ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Arnd Von
Wissel
FEDIOL, the EU Oil and Proteinmeal Industry ADM–Ölmühle Hamburg
A.G., Nippoldstrasse 117 (21107), Postfach 930320, D – 21083 –
Hamburg (Germany)
Biodiesel in Europe is part of the European biofuels program. The
growth and development of Biodiesel and other biofuels are
interdependent on each other. I therefore have to start a bit
wider.The EU transport sector accounts for more than 30% of the
total energy consumption of the EU.It is at 98% dependent on fossil
fuels.It is the main reason for Europe to fail the Kyoto targets
because it has contribute about 90% of the increase of
CO2 emissions between 1990 and 2000 in Europe.It is
almost entirely dependent on imports.This is the reason that Europe
defined ambitious targets for the development of biofuels from
mainly home grown biomass as it aims:
- – to improve domestic energy security;
- – to improve the CO2 balance in the transport
sector;
- – to improve farm prospects and competitiveness.
In 2003 the EU agreed on two Directives:
- – promoting the use of biofuel for transport applications
by replacing diesel and gasoline to the level of 2% by 2005 and
5,75% by 2010 (Dir. 2003/30 EC) and;
- – enabling the detaxation of biofuels (Dir. 2003/96
EC).
Local governments have to adopt this goal to their national
legislation. Individually they can decide how to implement it:
- – by mandates without any tax incentives;
- – by tax incentives;
- – a combination of both.
The measures or – if detaxation is chosen – the rates applied can
change depending to the type of biofuel concerned. It can be a mix
or just one, it can be allocated to diesel or gasoline or be a new
fuel for newly developed engines.As well the composition of the
different biofuels is subject to the individual member states and
will depend on which is the most appropriate one to their region.
Two generations of biofuels
Biofuels discussed about are divided in two generations (table 1)(
Table 1 ).
The first Generation: mainly food and feed type feedstock plus
their waste and the second generation: made of residues of current
agriculture and forestry, biomass to Liquids (BTL), etc.
Products from the second generation are still under development
and not yet available at commercial quantities. Production costs
are high and not by far competitive. Nevertheless they show a large
political presents. Car industry, mineral oil companies and
“progressive politicians” – driven by some NGO’s – refer to them as
argument against the promotion of the biofuels of the first
generation. They expect the 2 nd generation to take
over the further expenditure after 2010 if not to completely
replace biodiesel from vegetable oil in the years to come.
Only the first generation offers commercial products for the
near future (5-10 years).
- – Ethanol is incorporated in the gasoline pool without
engine modifications. Very small quantities are used as an 85%
blend in flexible blend cars and in diesel buses with ignition
improver. The most frequent use in Europe at present is, however,
as ETBE (ethyl tertiary butyl ether).
- – Pure vegetable oil as such has been tested in diesel
driven vehicle fleets with controversial results. Because of its
economic price (ca. 50% of diesel) it is gaining more and more
popularity. We consider a volume of 500,000 tons has been used in
2005 although the entire car industry opposes.
- – Biodiesel is the only product widely accepted by
consumers as well as by diesel engineers. For technical reasons it
is in Europe mainly based on the feedstock rapeseed oil (RME).
Biodiesel is fully compatible with fossil diesel and used both in
pure form as B100 and admixed to fossil diesel. Most common is the
5% blend based on the current diesel norm EN 590.
- – Upgraded biogas can as well be used as fuel. It is a
niche market although it could be better assessed in competition to
natural gas.
Table 1 Biofuels, their feedstock and production
process.
|
First generation:
|
mainly food and feed type feedstock plus their waste
|
|
1. Bioethanol
|
sugar
|
fermentation
|
|
3. Pure Vegetable Oil
|
oils seeds
|
cold pressing/extraction
|
|
3. Biodiesel
|
(FAME)
|
vegetable or recycling oils
|
esterification/transesterificated
|
|
(NE×BTL)
|
vegetable or recycling oils
|
hydrogenation/hydrocracking
|
|
4. Biogas
|
organic residues/energy crops
|
digestion/gasification
|
|
Second Generation:
|
residues of current and foresty Biomass to Liquids (BTL),
etc.
|
|
5. Synthetic Biodiesel
|
lignocellulosic material
|
gasification & synthesis
|
|
6. Synthetic Bioethanol
|
lignocellulosic material
|
advanced hydrolysis/fermentation
|
|
7. Biohydrogen
|
lignocellulosic material
|
Biological process
|
What does the EU Directive mean in terms of quantities in the
EU?
The Energy demand for transport and Biodiesel portions are
illustrated by table 2( Table 2 ).
As “Seed Crushers and Oil Producers Association” our main focus
is directed to those products replacing diesel and based on the
feedstock of our industry oilseeds and vegetable oil or Biodiesel
and to a lesser extend Pure vegetable oil.
