ARTICLE
INTRODUCTION
Malaria continues to be a major public health problem world-wide. Currently,
nearly 2.4 billion people in 100 countries are at risk of malaria, and
an estimated 1.5-2.7 million deaths and 300-500 million new malaria cases
occur annually [1]. The main victims of malaria are children under the
age of 5 years, and pregnant women. The global malaria situation is worsening
with each passing day due to various reasons, including global warming
which is leading to the spread of malaria to parts of the world where
it did not previously exist. It is acquiring dangerous new dimensions
as reflected by the increase in the incidence of case of Plasmodium
falciparum malaria, the parasite responsible for more than 95% of
deaths attributed to malaria. The emergence of parasite strains and vectors
resistant to anti-malarial drugs and insecticides, respectively, has further
compounded the problem. Furthermore, despite over 21 years of effort,
a suitable malaria vaccine is not yet available. Biotherapy of malaria
[2,3], a pro-mising new approach for the treatment and control of malaria,
is however still very much in its infancy.
Mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a
23 kDa glycoprotein hormone, which regulates the differentiation and proliferation
programme of the committed progenitor cells for granulocytes and macrophages
in vitro [4, 5]; in vivo it promotes cell survival and stimulates
hematopoiesis [6]. Additionally, GM-CSF regulates the activation status
of the mature macrophages [7-12] and plays an important role(s) in host
defense [13]. Peritoneal macrophages from transgenic mice producing high
levels of GM-CSF, have been reported to show enhanced anti-bacterial [14]
and other functional activities [15]. The complementary DNA and genomic
DNA clones of mouse GM-CSF have been isolated [16], and large quantities
of recombinant GM-CSF can now be produced with biological properties similar
to the native purified molecule [17]. Mature mouse GM-CSF consists of
a single polypeptide chain of 124 amino acids (a.a.), with a leader sequence
of 17 a.a., and the two disulfide bonds provide the molecule with a 3-dimensional,
biologically active configuration. The carbohydrate content of the GM-CSF
is not required for biological activity in vitro or in vivo.
CSFs are very potent molecules which are active at picomolar concentrations,
and the levels of constitutively produced GM-CSF are very low; nevertheless,
its production is rapidly increased during infections [18]. However, not
much is known about the role of CSFs during malaria. Two peaks of serum
CSF activity have been reported during fatal and non-fatal murine malaria
[19], and maximum serum CSF activity was observed just before the attainment
of the peak of the circulating leukocyte counts, and the onset of the
decline of P. cynomolgi infection in monkeys [20]. Later, plasmodial
antigens and parasitized-erythrocytes [PE] were demonstrated to induce
the production of CSFs by macrophages in vitro [21]. Recently,
a plasmid encoding murine GM-CSF has been reported to increase protection
conferred by a rodent malaria DNA vaccine [22, 23].
Enkephalins, the two endogenous pentapeptides from the brain, with potent
opiate agonist activity [24], are known to exert immunomodulatory effects,
both in vivo and in vitro [25, 26]. Methionine-enkephalin
(M-ENK) has been reported to modulate the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced
production of cytokines [27], and to enhance various immune parameters
in AIDS and cancer patients [28]. Additionally, M-ENK and its synthetic
congener (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Me-Phe-Gly-NH.C3H7-iso)
can biphasically modulate the in vitro production of plasmodial
antigens-induced CSFs by macrophages [29], and of concanavalin A-stimulated
production of lymphokines by mouse splenocytes [30]. Furthermore, we have
reported earlier that dose dependent quantities of morphine can protect
mice against fatal P. berghei infection [31], and modulate the
plasmodial antigen-induced production of CSFs by macrophages, in vitro
[32]. Nevertheless, the role of enkephalins during malaria remains elusive.
Herein, we report that recombinant mouse GM-CSF (rmGM-CSF) and M-ENK co-administration
can protect mice against blood-induced P. berghei infection, apparently
through macrophage-mediated mechanisms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
Swiss mice (20 ± 2 g) of both sexes were obtained from the Central
Animal Facility of the Institute. The mice were maintained at 22-24°
C, and were provided with standard animal feed and clean water, ad
libitum. All studies were carried out in accordance with the Guide
for Care and Use of Animals in Scientific Research, INSA, New Delhi, as
adapted and promulgated by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.
