ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Maud Bezier1, Ziad
Reguiai1, Fabien Vitry2, Franck
Broly3, Philippe
Bernard1
1Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Robert-Debré,
Centre Hospitalier de Reims, avenue du Général Koenig, 51092 Reims
Cedex, France
2UAM, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Centre Hospitalier de
Reims, France
3Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Hôpital Calmette, Centre Hospitalier de Lille, France
accepté le 22 Avril 2008
Azathioprine is an immunosuppressive agent widely used in the
prevention of organ transplant rejection and as a steroid-sparing
agent in autoimmune diseases. The main indications of azathioprine
in dermatology include different auto-immune bullous diseases,
severe atopic dermatitis, chronic actinic dermatitis, systemic
lupus erythematosus or vasculitis [1-3]. The major drawback of
azathioprine therapy is the possible occurrence of myelosuppression
(chronic leukopenia or acute bone marrow failure) which can be
predicted by measuring thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT)
activity [4-6]. Other side-effects, including dose-dependent
nausea, predisposition to infections and hypersensitivity
reactions, are unrelated to TPMT activity. TPMT is a key enzyme in
azathioprine metabolism, which has recently been more clearly
defined and a mechanism for this acute toxicity has been identified
[7]. Its activity is inversely related to the risk of developing
severe hematopoietic toxicity in patients treated with standard
doses of azathioprine. The cytosolic enzyme TPMT shows in vivo
inter-individual and inter-ethnic variability caused by TPMT gene
polymorphism, which is inherited as an autosomal co-dominant trait
[8, 9]. Multiple alleles of the TPMT gene have been identified and
three major inactivating mutations causing TPMT deficiency (G238C,
G460A et A719G in exons 5, 7, and 10, respectively) either isolated
or combined, have been identified in a European population and
account for 80-95% of abnormalities of enzymatic activity [10-12];
89% of Caucasians are homozygous for a functional allele of the
TPMT gene, 11% are heterozygous for a functional allele of the gene
and 1/300 individuals are compound heterozygous or homozygous for a
non-functional allele of the gene. Three phenotypes correspond with
these genotypes: high TPMT activity (high methylators),
intermediate activity (intermediate methylators) and deficient
activity (deficient methylators). This has led to the development
of TPMT genotyping in order to identify patients at risk of
azathioprine-induced myelosuppression [10]. The aim of the present
study was to evaluate the usefulness of the TPMT genotyping in
severe cases of autoimmune bullous diseases currently being or
susceptible to be treated by azathioprine.
Patients and methods
Patients
All patients hospitalized in the Department of Dermatology of the
Reims University Hospital in France between 1999 and 2006 for one
of the following autoimmune bullous diseases: bullous pemphigoid
(BP), cicatricial pemphigoid (CP), pemphigus or epidermolysis
bullosa acquisita (EBA), in whom a TPMT genotyping had been
performed, were included in the study. Since they did not usually
receive azathioprine therapy, patients with other autoimmune
bullous conditions, including IgA bullous dermatosis linear,
dermatitis herpetiformis and pemphigoid gestationis were not
included in the study. In all cases, a proper diagnosis of an
autoimmune bullous disease was established using the usual
clinical, histological and immunopathological (direct and indirect
immunofluorescence testing ± direct immunoelectron microscopy,
western immunoblotting and ELISA for anti-BP180, anti-desmogein 1
or 3 depending on the cases) criteria for each disease.
TPMT genotyping
Blood samples were sent to the Laboratory of biochemistry and
molecular biology, Calmette Hospital (Lille, France) for analysis.
The three major inactivating mutations of the TPMT gene (G238C,
G460A and A719G) were researched by performing analysis of DNA
single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of exons 5, 7 and 10
[10, 11]. The result of the test was a genotyping (homozygosity for
a functional or non-functional allele, heterozygosity) which
allowed predicting of the enzymatic activity phenotype (high,
intermediate or deficient) in 90% of the cases [11].
