ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Tessin Watanabe,
Hiromi Higaki, Nanako Yamada, Yuichi Yoshida, Osamu Yamamoto
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine
of Sensory and Motor Organs, Faculty of Medicine,
Tottori University, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan
Several antibiotics and growth promoters are used widely in pig
farming. They rarely cause allergic or photoallergic contact
dermatitis [1-3]. We describe a case of photoallergic contact
dermatitis in a pig farmer, caused by cotrimoxazole.
A 53-year-old man, with no atopic history, had a 1-year history
of skin lesions on his face, neck, ears, forearms and dorsal hands.
He had been working as a pig farmer for the past 20 years and
had used oxytetracycline, tylosin and cotrimoxazole
(sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) for preventing infectious diseases
in pigs. He handled dry pig foods containing these drugs without
using protective clothing or gloves for 2 months before the
development of skin lesions. The pattern developed was lichenified
erythema on sun-exposed areas, including his forehead, cheeks,
neck, ears, forearms and hands (figure 1). Topical
steroids were ineffective for treating these lesions. Blood
biochemistry was within normal limits. Histopathologically, the
cutaneous lesions of his dorsal hand showed hyperkeratosis,
acanthosis and superficial perivascular lymphocyte infiltration.
His skin lesions improved slightly but became worse again. We
suspected that the lesions were caused by contact or photocontact
allergy to the antibiotic used in pig feed. Minimal erythema doses
for UVA and UVB of the patient were within normal ranges. Patch
testing was performed with oxytetracycline, tylosin and
cotrimoxazole at 1% and 10% in petrolatum. The patch testing only
yielded positive reactions for tylosin at 1% and 10% (++), both at
D3 and D4. Photopatch tests using oxytetracycline and cotrimoxazole
with 5 J/cm2 UVA were also performed at the same
concentrations as those used in patch testing. Positive results
were obtained with cotrimoxazole at 10% (+) at D3 and D4.
Drug-induced lymphocyte stimulating tests (DLST) revealed positive
reactions to tylosin with a stimulating index of 431% and to
cotrimoxazole with a stimulating index of 213% (normal < 180%).
The skin lesions improved with topical steroid treatment after
hospitalization for tests. Therefore, we advised the patient to
avoid handling these antibiotics in the future.
Based on the clinical history, positive DLST index and positive
results of patch and photopatch tests, we made a diagnosis of
allergic contact dermatitis to tylosin and photoallergic contact
dermatis due to cotrimoxazole. In the present case, both allergic
contact dermatitis to tylosin and photoallergic contact dermatis
due to cotrimoxazole in a pig farmer were demonstrated.
Tylosin and Olaquindox are well-known contact allergens for pig
farmers. Fixed drug eruptions and toxic epidermal necrolysis have
been reported as adverse skin reaction to cotrimoxazole [4, 5].
However, photoallergic skin reactions to cotrimoxazole (sulfamides)
are extremely rare [6]. In addition, photoallergic contact
dermatitis due to cotrimoxazole in a pig farmer has not been
reported as far as we know. A persistent dermatitis of
sun-exposed areas in a pig farmer should be studied as a possible
photoallergic contact dermatitis, possibly induced by
antibiotics.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Belhadjali H, Marguery MC, Journé F, et al.
Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis to Olaquindox in a
pig breeder with prolonged photosensitivity. Photodermatol
Photoimmunol Photomed 2002; 18: 52-3.
2 Tuomi ML, Räsänen L. Contact allergy to tylosin and
cobalt in a pig-farmer. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 285.
3 Pirkis JE, O’Regan KK, Bailie R. Contact
dermatitis and in-feed exposure to antibiotics among pig feed
handlers. Aust J Rural Health 1997; 5: 76-9.
4 Ozkaya-Bayazit E, Bayazit H, Ozarmagan G.
Topical provocation in 27 cases of cotrimoxazole-induced fixed drug
eruption. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 185-9.
5 Buslau M. Case report: TEN in a patient with black
skin–blister fluid for rapid diagnosis. Dermatol Online 2008; 14:
14.
6 Affronti M, Malta R, Di Rosa S, et al.
Photo-sensitization by sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim through the
skin: a case report. J Chemother 1989; 1: 627.
|