ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Kiriko
Inoue, Yoko Kano, Hiroaki Kagawa, Kazuhisa Hirahara, Tetsuo
Shiohara
Department of Dermatology, Kyorin University School
of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611
Japan
Recent studies by Aurelian and colleagues [1-3] have indicated
that the course of herpes virus-associated erythema multiforme
(HAEM) is biphasic, with early virus-specific events and late
inflammatory events mediated by cytokines. If so, episodic
treatment with antiviral drugs followed by a short-course of
systemic corticosteroids would be expected to have a favorable
response in patients with recurrent HAEM. However, the results of
our patient indicate that such episodic treatments might
paradoxically be associated with an increase in the recurrence and
severity of HAEM.
A 16-year-old man was referred for evaluation of a 7-day history
of progressive erythematous lesions on his whole body which
developed 10 days after herpes labialis (HL), in October 2006. The
preliminary diagnosis of HAEM or drug eruption was made. His past
history revealed that he had had eight episodes of similar erythema
multiforme (EM) after HL, since 2004. From May 2006, episodic
treatments with valacyclovir 1000 mg daily followed by a
short-course of systemic corticosteroids were started by the
referring physician (figure 1A). Since then, he
had had identical episodes of EM more frequently, and the eruptions
worsened with every attack. Sixteen days prior to his initial
presentation, he was also given oral valacyclovir followed by oral
corticosteroids for EM. Despite these treatments, the EM became
generalized and mucous membranes were involved.
Examination revealed general fatigue with dysphagia, high-grade
fever, targetoid skin macules involving his trunk and extremities,
and multiple ulcerations on his mouth and scrotum. The targetoid
skin lesions were, in part, confluent to form large macules more
than 10 cm in diameter (figure 1B). No pathogen
was isolated from a throat swab but HSV-1 antigens were detected on
his lips.
A skin biopsy specimen obtained from a typical target lesion on
the arm revealed scattered necrotic keratinocytes, hydropic
degeneration of the basal layer in the epidermis, and
lymphohistiocytic infiltration in the upper dermis (figure 1C). Baseline blood
tests were almost within normal limits. HSV IgG titer was 74.0 and
anti-mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM titer was negative. The stimulation
index (S.I.) value of lymphocyte transformation tests for
valacyclovir examined 9 days after onset of EM were 1.8 (positive ≥
1.8) [4, 5].
Because valacyclovir was also suspected on chronological
grounds, valacyclovir was withdrawn and palliative therapy was
started. His symptoms resolved gradually; he was discharged after 3
weeks’ hospitalization.
For the next 3 months, he maintained a clinical remission
without any treatment. Three months however later in January 2007
the patient developed another attack of EM after HL without any
drug administration; the diagnosis of HAEM was finally made.
Another, the lesions were minor and did not evolve into generalized
lesions. The levels of S.I. for valacyclovir decreased with time;
the patch test with the drug was also negative. 3 months later he
developed HL. On this occasion, he received a short-course of
valacyclovir therapy (1000 mg/day, 5 days) which did not
provoke any cutaneous reaction. This finding excluded its role in
causation of EM and ascertained the safety of continuous therapy
with valacyclovir (500 to 1000 mg per day). Prophylactic
continuous therapy with valacyclovir was started and no further
recurrence of HAEM with widespread target lesions was observed,
although a few “minor” versions of this eruption were observed,
much less frequently.
This patient with HAEM did not respond to valacyclovir followed
by systemic corticosteroids, and the recurrence and severity of
HAEM were increased dramatically after starting this treatment.
Although various triggering factors could be involved in the
development of HAEM, the episodic treatments followed by systemic
corticosteroids may be added to the list.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of
Education, Sports, Science and Culture in Japan (to T.S. and to
Y.K.) and the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (to
T.S.). Conflicts of interest: none.
References
1 Kokuba H, Aurelian L, Burnett J. Herpes simplex
virus associated erythema multiforme (HAEM) is mechanistically
distinct from drug-induced erythema multiforme: interferon-γ is
expressed in HAEM lesions and tumor necrosis factor-α in
drug-induced erythema multiforme lesions. J Invest Dermatol 1999;
113: 808-15.
2 Ono F, Sharma BK, Smith CC, et al.
CD34+cells in the peripheral blood transport herpes
simplex virus DNA fragments to the skin of patients with erythema
multiforme (HAEM). J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124: 1215-24.
3 Gober MD, Laing JM, Burnett JW,
Aurelian L. The herpes simplex virus gene Pol expressed in
herpes-associated erythema multiforme lesions upregulates/activates
SP1 and inflammatory cytokines. Dermatology 2007; 215: 97-106.
4 Pichler WJ, Tilch J. The lymphocyte transformation
test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2004; 59:
809-20.
5 Kano Y, Takahashi R, Shiohara T, et al.
Utility of lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug
sensitivity: dependence on its timing and the type of drug
eruption. Allergy 2007; 62: 1439-44.
|