]. The epoxy hardeners phthalic anhydrides are well known causes of
bronchial asthma and contact urticaria [1, 7, 23], but were not used in
the present patient's workplace.
The provocation test was performed in a provocation chamber in which
exposure was both to the respiratory tract and the skin. This resulted
in an asthma reaction and a strong allergic airborne
skin reaction (Fig. 2).
In our experience, skin reactions are rare from bronchial provocation
but it would be desirable to use direct bronchial provocation with mask
to avoid skin exposure [24].
Our patient's primary sensitization occurred after a single accidental
exposure to DGEBA [9]. Very little is known about the mechanisms of respiratory
sensitization. Our patient continued to work with exposure to ER even
after the diagnosis of occupational allergic contact dermatitis to ER
had been established. There is a risk of developing occupational asthma
from continuous exposure [1, 3] but it is not clear whether this risk
is increased compared with patients who do not have a delayed contact
allergy to the corresponding chemical. Interestingly, our patient's occupational
asthma could be classified as a type IV allergic reaction: he had allergic
patch test reactions to DGEBA and a delayed asthma reaction but no signs
of IgE-mediated allergy. Symptoms of respiratory disease associated with
type IV allergy have occasionally been reported [25].
Article accepted on 10/5/00
REFERENCES
1. Jolanki R. Occupational skin diseases from epoxy compounds.
Epoxy resin compounds, epoxy acrylates and 2,3-epoxypropyl trimethyl ammonium
chloride [Doctoral dissertation]. Acta Derm Venerol 1991; (suppl.
159): 1-80.
2. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Toikkanen J, Tarvainen K, Estlander
T. Statistics on occupational dermatoses in Finland. In: Irritant Dermatitis.
New Clinical and Experimental Aspects, P. Elsner and HI Maibach, eds.
Curr Probl Dermatol, Basel, Karger, 1995; 23: 28-40.
3. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Tupasela O, Halmepuro L, Keskinen H,
Estlander T. Immediate and delayed allergy from epoxy resins based on
diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;
17: 208-15.
4. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T. Epoxy. In: Kanerva L, Elsner
P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatoses,
Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2000: 570-90.
5. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T. Contact urticaria from
epoxy resins. In: Contact Urticaria Syndrome; Amin S, Lahti A and Maibach
HI, eds. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, New York, USA, 1997: 143-8.
6. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T, Tarvainen K. Skin allergy
caused by organic acid anhydrides. In: Contact Urticaria Syndrome; Amin
S, Lahti A and Maibach HI, eds. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, New York, USA,
1997: 217-24.
7. Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL. Tables of major inducers of occupational
asthma. In: Bernstein IL, Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernsein DI. Asthma in
the workplace. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel 1999: 683-704.
8. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Accidental occupational
sensitization caused by methyl acrylate. Eur J Derm 1993; 3: 195-8.
9. Kanerva L, Tarvainen K, Pinola A, Leino T, Granlund H, Estlander
T, Jolanki R, Förström L. A single accidental exposure may result
in a chemical burn, primary sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis.
Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 229-35.
10. Newman-Taylor AJ, Davies RJ. Inhalation challenge testing.
In: Weill H, Turner-Warwick M, eds. Occupational lung diseases.
New York: Marcel Dekker 1981: 141-67.
11. Piirilä P, Kanerva L, Alanko K, Estlander T, Keskinen
H, Pajari-Backas M, Tuppurainen M. Occupational IgE-mediated asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis,
and contact urticaria caused by Easter lily (Lilium longiflorum)
and tulip. Allergy 1999; 54: 273-7.
12. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Skin testing for immediate
hypersensitivity in occupational allergology. In: Exogenous Dermatoses;
Environmental Dermatitis, Menné T, Maibach HI, eds. CRC Press Inc,
Boca Raton, FI. USA, 1991. 103-26.
13. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Allergic contact dermatitis
from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic
acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 201-11.
14. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Alanko K. Occupational
allergic contact dermatitis from 2,2-bis4-(2-hydroxy-3-acryloxypropoxy)phenylpropane
(epoxy diacrylate) in ultraviolet-cured inks. Contact Dermatitis
(in press).
15. Woyto´n A, Wasik F, Bliz.anowska A. Niezwyka reakcja
anafilaktyczna i wypryskowa po kontakcie z z.ywicami epoksydowymi [An
uncommon anaphylactic and eczematous reaction after contact with epoxide
resins]. Przegl Dermatol 1974; 61: 303-8.
16. Suhonen R. Epoxy-dermatitis in a ski-stick factory. Contact
Dermatitis 1983; 9: 131-3.
17. Lambourn EM, Mayes JP, McAllister WA, Taylor AJ. Occupational
asthma due to EPO 60. Br J Ind Med 1992; 49: 294-5.
18. Sasseville D. Contact urticaria from epoxy resin and reactive
diluents. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 57-8.
19. Miyamoto T, Okumura M. Occupational contact urticaria due
to epoxy resin. Environ Dermatol 1998; 5: 53-7.
20. Savonius B, Keskinen H, Tuppurainen M, Kanerva L. Occupational
asthma caused by ethanolamines. Allergy 1994; 49: 877-81.
21. Malo JL, Bernstein IL. Other chemical substances causing
occupational asthma. In: Bernstein IL, Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernsein
DI. Asthma in the workplace. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New
York, Basel 1999: 523-41.
22. Piirilä P, Estlander T, Keskinen H, Jolanki R, Laakkonen
A, Pfäffli P, Tupasela O, Tuppurainen M, Nordman H. Occupational
asthma caused by triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC). Clin Exp Allergy
1997; 27: 510-4.
23. Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Tupasela O, Pfäffli
P, Kanerva L. Immunologic contact urticaria due to airborne methylhexahydrophthalic
and methyltetrahydrophthalic anhydride. Contact Dermatitis 1995;
32: 204-9.
24. Cartier A, Malo JL. Occupational challenge tests. In: Bernstein
IL, Chan-Yeung M, Malo JL, Bernsein DI. Asthma in the workplace. 2nd
ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, Basel 1999: 211-33.
25. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Pekkarinen E. Occupational
pharyngitis associated with allergic patch test reactions from acrylics.
Allergy 1992; 47: 571-3.
|