Data collection
Data were retrospectively recorded from the patients’ files. They
included: (1) demographic data (sex, age at diagnosis) (2) when
performed, the date of TPMT genotyping and its result; (3)
azathioprine-related data including initial dose and maximal dose
(mg/kg–1 daily), duration, clinical efficacy (complete
remission) and associated treatments and (4) the incidence and
nature of any side effects attributable to azathioprine
(haematopoietic toxicity, gastro-intestinal effects, infections,
hypersensitivity syndrome and other adverse reactions).
An exhaustive list of all the TPMT genotypings performed between
1998 and 2006 for patients issued from our department (with
autoimmune bullous diseases or other dermatological conditions) was
also provided by the reference laboratory and the patients’ files
analysed.
Results
During the study period, 177 patients (mean age at diagnosis: 73
years) with the selected autoimmune bullous diseases were
hospitalized in our department, including 133 with BP, 18 with CP,
22 with pemphigus and 4 with EBA. During the same period of time, a
total of 117 TPMT genotypings were performed in patients with
either autoimmune bullous diseases (n = 75) or other dermatological
disorders (n = 42) including vasculitis (n = 12), systemic lupus
erythematosus (n = 7), cutaneous manifestations of chronic
inflammatory bowel diseases (n = 4), psoriasis (n = 2), chronic
actinic dermatitis (n = 3) and other inflammatory diseases (n =
14). Among these 117 patients, 106 (91%) exhibited a high
predictable TPMT activity and 11 (9%) an intermediate predictable
TPMT activity (table 1).
A total of 75 patients with autoimmune bullous diseases (42 with
BP, 15 with CP, 16 with pemphigus, 2 with EBA), who had been, at
the time of diagnosis, believed susceptible to be further treated
with azathioprine, had a TPMT genotyping. Among these, 70 patients
(93%) had a high predictable TPMT activity and 5 (7%) an
intermediate predictable activity (table
1). No patient showed a deficient TPMT activity. Only 34
out of 75 patients with an autoimmune bullous disease were further
treated with azathioprine, this decision being made on the basis of
either the severity or the cortico-resistance of the disease. TPMT
genotyping was performed in 33 out of 34 patients (17 with BP, 6
with CP, 11 with pemphigus) who were currently being treated by
azathioprine (mean initial dose: 1.7 mg/kg/day; mean maximal
dose: 2.2 mg/kg/day; mean duration: 10 months). Thirty-one patients
(94%) showed a high TPMT activity and two (6%) an intermediate TPMT
activity (one patient heterozygous for a functional allele and a
non-functional variant of the gene with G460A and A719G mutations;
one patient with G238C mutation). A clinical complete remission was
obtained in 14 out of 34 patients treated with azathioprine within
a mean delay of 135 ± 85 days (mean ± 2 SD) and a mean maximal dose
of 2.3 mg/kg/day (table 2).
Azathioprine was associated with another treatment in 28 out of 34
patients (82%), including topical corticosteroids (n = 22), oral
corticosteroids (n = 20) or both (n = 14), intravenous
immunoglobulins (n = 5) or other therapies (dapsone, plasma
exchange, tetracyclines; n = 4).
Adverse reactions were observed in 23 out of 34 patients (68%)
leading to withdrawal of treatment in 17 patients (table 3). Among these, there were two cases (6%)
of hypersensitivity reaction which occurred within a mean delay of
20 days. In one of these two patients, azathioprine was
reintroduced with recurrence of identical symptoms within a shorter
time duration (24 hours). Clinical signs during these
hypersensitivity reactions included fever, arthralgias, skin rash,
gastrointestinal symptoms, pancreatitis and hepatitis.
Haematopoietic side-effects were observed in 12/34 patients (35%)
treated with a mean maximal dosage of azathioprine of
2.7 mg/kg/day; they occurred over a mean period of 108 days,
despite a high predictive TPMT activity in all affected patients.
