ARTICLE
INTRODUCTION
The pleiotropic cytokine, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha),
produced primarily by activated macrophages, is intimately involved in
many immune and inflammatory responses including septic shock, cachexia,
and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [1-5]. TNF interacts with two high affinity
cell surface receptors, which also bind the structurally related cytokine,
lymphotoxin (LT) [6]. Two human soluble TNF binding proteins, termed TBP
I and TBP II, are homologous to the extracellular domains (ECDs) of the
p55 and p75 TNF receptors respectively [7, 8], and are generated by proteolytic
cleavage of the mature cell surface receptor [9]. Their levels are elevated
in a number of disease states such as RA [10] and cancer [11], and thus
they may play an important regulatory role in TNF-mediated inflammatory
processes [10].
A number of studies have investigated the possibility of ameliorating
TNF-related inflammatory diseases using anti-TNF neutralizing antibodies
or soluble TNF receptors. Treatment with an anti-TNF antibody caused marked
reduction in inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis in mice [12].
Four to twelve week, double-blind clinical trials of humanized anti-TNF
antibodies similarly produced dramatic reductions in disease pathology
in RA [13-15] and Crohn's disease [16, 17]. However, in longer term (up
to 95 weeks) dose response trials, half of the patients produced human
anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) responses [18], casting doubt on the suitability
of these agents for long-term treatment of some patients.
Monomeric soluble receptors bind TNF in vitro, but only at very
high molar ratios, doses which would not be feasible for therapeutic applications
[19, 20]. We and others have found that dimers of both the p55 and p75
soluble TNF receptors fused to human IgG heavy chains markedly increased
avidity for TNF in vitro compared with monomeric soluble receptors
[19-22]. These fusion proteins have been shown to protect against lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) and TNF-induced lethality in animal models [19, 21-23]. The much
lower molar ratios required suggest that they may be as good as anti-TNF
at combatting the harmful effects of TNF. Furthermore, they contain no
murine variable regions and are thus likely to be less immunogenic than
anti-TNF antibodies. This makes them an exciting prospect for clinical
trials in diseases such as RA. Indeed, a recent three month, double blind
trial of a human p75 soluble TNF-R-IgG fusion protein reported significant
improvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients, with no side effects [24].
The TNF receptor proteins possess homologous ECDs, consisting of four
repeating cysteine-rich motifs, conferring a high degree of structural
homology between the receptors [25, 26]. The ECDs of three TNF receptors
bind at the three corners of a TNF or LT trimer [27]. We have previously
established that deletion of the fourth (membrane proximal) cysteine-rich
repeat from the ECD of the p55 TNF receptor has no effect on TNF binding
by either the soluble or membrane bound receptor [28]. Thus the fourth
repeat is not involved in TNF binding. In contrast, each of the first
three repeats is essential for optimal TNF binding [28]. These results
concur with the reported crystallographic structure of a p55 soluble TNF
receptor/LT complex, which predicts that the fourth repeat is spatially
removed from the LT trimer [27].
The aim of this study was to construct dimers of the truncated p55 soluble
receptor lacking the fourth cysteine rich repeat on IgG heavy chains and
to compare the TNF binding of such chimeras with the full length soluble
receptor chimera. By virtue of their smaller size, they may provide greater
flexibility of interaction between the two arms of the IgG/TNF-R dimer
molecule and thus with the ligand. We have previously found that a tetrameric
Ig-p55 TNF-R fusion protein did not bind TNF significantly better than
the dimeric form, possibly due to steric hindrance [22]. A truncated receptor
may overcome this problem. Their smaller size may also render them less
immunogenic, an important consideration in long term treatment of chronic
inflammatory diseases such as RA.