Parasite
Plasmodium berghei (NICD, New Delhi strain), obtained from Central
Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India, is being maintained by cryopreservation
and animal passage. Mice were infected by inoculating with 1 x 104
PE, intraperitoneally (i.p.). The parasitaemia was monitored by examining
1 x 104 erythrocytes in Giemsa-stained, thin blood films, and
expressed as percentage PE.
Drugs, reagents and injection schedule
rmGM-CSF and M-ENK, and rabbit anti-rmGM-CSF polyclonal antibody (IgG
fraction) were purchased from Sigma, USA, and stored at - 20° C and
4° C, respectively. Mice (6/group) were injected i.p. with 0.2 ml
sterile 5.0% normal mouse serum/saline (vehicle) containing 0.312, 1.25,
5.0 and 10.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF and/or 2.0 and 10.0 mg/kg M-ENK, three-times
daily at 8:00 A.M., 4:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. All observations and analyses
were commenced at 9:00 A.M. on the next morning following the last injection.
Control mice were untreated or received vehicle only. Rabbit anti-rmGM-CSF
antibody was dialysed extensively, and a working dilution (1:2,500 in
PBS 0.01 M, pH 7.2) was prepared, filter-sterilized (0.2 mum), and injected
into each mice on day -1 and + 4, intravenously (i.v.), at a dose of 600
mug of protein in 0.2 ml sterile vehicle. One ml of rabbit anti-rmGM-CSF
antibody is able to neutralize a minimum of 400,000 units of rmGM-CSF,
as attested by supplier. Control mice received equivalent amounts of the
IgG fraction of normal rabbit serum.
Target cells
PE, the target cells, were prepared as reported [31]. Briefly, blood
from mice having 60-80% parasitaemia was collected in acid-citrate-dextrose
saline, spun at 450 g for 10 min at 4° C, and the PE-rich layer was
aspirated, aseptically. The PE were washed (x 3) with sterile Hank's balanced
salt solution (HBSS), resuspended (1 x 107/ml) in culture medium,
and opsonized by incubating (37° C; 30 min) with diluted serum (1:15
in HBSS) from mice refractory to repeated massive P. berghei challenges.
Total leukocyte count
Tail blood samples from control and treated mice were diluted in Turk's
fluid. The number of leukocytes/mul blood was counted using a Nuber-Levy-Hausser
chamber.
Preparation of adherent peritoneal and splenic
macrophages
Two ml of peritoneal exudate cell (PEC) suspension, collected by injecting
(i.p.) 5.0 ml of chilled HBSS and lavage, from each mouse, was centrifuged
(500 g; 7 min; 4° C). The cell pellets were resuspended in 5.0 ml
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% foetal calf
serum (FCS), 2.0 mM L-glutamine, 0.01 M HEPES, 5 x 10- 5 M
2-mercaptoethanol and 40 mug/ml gentamicin (CDMEM). The adherent macrophages
were harvested, resuspended in 5.0 ml HBSS and counted (number/ml). Similarly,
mouse splenic macrophages were harvested by finely mincing the aseptically
removed spleens in plastic dishes containing 5.0 ml of DMEM. After allowing
the large pieces to settle for 5 min at room temperature, the cell suspension
was centrifuged (500 g; 7 min; 4° C). The cell pellet was then resuspended
in 5.0 ml of CDMEM, and the adherent macrophages were harvested and counted
as for peritoneal macrophages. Separate sets of experiments were run for
pe-ritoneal and splenic macrophages for day +7 and day +16. The DMEM and
HBSS contained < 0.1 ng/ml endotoxin as determined by chromogenic Limulus
amoebocyte lysate test (Sigma). Macrophages were > 96% pure according
to morphological, phagocytic and non-esterase staining criteria, and >
98% viable as judged by trypan blue exclusion.
