JLE

European Cytokine Network

MENU

Circulating VEGF and its soluble receptors sVEGFR‐1  and sVEGFR‐2 in patients with acute leukemia Volume 14, numéro 3, July 2003

Auteurs
Department of Hematology, Medical University of Łódź, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Pabianicka 62, 93‐513 Łódź, Poland

Angiogenesis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acute leukemia, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a crucial, positive regulator of this process. The biological activity of VEGF is mediated by two different receptor tyrosine kinases: VEGFR‐2 and VEGFR‐1. The soluble form of VEGFR‐1 is likely to be a negative regulator of VEGF availability, but the physiological role of sVEGFR‐2 is still unclear. The plasma levels of sVEGFR‐1 and sVEGFR‐2 in patients with acute leukemia have not been investigated. We measured the plasma concentrations of VEGF and its two soluble receptors in 39 AML and 15 ALL patients as well as in the control group, using the ELISA assay. We also correlated the plasma levels of these proteins with disease status and known prognostic factors. The sVEGFR‐1 level was significantly higher in patients with AML and ALL than in the healthy subjects (p < 0.002 and p < 0.03 respectively). The sVEGFR‐2 level was significantly higher in AML patients compared with the control group (p < 0.03). The VEGF levels in AML and ALL patients and in healthy subjects did not differ significantly. The sVEGFR‐1 level was higher in AML patients with > 50% of blasts in the bone marrow (BM), WBC > 20 G\L and elevated LDH level, than in the group with BM blasts < 50% (p < 0.01), WBC < 20 G\L (p < 0.02) and a normal LDH level (p < 0.05). Positive correlations between sVEGFR‐1 level and WBC (p < 0.02),% of BM blasts (p < 0.05), the absolute blast count in peripheral blood (ABC) (p < 0.009) and LDH (p < 0.000001) were found. The sVEGFR‐1\VEGF ratio (R1) was calculated, and a positive correlation between R1 and ABC in AML (p < 0.03) was determined. A higher (above median) sVEGFR‐1\VEGF ratio correlated with a lower CR rate and a shorter survival (p < 0.03 and p ∓ 0.0007 respectively). In conclusion, the plasma concentration of sVEGFR‐1 is higher in leukemia patients than in healthy subjects and correlates with tumour burden and poor prognosis. The sVEGFR‐1\VEGF ratio may be of greater prognostic value than VEGF alone. Further investigation is recommended to better determine their function.