METHODS
Reagents
Oligonucleotides were purchased from National Biosciences (Plymouth,
MN). DNA sequencing kits were from U.S. Biochemical Corporation (Cleveland,
OH). Goat anti-human IgG Fc fragment-specific antibodies and alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (heavy and light chains) were
supplied by Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Rabbit polyclonal
anti-p55TNF-R antiserum was a kind gift from D. Wallach. Unlabelled recombinant
human TNF (400 units/ng, > 97% pure) and LT (125 units/ng, > 97%
pure) were obtained from R and D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and 125I-labelled
human TNF from DuPont Company, NEN (Boston, MA). Human LT was radioiodinated
with Na125I (IMS30, Amersham) and Iodogen (Pierce), according
to the manufacturers' instructions. CD1 mice (6-10 weeks) were obtained
from Charles River Labs. (Raleigh, NC). E. coli lipopolysaccharide
(0111:B4) was purchased from List Biological Labs. (Campbell, CA), and
D-galactosamine from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Construction of 4
TNF receptor-IgG chimeric vectors
Expression vectors: the heavy chain vectors used, designated sf2 (single
fusion) have been described previously [22]. Briefly, the vectors were
derived from plasmid pSV2-gpt, into which was inserted a cloned gene encoding
the human Ig heavy chain promoter and leader peptide coding sequence,
a cloning site, a coding sequence for eight amino acids of human J sequence,
followed by a genomic sequence for the human IgG1 constant region of a
chimeric mouse-human antibody, cM-T412 [29]. A modified vector, designated
sf3, was constructed in which the IgG CH1 domain was deleted. An analogous
vector was made from the cM-T412 light chain gene, which expressed a truncated
light chain lacking a variable region [30].
TNF receptor
constructs
The construction of a p55 soluble TNF-R/IgG chimera has been previously
described [22]. To construct 4
derivatives, PCR fragments encoding amino acids 1-127 of the p55 TNF-R
extracellular domain, excluding the signal peptide, and thus comprising
the first three cysteine-rich repeats, were amplified from a full length
cDNA clone [25] using the 3' oligo 5'-GGTGCACACGGTGTTCT-3' and various
5' oligos described below. The PCR fragments were blunt-end ligated into
the sf2 and sf3 heavy chain vectors and the integrity of the sequence
confirmed by sequencing. The three versions of 4
constructed in sf2 were: 4alt,
which contains an Ig signal peptide and 2 altered amino acids at the N
terminus, to give the consensus Ig recognition sequence; 4
N, which contains an Ig signal peptide and the TNF-R native N terminus;
4 N2, which contains the native
TNF-R signal peptide and N terminus. The 5' oligos used were
5' CACAGGTGTGTCCCCAAGGAAAA 3',
5' CAGATAGTGTGTGTCCCCAAGGAAAA 3'
5' ATAAGAGGCCATAGCTGTCTGGC 3'
The 4alt version was also
expressed in the sf3 vector.
A cDNA clone, encoding a monomeric non-fusion (nf) form of the p55 extracellular
domain (p55-nf), including the leader peptide, has been described [25].
This cDNA was inserted into a dhfr mammalian expression vector
under the transcriptional control of an SV40 early promoter. The various
constructs are depicted in Figure
1.
Transfection and expression
Linearized plasmids encoding fusion proteins were transfected into the
myeloma cell line X63-Ag8.653 by electroporation. Cell supernatants were
assayed for IgG production by ELISA as described elsewhere [30]. Briefly,
supernatants were incubated on plates coated with anti-human IgG Fc and
bound protein was detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human
IgG. The p55-nf construct was transfected into a dhfr
mutant CHO cell line by standard calcium phosphate precipitation techniques
and amplified by selection in methotrexate.
Purification and Western blotting of fusion
proteins
Fusion protein cell supernatants were purified on a Protein A-Sepharose
column as described [22]. The p55-nf was purified on a TNF affinity column
as described [28]. Purified proteins were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulphate
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to estimate purity and correct
size. The fusion proteins were Western blotted with rabbit polyclonal
anti-TNF-R followed by alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti rabbit
antibody.
WEHI cytotoxicity assay
The fusion proteins were assayed for their inhibition of the cytotoxic
effect of TNF or LT on the TNF/LT sensitive cell line WEHI 164 clone 13
[31]. WEHI cells (50,000 cells per well) were adhered for 4 hours at 37°
C and then incubated overnight at 37° C with 4 pM TNF or 3.6 pM LT,
either alone or in combination with increasing concentrations of p55 fusion
or non-fusion proteins. The cells were assayed as described elsewhere
[31] except that they were lysed with dimethyl sulphoxide and analysed
immediately.
Inhibition of binding of 125I labelled
TNF and LT to U937 cells
Increasing concentrations of p55 and 4 fusion proteins were preincubated
with 1 nM 125I labelled TNF or 2 nM LT for 1 hour at 37°
C and then added in triplicate to U937 cells aliquoted at 2 x 106
cells per well in 96 well plates, for 2 hours at 4° C. Non-specific
binding was determined by preincubation of cells with 250 nM unlabelled
cytokine, followed by 125I cytokine. Cells were centrifuged
through 20% sucrose in PBS to remove unbound cytokine and counted on an
LKB 1260 Multigamma II gamma counter.
