ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Rudolf Happle
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center
Freiburg, Hauptstr. 7, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
In this issue, Fleury et al. from Poitiers (France)
describe a case of muscular calcinosis showing an unusually
pronounced, unilateral distribution in a patient who had, in
addition, classical nonsegmental lesions of dermatomyositis (DM)
[1]. The calcified masses involved the patient's right shoulder and
upper arm to such a degree that they had to be removed by a major
surgical procedure.
I propose to explain this uncommon case in the following way.
The patient carried several genes predisposing to DM. At an early
stage of embryogenesis, either a postzygotic mutational event gave
rise to loss of heterozygosity at one of these predisposing loci,
or a somatic cell became heterozygous for a mutation at an
additional predisposing gene locus [2, 3]. The pronounced
unilateral calcinosis as documented by Fleury et al. [1] would
reflect a clonal outgrowth of cells having undergone such
additional mutational step.
By 2007, the concept of superimposed segmental manifestation had
been applied to 11 common skin disorders with a polygenic
background, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, lichen planus,
and vitiligo [2]. In the meantime, lichen nitidus [3], chronic
prurigo [4], lichen planopilaris [5], and giant melanocytic nevus
[6] have been added to this list. Moreover, a case of pronounced
linear calcinosis of the skin appearing in a 4-year-old boy was
described by Boente et al. [7] and categorized as a possible
example of superimposed segmental DM. A similar case
supporting this inference was published by Lipsker and Lenormand
[8].
Hence, this concept can be used as a powerful tool to understand
exceptional cases of pronounced segmental DM involving the skin [7,
8] or deep tissues [9], or both. Accordingly, the case reported by
Fleury et al. [1] would represent an impressive example of
pronounced unilateral muscular involvement superimposed on
classical nonsegmental lesions of DM.
To date, at least seven different gene loci predisposing to DM
have been described [10]. Molecular analysis of unusual cases of
superimposed segmental DM, as reported by Fleury et al. [1],
may help elucidate further the polygenic basis of this autoimmune
disorder.
Acknowledgements
Conflict of interest: none. Financial support: none.
References
1 Fleury J, Guillet G, Anyfantakis V,
Huguier V. Unusual calcinosis of muscular loges in a
37-year-old patient with a history of juvenile dermatomyositis. Eur
J Dermatol 2010; 20: 647-8.
2 Happle R. Superimposed segmental manifestation of
polygenic skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57: 690-9.
3 Happle R. Superimposed segmental manifestation of both
rare and common cutaneous disorders: a new paradigm. Actas
Dermosifiliogr 2009; 100 (Suppl. 1): 77-85.
4 Kawachi Y, Taguchi S, Fujisawa Y, et al.
Superimposed segmental dermatitis with chronic prurigo. Eur J
Dermatol 2009; 19: 337-40.
5 Bussmann C, Happle R, Baar W, Bieber T,
Haidl G, Novak N. Superimposed linear lichen
planopilaris: another polygenic disorder exemplifying a new genetic
concept. Eur J Dermatol 2010; 20: 269-70.
6 Happle R. Giant melanocytic nevus may be explained as a
superimposed patchy manifestation of a polygenic trait. Dermatology
2010 Apr 24. [Epub ahead of print]
7 Boente MC, Nadra G, Asial R, Happle R.
Pronounced linear calcinosis in a boy with mild dermatomyositis: a
further possible example of superimposed segmental manifestation of
a polygenic disorder. Dermatology 2009; 219: 155-7.
8 Lipsker D, Lenormand C. Classification of polygenic
inflammatory diseases distributed along the lines of Blaschko.
Dermatology 2009; 219: 99-101.
9 Blane CE, White SJ, Braunstein EM,
Bowyer SL, Sullivan DB. Patterns of calcification in
childhood dermatomyositis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142:
397-400.
10 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Web site
available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/. Accessed
25 May 2010.
|