ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Sophie C Flohil1, Maria C
Bolling1, Kristia A Kooi2, Henny H
Lemmink2, Marcel F
Jonkman1
1Department of Dermatology, University Medical
Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001,
9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
2Department of Genetics, University Medical Center
Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen,
the Netherlands
accepté le 31 Août 2009
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) is a blistering
genodermatosis that is mainly caused by mutations in either of the
genes KRT5 or KRT14 encoding the basal epidermal keratins 5 (K5)
and 14 (K14) [1, 2]. EBS due to keratin mutations can be subdivided
into: Dowling-Meara (EBS-DM), generalized other (EBS, gen-nDM;
formerly known as Koebner), localized (EBS-loc; formerly known as
Weber-Cockayne), migratory circinate (EBS-migr), with mottled
pigmentation (EBS-MP), and autosomal recessive (EBS-AR) [3]. EBS-DM
is the most severe subtype with congenital generalized grouped
blisters in a circinate (ring) pattern, and not herpetiform (en
bouquet). The former denominator “herpetiformis” in EBS-DM was a
misnomer. In EBS, gen-nDM the skin fragility is generalized as
well, but is milder and without the characteristic circinate
pattern. EBS-loc is the mildest form of EBS with blistering
confined to the hands and feet, sometimes resulting in palmoplantar
hyperkeratosis [3]. In EBS-loc, blistering usually begins when the
child starts to walk although occasionally the onset may be earlier
within the neonatal period. Here we describe a novel pathogenic
missense mutation in the 1A domain of K5 in a family with early
onset EBS-loc.
Case report
The proband, a 32-year-old male, presented with localized
blistering (figure
1) after minor friction, mainly affecting the hands and
feet. Blistering was present from birth, and warm weather worsened
the symptoms. After puberty the number of skin lesions diminished.
Plantar skin showed marked diffuse hyperkeratosis, and
postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was seen on his shins. Eyes,
nails and mucous membranes were normal and blisters healed without
scarring. The proband’s parents were unrelated (figure 2). His father
(II-1), two uncles (II-3 and II-9) and two cousins (III-13 and
III-15) were similarly affected with blistering. The one year old
daughter (IV-3) of the proband was born with a blister on her thumb
and later developed blisters in her diaper area.
After mechanically trying to induce a blister, histopathological
examination demonstrated splitting through the stratum spinosum of
the epidermis corresponding with a physiological friction blister.
Electron microscopy of the proband’s lesional skin showed no
keratin clumping. Genomic DNA was extracted from the proband
(III-3), his daughter (IV-3), mother (II-2), father (II-1) and
brother (III-2). PCR amplification and subsequent direct sequence
analysis of KRT5 and KRT14 was performed [4]. In KRT5 a
heterozygous A-to-T substitution was identified at nucleotide 596
(c.596A>T), altering codon 199 of K5 from a lysine to a
methionine (KRT5:p.Lys199Met). The mutation was excluded in 100
matched control samples (data not shown). Surprisingly, another
heterozygous variation was found in KRT14 (c.88C>T, p.Arg30Cys).
Neither substitution has been described thus far. The proband’s
affected father (II-1) and daughter (V-I3) were carriers of both
variations as well, the proband’s unaffected mother (II-2) and
brother (III-2) did not carry either of them.
All initially analysed affected family members were carriers of
KRT5:p.Lys199Met and KRT14:p.Arg30Cys, while the unaffected persons
were all negative for both variations, which gave the impression
that the variations mutually contributed to the EBS phenotype in
this family. To verify this, we investigated genomic DNA of other
family members (figure
2). This revealed that all affected family members were
carriers of the KRT5:p.Lys199Met mutation, but not all of them
carried the KRT14:p.Arg30Cys variation as well. Furthermore, five
clinically unaffected family members (II-15, II-17, II-21, III-5
and III-6) were carriers of the KRT14:p.Arg30Cys alone.
Additionally, no clinical differences were observed between the
affected family members carrying both the mutated KRT5 and KRT14
alleles (II-1, III-3 and IV-3) and the affected family members with
only the mutated KRT5 allele (II-9, III-13 and III-15), hereby
rejecting the bigenic hypothesis that substitution of an arginine
for a cysteine at amino acid position 30 of K14 could have a
modifying effect on this K5-causing EBS phenotype and rejecting the
hypothesis that KRT14:p.Arg30Cys leads to a phenotype on its
own.
Discussion
The KRT5:p.Lys199Met missense mutation has not been described
previously. Other mutations have been reported altering the same
codon 199 of KRT5, p.Lys199Thr and p.Lys199Arg, that both induce a
mild EBS-loc phenotype similar to that in our family [5, 6]. Lysine
at codon 199 comprises a highly conserved amino acid at the
C-terminal part of the α-helical 1A domain of K5 [2]. Furthermore,
this mutation fully segregates with the disease phenotype in the
family, hereby confirming the clinical diagnosis of EBS in this
proband and the pathogenicity of the mutation. The other DNA
change, KRT14:p.Arg30Cys, has not been described in the literature.
Since KRT14:p.Arg30Cys did not segregate with the condition and did
not cause another phenotype in the family members carrying this
variation without the KRT5 mutation, this probably represents a
non-pathogenic polymorphism. The KRT14 variation also did not
modify the phenotypical outcome of the pathogenic KRT5 mutation.
Therefore, we concluded that the KRT5:p.Lys199Met mutation is the
only pathogenic mutation in this Hindoestan family.
Acknowledgements
No conflict of interest. No financial support.
References
1 Bonifas JM, Rothman AL, Epstein Jr EH.
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex: evidence in two families for keratin
gene abnormalities. Science 1991; 254: 1202-5.
2 Lane EB, Rugg EL, Navsaria H, Leigh IM,
Heagerty AHM, Ishida-Yamamoto A, et al. A mutation
in the conserved helix termination peptide of keratin 5 in
hereditary skin blistering. Nature 1992; 356: 244-6.
3 Fine J, Eady RAJ, Bauer EA, et al. The
classification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB): Report of
the Third International Consensus Meeting on Diagnosis and
Classification of EB. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 931-50.
4 Wu Y. Design and application of DGGE-based mutation detection
systems for genes involved in HNPCC [dissertation]. Groningen:
University of Groningen, 1999. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/182343367
(accessed 23 Sept. 2006).
5 Abu Sa’d J, Indelman M, Pfendner E, et al. Molecular
epidemiology of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa in a middle
eastern population. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 777-81.
6 Xu Z, Dong H, Sun X, et al. A new keratin
5 mutation (K199T) in a family with Weber-Cockayne epidermolysis
bullosa simplex. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29: 74-6.
|