Although generally mild, these haematopoietic side-effects led to
the interruption of azathioprine therapy in 8/12 patients. No
myelotoxicity was observed in the two patients with intermediate
TPMT activity (mean maximal azathioprine dosage:
1.7 mg/kg/day). Gastro-intestinal effects or infections were
respectively reported for 8 and 10 patients.
Table 1 TPMT Genotyping in patients with autoimmune
bullous diseases (n = 75) and other dermatologic disorders (n =
42)
|
No mutation1
|
G460A+A719G2
|
G238C3
|
A719G4
|
Total n
|
|
Autoimmune bullous diseases n (%)
|
70 (93)
|
4 (5)
|
1 (1)
|
-
|
75
|
|
Other dermatologic disorders n (%)
|
36 (86)
|
4 (10)
|
1 (2)
|
1 (2)
|
42
|
|
Total n (%)
|
106 (91)
|
8 (7)
|
2 (2)
|
1 (1)
|
117
|
1Homozygous for a functional allele of the TPMT gene
(predict a high TPMT activity).
2Heterozygous for a functional allele of the gene and
nonfunctional variant of the gene with mutations G460A and
A719G.
3Heterozygous for a functional allele of the gene and
nonfunctional variant of the gene with mutation G238C.
4Heterozygous for a functional allele of the gene and
nonfunctional variant of the gene with mutation A719G.
Table 2 Characteristics of patients treated with
azathioprine with a further complete clinical remission
|
Sex/age (years)
|
Disease
|
TPMT mutation
|
Prediction of phenotype
|
Azathioprine dosage (mg kg–1 per day)
|
Time to remission (days)
|
|
|
|
|
Initial
|
Maximal
|
|
|
M/71
|
BP1
|
None
|
High activity
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
38
|
|
F/69
|
BP
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
154
|
|
F/93
|
BP
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.0
|
3.5
|
95
|
|
F/ 67
|
BP
|
G460A and A719G
|
Intermediate activity
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
622
|
|
M/84
|
BP
|
None
|
High activity
|
-4
|
-
|
10
|
|
M/87
|
BP
|
None
|
High activity
|
-
|
-
|
30
|
|
M/86
|
BP
|
G238C
|
Intermediate activity
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
57
|
|
F/82
|
BP
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.5
|
3.0
|
24
|
|
M/76
|
CP2
|
None
|
High activity
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
246
|
|
M/53
|
P3
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
21
|
|
M/58
|
P
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.5
|
2.5
|
168
|
|
M/56
|
P
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.0
|
2.5
|
184
|
|
F/77
|
P
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.5
|
2.5
|
140
|
|
F/42
|
P
|
None
|
High activity
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
104
|
1Bullous Pemphigoid.
2Cicatricial Pemphigoid.
3Pemphigus.
4Weight not done.
Table 3 Adverse events in patients treated with
azathioprine (AZA) (n = 23)
|
Sex/age (years)/disease
|
TPMT mutation
|
TPMT activity
|
AZA dosage (mg kg–1 per day)
|
Adverse events*
|
Interruption of AZA
|
|
|
|
Initial
|
Maximal
|
|
|
|
M/71/BP
|
None
|
High
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Leukopenia grade 2/neutropenia grade 2/cytolysis grade 1
|
Yes
|
|
F/85/BP
|
None
|
High
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Leukopenia grade 3
|
Yes
|
|
F/69/BP
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
Nausea grade 1/diarrhea grade 2/cytolysis grade 1/infection grade
4
|
Yes
|
|
F/93/BP
|
None
|
High
|
1.0
|
3.5
|
Anemia grade 1/infection grade 3
|
No
|
|
M/77/BP
|
Not done
|
not done
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
Nausea grade 1/diarrhea grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
F/67/BP
|
G460A and A719G
|
Intermediate
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
Others symptoms (pulmonary fibrosis)
|
Yes
|
|
M/87/BP
|
None
|
High
|
-
|
-
|
Anemia grade 1/others symptoms (inflammatory biological
syndrome)
|
Yes
|
|
F/100/BP
|
None
|
High
|
-
|
-
|
Anemia grade 1/infection grade 2
|
No
|
|
F/82/BP
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
3.0
|
Leukopenia grade 3/infection grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
F/82/BP
|
None
|
High
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
Hypersensitivity syndrome
|
Yes
|
|
F/84/BP
|
None
|
High
|
-
|
-
|
Leukopenia grade 1/infection grade 1
|
No
|
|
M/66/CP
|
None
|
High
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Leukopenia grade 1/neutropenia grade 1/anemia grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