Determination of the phagocytic activity of
peritoneal and splenic macrophages
Phagocytic activity was determined as described [33]. Briefly, 100 mul
of peritoneal or splenic macrophage suspension (1 x 107 cells/ml)
from co-administered or control mice were layered over 12 mm, round cover
slips, and incubated at 37° C for 1 hour in humid 5% CO2-air
atmosphere to allow the formation of macrophage monolayer. The macrophages
were washed with DMEM at 37° C, and then overlaid with 1 x 107
opsonized PE in CDMEM. Following incubation at 37° C for 30 min,
the assay was stopped by adding an excess of ice-cold medium, the macrophages
were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) diluted with distilled
water (1:5), and stained with Giemsa to assess the ingestion. Two hundred
macrophages on each cover slip were examined by light microscopy, and
the number of PE ingested/100 macrophages was determined. All experiments
were run in triplicate, separately. Student's t-test was used for
statistical analysis and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Effect of rmGM-CSF and M-ENK administration
on the course of P. berghei infection in mice
Co-administration of 10.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF and 2.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day
in P. berghei-infected mice, from day -1 through day +4, resulted
in significant suppression (p < 0.05) (in some cases even complete
elimination) of parasitaemia, compared to vehicle-treated controls (Figure
1). The mice (n = 6) became positive on day +5, developed maximum
(20.4 ± 3.8%) parasitaemia on day +15, and gradually turned negative
by day +19. Whereas four of these mice completely eliminated the parasites
(as determined by isodiagnostic tests) and remained negative till the
end of experiment on day +60, the other 2 mice became positive on day
+24, developed > 65.0% parasitaemia on day +31, and died (data not
shown). Somewhat similarly, mice co-administered with 5.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF
and 2.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day, from day -1 through to day +4, showed significant
(p < 0.05) suppression of parasitaemia until day +18, which then increased
progressively (66.5 ± 10.2%), and finally culminated in the death
of all the mice by day +21. The course of parasitaemia in mice co-administered
with 1.25 or 0.312 mug/kg rmGM-CSF and 2.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day, from day
-1 to day +4, was almost similar to that in the vehicle-treated controls.
Surprisingly, co-administration of 0.312, 1.25, 5.0 and 10.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF
and 10.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day in mice, from day -1 through day +4, also
appeared to lack any effect in the course of infection, as compared to
controls (data not shown). Furthermore, mice that received either rmGM-CSF
(0.312, 1.25, 5.0 and 10.0 mug/kg x 3/day) or M-ENK (2.0 and 10.0 mg/kg
x 3/day), alone, from day -1 to day +4, showed no detectable change in
the course of parasitaemia, as compared to the controls (data not shown).
Curiously, both rmGM-CSF and M-ENK, separately or combined, lacked any
direct antimalarial activity against P. berghei and P. falciparum,
in vitro (data not shown).
Effect of anti-rmGM-CSF polyclonal antibody
treatment on the rmGM-CSF and M-ENK co-administration-induced suppression
of parasitaemia in P. berghei-infected mice
Simultaneous treatment of P. berghei-infected mice with rabbit
anti-rmGM-CSF polyclonal antibody at a dose of 600 mug on day -1 and +
4, and 10.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF and 2.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day, from day -1 through
to day +4, abrogated the suppression of parasitaemia; the course of infection
in these mice was similar to that in the vehicle-treated controls (Figure
2). Paradoxically, out of the 6 mice that were given similar treatment
but with pre-immune rabbit IgG at a dose of 600 mug, 4 mice were protected;
the remaining 2 succumbed to infection.
Effect of naloxone treatment on the course
of P. berghei infection in mice co-administered with rmGM-CSF and
M-ENK
Naloxone treatment (10.0 mg/kg/day; i.p.; day -1 through day +4) of
P. berghei-infected mice co-administered with protective doses
of rmGM-CSF and M-ENK completely inhibited the suppression of parasitaemia
(Figure 3).
Effect of rmGM-CSF and M-ENK co-administration
on the number of circulating leukocytes, and the pool-size and phagocytic
activity of peritoneal and splenic macrophages in P. berghei-infected
mice
Total leukocyte counts of P. berghei-infected mice co-administered
with rmGM-CSF and M-ENK were performed on day +7 and day +16. The cell
counts on day +7 remained unchanged (Table
1); however, there was almost a 2-fold increase in the number of neutrophils.
