ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Cheng Zhou, Hongjun Xu, Dongjie Zang, Juan
Du, Jianzhong Zhang
Department of Dermatology, Peking University People's
Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
Divided nevus or kissing nevus of the penis is a rare entity
originating during embryogenesis. The lesions locate on the glans
penis and the inner surface of the prepuce, representing
mirror-image symmetry relative to the coronal sulcus. We report
three Chinese cases.
A 20-year-old man presented with melanocytic nevi on his penis.
The pigmented lesions on the glans penis (19 × 16 mm) and on
the inner surface of the prepuce (18 × 13 mm) on the right
dorsum of the penis (figure 1A) appeared
as mirror images of each other relative to the coronal sulcus when
the skin of the prepuce was retracted. His family history was
negative. Histological examination of the biopsy specimen taken
from the prepuce revealed a compound nevus (figure 1D).
A 25-year-old man with a redundant prepuce complained of
melanocytic nevi on his penis since the prepuce could be retracted
in his teens. He found erythema on his penis with mild itching
three days before his visit. Two pigmented lesions were located on
both sides of the coronal sulcus, affecting the inner surface the
prepuce (12 × 6 mm) and the left side of the glans next to the
urinary meatus (12 × 10 mm) (figure 1B). Erythema
with mild erosion was noticed around the coronary sulcus and the
nevus on the prepuce, and balanoposthitis was diagnosed. After one
week treatment of triamcinolone acetonide and econazole nitrate
cream, the erythema and erosion improved, leaving the nevus as
before.
A 21-year-old man presented with melanocytic nevi on thepenis
involving both the inner surface of the prepuce (11 × 6 mm)
and the right dorsum of the penis (11 × 8 mm) with mirror
image symmetry (figure 1C). The
lesions werenoticed after circumcision when he was 7 years
old.
Divided nevus or “kissing” nevus was first described by Von
Michael in 1908 [1], and named by Fuchs in 1919 [2], describing a
congenital melanocytic nevus that occurs on adjacent parts of the
upper and lower eyelids and may appear to be a single lesion when
the eye is closed. Divided nevus of the penis is extremely rare,
only eight cases have been described [2]. The divided nevus
was located on the dorsal or dorsolateral aspect of the glans
penis and the inner surface of the prepuce without involvement
of the coronal sulcus [3]. Most lesions showed
sharply-demarcated, oval-shaped, smooth-surfaced, pigmented
macules, and presented mirror-image symmetry relative to the
coronal sulcus [3, 4]. The histology mostly showed compound or
intradermal melanocytic nevi [2, 3, 5].
Divided nevus occurs only on those parts of the body that
separate during embryogenesis [5]. From the 11-14th gestational
week, cleavage of the invaginated epithelial preputial placode
divides the glans from the prepuce [3, 5]. It has been
proposed that migration of melanoblasts occurs just after
completion of the invagination of the preputial epithelial placode
at the 12th week of gestation, preceding the embryological
separation of epithelial preputial placode [3, 5]. Consequently,
separate lesions of the penis may originate from a single lesion in
the embryo that subsequently divides during maturation of external
genitalia [3, 5]. This embryological separation results in
mirror-image lesions relative to the coronal sulcus, with the same
size and shape. Epithelial invagination from the dorsal side
precedes the ventral side and may explain why the predilection site
is almost always the dorsal or dorsolateral aspect [3].
Malignant melanoma of the penis is very rare, accounting for
less than 2% of all primary malignancies of the penis [2]. Most
arise in the sixth or seventh decade and precursor melanocytic nevi
are not usually identified [6]. There are differing opinions
regarding the management of melanocytic nevus of penis [6]. For
divided nevus, only one patient underwent malignant alteration in
the literature [2]. Most lesions were greater than 10 mm in
diameter, and the esthetic challenges presented by lesion removal
should be carefully considered. In our opinion, conservative care
with close follow-up might be more appropriate.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Phan PT, Francis N, Madden N, Bunker CB.
Kissing naevus of the penis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29: 471-2.
2 Egberts F, Egberts JH, Schwarz T, Hauschild A. Kissing
melanoma or kissing nevus of the penis? Urology 2007 ; 69 :
384 e385-7.
3 Kono T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Ercocen AR,
Hayashi N, Chan HH, et al. Divided naevus of the
penis: a hypothesis on the embryological mechanism of its
development. Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83: 155-6.
4 Choi GS, Won DH, Lee SJ, Lee JH,
Kim YG. Divided naevus on the penis. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143:
1126-7.
5 Desruelles F, Lacour JP, Mantoux F,
Ortonne JP. Divided nevus of the penis: an unusual location.
Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 879-80.
6 Mahto M, Woolley PD, Ashworth J. Pigmented
penile macules. Int J STD AIDS 2004; 15: 717-9.
|