Binding assays and Scatchard analysis
96-well microtitre plates were coated with goat anti-human IgG Fc antibodies
(10 µg/ml). Fusion proteins were captured at a concentration of 10ng/ml.
Increasing concentrations of 125I-labelled TNF and LT (4.9-20,000
pM) were added in PBS/1% BSA and bound for 2 hours at room temperature.
Non-specific binding was determined with a 200-fold excess of unlabelled
cytokine. Bound cpm were removed with 2N NaOH and counted.
In vivo mouse model of LPS induced lethality
Groups of fifteen CD1 mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) with either
saline (control mice), or p55-sf2 or 4-sf2
in two quantities 0.5 or 5 ug. One hour later, the mice were injected
simultaneously i.v. with 50 µg E. coli LPS (0111:B4) and 15
mg D-galactosamine. Live mice were counted after 24 hours. Three separate
experiments were performed.
RESULTS
The p55-sf2 and 4-sf2 constructs
were expressed in association with the truncated light chain as this was
necessary for secretion of the heavy chain fusion proteins from myeloma
cells. The 4-sf3 construct,
which lacks the IgG CH1 domain, was expressed in the absence of light
chain. The purified fusion proteins were shown by SDS-PAGE to be >
95% pure and the appropriate size i.e. 168 kD for p55-sf2 [22],
162 kD for the 4 derivatives
lacking the fourth cysteine-rich repeat, and 108 kD for 4-sf3
due to the additional deletion of the CH1 domain. Western blotting with
anti-TNF-R confirmed the presence of TNF receptor derivatives fused to
the Ig heavy chain (data not shown). The levels of expression of the 4
sf2 chimeras were very similar, as was their biological activity in the
assays described below. Thus, provision of an Ig leader sequence or N-terminal
recognition sequence is not necessary for stable expression of functional
TNF-R/Ig chimeras. For brevity only the 4alt
version is shown in the following experiments.
Inhibition of TNF or LT cytotoxicity in the
WEHI assay
The ability of the soluble receptor fusion proteins to sequester TNF
and LT, thus inhibiting their biological activities, was tested in a cytotoxicity
assay using the TNF/LT-sensitive murine cell line, WEHI 164 clone 13,
which expresses the p55 TNF-R. Figure
2A shows that p55 sf2, 4-sf2
and 4-sf3 exhibited identical
dose-dependent inhibition of TNF cytotoxicity. All three fusion proteins
effected 50% inhibition at a 2 fold molar excess over TNF. In contrast,
the non-fusion soluble receptor was required in 500 fold excess to achieve
50% inhibition (Table 1).
In the case of LT inhibition, 50% inhibition was achieved by p55-sf2 at
an 11 fold molar excess (Figure 2B).
However, the molar ratio of 4-sf2
and 4-sf3 required was significantly
higher (18 fold and 21 fold respectively).
Inhibition of binding of 125I TNF
or LT to U937 cells
The U937 human monocytic cell line expresses both p55 and p75 TNF-R [32].
As seen in Figure 3A,
the 4-sf2 and 4sf3
fusion proteins effectively inhibited binding of TNF to this cell line,
with IC50s very close to that of the wild type fusion protein
(Table 1). The molar ratios
required (approx. 7:1) were higher than for the WEHI assay. Inhibition
of LT binding by p55-sf2 was similar to the profile seen with TNF, as
shown in Figure 3B. However,
a relatively higher molar ratio of the 4
derivatives (16:1 and 15:1 for 4-sf2
and 4-sf3 respectively) was
required to achieve IC50 (Table
1). As before, much higher molar ratios of the monomeric receptor
were required to reach IC50-200:1 with TNF and 300:1 with LT.
