ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Masayoshi Yamanaka, Osamu
Ishikawa
Department of Dermatology, Gunma University Graduate School
of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511,
Japan
Guttate morphea is a rare varient of localized scleroderma and
accounts for only 0.13%-1.2% of patients with morphea [1, 2]. We
herein present a case of guttate morphea in a scleroderma spectrum
disorder (SSD) [3, 4] with ACA.
A 38-year-old Japanese woman presented with a 4-year history of
erythematous skin lesions on her extremities. She had suffered from
atopic dermatitis since the age of 15 and often scratched her skin.
At the age of 34, she experienced asymptomatic small eruptions
around the scratched areas on her extremities. In December 2007,
she visited our hospital. Multiple, small (< 1 cm),
reddish erythematous plaques were scattered on the extensor
surfaces of the forearms and lower legs, and lesions on the lateral
aspects of the thighs and buttocks (figure 1A). The central
part of the plaques was slightly atrophic. Nail fold bleeding and
periungal erythema were observed on her fingers (figure 1B), sclerodactyly
was not present. There was no history of Raynaud’s phenomenon, nor
systemic symptoms suggestive of SSc. Laboratory studies revealed a
positive ANA (1:1280) and ACA (209.6 Index). Anti-topoisomerase I,
anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, anti-RNP, anti-single-stranded-DNA,
anti-double-stranded-DNA, antihistone and antimitochondrial
antibodies were all negative. A skin biopsy specimen from a
forearm lesion showed thickened collagen bundles in the dermis and
moderate infiltrates of lymphocytes, histiocytes and plasma cells
around blood vessels and appendages (figure 1C). Taken
together, the diagnosis of guttate morphea in ACA-positive SSD was
established.
The concept of SSD was proposed by Maricq et al. [3] to
unify typical scleroderma, early forms of scleroderma and closely
related disorders, including mixed connective tissue disease
(MCTD). Our patient did not show sclerodactyly but nail fold
bleeding in all fingers and positive-ACA. According to the
diagnostic method of SSD by Ihn et al. [4], these findings
indicate that she has high risk of future development to SSc and
requires careful follow-up.
Localized scleroderma is considered to have an autoimmune
background, because of a high frequency of autoantibodies [1, 2].
In general, anti-topoisomerase I antibody and ACA, which are
representative autoantibodies for SSc, have been considered not to
be detected in localized scleroderma. However, ACA-positive
patients with localized scleroderma have been reported in recent
years [5, 6]. Zulian et al. [1] analyzed 750 patients with
juvenile localized scleroderma and found that ACA were positive in
2% of cases, respectively. Marzano et al. [2] also examined
239 patients with localized scleroderma (113 adults and 126
children) and reported that ACA were positive in 5% of adults but
not in children. Although none of their patients developed SSc,
four of the six ACA-positive patients had Raynaud’s phenomenone and
capilloscopic changes. These patients may have SSD like our
patient. Thus, ACA can be detected with a certain frequency in
localized scleroderma.
Trauma is considered to be a possible trigger of morphea. Zulian
et al. [1] reported that a history of local mechanical
factors, including accidental trauma, insect bite and vaccination,
were present in approximately 10% of patients. In our case, skin
scratching seems to be a trigger of morphea. Recently, Ehara
et al. [6] reported two patients who had morphea lesions in
areas mechanically-compressed by underclothes. Interestingly, one
patient had Raynaud’s phenomenon and positive detection of ACA.
Certainly, trauma itself is associated with local inflammation and
release of cytokines and growth factors, however, most traumas do
not result in morphea. For developing trauma-induced morphea, some
predisposition should be required. In patients with ACA, there may
be an immunological predisposition to develop morphea. Further
clinical studies are warranted to clarify the relationship between
the development of morphea and ACA.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Zulian F, Vallongo C, Woo P, et al. Juvenile
localized scleroderma: clinical and epidemiological features in 750
children. An international study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45:
614-20.
2 Marzano AV, Menni S, Parodi A, et al.
Localized scleroderma in adults and children. Clinical and
laboratory investigations on 239 cases. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13:
171-6.
3 Maricq HR, McGregor AR, Diat F, et al.
Major clinical diagnoses found among patients with Raynaud
phenomenon from the general population. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:
1171-6.
4 Ihn H, Sato S, Tamaki T, et al. Clinical
evaluation of scleroderma spectrum disorders using a points system.
Arch Dermatol Res 1992; 284: 391-5.
5 Ohmatsu H, Tada Y, Yazawa N, Kadono T,
Tamaki K. Generalized morphea positive for anticentromere
antibody. Eur J Dermatol 2008; 18: 718-9.
6 Ehara M, Oono T, Yamasaki O, Matsuura H,
Iwatsuki K. Generalized morphea-like lesions arising in
mechanically-compressed areas by underclothes. Eur J Dermatol 2006;
16: 307-9.
|