ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Rym
Benmously1, Houda Hammami1, Mondher
Rouatbi1, Achraf Debbiche2, Adnane
Souissi2, Inçaf Mokhtar1, Sammy
Fenniche1
1Dermatology Department, Habib Thameur Hospital, 8,
Ali Ben Ayed Sreet Montfleury-1008 Tunis-Tunisia
2Histopathology Department, Habib Thameur Hospital,
Tunis
An exaggerated reaction to an insect bite is a non specific
phenomenon described mostly with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [1].
This dermatosis has been described in about 40 patients affected by
lymphoproliferative disorders [1, 2]. We report herein a new
case.
A 74-year-old woman was referred to our department for
evaluation of a generalized pruritic skin eruption of 2 years’
duration. She had been diagnosed 5 years previously with stage III
low-grade nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma of B-cell origin (NHBCL). She
received at that date chemotherapy including CEOP and Alkeran
(6 cycles). A total remission was achieved. She presented
for recurrent urticarial plaques involving the face (figure 1A) and limbs,
erythematous papules covered by vesicles (figure 1B) and bullae
associated with infiltrated nodules on the limbs. The patient
denied having an arthropod bite preceding the lesions. There was no
history of drug intake. There were no clinical or biological signs
of lymphoma relapse (no adenopathy, or splenomegaly). Blood tests
showed no evidence of lymphocytosis but demonstrated elevated
lactate dehydrogenase at 791 U/L and an elevated eosinophilic
count of 900 cells/mm3. Stool analysis for
parasites proved negative. A skin biopsy of a bullous lesion
showed intraepidermal spongiotic bullae containing numerous
eosinophils and fibrin exsudates (figure 1C) associated with
a perivascular and interstitial eosinophilic infiltrate through the
dermis. Blue Alcian staining revealed no mucinosis deposit.
Histological examination of a nodular lesion revealed a dense
perivascular and interstitial eosinophilic infiltrate of the dermis
and the subcutis (figure
1D). No Flame figures were observed. Direct
immunofluorescence tested negative. These findings support the
diagnosis of an insect bite-like reaction. Treatment with topical
corticosteroids led to a partial improvement. Dapsone was
administered at 100 mg/day, but stopped because of the
appearance of hemolytic anemia. One week later, we observed an
increase in white blood cell count (20,300/μL with 12,600/μL
lymphocytes). A relapse of NHBCL was diagnosed. The patient
was referred to the oncology department. A complete remission
of her cutaneous lesions was observed after 2 cycles of new
chemotherapy treatment.
Exaggerated reaction to an insect bite was first described in
1965 by Weed [2]. A debate has ensued as to whether this
phenomenon is due to exaggerated delayed hypersensitivity to
mosquito bites. In fact, most of the patients could not recall have
been bitten [1, 3]. Therefore, Barzilai et al. proposed new terms
to describe this eruption such as insect bite-like reaction or
eosinophilic eruption of hematoproliferative disease [1]. Byrd et
al. proposed the following diagnostic criteria: (i) pruritic
papules, nodules and/or vesiculobullous eruption resistant to
conservative treatment; (ii) eosinophilic-rich dermal
lymphohistiocytic infiltrate; (iii) exclusion of the other causes
of tissue eosinophilia; and (iiii) preexisting diagnosis of a
hematologic malignancy or dyscrasia or its subsequent development
[4]. Our patient bore a striking resemblance to these findings. The
pathogenesis of this entity remains unknown. A cytokine
imbalance with an excess of interleukin IL-4 and IL-5, leading to a
proliferation of malignant B cells and to a modified immune
response characterized by eosinophilic infiltration, has been
proposed. Another suggestion is that neoplastic B cells may be
responsible for the skin hypersensitivity reaction [5]. Treatment
failure of insect bite-like reactions has been reported with
antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, systemic antihistamines, UV-B
phototherapy, isolated chemotherapy, and interferon therapy [1].
Prednisolone may suppress the eruption but lesions recur when the
dose is reduced [1]. Treatment with dapsone may lead to marked
improvement [6]. Improvement of skin lesions in our patient is
probably due to the fact that corticosteroids were included in the
chemotherapy regimen [1].
In conclusion, this disease should be considered in patients
affected by NHBCL. As the eruption may precede the occurrence or
relapse of the hematoproliferative malignancy, a thorough follow-up
in patients with eosinophilic dermatosis is recommended.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Barzilai A, Shpiro D, Goldberg I, et al.
Insect bite-like reaction in patients with hematologic malignant
neoplasms. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 1503-7.
2 Weed RI. Exaggerated delayed hypersensitivity to mosquito
bites in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1965; 26: 257-68.
3 Davis MD, Perniciaro C, Dahl PR,
Randle HW, McEvoy MT, Leiferman KM. Exaggerated
arthropod-bite lesions in patients with chronic lymphocytic
leukemia: a clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic study
of eight patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 27-35.
4 Byrd JA, Scherschun L, Chaffins ML,
Fivenson DP. Eosinophilic dermatosis of myeloproliferative
disease: characterization of a unique eruption in patients with
hematologic disorders. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1378-80.
5 Dodiuk-Gad RP, Dann EJ, Bergman R. Insect
bite-like reaction associated with mantle cell lymphoma: a report
of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2004; 43:
754-8.
6 Ulmer A, Metzler G, Schanz S, Fierlbeck G.
Dapsone in the management of "insect bite-like reaction" in a
patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Dermatol 2007;
156: 172-4.
|