Affinity studies
The binding affinity of the fusion proteins for TNF and LT was determined
by incubation with increasing concentrations of 125I labelled
ligand. The binding curves in Figure
4A and 5A demonstrate specific saturable binding of TNF and LT
respectively, by p55-sf2, 4-sf2
and 4-sf3. Scatchard analysis
reveals a single set of high affinity binding sites for each. p55-sf2
(Figure 4B) has a Kd for
TNF of 29 pM similar to that previously described [22]. The affinities
of both 4-sf2 (s)
and 4-sf3 (Figure
4D) were consistently slightly higher in each individual experiment
performed (n = 5), showing mean Kds of 26 and 25 pM respectively, although
this difference was not statistically significant. The normal circula-ting
levels of TNF are 10 18 M, increasing to up to 10
9 M in disease states. Thus the soluble receptor fusion proteins
would be able to sequester increasing levels of TNF. The affinities of
the fusion proteins for LT were much lower at 117, 240 and 170 pM respectively
for p55-sf2 (Figure 5B),
4-sf2 (Figure
5C) and 4-sf3 (Figure
5D). The affinity of 4-sf2
for LT was considerably lower than that of the wild type receptor and
a paired Student's T test revealed this difference to be statistically
significant (p < 0.005). The affinity of 4-sf3
for LT was intermediate and not statistically different from p55-sf2.
In vivo model
The D-galactosamine (GaLN) sensitization model of LPS induced cytotoxicity
[33] has been used previously to analyse TNF-R-Ig chimeras and was used
to analyse the in vivo biological activity of the 4-sf2
chimera. GaLN increases sensitivity to LPS or TNF toxicity by up to 100,000
fold. TNF has been well established as the key inflammatory mediator of
LPS toxicity, and has identical lethality effects in this model. As shown
in Figure 6, for both
the p55sf2 and 4 sf2 fusion
proteins, the lower dose of 0.5 mg afforded some protection against LPS
challenge, in comparison with the control mice which exhibited 100% mortality
after 24 hours. Increasing the dose of fusion protein 10 fold led to almost
complete inhibition of LPS lethality in both cases. Overall, the ability
of the two TNF-R fusion proteins to sequester TNF and thus protect against
LPS cytotoxicity was not significantly different in repeated experiments.
DISCUSSION
A wealth of evidence demonstrates the central role of TNF in inflammatory
processes. In murine collagen-induced arthritis, treatment with anti-TNF
antibodies ameliorates the disease [12]. In recent clinical trials (open
and placebo-controlled), patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and
Crohn's disease treated with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies showed marked
clinical improvement, indicating that blockage of this cytokine is of
therapeutic benefit [13, 14, 17].
The identification of soluble TNF binding proteins in normal human serum
and urine, and increased levels of these proteins in inflammatory disease
suggest that they may play an important protective role against the harmful
effects of excess TNF production in inflammatory diseases [10, 11]. However,
we and others have shown that these monomeric soluble receptors fully
inhibit TNF cytotoxicity in vitro only at extremely high molar
ratios, which are not found in vivo. Reported ratios vary from
2,000:1 to 30,000:1 [19, 20, 22]. Such a high dosage requirement excludes
the possibility of administering recombinant monomeric soluble receptors,
which are cleared quickly via the kidney, as an anti-inflammatory
strategy. Avidity for TNF is increased dramatically by the dimerization
of soluble receptors on IgG backbones, presumably due to the fact that
the stoichiometry of TNF binding to these receptors is 3 receptors to
1 TNF trimer. Location of two receptor-IgG molecules side by side along
the boundaries of the TNF subunits thus leads to a rapid stable binding
equilibrium. We have previously shown that a number of p55-IgG fusion
proteins bind TNF with high affinity (Kd = 22pM) compared with the monomeric
soluble receptor (Kd = 1,900 pM) [22]. Functionally, the molar ratio of
fusion protein to TNF required to inhibit TNF cytotoxicity by 50% was
2, which was 1,000 fold less than for the non-fusion protein. Thus, these
soluble receptor Ig chimeras may provide a further advance on the use
of anti-TNF antibodies, particularly as they are entirely humanized, i.e.
have no murine variable regions and thus are likely to be less immunogenic.
Indeed, a p75TNF-R-IgG chimera has recently been shown to be beneficial
in the treatment of RA [24]. In this study we have compared several versions
of a truncated soluble TNF-R fusion protein with the full length version,
and have found that their biological efficacy in sequestering TNF is identical
to or slightly better than that of the full length chimera, both in in
vitro assays and in an in vivo model of LPS-induced lethality.
Thus, these fusion proteins are likely to be as effective as the wild
type receptor for future therapeutic applications.
