ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Hatice Sanli1, Bengu Nisa Akay1,
Aylin Okcu Heper2
1Department of Dermatology, Ankara University,
School of Medicine, Dermatoloji Anabilim Dalı, İbni Sina
Hastanesi, Samanpazarı-Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Pathology, Ankara University, School
of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Dermatofibromas clustered in one anatomical area, defined as
multiple clustered dermatofibromas (MCD), are a strikingly rare
entity [1-3]. MCD usually develop during adolescence or early adult
life. Congenital MCD is extremely rare [2]. We present an
additional case of congenital MCD, together with its dermatoscopic
findings.
A 19-year-old boy presented with multiple, pruritic,
reddish-brown papules on his left lumbar region. He reported
lesional onset at birth with gradual enlargement after puberty,
associated with the development of multiple new lesions. He
reported no allergies, surgery or trauma. Examination of the left
lumbar region showed reddish brown, clustered, non-scaling, firm
papules ranging in size from 4 to 9 mm, arranged in a linear
pattern (figure
1A). Some papules demonstrated dimpling on lateral
compression. Dermatoscopic examination showed a pigment network all
over the clustered papules (figure 1B).
Dermatopathological examination revealed a dermal tumor just
beneath the hyperplastic and hyperpigmented epidermis, extending
from the superficial dermis to the deep reticular dermis and
largely composed of interlacing short fascicles of spindle cells in
a storiform arrangement. Tumor cells showed factor XIIIa positivity
and CD34 negativity. A diagnosis of dermatofibroma was
made.
Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous condition, probably of
inflammatory origin, with diverse clinical variants including giant
(> 5 cm in diameter), atrophic, atypical polipoid and
dermatofibroma with satellites. MCD is a very rare entity that
corresponds to numerous dermatofibromas appearing on a single
region of the anatomy, mainly on the lower half of the body [1-3].
In all reported cases, the lesions seem to develop during
adolescence or early adult life. To our knowledge, there is only
one report of MCD occurring at birth [2]. In that case the lesions
extended to involve a broad zone on the left hip, gluteal region
and upper thigh. The present case is the second congenital MCD
arranged in a linear pattern to be described.
MCD can be eruptive or new lesions can develop over months to
years. Papules may arrange in a coalescent fashion to form a large
plaque or in a linear configuration. The pathogenesis is still
unknown. Triggering factors such as insect bites, jelly fish bites,
superficial venous thrombosis and surgery have been implicated in
some cases [1, 3]. However development of MCD appears to be
unassociated with an inciting event or immune dysfunction.
Dermatoscopy, which is a non-invasive diagnostic technique, was
used to evaluate the pigmentary changes of the lesion. Dermatoscopy
revealed pigment network all over the clustered lesions. In the
algorithm for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by
dermatoscopy, the presence of pigment network usually indicates a
melanocytic skin lesion but it can also be found in a variety of
non-melanocytic lesions, including dermatofibroma, solar lentigo,
ink spot lentigo, accessory nipple and CM [4-6]. In the clinical
and dermatoscopic differential diagnosis [6], CM was considered
more likely due to the congenital and pruritic origin of the
lesions. The diagnosis of CM is confirmed by a dermal infiltrate
composed of mast cells that can be recognized on skin sections
stained with HE. The hyperpigmentation of CM can be explained by an
increase in melanin in basal keratinocytes. Here the pigment
network seen in dermatoscopy is a result of an increase in melanin
in the hyperplastic epidermis. The papule came into being mostly by
virtue of the fibroplasia in the upper half of the dermis, and the
smooth surface is a reflection of the stratum corneum being
normal.
In conclusion, we present the dermatoscopic findings in an
unusual case of MCD. The presence of the lesions in our patient
since birth indicated the possibility of the congenital character
of this fibroblastic tumour.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none
REFERENCES
1 Berbis P, Benderitter T, Perier C, Frey J,
Privat Y. Multiple clustered dermatofibromas. Evolution over
20 years. Dermatologica 1988; 177: 185-8.
2 De Unamuno P, Carames Y, Fernandez-Lopez E,
Hernandez-Martin A, Peña C. Congenital multiple clustered
dermatofibroma. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 1040-3.
3 Viseux V, Chaby G, Agbalika F, et al.
Multiple clustered dermatofibromas on a superficial venous
thrombosis in a kidney transplanted patient. Dermatology 2004; 209:
156-7.
4 Argenziano G, Soyer HP, De Giorgi V, et al.
Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy. Milan, EDRA Medical Publishing
& New Media 2000 : 297-305 (CDROM).
5 Ferrari A, Soyer HP, Peris K, et al.
Central white scarlike patch: a dermatoscopic clue for the
diagnosis of dermatofibroma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43:
1123-5.
6 Akay BN, Kittler H, Sanli H, Harmankaya K,
Anadolu R. Dermatoscopic findings of cutaneous mastocytosis.
Dermatology 2009; 218: 226-30.
|