Here Europe demonstrated an impressive development
(figures 1 and 2). It was only made possible because of a
strong and pronounced political will to establish alternative fuels
in the market. This will was demonstrated by implementing
government programs which at the beginning concentrated on
exemptions or at least reductions of the excise tax.
France, Germany and Italy started already in the mid
90th (before the EU picked up) with encouraging
incentive programs but only in the last few years the development
was fuelled by exploding mineral oil prices and expended all over
Europe ( (figure
3) ).
While the fuel use of pure vegetable oil is difficult to detect
as quantities are taken from the food supply chain and not
recorded, it was evident for Biodiesel.
As you can see, Biodiesel meanwhile is well established in the
EU. The shown large demand and promising future will enable modern
and large scale production facilities which can make use of higher
efficiency and reduced cost structures. In addition mineral oil
price – although certainly with large fluctuations – will
maintain a high level and show increasing trends. But never the
less, for the years to come Biodiesel and even more so the demanded
increase will further highly depend on governmental support – be it
a mandatory regulation or a financial incentive. Without support
Biodiesel can not survive.
It is still a fact that the development of biodiesel – and as
well of all the other biofuels – is still subject of governmental
actions. And fact is as well: governments are short of money and
loose popularity if fuel prices increase. It therefore gets visible
that all over Europe governments look for ways to avoid or limit
the expenditures which follow the ambitious goals of the EU and
especially the exploding growth of biodiesel. Some countries
hesitate to implement the EU-Directive and others like France and
Germany with exploding biodiesel consumption look for measures to
limit the tax shortfall and to control increases. Furthermore those
parties get more and more followers, that demand to transfer the
government support to Biodiesel of the 2nd generation –
away from food crops to cellulosic not used today or yielding more
energy per ha.
Let me repeat and make very clear:
- – The EU Directive is no law by itself but a strong
political will. It has to be implemented in national legislation
but there it meets budget constraints.
- – To enforce the implementation the EU Commission needs a
new EU decision.
- – The process can take years.
- – The boom might become a temporary one. Cellulosic might
take over and give vegetable oil back to food.
But as we sense a general interest in most EU countries and
under the impression of the latest energy price surge I feel
entitled to believe in a coexistence of both generations for many
years until the 2nd generation of Biodiesel is ready for
the market.
Let us assume that never the less the EU-wide biodiesel
consumption will meet or even slightly exceed the above mentioned
goal to substitute almost 10,35 Mt or the volume of 12,75 Mt of
diesel in 2010.
Let us assume to need 12,75 Mt of oil for biodiesel or 13,5 Mt
with the use of pure vegetable oils (0,75 Mt).
We expect some countries to exceed their portion of biodiesel on
account of ethanol; others will not reach it but exceed on ethanol;
others will not comply with any of them.
For example France announced to substitute 8% of diesel by
biodiesel in 2010 and Germany’s investment projects – including the
announced ones – exceed already 5 Mt capacity with 4 Mt on stream
or having passed the point of no return. Denmark on the contrary
has declared not to initiate biofuel consumption at all.
But in average the volume might be reached.
Table 2 Energy demand for transport and its Biodiesel
portions.
|
Roadfuel
|
2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
|
|
Gasoline
|
130.0
|
138.0
|
142.0
|
Mt
|
|
Diesel
|
148.0
|
167.0
|
180.0
|
Mt
|
|
Total
|
273.0
|
305.0
|
322.0
|
Mt
|
|
There off Biofuels as per EU demand (2% or 5.75%)
|
|
For Gasoline (ethanol gas)
|
0.00
|
2.76
|
8.16
|
Mt
|
|
For Diesel (biodiesel veg Oil)
|
0.00
|
3.34
|
10.35
|
Mt
|
|
Total
|
0.00
|
6.10
|
18.51
|
Mt
|
|
Biofuels equivalent in volume tons (on individual fuel
separately)
|
|
Bioethanol (factor 0.6)
|
|
4.60
|
13.60
|
Mt
|
|
Biodiesel veg oil (factor 0.812)
|
0.00
|
4.11
|
12.75
|
Mt
|
The feedstock demand
What does the above assumption mean in terms of feedstock demand?
Where does – at a conversion of vegetable oil to biodiesel of
1:1 – all these 13,5 Mt vegetable oil come from and what will be
the effect on our agricultural markets?
The original and dominant vegetable oil used for biodiesel is
Rape Oil. It is very suitable for Europe’s climate and because of
its advantages properties such as oxidation stability and filtering
characteristics. In addition it is home grown. Although the CEN
norm for Biodiesel (EN14214) is bases on Fatty Methyl Esther (FAME)
the Rape Methyl Esther (RME) is the preferred Biodiesel by the car
industry who demand RME to qualify for warranties if used as B100.