F/65/CP
|
None
|
High
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Hypersensitivity syndrome
|
Yes
|
|
M/66/CP
|
None
|
High
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Others symptoms (anorexia and elevated GGT 2N)
|
Yes
|
|
M/53/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
Infection grade 1
|
No
|
|
F/68/P
|
None
|
High
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
Leukopenia grade 1/anemia grade 2/cytolysis grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
F/50/P
|
None
|
High
|
3.5
|
5.0
|
Leukopenia grade 2/neutropenia grade 3/anemia grade 1/infection
grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
M/58/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
2.5
|
Others symptoms (vertigo)
|
Yes
|
|
M/56/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.0
|
2.5
|
Leukopenia grade 2/neutropenia grade 1/cytolysis grade 1
|
No
|
|
F/77/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
2.5
|
Cytolysis grade 1
|
Yes
|
|
F/42/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
Infection grade 3
|
No
|
|
F/60/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
Anemia grade 1/cytolysis grade 2
|
Yes
|
|
F/35/P
|
None
|
High
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
Cytolysis grade 1/infection grade 2
|
Yes
|
*
- Adverse events: leukopenia (109/L) grade 1: 3.0-3.9,
grade 2: 2.0-2.9, grade 3: 1.0-1.9
- neutropenia (109/L), grade 1: 1.5-1.9, grade 2:
1.0-1.4, grade 3: 0.5-0.9
- anemia (g/L) grade 1: 95-109, grade 2: 80-94
- nausea and vomiting grade 1: nausea
- diarrhea grade 1: < 2 days, grade 2: >2 days no necessary
medication
- infection grade 1: minor, grade 2: moderate, grade 3: major,
grade 4: sepsis with hypotension
- cytolysis grade 1: 1.26-2.5 N, grade 2: 2.6-5 N.
Discussion
The present retrospective study is the first to try to assess the
clinical usefulness of TPMT genotyping specifically in a series of
patients with severe autoimmune bullous diseases, reflecting our
past experience of routine clinical practice of azathioprine
prescription. Individual testing for TPMT levels activity was
performed in our patients with severe autoimmune bullous diseases
in order to adjust the azathioprine dosage: every time there was an
“intention to treat” with azathioprine, a TPMT genotyping activity
was carried out. Because there is no current standard in France
between genotyping and enzymatic activity dosage of TPMT, we
preferred to use genotyping tests since they could be available as
a routine laboratory test with the collaboration of the Broly group
[11, 12] whereas erythrocyte TPMT enzyme activity could not, in our
centre. TPMT genotyping has therefore been performed since 1998 in
our patients with autoimmune bullous diseases or other
dermatological conditions (systemic vasculitis, lupus
erythematosus, dermatomyositis, etc.) in whom azathioprine could be
eventually prescribed. In our series, only one patient was treated
with azathioprine without TPMT genotyping, this test being not
routinely performed at that time. Interestingly, the overall
results of TPMT genotyping within the total population tested (i.e.
patients with autoimmune bullous diseases and other dermatological
disorders) as well as in patients with autoimmune bullous disorders
who had been actually treated with azathioprine, were quite similar
to that previously reported using the same technique in a cohort of
European subjects [11]. In the report of Snow and Gibson [4], the
TPMT activity of 28 patients with various dermatological disorders
was shown to be correlated both with efficacy and with occurrence
of side effects attributed to azathioprine. From previous studies
[13, 14] or case reports [6, 15], it was suggested that TPMT
activity measurement has a potential usefulness for patients
treated with azathioprine. Actually, an inverse relationship may
exist between TPMT activity and the effective immunosuppression
achieved with standard empirical doses of the drug. Its systematic
measurement in patients susceptible to be treated with azathioprine
would theoretically prevent severe, life-threatening
myelosuppression in only one out of 300 individuals who presents a
deficient TPMT activity. Determination of an intermediate activity
should alert the clinician to a possible increased risk of
myelosuppression with standard, empirical doses of azathioprine.