On the other hand, the day +16 cell counts of protected mice showed a
clear leukocytosis, and there were almost 3- and 5-fold increases in neutrophils
and monocytes, respectively. Figure
4 shows pooled data on peritoneal macrophages from three separate
experiments wherein P. berghei-infected mice were co-administered
with 10.0 mug/kg rmGM-CSF and 2.0 mg/kg M-ENK x 3/day, from day -1 through
day +4. A clear increase in the number of peritoneal macrophages was observed
both on day +7 (almost 6-fold) and on day +16 (almost 8.8-fold). Similarly,
in spleen an almost 2.8-fold increase in the number of macrophages was
observed on day +7, along with a moderate rise (30%) in the spleen weight
(data not shown); however, on day +16, whereas there was seemingly no
further change in the macrophage populations, a heavy splenomegaly was
evident with nearly 50-58% increase in weight (data not shown). The percentage
of phagocytic peritoneal macrophages from these co-administered mice showed
a significant (p < 0.05) increase on day +7 (nearly 5.5-fold) over
the serum/saline- or untreated controls, whereas on day +16, close to
a 8.7-fold enhancement in phagocytosis was observed (Figure
5). Similarly, the percentage of splenic macrophages engaged in phagocytosis
showed an increase of up to 3- and 3.5-fold on day +7 and +16, respectively.
Besides the increase in the pool-size and percentage of macrophages engaged
in phagocytosis, there was a clear-cut augmentation in the intrinsic phagocytic
activity of macrophages as demonstrated by the increase in the average
number of PE/phagocytically active macrophages; peritoneal macrophages:
6- and 8-fold, and splenic macrophages: 5.5- and 6-fold on day +7 and
+16, respectively (Figure 6).
Effect of silica on the course of P. berghei
infection in mice co-administered with rmGM-CSF and M-ENK
A single administration of sterile silica (3.0 mg/mouse; i.v.), on day
0, in P. berghei-infected mice co-administered with protective
doses of rmGM-CSF and M-ENK, almost completely abrogated their combined
protective effect (Figure 7).
DISCUSSION
Our laboratory is engaged in research into the biotherapy of malaria.
In this study, we have attempted to determine the protective effect of
rmGM-CSF and M-ENK co-administration on the course of P. berghei
infection in mice. Our results clearly demonstrate that co-administration
of rmGM-CSF and dose dependent quantities of M-ENK in P. berghei-infected
mice can strongly suppress (in some cases even completely eliminate) the
parasitaemia; however, when administered alone, none of these agents could
induce detectable protection. Silica, a selective killer of macrophages
[34], abrogated the combined protective effect of both of these agents.
Metcalf et al. [35] have reported that in BALB/c mice given 65
ng rmGM-CSF, i.p., the serum GM-CSF level attained a peak value of 500
U/ml after 30 min and then, by 3 hours, fell logarithmically to 10 U/ml
(approximate half-life = 35 min), a concentration that would have minimal
effect on phagocytes and hematopoiesis. Based on these considerations,
they chose a dose range of 6 ng to 200 ng/mouse, 3 times/day for 6 days,
in their studies. The interrupted schedule of 200 ng doses, thus would
have achieved > 50 U/ml (a concentration considered significant from
in vitro studies) for up to 3 hours, followed by an interlude of
5-7 hours with no significant elevation of CSF levels. Therefore, in the
present studies, we considered it appropriate to use a similar range of
rmGM-CSF doses; the range of serum concentrations achieved by these doses
were within those estimated in the serum during the cytokine-cascade due
to natural parasitic infections [36]. The doses of M-ENK were also selected
based on the published reports [37], wherein both immunoenhancing and
immunosuppressive effects of M-ENK were reported in mice following i.p.
injections of multiple doses of 2.0 and 10.0 mg/kg/day x 4-8 days, respectively.
Furthermore, in mice chronically treated with enkephalins, these authors
observed no obvious behavioral signs which were different from the animals'
normal behaviour in the laboratory.
In this study, P. berghei-infected mice were adminis-tered with
rmGM-CSF (0.312, 1.25, 5.0 and 10.0 mug/kg x 3/day) and/or M-ENK (2.0
and 10.0 mg/kg x 3/day), from day -1 to day +4. Whereas the effect of
rmGM-CSF was predominantly dose-dependent, the effect of M-ENK appeared
to be both dose-dependent and biphasic, within the dose limits tested,
as regards both the course of infection, and in a contemporaneous manner,
the alterations in the numerical strength and the phagocytic activity
of the macrophages. Unfortunately however, no generally accepted satisfactory
explanation can be advanced for these latter observations. Nevertheless,
these observations are consistent with similar activities of endorphins
[38], morphine [31, 32] and enkephalins [39, 40] all of which have a characteristic
bell-shaped, dose-response curve, which indicate the mediation by multiple
opioid receptors which transduce bi-directional paradoxical signals which
culminate in the translation of opposing biological effects. Besides this
however, other alternative explanations [41, 42] also can not be ruled
out.
