ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Carl Meissner1, Marc
Hoefeld-Fegeler1, Robert Vetter1, Michael
Bellutti1, Artem Vorobyev3, Harald
Gollnick1, Martin
Leverkus1,2
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology,
Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany
2Department of Dermatology, Venereology,
and Allergology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University
of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim,
Germany
3Department of Dermatology, University
of Lübeck
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a chronic acquired
autoimmune blistering disease with highly variable clinical
manifestations [1]. The classic mechano-bullous non-inflammatory
type presents with acral blisters and erosions. Inflammatory
variants of EBA can resemble bullous or cicatricial pemphigoid, and
severe mucosal involvement may be present, leading to severe
complications, such as oesophageal stenosis [2]. Therapeutically,
EBA represents a major challenge, requiring high dose long term
immunosuppressive therapy, with modest long term success [3].
We describe a 50-year-old patient in whom a mechano-bullous form
of EBA was diagnosed 12 years ago [4]. First symptoms were
blister formation on mechanically stressed areas (figure 1A).
Furthermore, aggravated blister formation of the hands was evident
within hours after sun exposure. Histopathology of biopsies
revealed subepidermal bullae and a dense inflammatory infiltrate in
the upper dermis. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy showed
linear depositions of IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone, and
indirect IF microscopy showed binding of circulating IgG (figure 1F), but
not IgA antibodies to the dermal side of the split (figures 1G, H).
Immunoblot analysis with IgG4 isotype-specific secondary antibodies
showed that the patient's serum specifically reacted with the
recombinant NC-1 domain of type VII collagen. ELISA using
recombinant BP230, BP180 NC16A domains, as well as ANA, ENA, or Abs
against single or double stranded DNA, were negative. We diagnosed
a predominantly mechano-bullous form of EBA. The patient refused
consent for an oral corticosteroid therapy and did not present
again for several years. He noted an aggravation of the symptoms
upon intensive manual work. 9 years after diagnosis he noted
progressive atrophic scarring of his hands (figure 1B). After the
initial diagnosis 12 years before, therapy with intravenous
immunoglobulins (1.2 g kg-1 in monthly
intervals over a total of 18 months) was initiated.
Subsequently, he was treated with mycophenolate mofetil (2 g
daily p.o.) and colchicine (1 mg daily) [5] for several years.
Later, recurrent oesophageal strictures required balloon dilation.
12 years after the initial diagnosis, the patient presented
with severe contractures of the hands and feet (figures 1C-E). The
palmar side of his hands demonstrated severe dermatogenic
contractures and nail loss (figure 1E). For this
we started systemic corticosteroid treatment in combination with
azathioprine (1.5 mg/kg body weight). Based upon previous
successful reports [6, 7], we initiated 4 cycles of a B-cell
depleting therapy with Rituximab (375 mg/m2
infusion once a week) and achieved remission of the inflammatory
clinical symptoms over 4 months. Circulating autoantibody
titers against the immuno-dominant (NC-1) domains of type VII
collagen (titer of 1:1600 at presentation) were undetectable within
4-6 months, and the skin vulnerability was substantially
improved.
A loss of function of type VII collagen due to mutations within
the COL7A1 gene leads to different forms of epidermolysis bullosa
[8]. We demonstrate that over the prolonged course presented here a
predominantly mechano-bullous EBA can lead to severe contractures
and mutilations that may resemble a dystrophic form of
Epidermolysis bullosa. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first documented case of such major skin complications of EBA in
the literature, arguing for an early aggressive immunosuppression
for such forms of EBA. Although the patient was not continuously
affected in his daily life by the extent of active disease, the
mechano-bullous form of EBA can lead to serious acral
complications. We will now aim to mobilize the patient once
clinical activity of the disease is controlled by immunosuppressive
and B-cell depleting therapy. Future studies will evaluate the
effectiveness of immunosuppression, not only for acute
inflammation [9], but also for prevention of mutilations. We
speculate that immunosuppression and thus reduction of circulating
and tissue-bound autoantibodies to collagen type VII may delay the
scarring and contractions that we document in this report.
Acknowledgement
We thank Dr. Enno Schmidt (University of Lübeck, Department of
Dermatology) for helpful suggestions and critical reading of the
manuscript.
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Sitaru C. Experimental models of epidermolysis bullosa
acquisita. ExpDermatol 2007; 16: 520-31.
2 Shipman AR, Agero AL, Cook I, et al.
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita requiring multiple oesophageal
dilatations. ClinExpDermatol 2008; 33: 787-9.
3 Schmidt E, Brocker EB, Goebeler M. Rituximab in
treatment-resistant autoimmune blistering skin disorders.
ClinRevAllergy Immunol 2008; 34: 56-64.
4 Jappe U, Zillikens D, Bonnekoh B,
Gollnick H. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita with ultraviolet
radiationsensitivity. BrJ Dermatol 2000; 142: 517-20.
5 Bibas R, Gaspar NK. Ramos-e-Silva. Colchicine for
dermatologic diseases. JDrugs Dermatol 2005; 4: 196-204.
6 Niedermeier A, Eming R, Pfutze M, et al.
Clinical response of severe mechanobullous epidermolysis bullosa
acquisita to combined treatment with immunoadsorption and rituximab
(anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). Arch Dermatol 2007; 143:
192-8.
7 Schmidt E, Benoit S, Brocker EB,
Zillikens D, Goebeler M. Successful adjuvant treatment of
recalcitrant epidermolysis bullosa acquisita with anti-CD20
antibody rituximab. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 147-50.
8 Dang N, Murrell DF. Mutation analysis and
characterization of COL7A1 mutations in dystrophic epidermolysis
bullosa. Exp Dermatol 2008; 17: 553-68.
9 Takae Y, Nishikawa T, Amagai M. Pemphigus mouse
model as a tool to evaluate various immunosuppressive therapies.
Exp Dermatol 2009; 18: 252-60.
|