Determination of high TPMT activity allows the identification of a
group of patients who could benefit from more aggressive dosing,
again with close follow-up (table 4).
TPMT is the best studied enzyme involved in thiopurine
metabolism and represents an interesting example of practical
pharmacogenomics [7, 8]. After oral ingestion, azathioprine, an
antimetabolite in the metabolism of purines, is rapidly converted
into its active metabolite 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in vivo and
metabolized by three competing enzymes. The two catabolic enzymes
TPMT and xanthine oxidase (XO) produce inactive metabolites. The
third enzyme, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase,
converts azathioprine into 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGn) which
are responsible for the cytoxicity via their incorporation into RNA
and DNA [16]. Several clinical studies have found that high
methylators may actually be insufficiently treated with
conventional doses of azathioprine, whereas intermediate and
deficient methylators are known to be at risk for moderate to
severe hematopoietic toxicity when treated with standard doses [5,
7, 17]. This is due to an inverse relationship between TPMT
activity and production of active metabolites of azathioprine
(6TGn). Two techniques can be used to measure TPMT status:
enzyme-level testing (phenotype testing) and DNA based testing
(genotype testing). However, evaluation of the phenotypic status of
patients by the measurement of red blood cell may be altered by
environmental factors, especially in patients receiving blood
transfusions or certain drugs that may interfere with TPMT
metabolism, which may limit the usefulness of those phenotyping
procedures. Unlike the previous series of Snow and Gibson [4], the
TPMT genotyping technique used in our present study also allowed us
to predict enzyme activity.
The recommended standard dosage of azathioprine for
dermatological indications in order to be safe and efficient is 1-3
mg kg–1 daily [1, 2, 21], adjusted within these limits
according to the response, and care should be taken when
prescribing azathioprine in the elderly.
From our present results based on TPMT genotype, a highly
predictable TPMT activity authorizes azathioprine dosage superior
to 2 mg/kg/day, though this is not an absolute guarantee
against the occurrence of hematopoietic side-effects. Indeed,
azathioprine-induced myelotoxicity could also be ascribed to
non-functional TPMT gene mutations in 10% of cases in the European
population [11], to factors such as viral infections or drug
interferences (allopurinol, salicylates), or to other azathioprine
metabolic pathway disturbances [17]. In a previous report of
Spire-Vayron de la Moureyre et al. who used the same genotyping
technique as in the present study, 15 out of 164 individual
homozygotes for the functional allele actually presented a slightly
decreased TPMT activity [11]. The hypothesis that rare and unknown
non-functional alleles of the TPMT gene are not discovered so far
is possible, but several non functional variants of the gene have
been characterized and major mutations causing loss of function of
alleles have been recognized [12, 18, 19]. Moreover, our elderly
patients with high TPMT activity achieved a complete clinical
remission with a mean maximal dosage (2.4 mg/kg/day) in
accordance with previous report by Snow and Gibson [4]. Patients
with intermediate TPMT activity require a substantial reduction in
doses and careful management to avoid severe bone marrow toxicity
[15]. In our series, only 2 out of 5 patients with an autoimmune
bullous disease who had an intermediate predictable TPMT activity
were actually treated with azathioprine at a moderate dosage, i.e.
1.5-2 mg per kg daily (table 2). In
these two patients, no myelotoxicity was observed and the disease
further remained controlled under lower dosages of azathioprine,
illustrating that TPMT-based azathioprine dosage adjustment may be
of clinical value.