A major finding from these studies is that while the 4
chimeras have an identical affinity for TNF compared with the wild type,
4-sf2 has a lower affinity
for LT (Kd of 240 vs 117 for p55-sf2). These Scatchard data were
reflected by the greater molar ratio of 4-sf2
required to achieve IC50 with LT in the WEHI and U937 assays.
Structurally, this is probably due to the different structure of the membrane
proximal apices of TNF and LT, which lie close to the deleted fourth cysteine-rich
repeat of the receptor. The TNF apex forms a tight cone whereas the apical
structure of LT is more open [34, 35]. This decreased affinity of 4-sf2
may reduce interference with the action of LT concomitant with sequestration
of TNF. As LT is produced at much lower levels than TNF in a TNF-mediated
inflammatory response, the full length p55-sf2 may sequester it efficiently
even at levels too low to fully sequester TNF. This effect might be deleterious
because, while TNF and LT have many physiological effects in common, LT
has a number of important unique effects, in particular regulation of
lymph node and spleen development and maintenance of normal peripheral
B cell populations [36, 37]. Furthermore, it is likely that LT may bind
a separate, as yet unidentifed receptor which does not bind TNF and may
thus have other distinct functions [37]. Therefore, use of 4-sf2
rather than p55-sf2 to sequester TNF may be advantageous as it is likely
to interfere less with LT functions.
Our investigation of the biological properties of the 4-sf3
variant also resolve, a discrepancy concerning the comparative biological
activity of 4 and the full
length soluble receptor. Marsters et al. reported that a 4
version of the TNF-R fused to an Ig backbone lacking the CH1 domain bound
TNF with 10 fold lower affinity than the wild type soluble receptor fused
to the same backbone [38]. In contrast, our previous work with monomeric
soluble receptors indicates that the biological activity of 4
is equivalent to that of the wild type receptor [28]. To resolve this
anomaly, we tested Marsters' observation by fusing the 4
to sf3, which encodes a similar Ig backbone, lacking the CH1 domain. In
our hands, this fusion protein had very similar biological activity to
the 4 TNF receptor fused to
a full length Ig backbone. As discussed above, both proteins exhibited
similar TNF binding characteristics to the wild type TNF-R fusion protein.
Thus, our results in two separate studies are in contrast to those of
the previous Marsters' study and concur with crystallographic data which
depicts the fourth cysteine-rich repeat as spatially removed from the
LT trimer [27].
We conclude that a truncated version of a human soluble p55 TNF-R/IgG
chimera containing the three membrane distal cysteine-rich repeats has
identical TNF binding affinity to the wild type receptor. In contrast,
it binds LT with significantly lower affinity. In future therapeutic applications,
4-sf2 is likely to be a potent
inhibitor of TNF-mediated inflammatory responses and may be more selective
than the wild type receptor in its cytokine-blocking effects. Its efficacy,
in dimeric form, sets the stage for construction of tetrameric fusion
proteins, which may bind TNF with even greater avidity. Additionally,
although no immunogenic effects of humanized Ig-soluble TNF-R therapy
have yet been reported [24], these may arise in longer term therapy and
4-sf2 may be less immunogenic
than the full length soluble receptor, by virtue of its smaller size.
REFERENCES
1. Beutler B, Cerami A. 1988. Tumor necrosis, cachexia, shock, and inflammation:
a common mediator. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57: 505.
2. Larrick J W, Wright S C. 1990. Cytotoxic mechanism of tumor necrosis
factor-alpha. (Review) FASEB J 4: 3215.
3. Brennan F M, Chantry D, Jackson A, Maini R, Feldmann M. 1989. Inhibitory
effects of TNF-alpha antibodies on synovial cell interleukin-1 production
in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet ii: 244.
4. Feldmann M, Brennan F M, Chantry D, Haworth C, Turner M, Abney E,
Buchan G, Barrett K, Barkley D, Chu A, Field M, Maini R N. 1990. Cytokine
production in the rheumatoid joint: implications for treatment. Ann.
Rheum. Dis. 49: 480.
5. Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H, Georgopoulos S, Kaslaris E, Kioussis
D, Kollias G. 1991. Transgenic mice expressing human tumour necrosis factor:
a predictive genetic model of arthritis. EMBO J. 10: 4025.
6. Stauber G B, Aggarwal B B. 1989. Characterization and affinity cross-linking
of of receptors for human recombinant lymphotoxin (Tumour necrosis factor-ß)
on a human histiocytic lymphoma cell line, U-937. J. Biol. Chem.
