Author(s) : Marjolein AC Mattheij, Louis AA Kollee, Cecile JM Buzing, Marieke MB Seyger , Department of Paediatrics, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, PO box 90153, 5200 ME ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, Department of Paediatrics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Department of Paediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, PO box 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. |
ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Marjolein AC Mattheij1, Louis AA
Kollee2, Cecile JM Buzing3, Marieke MB
Seyger4
1Department of Paediatrics, Jeroen Bosch
Hospital, PO box 90153, 5200 ME ’s-Hertogenbosch, The
Netherlands
2Department of Paediatrics, Radboud University
Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The
Netherlands
3Department of Paediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina
Hospital, PO box 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands
4Department of Dermatology, Radboud University
Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The
Netherlands
Congenital ring constrictions coexisting with amputations or
other abnormalities are rare malformations occurring in
1:10:000-1:45:000 births. The amniotic band hypothesis suggests
that, following an amniotic tear, fibrous bands produce
constrictions which may progress to amputation [1]. We describe a
patient with a congenital constriction band in combination with
acquired raised bands becoming apparent after birth. Information
from the scarce literature is reviewed.
Case report
A five-month old girl presented to the department of dermatology
with a three-month history of skin lesions (figure 1). The lesions
were initially hypopigmented, slightly constricted and atrophic.
Examination at the age of five months revealed a deep invagination
of the skin of the right elbow, present since birth, with three
parallel, linear, slightly raised, skin-coloured lesions on the
right arm and similar lesions on the trunk.
Her medical history included premature rupture of membranes and
caesarean section at 28 weeks gestation because of foetal distress.
Antenatal sonography showed oligohydramnion at a gestational age of
27+5, but no abnormalities at a gestational age of 25+0 and 26+0
weeks. No record was made of any amniotic bands. The girl underwent
surgery because of a persistent ductus arteriosus and received
diuretics because of mild bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The skin
lesions were diagnosed as acquired raised bands of infancy. At the
age of 1.6 years the lesions were unchanged.
Raised bands of infancy seem even rarer than congenital
constriction bands, with only 5 case reports to date [1-5]. In
2002, two premature infants with so called postnatally developing
“raised limb bands” were described [1]. One child had a congenital
constriction band around the forearm and premature termination of
the right hallux and second toe. Because of the unfamiliarity of
the lesions, both children underwent chromosome analyses,
biochemical, hematological, immunological investigations and
skeletal surveys, which showed no abnormalities. Biopsies of the
raised bands showed mild edema of the dermis in one child and a
poorly circumscribed area in the dermis, composed of collagen with
mild perivascular chronic inflammation in the other child; very
unspecific findings. The fourth described patient, with both
truncal and extremity lesions [3], made the authors propose the
term “acquired raised bands of infancy”. The lesions in our case
show various stages: from hypopigmented atrophic to skin-colored
raised bands. How these different stages develop, which can also
exist at the same time [1, 3], remains unknown. The development of
the skin, as well as the period of time that the constriction
occurred, might play a role.
In table 1 the most important
features of all the patients known with acquired raised bands are
shown. Half of the patients were born preterm. Suggestions that
amniotic bands play a role in the development of raised bands seem
plausible because of the associated limb constrictions seen in two
patients – including our patient –, the congenital
constriction bands in three patients, and the presence of amniotic
bands at antenatal sonography in one patient. A shortcoming is
the scarcity of sonographic results mentioned; detecting amniotic
bands in utero would make the hypothesis of amniotic bands as the
cause of the skin deficits even more plausible.
From the literature published to date, a few conclusions can
carefully be drawn and can be used for parent information.
i) Association with amniotic bands seems likely. ii) The
raised bands are asymptomatic and without any significant sequelae.
iii) Additional laboratory, radiological investigations or skin
biopsy are unnecessarily damaging. iv) New acquired bands can
develop until at least the age of 1 year. v) There is a chance of
partial remission, but is seems more probable that the skin lesions
will remain more or less visible. vi) There are no treatment
options. Surgical intervention should be avoided.
Table 1 Information of all patients reported with
acquired raised bands
|
Author
|
Perinatal conditions
|
Gestational age1
|
Sex2
|
Age at development acquired bands3
|
Localisation acquired bands
|
Congenital constriction band
|
Other deformities
|
Further course (years.months)
|
Ultrasound findings antenatal
|
|
Meggitt 1, 2002
|
Placental abruption
|
31
|
m
|
2
|
Arms, legs
|
Yes, 1
|
Premature termination toe
|
Unknown
|
19 weeks: normal
|
|
Meggitt 2, 2002
|
PROM
|
29
|
f
|
3-12
|
Thighs
|
No
|
None
|
At age 5 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Russi, 2003
|
Normal
|
Term
|
m
|
2
|
Back, legs
|
No
|
None
|
At age 3.3 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Dyer, 2005
|
Placental abruption
|
28
|
m
|
3-5
|
Leg, buttocks
|
Yes, 1
|
Clubfoot
|
Unknown
|
28 weeks: amniotic band
|
|
Lateo 1, 2006
|
Normal
|
Term
|
f
|
7
|
Calf
|
No
|
None
|
At age 2 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Lateo 2, 2006
|
Normal
|
36
|
f
|
1
|
Calf
|
No
|
None
|
At age 3 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Lateo 3, 2006
|
Normal
|
Term
|
f
|
6
|
Arms
|
No
|
None
|
At age 2.6 resolved partially
|
Unknown
|
|
Lateo 4, 2006
|
Normal
|
Term
|
f
|
1
|
Arms
|
No
|
None
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
|
Marque 1, 2006
|
Normal
|
Term
|
f
|
2
|
Legs
|
No
|
None
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
|
Marque 2, 2006
|
Normal
|
Term
|
m
|
4
|
Legs
|
No
|
None
|
At age 2 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Marque 3, 2006
|
Normal
|
Unknown
|
m
|
Unknown
|
Legs, thigh
|
No
|
None
|
At age 18 unchanged
|
Unknown
|
|
Mattheij, 2009
|
PROM
|
28
|
f
|
2-7
|
Arm, back
|
Yes, 1
|
None
|
At age 1.6 unchanged
|
27+5 weeks: oligohydramnion
|
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Meggitt SJ, Harper J, Lacour M, Taylor AEM.
Raised limb bands developing in infancy. Brit J Derm 2002; 147:
359-63.
2 Russi DC, Irvine AD, Paller AS. Raised limb
bands developing in infancy. Brit J Derm 2003; 149: 436-7.
3 Dyer JA, Chamlin S. Acquired raised bands of
infancy: association with amniotic bands. Ped Derm 2005; 22:
346-9.
4 Lateo SA, Taylor AEM, Meggitt SJ. Raised limb
bands developing in infancy. Brit J Derm 2006; 154: 791-2.
5 Marque MM, Guillot B, Le Gallic G,
Bessis D. Raised bands in infancy: a post-traumatic aetiology?
Br J Derm 2007; 156: 578-9.
|