ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Paulina
Belmar Flores1, Jesus Cuevas2, Consuelo
Sánchez1, Esther De Eusebio1, Aranzazu
Vergara1
1Departments of Dermatology
2Pathology, Universidad Alcalá de Henares, Hospital
Universitario de Guadalajara, Spain
Papular elastorrhexis (PE) is a rare disorder of elastic tissue,
characterized by asymptomatic papules and intense fragmentation of
the elastic bundles in the reticular dermis. It was first described
by Bordas in 1987 [1] and since then, approximately 18 cases
have been published in the literature [2-4].
We report a 37-year-old woman who presented multiple,
asymptomatic, white, non-follicullar papules on her trunk and upper
arms (figure 1A). She had
no prior history of trauma or local inflammation and no relevant
family history. The histopathological examination of a cutaneous
specimen showed a normal epidermis and a focal area of homogenized
collagen in the reticular dermis with hematoxylin-eosin stain (figure 1B).
Orcein stain revealed a decrease and significant fragmentation of
elastic fibers in these areas (figure 1C). The
electron microscope findings were in agreement with those of the
optical microscope.
X-ray examinations, routine laboratory tests, ANA, rheumatoid
factor and immunoelectrophoretic studies were normal. Luetic
serology and tests for antibodies against B. burgdoferi were
negative. PE was diagnosed and no treatment was instituted,
due to the asymptomatic character of the lesions.
PE is an uncommon cutaneous disorder of elastic fibers that
presents as multiple, whitish or skin-colored, non-follicular
papules, with symmetrical distribution on the trunk and upper
extremities. It is an acquired disorder that usually appears in the
second decade of life without any history of trauma or infection.
Hereditary transmission has been described [5] in only one family
and extracutaneous changes have not been reported.
Histopathologically, the most characteristic finding is the
decrease and substantial fragmentation of elastic fibers within the
reticular dermis. The differential diagnosis includes nevus
anelasticus, papular acne scars, collagenoma, anetodermas, white
fibrous Papulosis of the neck and middermal elastolysis.
Since the first descriptions of PE, two nosological
considerations have been debated in the literature: its relation to
nevus anelasticus and to Buschke-Ollendorf syndrome (BOS). Bordas
suggested that PE was a variant of nevus anelasticus, due to the
reduction and fragmentation of elastic fibers [1]. However, some
features distinguish it from PE. Nevus anelasticus is a
predominantly congenital disorder that presents as asymmetrical and
perifollicular papules, typically grouped into patches on the
anterior aspect of the chest. Moreover, the most striking
histopathological feature is the remarkable loss of elastic fibers,
whereas fragmentation is the most prominent feature of PE
[3-5].
Later, Schirren et al. described one family with PE and
proposed that it was an abortive form of BOS [6]. BOS is an
autosomal dominant disease characterized by disseminated connective
tissue nevi and osteopoikilosis. Elastoma is the condition most
commonly found in this syndrome. Patients present with larger, and
often grouped, nodules or plaques and most cases show increased
elastic fibrils. The nosological confusion between the entities is
based on three facts: i) incomplete forms of BOS without
osteopoikilosis, ii) infrequent cases with a decrease of elastic
bundles in biopsy specimens of BOS and iii) one report of familiar
PE. However, those elements only show a certain grade of overlap
among the different elastic tissue disorders. As in our patient, a
negative family history, the absence of any radiological
abnormalities and the histological evidence of a decrease and
fragmentation of elastic fibers established the diagnosis of PE as
likely.
According to these considerations, Buecher [3] and Martinez [2]
upheld that PE is a separate entity, different from nevus
anelasticus and Buschke-Ollendorf syndrome. Moreover, Lewis
et al. [4] in an extensive review of elastic fiber disorders,
classified PE as a distinctive entity in acquired elastic tissue
disorders.
In conclusion, we report a new case of papular elastorrhexis. We
believe that PE is a distinctive entity with characteristic
clinical and histopathological features.
Acknowledgements
The authors declare no affiliation or significant financial
involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial
interest in the subject matter or material discussed in the
manuscript.
References
1 Bordas X, Ferrándiz C, Ribera M, Galofré E.
Papular elastorrhexis: a variety of nevus anelasticus?. Arch
Dermatol 1987; 123: 433-4.
2 Martínez W, Del Pozo J, Sacristán F,
Fernández-Jorge B, Fonseca E. Popular elastorrhexis, a
distinctive entity? Am J Dermatopathol 2008; 30: 188-90.
3 Buecher SA, Itin P. Papular elastorrhexis. Report of
five cases. Dermatology 2002; 205: 198-200.
4 Lewis K, Bercovitch L, Dill S,
Robinson-Boston L. Acquired disorders of elastic tissue: Part
II. Decreased elastic tissue. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:
165-85.
5 Choonhakarn C. Jirarattanapochai. Papular elastorrhexis:
a distinct variant of connective tissue nevi or an incomplete form
of Buschke-Ollendorf syndrome? Clin Expl Dermatol 2002; 27:
454-7.
6 Schirren H, Schirren CG, Stolz W, Kind P,
Plewig G. Papular elastorrhexis: a variant of dermatofibrosis
lenticularis disseminata (Buschke-OllendorfSyndrome)? Dermatology
1994; 189: 368-72.
|