264: 3573.
7. Seckinger P, Isaaz S, Dayer J M. 1989. Purification and biologic
characterization of a specific tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor.
J. Biol. Chem. 264: 11966.
8. Engelmann H, Novick D, Wallach D. 1990. Two tumor necrosis factor-binding
proteins purified from human urine. Evidence for immunological cross-reactivity
with cell surface tumor necrosis factor receptors. J. Biol. Chem.
265: 1531.
9. Porteu F, Brockhaus M, Wallach D, Engelmann H, Nathan C F. 1991.
Human neutrophil elastase releases a ligand-binding fragment from the
75 kDa tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor. Comparison with the proteolytic
activity responsible for shedding of TNF receptors from stimulated neutrophils.
J. Biol. Chem. 266: 18846.
10. Cope A, Aderka D, Doherty M, Engelmann H, Gibbons D, Jones A C,
Brennan F M, Maini R N, Wallach D, Feldmann M. 1992. Increased levels
of soluble tumour necrosis factor receptors in the sera and synovial fluids
of patients with rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 35: 1160.
11. Aderka D, Englemann H, Hornik V, Skornick Y, Levo Y, Wallach D,
Kushtai G. 1991. Increased serum levels of soluble receptors for tumor
necrosis factor in cancer patients. Cancer Res. 51: 5602.
12. Williams R O, Feldmann M, Maini R N. 1992. Anti-tumour necrosis
factor-ameliorates joint disease in murine collagen-induced arthritis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 9784.
13. Elliott M J, Maini R N, Feldmann M, Kalden J R, Antoni C, Smolen
J S, Leeb B, Breedveld F C, Macfarlane J D, Bijl H, Woody J N. 1994. Randomized
double blind comparison of a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis
factor-alpha (cA2) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet
344: 1105.
14. Rankin E C, Choy E H S, Kassimos D, Kingsley G H, Sopwith A M, Isenberg
D A, Panayi G S. 1995. The therapeutic effects of an engineered human
anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody (CDP571) in rheumatoid arthritis.
Br. J. Rheumatol. 34: 334.
15. Lorenz H M, Antoni C, Valerius T, Repp R, Grunke M, Schwerdtner
N, Nusslein H, Woody J, Kalden J R, Manger B. 1996. In vivo blockade
of TNF-alpha by intravenous infusion of a chimeric monoclonal TNF-alpha
antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Short term cellular and
molecular effects. J. Immunol. 156: 1646.
16. Targan S R, Hanauer S B, van Deventer S J, Mayer L, Present D H,
Braakman T, DeWoody K L, Schaible T F, Rutgeerts P J. 1997 A short-term
study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor-alpha
for Crohn's disease. Crohn's disease cA2 study group. N. Engl. J. Med.
337: 1029
17. Stack W A, Mann S D, Roy A J, Heath P, Sopwith M, Freeman J, Holmes
G, Long R, Forbes A, Kamm M A. 1997. Randomised controlled trial of CDP571
antibody to tumour necrosis factor-alpha in Crohn's disease. Lancet
349: 521.
18. Elliott M J, Maini R N, Feldmann M, Long-Fox A, Charles P, Bijl
H, Woody J N. 1994. Repeated therapy with monoclonal antibody to tumour
necrosis factor-alpha (cA2) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet
344: 1125.
19. Ashkenazi A, Marsters S A, Capon D J, Chamow S M, Figari I S, Pennica
D, Goeddel D V, Palladino M A, Smith D H. 1991. Protection against endotoxic
shock by a tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 88: 10535.
20. Peppel K, Crawford D, Beutler B. 1991. A tumour necrosis factor
(TNF) receptor-IgG heavy chain chimeric protein as a bivalent antagonist
of TNF activity. J. Exp. Med. 174: 1483.
21. Lesslauer W, Tabuchi H, Gentz R, Brockhaus M, Schlaeger E J, Grau
G, Piguet P F, Pointaire P, Vassalli P, Loetscher H. 1991. Recombinant
soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor proteins protect mice from lipopolysaccharide-induced
lethality. Eur. J. Immunol. 21: 2883.
22. Scallon B J, Trinh H, Nedelman M, Brennan F M, Feldmann M, Ghrayeb
J. 1995. Functional comparisons of different Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor/IgG
fusion proteins. Cytokine 7: 759.