Screening for TPMT measurement may also be a cost-attractive
strategy. The direct cost of hospital treatment in the UK of an
episode of azathioprine-related myelotoxicity was estimated at
₤3200 in 1997 [6]. A more recent cost analysis performed in Canada,
where a single TPMT test costs CAN$100, suggested that TPMT
screening was cost-neutral when considering only the prevention of
myelosuppression in TPMT-deficient individuals (based on a
population incidence of 1/300 TPMT deficiency) and cost-beneficial
when considering the prevention of myelosuppression in patients
with intermediate TPMT activity [20]. But in fact, the number of
patients studied in our preliminary study did not allow us to
detect the very rare individuals with completely deficient activity
in whom azathioprine must be avoided. Determination of TPMT
activity, in our view, may always be used in severe cases of BP, as
in most cases of pemphigus, though the clinical use of azathioprine
is decreasing in recent years in these two conditions. This is due
to the emergence of new therapeutic strategies such as rituximab in
pemphigus [22] or methotrexate in BP [23, 24] which are currently
developed as alternatives to classical immunosuppressant drugs in
France. However, apart from autoimmune bullous diseases, a number
of indications for azathioprine remain in dermatological disorders,
including severe cases of atopic dermatitis or chronic actinic
dermatitis [1, 13-15, 21]. Since newer immunosuppressants are much
more expensive and relatively unproven in many instances,
azathioprine probably will remain in dermatology for years [1]. The
use of TPMT testing to guide azathioprine prescription could rise
in current practice with the increasing of clinical TPMT testing
services and a better knowledge about the risks of prescribing
azathioprine in patients with abnormal TPMT activity. In
conclusion, although strongly recommended before azathioprine
treatment [1, 2, 5, 6, 21, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32], predicting TPMT
activity appears only marginally helpful in patients with
autoimmune bullous diseases, due to the rarity of deficient
methylators (one in 2-300 individuals in the general population).
In clinical practice, its main interest is to adjust more precisely
the azathioprine dosage in predicted high- and
intermediate-methylators. However, a high predicted TPMT activity
using genotyping is not a guarantee against the occurrence of
haematological side-effects [26, 29, 31] since about 10% of
homozygotes for the functional allele may actually present a
slightly decreased TPMT activity [11] and a regular haematological
monitoring during the treatment remains mandatory.
Table 4 Recent studies evaluating the relationship
between TPMT activity and azathioprine (AZA) hematological side
effects
|
Authors
|
Type of study
|
Number of cases
|
mean age (years)
|
Disease
|
TPMT determination (Phe/Ge), number normal or Wild type/
intermediate or Mutant type/ deficient level or gene
|
Relationship between TPMT activity and AZA haematological
side-effects
|
|
Gisbert et al. [29]
|
S, P
|
394
|
43
|
IBD
|
Phe, 366/28/0
|
Poor
|
|
Meggit et al. [14]
|
M, P
|
41
|
30
|
Atopic eczema
|
Phe, 36/5/0
|
No relation
|
|
Kurzawski et al. [28]
|
S, P
|
112
|
38
|
Renal transplant patients
|
Ge, 98/13/1
|
Good
|
|
Jun et al. [26]
|
S, R
|
94
|
31
|
Systemic LE
|
Ge, 86/8/0
|
No relation
|
|
Lennard et al. [7]
|
S, R
|
21
|
54
|
Autoimmune disorders
|
Phe, 16/0/5
|
Excellent
|
|
Zelinkova et al. [27]
|
S, R
|
262
|
39
|
IBD
|
Ge, 238/23/1
|
Good
|
|
Colombel et al. [17]
|
S, P
|
41
|
44
|
Crohn’s disease
|
Ge, 30/7/4
|
Poor
|
|
Snow et al. [4]
|
S, P
|
28
|
?