Only for blends up to 5% the car industry has accepted the FAME
quality. Even for the future the preference of Rape Oil will
maintain but – with growing experience, larger volumes to be
delivered at one location and in view of increasing price
differences between the oils – this preference will be diminishing.
Alternative feedstock or blends of feedstock will gain importance
(table 3( Table 3 )).
Can the European oils and fat markets make available the
vegetable oils needed for Biodiesel?
Table 3 Feedstock-Mix for Biodiesel (Kt).
|
2000
|
2005
|
2006
|
2010
|
|
Rape oil
|
91.0%
|
779
|
81.2 %
|
2.600
|
77.5 %
|
3.487
|
55.0 %
|
7.015
|
|
Soya/Sun Oil/
|
2.4%
|
20
|
11.1 %
|
355
|
15.0 %
|
675
|
27.5 %
|
3.505
|
|
Palm oil
|
|
|
|
45
|
1.5 %
|
68
|
13.5 %
|
1.720
|
|
Recycling Oil + Fat
|
6.0%
|
51
|
|
200
|
6.0 %
|
270
|
4.0 %
|
510
|
|
Total
|
|
850
|
|
3.200
|
|
4.500
|
|
12.750
|
The EU’s agricultural rapeseed potential (the home grown
supply)
As per the EU statistics the area under arable crops and set aside
in the EU-25 is about 71,5 Mio. ha.
In 2005 here off 7 M ha were under the “set aside” program with
6 M ha real set aside and ca. 1 M ha used for technical crops.
Finally there remained an area of 65 M ha for cereals, oilseeds,
silage and a few others. This land plus/minus the changes in set
aside land is what rapeseed has to compete for (table 4( Table 4 )).
The increase in arable land used for rape seed reflects the
expectation that higher energy prices will provide the incentive to
exploit both fertile and marginal land. In future some further
increase might be possible.
Furthermore we expect rapeseed breeders to enable significant
yield increases not only in tons per ha but also referring the oil
yield which in both cases overrule the effect of the marginal land
used.
A sustainable cultivation of rapeseed will be limited to
slightly more than 10% of the area under arable land – I believe.
Not only crop rotation but as well competition for land from other
crops needed to supply energy (cereals, silage, energy celluloses,
forestry) will determine the area achievable.
Besides for biofuels, the EU is running a very promising Bio
Energy Program to stimulate heat and electricity production. It was
designed to use unexploited agricultural and forestry residues to
start with, but rising energy prices encourage to use as well whole
plants (primary product and residues) for biomass conversion. In
addition specific non-food, high-yield energy plants will start to
compete for land.
Table 4 Long term potential of rape oil production in
the EU-25.
|
Area under
|
|
|
Production
|
|
Potential
|
Produced oil
|
|
Crop
|
arable crops
|
Rapeseed-area
|
yield
|
of seed
|
oil
|
oil
|
local + imported seed
|
|
Year
|
1.000 ha
|
1.000 ha
|
%
|
t/ha
|
1.000 t
|
yield
|
1.000 t
|
1.000 t
|
|
2003
|
64.400
|
4.185
|
6.5%
|
2.67
|
11.175
|
42.0%
|
4.700
|
4.650
|
|
2004
|
65.800
|
4.455
|
6.8%
|
3.41
|
15.200
|
42.0%
|
6.385
|
5.500
|
|
2005
|
65.200
|
4.630
|
7.1%
|
3.30
|
15.275
|
42.0%
|
6.415
|
5.800
|
|
2006
|
64.400
|
5.100
|
7.9%
|
3.10
|
15.810
|
42.3%
|
6.680
|
6.700
|
|
2008
|
65.500
|
5.800
|
8.9%
|
3.20
|
18.550
|
42.7%
|
7.920
|
8.000
|
|
2010
|
66.000
|
6.600
|
10.3%
|
3.32
|
22.575
|
43.0%
|
9.710
|
9.900
|
The EU 25 vegetable oils supply and demand perspectives
EU-25 rape oil supply and demand
In principle the EU can produce all the rape oil it needs to meet
the substitution of diesel we expect. Some imports of seed and oil
from neighbouring European countries included (table 5( Table 5 )).
