Home > Journals > Medicine > Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux > summary
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
Printable version

Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes in the ADVANCE trial


Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux. Volume 22, Number 5, 264-70, mai 2010, Mini-revue

Résumé   Texte intégral  

Author(s) : André-Pascal Kengne, Sébastien Czernichow, John Chalmers

Summary : The relative importance of different indices of blood pressure on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes has not been established. The present study compared the relationships between different parameters of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulsed pressure [PP] and mean blood pressure [MBP], and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 4.3 years in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. The mean age of the 11 140 participants was 65.8 (6.4) years. During follow-up, 1 000 major adverse cardiovascular events, 559 major coronary events and 468 cardiovascular deaths were registered. After adjustment for age, sex and randomisation group, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) associated with increased deviation from the standard for the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events were 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24) for SBP, 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28) for PP, 1.12 (1.05 to 1.19) for MBP, and 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) for DBP. The areas under the ROC curve were higher for SBP and PP compared with DBP and MBP for major adverse cardiovascular events and major coronary events. When MBP was used during follow-up instead of basal blood pressure values, there was marginal improvement of the estimation of SBP, DBP and MBP, but without significant differences in areas under the ROC curve between models of SBP and those of PP. In conclusion, SBP and PP are the two best and DBP the least predictive parameters of the risk of cardiovascular events in the ADVANCE population of patients, who were relatively elderly with type 2 diabetes. However, SBP would be the simplest and most useful predictive factor in all age groups and populations.

Keywords :

 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]