|
Dermatologic patients
|
Phe, 23/5/0
|
Excellent
|
|
Murphy et al. [13]
|
M, R
|
48
|
7
|
Atopic eczema
|
Phe, 48/0/0
|
Excellent
|
|
Black et al. [25]
|
M, P
|
67
|
51
|
Rheumatic diseases
|
Ge, 61/6/0
|
Excellent
|
|
Stolk et al. [30]
|
S, P
|
33
|
56
|
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
Phe, 25/8/0
|
Good
|
|
Stocco et al. [31]
|
M, R
|
70
|
14
|
IBD
|
Ge, 65/5/0
|
No relation
|
|
Pandya et al. [32]
|
S, R
|
88
|
?
|
Renal transplant patients
|
Ge, 76/12/0
|
Good
|
|
Present study
|
S, R
|
33
|
73
|
Autoimmune bullous diseases
|
Ge, 31/2/0
|
No relation
|
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Patel AA, Swerlick RA, McCall CO. Azathioprine in
dermatology: The past, the present, and the future. J Am Acad
Dermatol 2006; 55: 369-89.
2 Tan BB, Lear JT, Gawkrodger DJ,
English JSC. Azathioprine in dermatology: a survey of current
practice in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 351-5.
3 Scerri L. Azathioprine in dermatological practice. An
overview with special emphasis on its use in non-bullous
inflammatory dermatoses. Adv Exp Med Biol 1999; 455: 343-8.
4 Snow JL, Gibson LE. The role of genetic variation in
thiopurine methyltransferase activity and the efficacy and/or side
effects of azathioprine therapy in dermatologic patients. Arch
Dermatol 1995; 131: 193-7.
5 Snow JL, Gibson LE. A pharmacogenetic basis for the
safe and effective use of azathioprine and other thiopurine drugs
in dermatologic patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 114-6.
6 Jackson AP, Hall AG, McLelland J. Thiopurine
methyltransferase levels should be measured before commencing
patients on azathioprine. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 133-4.
7 Lennard L, Van Loon JA, Weinshilboum RM.
Pharmacogenetics of acute azathioprine toxicity: relationship to
thiopurine methyltransferase genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacol
Ther 1989; 46: 149-54.
8 Weinshilboum RM, Sladek SL. Mercaptopurine
pharmacogenetics: monogenic inheritance of erythrocyte thiopurine
methyltransferase activity. Am J Hum Genet 1980; 32: 651-62.
9 Bessard G, Hardy G, Chartier A,
Stanke-Labesque F. Genetic polymorphism and treatment of
chronic bowel inflammatory diseases: the example of azathioprine.
Therapie 2004; 59: 71-5.
10 Yates CR, Krynetski Y, Loennechen T,
Fessing MY, Thai HL, Pui CH, et al. Molecular
diagnosis of thiopurine s-methyltransferase deficiency: genetic
basis for azathioprine and mercaptopurine intolerance. Ann Intern
Med 1997; 126: 608-14.
11 Spire-Vayron de la Moureyre C, Debuysere H,
Mastain B, Vinner E, Marez D, Lo Guidice JM,
et al. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of the polymorphic
thiopurine S-methyltransferase gene (TPMT) in a European
population. Br J Pharmacol 1998; 125: 879-87.
12 Spire-Vayron de la Moureyre C, Debuysere H,
Sabbagh N, Marez D, Vinner E, Chevalier ED,
et al. Detection of known and new mutations in the Thiopurine
S-Methyltransferase gene by single-strand conformation polymorphism
analysis. Hum Mutat 1998; 12: 177-85.
13 Murphy LA, Atherton D. A retrospective evaluation
of azathioprine in severe chilhood atopic eczema, using thiopurine
methyltransferase levels to exclude patients at high risk of
myelosuppression. B J Dermatol 2002; 147: 308-15.
14 Meggitt SJ, Gray JC, Reynolds NJ. Azathioprine
dosed by thiopurine methyltransferase activity for moderate to
severe atopic eczema: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet 2006; 367: 839-46.
15 Murphy LA, Atherton DJ. Azathioprine as a treatment
for severe atopic eczema in children with a partial thiopurine
methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency. Pediatr Dermatol 2003; 20:
531-4.
