Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version
  Version PDF

Mycosis fungoides plantaris


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 20, Number 1, 129-30, January-February 2010, Correspondence

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2010.0830


Author(s) : Gemma Márquez Balbás, Angeles Sola Casas, Maribel Iglesias Sancho, Manuel Sánchez-Regaña, Loida Galvany Rossell, Elisabet Dilmé Carreras, Joaquim Sola Ortigosa, Pablo Umbert Millet , Dept of Dermatology, Dermatology Univesitary Hospital Sagrat cor, Viladomat street 288, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.

Pictures

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Gemma Márquez Balbás, Angeles Sola Casas, Maribel Iglesias Sancho, Manuel Sánchez-Regaña, Loida Galvany Rossell, Elisabet Dilmé Carreras, Joaquim Sola Ortigosa, Pablo Umbert Millet

Dept of Dermatology, Dermatology Univesitary Hospital Sagrat cor, Viladomat street 288, 08029 Barcelona, Spain

Mycosis fungoides palmaris en plantaris (MFPP) is a variant of mycosis fungoides (MF) that presents primarily on the palms and soles [1], and it has been infrequently described. Herein we report three new cases of MF plantaris, each with a different clinical form.

Case 1. A 63 year-old female presented a 1 year history of multiple hyperkeratotic and fissured plantar plaques (figure 1A). She was treated for plantaris hyperkeratosis resembling keratoderma with topical corticosteroids and keratolytics, and oral acitretin, with partial response. One 4 mm punch biopsy specimen was obtained from the right foot, and it showed psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia and atypical lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei (figure 1B). The immunohistochemical study showed positivity for CD4 (> 70%).

Case 2. A 25-year-old male presented some brownish and purple plaques, a little desquamative, on both feet (figure 1C). A punch biopsy from the right foot was diagnostic for MF plantaris. The skin biopsy showed a psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia and focal epidermotropism of cerebriform lymphocytes and Pautrier’s micro-abscesses in some sections (figure 1D). Immunohistochemical findings showed the infiltrate to be composed mostly of CD4.

Case 3. A 43-year-old female presented a 2-year history of an eczematous plantar plaque. It was pruritic and had not responded to emollients and topical keratolytics (figure 1E). A biopsy specimen from the lesion showed psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia, a band-like infiltrate containing numerous cerebriform lymphocytes in the papillary dermis, and a single Pautrier’s micro-abscess (figures 1F, G). The immunohistochemical study showed a marked predominance of CD4.

In all three cases a diagnosis of MF plantaris was established. No other cutaneous involvement was observed, besides the plantar lesions. In addition, extension studies were negative in all patients. The first case is currently receiving treatment with re-PUVA (acitretin 25 milligrams per day, and topical 8-metoxipsoralen and UVA), with a poor response after three months of treatment. The second case presented clinical remission after two months of treatment with topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% and oral acitretin 25 mg/day. The third case also presented a complete response with topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% after six months of treatment. The last two cases have had a follow-up period of almost 4 years.

MFPP is infrequent, about 0.6% of all MF [2]. Clinically, MFPP mimics many other dermatoses. Cutaneous lesions may present as multiple or single lesions, scaly and erythematous patches, hyperkeratotic and dyshidrotic plaques [3, 4]. A wide clinical spectrum is the reason why diagnosis of this entity is often delayed. When the differential diagnosis is difficult, T cell-receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement study is one of the most useful methods for diagnosing MF [1]. In addition, clinical and histological findings should be considered.

It is important to distinguish it from palmo-plantar involvement in the course of a generalized MF, which is not uncommon. The histopathological findings in a skin biopsy are indistinguishable between these two entities. In single lesions, the most important differential diagnosis is Woringer-Kolopp disease, which is characterized by the presence of one or several scaly patches and plaques with acral distribution. It is a benign T-cell lymphoproliferative process with certain histological and phenotypical similarities both to early epidemotropic mycosis fungoides-type cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and other T-cell lymphoproliferations.

In MFPP, various therapeutic modalities have been described with PUVA [5], narrow band UVB [5], excision of solitary lesions [5], high potency topical corticoids and intralesional corticoids, methotrexate [5], bexarotene [5], radiotherapy [6], and electron beam therapy [6], CO2 laser and topical nitrogen mustard [5].

This form of MF typically has a long benign course [4], no case of extracutaneous spread has been described [5]. A skin biopsy should be included in the study of all recalcitrant palmo-plantar dermatoses, and MFPP considered in the differential diagnosis.

Acknowledgements

Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.

References

1 Kim ST, Jeon YS, Sim HJ, et al. Clinicopathologic features and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement findings of mycosis fungoides palmaris et plantaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: 466-71.

2 M. Fernández-Guarino R. Carrillo-Gijón M. Fernández-Lorente C. García-Millán E. Muñoz-Zato y P. Jaén-Olasolo. Placa eritematoescamosa plantar. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007; 98: 207-8.

3 Masmoudi S. Bouassida, A. Khabir, M. Loukil, J. Wechsler, M. Bagot, T. Boudawara, H. Turki, A. Zahaf. Plaques érythémato-squameuses palmo-plantaires. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2006; 133: 715-6.

4 Spieth K, Grundmann-Kollmann M, Runne U, et al. Mycosis-fungoides-type cutaneous T cell lymphoma of the hands and soles: a variant causing delay in diagnosis and adequate treatment of patients with palmoplantar eczema. Dermatology 2002; 205: 239-44.

5 Laguna C, Pérez-Farriols A, Martín B. Alegre. V. Placas hiperqueratósicas palmoplantares. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007; 98: 565-6.

6 Resnik KS, Kantor GR, Lessin SR, et al. Mycosis fungoides palmaris et plantaris. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 1052-6.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]