Table 5 EU 25 rape oil supply and demand (Kt).
|
Eu 25
|
|
1990
|
2000
|
2005
|
2006
|
2010
|
|
production
|
|
2.360
|
3.740
|
5.800
|
6.700
|
9.900
|
|
+ import
|
|
10
|
5
|
60
|
400
|
200
|
|
– traditional consumers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– food demand
|
– 1.220
|
– 2.350
|
– 2.550
|
– 2.600
|
– 2.400
|
|
– technical product
|
– 110
|
– 140
|
– 200
|
– 230
|
– 300
|
|
available for new applications
|
|
1.040
|
1.255
|
3.110
|
4.270
|
7400
|
|
– energy
|
– pure vegetable oil
|
0
|
– 25
|
– 350
|
– 450
|
– 500
|
|
– biodiesel
|
0
|
– 779
|
– 2.600
|
– 3.450
|
– 7.015
|
|
+ net import biodiesel (based on rape oil)
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
50
|
200
|
|
excess
|
|
1.040
|
451
|
190
|
420
|
80
|
|
registered export
|
940
|
360
|
50
|
|
|
|
portion of total Rape oil supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENERGY
|
0.00%
|
21.47%
|
50.34%
|
54.93%
|
74.41%
|
EU-25 soya oil supply and demand
Although an increase of the EU crush of 3 Mio. Tons is anticipated,
additional large soya oil imports will be necessary to satisfy the
demand of biodiesel. For southern Europe a modified high oleic
sunseed has been developed. Its oil might replace some of the soya
oil imports projected and reduce the import dependency
correspondently. Breeders speak of promising results of their
research teams (table 6( Table 6 )).
Table 6 EU-25 soya oil supply and demand (Kt).
|
Eu 25
|
|
1990
|
2000
|
2005
|
2006
|
2010
|
|
production
|
|
2.310
|
2.710
|
2.600
|
6.700
|
3.200
|
|
+ import
|
|
10
|
20
|
150
|
150
|
2.000
|
|
– traditional consumers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– food demand
|
– 1.485
|
– 1.500
|
– 1.600
|
– 1.550
|
– 1.500
|
|
– technical product
|
– 100
|
– 100
|
– 130
|
– 150
|
– 230
|
|
available for new aplictions
|
|
735
|
1.130
|
1.020
|
1.050
|
3.470
|
|
– energy
|
– pure vegetable oil
|
0
|
0
|
– 150
|
– 200
|
– 250
|
|
– biodiesel
|
0
|
0
|
– 355
|
– 675
|
– 3.505
|
|
+ net import biodiesel (based on rape oil)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
35
|
350
|
|
excess
|
|
735
|
1.130
|
515
|
210
|
65
|
|
registered export
|
940
|
360
|
465
|
|
|
|
portion of total Rape oil supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENERGY
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
18.36%
|
31.82%
|
72.21%
|
EU-25 palm oil supply and demand
Palmoil as well has to carry a large part of the European oil
demand. Transport and power will have to compete with food for
coverage. Imports of palm oil need to almost double (table 7( Table 7 )).
Table 7 EU-25 palm oil supply and demand (Kt).
|
Eu 25
|
|
1990
|
2000
|
2005
|
2006
|
2010
|
|
import
|
|
|
|
4.325
|
4.850
|
7.500
|
|
– traditionnel consumers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– food demand
|
|
|
– 3.650
|
– 3.820
|
– 4.400
|
|
– technical product
|
|
|
– 130
|
– 150
|
– 250
|
|
available for new aplictions
|
|
0
|
0
|
545
|
880
|
2.850
|
|
– energy
|
– pure vegetable oil
|
0
|
0
|
– 525
|
– 770
|
– 1.350
|
|
– biodiesel
|
0
|
0
|
45
|
– 68
|
– 1.720
|
|
+ net import biodiesel
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
10
|
275
|
|
excess
|
|
0
|
0
|
– 15
|
52
|
65
|
|
portion of total Rape oil supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENERGY
|
heat electicity
|
|
|
12.14%
|
15.88%
|
18.00%
|
|
|
biodiesel
|
|
|
1.04%
|
1.40%
|
22.93%
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
13.18%
|
17.28%
|
40.93%
|
Interesting to note
These tables demonstrate as well, that the food demand has been
very stable over the decades: slowly declining for seed oils in
favour of tropical oils, mainly Palm. All the future and the
R&D in farming and crushing of oilseeds in Europe depend on the
new market: ENERGY.
Conclusion
My conclusion stand in these few statements:
- – Biodiesel will change the oilseed and oils/fat markets
in Europe from food/feed oriented to energy driven.
- – Energy prices will determine vegetable oil prices.
- – Governmental energy legislation will strongly influence
oilseeds and oil markets.
- – Food industry will switch to individually designed oils
and fats with special functions and properties, away form the large
volume bulk products. Palm oil will gain on seed oils.
- – The EU will further increase acreage and production of
rapeseed and rapeoil.
- – The EU will grow a new olein sunseed very suitable for
biofuels.
- – Anyhow the EU will move from a net exporting to a net
importing region for liquid oils and sharply increase imports of
Soya-seed and/or Soya-oil.
- – In addition the EU will increase substantially the
import of Palmoil.
- – The move to competing feedstock for Biodiesel will
narrow prices of the different vegetable oils.
- – Rape-oil will maintain only a small logistically or
technically justified price premium.
- – Vegetable oil prices will stabilise.
|