16 Lennard L. The clinical pharmacology of
6-mercaptopurine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 43: 329-39.
17 Colombel JF, Ferrari N, Debuysere H,
Marteau P, Gendre JP, Bonaz B, et al. Genotypic
analysis of thiopurine S-methyltransferase in patients with Crohn’s
disease and severe myelosuppression during azathioprine therapy.
Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 1025-30.
18 Hamdan-Khalil R, Allorge D, Lo-Guidice JM,
Cauffiez C, Chevalier D, Spire C, et al. In
vitro characterization of four novel non-functional variants of the
thiopurine S-methytransferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;
309: 1005-10.
19 Hamdan-Khalil R, Gala JL, Allorge D,
Lo-Guidice JM, Horsmans Y, Houdret N, et al.
Identification and functional analysis of two rare allelic variants
of the thiopurine S-methltransferase gene, TPMT*16 and TPMT*19.
Bioch Pharmacol 2005; 69: 525-9.
20 Tavadia SMB, Mydlarski PR, Reis MD,
Mittmann N, Pinkerton PH, Shear N, et al.
Screening for azathioprine toxicity: a pharmacoeconomic analysis
based on a target case. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 628-32.
21 Anstey AV, Wakelin S, Reynolds NJ, British
Association of Dermatologists Therapy, Guidelines and Audit
Subcommittee. Guidelines for prescription azathioprine in
dermatology. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151: 1123-32.
22 Joly P, Mouquet H, Roujeau JC, D’Incan M,
Gilbert D, Jacquot S, et al. A single cycle of
rituxmab for the treatment of severe pemphigus. N Engl J Med 2007;
357: 545-52.
23 Bara C, Maillard H, Briand N, Celerier P.
Methotrexate for bullous pemphigoid: preliminary study. Arch
Dermatol 2003; 139: 1506-7.
24 Dereure O, Bessis D, Guillot B,
Guilhou JJ. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid by low-dose
methotrexate associated with short-term potent topical steroids: an
open prospective study of 18 cases. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138:
1255-6.
25 Black AJ, McLeod HL, Capell HA,
Powrie RH, Matowe LK, Pritchard SC, et al.
Thiopurine methyltransferase genotype predicts therapy-limiting
severe toxicity from azathioprine. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(9):
716-8.
26 Jun JB, Cho DY, Kang C, Bae SC.
Thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphisms and the relationship
between the mutant alleles and the adverse effects in systemic
lupus erythematosus patients taking azathioprine. Clin Exp
Rheumatol 2005; 23: 873-6.
27 Zelinkova Z, Derijks LJ, Stokkers PC,
Vogels EW, Van Kampen AH, Curvers WL, et al.
Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase and thiopurine
S-methyltransferase genotypes relationship to azathioprine-induced
myelosuppression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 44-9.
28 Kurzawski M, Dziewanowski K,
Gawronska-Szklarz B, Domanski L, Drozdzik M. The
impact of thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphism on
azathioprine-induced myelotoxicity in renal transplant recipients.
Ther Drug Monit 2005; 27: 435-41.
29 Gisbert JP, Nino P, Rodrigo L, Cara C,
Guijarro LG. Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity and
adverse effects of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease:
long- term follow-up study of 394 patients. Am J Gastroenterol
2006; 101: 2769-76.
30 Stolk JN, Boerbooms AM, de Abreu RA, de
Koning DG, van Beusekom HJ, Muller WH, et al.
Reduced thiopurine methyltransferase activity and development of
side effects of azathioprine treatment in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41(10): 1858-66.
31 Stocco G, Martelossi S, Barabino A,
Fontana M, Lionetti P, Decorti G, et al. TPMT
genotype and the use of thiopurines in paediatric inflammatory
bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37: 940-5.
32 Pandya B, Thomson W, Poulton K, Payne BD,
Qasim F. Azathioprine toxicity and thiopurine
methyltransferase genotype in renal transplant patients. Transplant
Proc 2002; 34(5): 1642-5.
|