In quantitative terms, the single most striking change, in co-administered
and protected mice, was a dramatic alteration in the number of leukocytes
both locally (in the peritoneal cavity; the site of injection) and systemically
(in the circulation and spleen). There was an almost 15-fold rise in the
number of peritoneal macrophages (with an approximately 35-fold increase
in the mitotic activity; data not shown). The peritoneal macrophages from
co-administered and protected mice, on day +16, exhibited rises both in
the percentage of macrophages with phagocytosed PE (8.7-fold) and in the
average number of IE phagocytosed per macrophage (8-fold). These data,
in combination with the absolute increase in the total number of macrophages
induced by rmGM-CSF and M-ENK, especially in the peritoneal cavity, indicated
that the over-all level of phagocytic activity in the total peritoneal
cavity macrophage population had increased > 100-fold, relative to
the control mice given serum/saline. These observations, therefore, confirm
the earlier reports demonstrating that i.p. administration of GM-CSF to
mice and humans elicits large increases in the number and functional capacity
of peritoneal macrophages [6, 35, 43, 44]. Since macrophage phagocytosis
of PE is known to play a major role in the expression of protective immunity
in malaria by clearing and destroying the parasites from the circulation
[45], and since recovery from human malaria correlates with the phagocytosis
of IE by mononuclear cells [46], it is very likely that this may be one
of the effector immune mechanism, among others that may be responsible
for imparting protection in our studies. Systemically, the rmGM-CSF and
M-ENK co-administration in P. berghei-infected mice induced only
a 2-fold increase in the number of circulating neutrophils; the level
of eosinophils and monocytes remained almost unaltered. The spleens of
co-administered and protected mice, on day +16, showed a moderate dose-dependent
rise in weight nearing 38%, which was very closely paralleled by corresponding
increases in the cellularity (data not shown). The differential cell counts
revealed a consistent 2.6-fold increase in the percentage of macrophages.
Surprisingly, the percentage of neutrophils and eosinophils remained unchanged.
Ex vivo, the percentage increase in splenic phagocytic cells on
day +7 and day +16 was observed to be 3- and 7-fold, respectively. Similarly,
the average number of PE/splenic macrophage also rose by 4- and 8-fold
on day +7 and +16, respectively.
GM-CSF is known to act on various immunocompetent cell types including
macrophages [47] through specific cell surface receptors. rmGM-CSF has
been reported to activate macrophages to kill Leishmania tropica
and L. donovani [7, 10], to inhibit the growth and multiplication
of Trypanosoma cruzi and for the release of hydrogen peroxide [9].
Furthermore, rmGM-CSF is known to function as an intermediate in the increased
production of tumor necrosis factor, and macrophage accumulation in the
lymphoid organs during murine cerebral malaria [48]. GM-CSF is also known
to increase the number of splenocytes capable of secreting interferon-gamma
and interleukin-2, but its effect on antibody production is complex and
elusive [22]. M-ENK, on the other hand, has been shown to have significant
effects on the immune system via pharmacological interactions with
opioid-receptors on the surface of immunocytes, and is known to enhance
several pro-inflammatory, host defence functions such as macrophage phagocytosis
[39, 49], modulation of the elaboration of phagocytosis promoting lymphokines
by the splenocytes [30], and the production of CSFs by macrophages stimulated
with plasmodial antigens [32], in vitro. Nevertheless, based on
the evidence such as (i) both the number and phagocytic/microbicidal activity
of macrophages are augmented by GM-CSF, (ii) macrophages function as the
key cellular target for the expression of the immunomodulatory effects
of opioids, (iii) macrophages play a definitive role in the resolution
of malaria infection, and (iv) opioids can modulate the plasmodial antigen-induced
production of CSFs by macrophages, we hypothesize that rmGM-CSF and M-ENK-induced
protection against malaria may be due to the macrophage effector mechanisms.
However, other direct or indirect protective mechanism(s) may also be
involved.