23. Bertini R, Delgado R, Faggioni R, Gascon M P, Ythier A, Ghezzi P.
1993. Urinary TNF-binding protein (TNF soluble receptor) protects mice
against the lethal effect of TNF and endotoxic shock. Eur. Cytokine
Netw. 4: 39.
24. Moreland L W, Baumgartner S W, Schiff M H, Tindall E A, Fleischmann
R M, Weaver A L, Ettlinger R E, Cohen S, Koopman W J, Mohler K, Widmer
M B, Blosch C M. 1997. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a recombinant
human tumor necrosis factor receptor (p75)-Gc fusion protein. N. Engl.
J. Med. 337: 141.
25. Gray P W, Barrett K, Chantry D, Turner M, Feldmann M. 1990. Cloning
of human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor cDNA and expression of recombinant
soluble TNF binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 7380.
26. Smith C A, Davis T, Anderson D, Solam L, Beckmann M P, Jerzy R,
Dower S K, Cosman D, Goodwin R G. 1990. A receptor for tumor necrosis
factor defines an unusual family of cellular and viral proteins. Science
248: 1019.
27. Banner D W, D'Arcy A, Janes W, Gentz R, Schoenfeld H J, Broger C,
Loetscher H, Lesslauer W. 1993. Crystal structure of the soluble human
55 kd TNF receptor-human TNF-ß complex: implications for TNF receptor
activation. Cell 73: 431.
28. Corcoran A E, Barrett K, Turner M, Brown A, Kissonerghis A M, Gadnell
M, Gray P W, Chernajovsky Y, Feldmann M. 1994. Characterization of ligand
binding by the human p55 tumour-necrosis-factor receptor. Involvement
of individual cysteine-rich repeats. Eur. J. Biochem. 223: 831.
29. Looney J E, Knight D M, Arevalo-Moore M, Trinh H, Pak K Y, Dalesandro
M R, Rieber E P, Riethmuller G, Daddona P E, Ghrayeb J. 1992. High-level
expression and characterization of a mouse-human chimeric CD4 antibody
with therapeutic potential. Hum. Antibodies Hybridomas 3: 191.
30. Knight D M, Trinh H, Le J, Siegel S, Shealy D, McDonough M, Scallon
B J, Moore M A, Vilcek J, Daddona P E, Ghrayeb J. 1993. Construction and
initial characterization of a mouse/human chimeric anti-TNF antibody.
Mol. Immunol. 30: 1443.
31. Espevik T, Nissen-Meyer J. 1986. A highly sensitive cell line, WEHI
164, clone 13, for measuring cytotoxic factor/tumour necrosis factor from
human monocytes. J. Immunol. Methods 95: 99.
32. Brockhaus M, Schoenfeld H J, Schlaeger E J, Hunziker W, Lesslauer
W, Loetscher H. 1990. Identification of two types of tumor necrosis factor
receptors on human cell lines by monoclonal antibodies. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 87: 3127.
33. Lehmann V, Freundenberg M M, Galanos C. 1987. Lethal toxicity of
lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor in normal and D-galactosamine
treated mice. J. Exp. Med. 165: 657.
34. Jones E Y, Stuart D I, Walker N P. 1989. Structure of tumour necrosis
factor. Nature 338: 225.
35. Eck M J, Ultsch M, Rinderknecht E, de Vos A M, Sprang S R. 1992.
The structure of human lymphotoxin (tumor necrosis factor-ß) at
1.9-A resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 2119.
36. De Togni P, Goellner J, Ruddle N H, Streeter P R, Fick A, Mariathasan
S, Smith S C, Carlson R, Shornick L P, Strauss-Schoenberger J, Russell
J H, Karr R, Chaplin D D. 1994. Abnormal development of peripheral lymphoid
organs in mice deficient in lymphotoxin. Science 264: 703.
37. Koni P A, Sacca R, Lawton P, Browning J L, Ruddle N H, Flavell R
A. 1997. Distinct roles in lymphoid organogenesis for lymphotoxins alpha and
ß revealed in lymphotoxin ß-deficient mice. Immunity
6: 491.
38. Marsters S A, Frutkin A D, Simpson N J, Fendly B M, Ashkenazi A.
1992. Identification of cysteine-rich domains of the type 1 tumor necrosis
factor receptor involved in ligand binding. J. Biol. Chem. 267:
5747.
|