What then is the biological significance of these studies? The potential
toxicological effects of recombinant human GM-CSF (rhGM-CSF) are now well
known [50-53], and it is used clinically to stimulate the growth of bone
marrow cells in several different settings [52]. rhGM-CSF has also been
known to enhance the antibody response to recombinant hepatitis B vaccine
[53], and human GM-CSF has been tested as an adjuvant in the immunotherapy
of human cancer [54]. M-ENK has also been clinically tested in AIDS and
cancer patients with several of their immune parameters responding positively
[28]. We have observed no ill effects in mice co-administered with rmGM-CSF
and M-ENK. Because recovery from malaria in Gambian children infected
with P. falciparum has been correlated with the phagocytosis of
PE by macrophages, and because in our studies too the observed protection
against malaria in rmGM-CSF and M-ENK co-administered mice appeared to
strongly correlate with the macrophage-mediated protective mechanisms,
the results of this study can be objectively extrapolated to humans, albeit
after expedient extended studies in non-human primate malaria models which
should demonstrate acceptable levels of protection. Furthermore, these
studies should be extended to sporozoite-induced malarias, as both GM-CSF
and M-ENK can be expected to inhibit the growth and multiplication of
different liver stages of the malaria parasite.
CONCLUSION Acknowledgements.
We are grateful to Dr. C.L. Kaul, Director, for his help and encouragement
during the course of this study. This is NIPER communication No. 96. REFERENCES
1. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 2000. WHO Expert Committee on Malaria. 20th report.
No. 892.
2. Puri S K, Maheshwari R K, Dutta G P, Friedman R M, Dhar M M. 1988.
Human interferon-gamma protects rhesus monkeys against sporozoite-induced
Plasmodium cynomolgi malaria infection. J. Interferon Res.
8: 201.
3. Hoffman S L, Crutcher J M, Puri S K, Ansari A A, Villinger F, Franke
E D, Singh P P, Finkelman F, Gately M K, Dutta G P, Sedegah M. 1997. Sterile
protection of monkeys against malaria after administration of interleukin-12.
Nat. Med. 3: 80.
4. Metcalf D. 1989. The molecular control of cell division, differentiation,
commitment and maturation in haemopoietic cells. (Review) Nature
339: 27.
5. Metcalf D. 1991. The Florey Lecture, 1991. The colony-stimulating
factors: discovery to clinical use. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B.
333: 147.
6. Donahue R E, Wang E A, Stone D K, Kamen R, Wong G G, Sehgal P K,
Nathan D G, Clark S C. 1986. Stimulation of haematopoiesis in primates
by continuous infusion of recombinant human GM-CSF. Nature 321:
872.
7. Handman E, Burgess A W. 1979. Stimulation by granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor of Leishmania tropica killing by macrophages.
J. Immunol. 122: 1134.
8. Grabstein K H, Urdal D L, Tushinski R J, Mochizuki D Y, Price V L,
Cantrell M A, Gillis S, Conlon P J. 1986. Induction of macrophage tumoricidal
activity by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Science
232: 506.
9. Reed S G, Nathan G F, Phil D L, Rodricks P, Shanebeck K, Grabstein
K H. 1987. Recombinant granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor
activates macrophages to inhibit Trypanosoma cruzi and release
of hydrogen peroxide. Comparison with interferon-gamma. J. Exp. Med.
166: 1734.
10. Weiser W Y, van Niel A, Clark S C, David J R, Remold H G. 1987.
Recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor activates
intracellular killing of Leishmania donovani by human monocyte-derived
macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 166: 1436.
11. Wang M, Friedman H, Djeu J Y. 1989. Enhancement of human monocyte
function against Candida albicans by the colony-stimulating factors
(CSF), IL-3 granulocyte-macrophage -CSF and macrophage-CSF. J. Immunol.
143: 671.
12. Heidenreich S, Gong J H, Schmidt A, Nain M, Gemsa D. 1989. Macrophage
activation by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Priming
for enhanced release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and prostaglandin
E2. J. Immunol. 143: 1198.
13. Metcalf D. 1987. The role of colony-stimulating factors in resistance
to acute infections. (Review). Immunol. Cell Biol. 65: 34.
14. Tran H T, Metcalf D, Cheers C. 1990. Anti-bacterial activity of
peritoneal cells from transgenic mice producing high levels of GM-CSF.
Immunology 71: 377.
15. Elliot M J, Strasser A, Metcalf D. 1991. Selective up-regulation
of macrophage function in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 147: 2957.
16. Metcalf D. 1985. The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors.
(Review) Science 229: 16.
17. Metcalf D. 1991. Control of granulocyte and macrophages: molecular,
cellular, and clinical aspects. (Review) Science 254: 529.
18. Cheers C, Haigh A M, Kelso A, Metcalf D, Stanley E R, Young A M.
1988. Production of colony-stimulating factor (CSFs) during infection:
separate determinations of macrophage-, granulocyte-, granulocyte-macrophage-
and multi CSFs. Infect. Immun. 56: 247.
19. Villeval A, Gearing A, Metcalf D. 1990. Changes in hemopoietic and
regulator levels in mice during fatal or nonfatal malarial infections.
II. Nonerythroid populations. Exp. Parasitol. 71: 375.
20. Singh P P, Dutta G P. 1990. Serum colony-stimulating factors in
monkeys infected with Plasmodium cynomolgi. In: Dinarello C A,
Klugar M J, Powanda M C, Oppenheim J J, eds. Progress in leukocyte
biology. The Physiological and Pathological Effects of Cytokines.
New York: Wiley-Liss Inc. 10B: 339.
21. Singh P P, Dutta G P. 1992. Comparative evaluation of the colony-stimulating
factors induction potential of Plasmodium cynomolgi-infected monkey
erythrocytes and soluble antigens. Acta Trop. 51: 247.
22. Weiss W R, Ishii K J, Hedstorm R C, Sedegah M, Ichino M, Barnhart
K, Klinman D M, Hoffman S L. 1998. A plasmid encoding murine granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor increases protection conferred by a malaria
DNA vaccine. J. Immunol. 161: 2325.
23. Sedegah M, Weiss W, Sacci J B Jr, Charoenvit Y, Hedstorm R, Gowda
K, Majam V F, Tine J, Kumar S, Hobart P, Hoffman S L. 2000. Improving
protective immunity induced by DNA-based immunizations: priming with antigen
and GM-CSF-encoding plasmid DNA and boosting with antigen-expressing recombinant
poxvirus. J. Immunol. 164: 5905.
24. Hughes J, Smith T W, Kosterlitz H W, Fothergill L A, Morgan B A,
Moris H R. 1975. Identification of the two related pentapeptides from
the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature 258: 577.
25. Fischer E G. 1988. Opioid peptides modulate immune functions. (Review)
Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 10: 265.
26. Chukwuocha R U, Reyes E, Tokuda S. 1994. The in vivo effects
of opioid peptides on the murine immune response. Int. J. Immunopharmac.
16: 205.
27. Marotti T, Burek B, Rabatic S, Balog T, Hrsak I. 1994. Modulation
of lipopolysaccharide-induced production of cytokines by methionine-enkephalin.
Immunol. Lett. 40: 43.
28. Plotnikoff N P, Millet G C, Wybran J, Nimeh N F. 1986. Methionine
enkephalin: enhancement of T cells in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS).
Psychopharmacol. Bull. 22: 695.
29. Singh P P, Dhawan V C, Haq W, Mathur K B, Dutta G P, Srimal R C,
Dhawan B N. 1991. Enkephalins-modulation of Plasmodium cynomolgi
antigens-induced colony-stimulating factors elaboration by macrophages.
J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 5: 142.
30. Singh S, Singh P P, Dhawan V C, Haq W, Mathur K B, Dutta G P, Srimal
R C, Dhawan B N. 1994. Lymphokines production by concanavalin A-stimulated
mouse splenocytes: modulation by met-enkephalin and a related peptide.
Immunopharmacol. 27: 245.
31. Singh P P, Singh S, Dutta G P, Srimal R C. 1994. Immunomodulation
by morphine in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice. Life Sci.
54: 331.
32. Singh S, Singh P P. 2000. Morphine modulation of plasmodial-antigens-induced
colony-stimulating factors production by macrophages. Life Sci.
67: 1035.
33. Singh P P, Dutta G P. 1989. Simian malaria-induced lymphokines:
enhancement of macrophage erythrophagocytosis. Ind. J. Parasit.
13: 281.
34. Allison A C, Harrington J S, Birbeck M. 1966. An examination of
the cytotoxic effects of silica on macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 124:
141.
35. Metcalf D, Begley C G, Williamson D J, Nice E C, Lamarter J, Mermod
J J, Thatcher D, Schmidt A. 1987. Hemopoietic responses in mice injected
with purified recombinant murine GM-CSF. Exp. Hematol. 15: 1.
36. Metcalf D. 1984. The hemopoietic colony-stimulating factors. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
37. Maric D, Jankovic B D. 1987. Enkephalins and immunity II. In
vivo modulation of cell mediated immunity. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.
USA 540: 126.
38. Heijnen C J, Bevers C, Kavelaars A, Ballieux R E. 1986. Effect of
alpha-endorphin on the antigen-induced primary antibody response of human
blood B cells in vitro. J. Immunol. 136: 213.
39. Foris G, Medgyesi G A, Hauck M. 1986. Bidirectional effect of met-enkephalin
on macrophage effector functions. Mol. Cell Biochem. 69: 127.
40. Marotti T, Haberstok H. 1992. Naloxone is an inappropriate antagonist
of met-enkephalin-modulated superoxide anion release. Brain Behav.
Immun. 6: 223.
41. Donahoe R M, Falek A. 1988. Neuroimmunomodulation by opiates and
other drugs: relationship to HIV-1 infection and AIDS. (Review) Adv.
Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 44: 145.
42. Risdhal J M, Peterson P K, Chao C C, Pijoan C, Molitor T W. 1993.
Effects of morphine dependence on the pathogenesis of swine herpesvirus
infection. J. Infect. Dis. 167: 1281.
43. Groopman J E, Mitsuyasu R T, DeLeo M, Oette D H, Golde D W. 1987.
Effects of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor on myelopoiesis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N.
Engl. J. Med. 317: 593.
44. Vadhan-Raj S, Keating M, LeMaistre A, Hittleman W N, McCredie K,
Trujillo J M, Bronxmeyer H E, Henney C, Gutterman J U. 1987. Effects of
recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in
patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 317: 1545.
45. Taliaferro W H, Connan H W. 1936. The cellular reactions during
primary infections and superinfections of Plasmodium brasilianum
in Panamanian monkeys. J. Infect. Dis. 59: 72.
46. Brown J, Greenwood B M, Terry R J. 1986. Cellular mechanisms involved
in recovery from acute malaria in Gambian Children. Parasite Immunol.
8: 551.
47. Tarr P E. 1996. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
and the immune system. (Review) Med. Oncol. 13: 133.
48. Grau G E, Kindler V, Piguet P F, Lambret P H, Vassalli P. 1988.
Prevention of experimental cerebral malaria by anticytokine antibodies.
Interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor are
intermediates in increased tumor necrosis factor production and macrophage
accumulation. J. Exp. Med. 168: 1499.
49. Foris G, Medgyesi G A, Gyimesi E, Hauck M. 1984. Met-enkephalin
induced alteration of macrophage functions. Mol. Immunol. 21: 747.
50. Estey E H, Kurzrock R, Talpaz M, McCredie K B, O'Brien S, Kantarjian
H M, Keating M J, Deisseroth A B, Gutterman J U. 1991. Effects of low
doses of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF) in patients with myelodysplasic syndromes. Br. J Haematol.
77: 291.
51. Kurzrock R, Tapaz M, Gutterman J U. 1992. Very low doses of GM-CSF
administered alone or with erythropoietin in aplastic anemia. Am. J.
Med. 93: 41.
52. Lieschke G J, Burgess A W. 1992. Granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (2). (Review)
N. Engl. J. Med. 327: 99.
53. Tarr P E, Lin R, Mueller E A, Kovarik J M, Guillaume M, Jones T
C.1996. Evaluation of tolerability and antibody response after recombinant
human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) and
a single dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine 14: 1199.
54. Simons J W, Jaffee E M, Weber C E, Levitsky H I, Nelson W G, Carducci
M A, Lazenby A J, Cohen L K, Finn C C, Clift S M, Hauda K M, Beck L A,
Leiferman K M, Owens A H Jr, Piantadosi S, Dranoff G, Mulligan R C, Pardoll
D M, Marshall F F. 1997. Bioactivity of autologous irradiated renal cell
carcinoma vaccines generated by ex vivo granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor gene transfer. Cancer Res. 57: 1537.
|