ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Olivier Aynaud1,
Marc Buffet1, Philippe Roman1, Françoise
Plantier2, Nicolas Dupin1
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Pavillon
Tarnier, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, 89 rue d’Assas, 75006 Paris,
France
2Department of Pathology, Pavillon Tarnier, Hôpital
Cochin, APHP, 89 rue d’Assas, 75006 Paris, France
accepté le 6 Octobre 2007
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced anogenital lesions are the
expression of one of the most common sexually transmitted
infections (STI). In the United Kingdom, the prevalence of
anogenital condylamatosis is estimated at between 4% and 13% among
patients attending venereal disease clinics [1], with a
consistently increasing annual incidence [2]. In the USA in 1997,
the prevalence of HPV-induced clinical lesions was approximately 1%
in sexually active adults, and 15% of adults suffered from an
infra-clinical infection detected by DNA screening for HPV [2].
In the United States, the incidence of high-grade vulvar
intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN III) is estimated at 4.5 per 100,000
women aged 35 to 54 years [3]. In the Ile-de-France region around
Paris, the incidence of high-grade penile intraepithelial neoplasia
(PIN III) is estimated at 3.3 per 100,000 in the male population
aged 20 to 60 years, and 3.9 per 100,000 for VIN in females in the
same age group [4]. These epidemiological evaluations demonstrate
the importance of efficiently treating HPV-induced anogenital
lesions.
Numerous therapeutic methods have been proposed, adapted either
as a function of the clinical appearance of lesions, or their
surface area, or their site. No method can achieve a cure in 100%
of cases. Of these treatments, CO2 laser is proposed with a
remission rate which ranges from 27% to 94%, and a relapse rate of
between 7% and 72% [5-8]. Other treatments comprised
self-application of podophyllotoxine, application of imiquimod,
trichloacetic acid, cryotherapy, electrocoagulation and surgery,
with a relapse rate between 15 to 65% [8, 9].
During this study, we assessed the results obtained with CO2
laser treatment under colposcopic guidance, in all immunocompetent
and non-immunocompetent patients treated for HPV-induced anogenital
lesions. We sought to determine the factors associated with a
persistence or recurrence of HPV-induced lesions.
Methods
Patients
This retrospective study analysed the records of 106 patients (63
men, 43 women) presenting with HPV-induced anogenital lesions which
had been treated by CO2 laser under colposcopic guidance. The mean
age of the 106 treated patients was 36 years (range: 19-75 years in
men and 16-72 years in women). Of these 106 patients, 27 (25.5%)
were deemed to be immunocompromised: 19 (17.9%) were HIV(+) (13
men, 6 women), 8 (7.5%) were receiving immunosuppressant therapy (3
following organ transplantation, 2 for blood disorders and 3 to
treat a systemic disease). All lesions were histologically proven
and classified as condyloma or undifferenciated intraepithelial
neoplasia (IEN). HPV detection was not performed as condyloma and
undifferenciated IEN are known to be associated with HPV.
Of the 106 patients, 27 (25.5%) had been previously treated.
Seventeen patients had been treated by imiquimod, 7 patients
treated by application of liquid nitrogen and 3 patients had
already been treated by CO2 laser.
Treatment
We selected the surgical reports for all patients treated with CO2
laser by the same operator for HPV-induced anogenital lesions
(intraepithelial neoplasia and condylomas). The diagnosis had been
made clinically and was always confirmed by histological analysis.
The patients were treated with a CO laser (CM-500, 50 watts),
under colposcopic guidance (Zeiss colposcope, OPMI-9FC, focal
distance: 250 mm). We used a displayed power of 30 watts at
the cutaneo-mucosal level, in continuous mode, with a focal
distance of 125 mm and a spot at 0.5 mm. The average
lateral margins applied were 5 millimetres. Treatments were
performed in an outpatient setting: 62 patients (58.5%) under local
anaesthesia, and the 44 others under general anaesthesia
(Diprivan®).
The surface area for laser lesion excision was quantified by
S1 ≤ 4 cm2, 4 cm2
≤ S2 ≤ 8 cm2 and S3 > 8
cm2. We also quantified the number of sites in the
anogenital region (1 to 3 sites) where HPV-induced lesions had
developed. In patients who had undergone several treatments (either
because of a relapse, or because of several scheduled
appointments), we counted the number of CO2 laser sessions. During
each post-operative consultation, an anogenital examination was
performed under colposcopy (vulvar colposcopy, peniscopy, anuscopy,
meatoscopy).
Patients attended control visits at M1 (30 days), M3 (90 days)
and M6 (180 days).
In order to evaluate relapses, we introduced the notion of
recurrence and persistence to enable discussion of the efficacy of
CO2 laser treatment. The recurrence of an HPV-induced anogenital
lesion was defined by the onset after its treatment of a new lesion
at distance from the treated zone, whatever the time elapsing and
the site. The recurrent lesion originated from a current or latent
zone of HPV infection. Persistence of a lesion was the development
of a new HPV-induced lesion after treatment in the treated zone,
thus suggesting either insufficient or ineffective treatment. Thus
relapse was the clinical appearance of an HPV-induced lesion, after
treatment, of either type: persistent or recurrent.
The results were studied as a function of immune status. The
study population was thus divided into three groups: an HIV(+)
group, a group receiving immunosuppressant therapy (ImST) and an
immunocompetent group (ImC). Statistical analyses were performed
using the χ2 and Fisher tests.
Results
The lesions diagnosed (table 1) in the
106 treated patients included: 79 condylomas (48 men, 31 women), 19
undifferentiated intraepithelial neoplasms (11 men, 8 women), and 8
cases of combined condyloma and intraepithelial neoplasm (4 men, 4
women). Among the 27 cases of intraepithelial neoplasms, 12 were
high-grade penile intraepithelial neoplasms (PIN III), nine were
high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasms (VIN III), three were
high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasms (AIN III), two were
high-grade urethral intraepithelial neoplasms (UIN III) and one was
a combination of AIN-VIN III. No microinvasive foci were identified
on biopsies of the intraepithelial neoplasms.
HPV-induced intraepithelial neoplasms affecting the anogenital
organs were significantly more frequent in the HIV(+) group of
patients (47.4%) than in the ImC group (20.2%) (p = 0.015,
χ2). In contrast, this difference was not significant
between ImST and IC patients (p = 0.79, Fisher test).
Whatever the immune status of patients, we saw no significant
difference between groups with respect to the surface area affected
(Fisher test).
A significant difference could be seen (p < 0.05) between the
risk of developing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms at several
sites in HIV+ patients (67%, 6/9) and in ImC patients (43.7%,
7/16). In contrast, there was no significant difference (p = 0.79,
Fisher test) between the three groups regarding the development of
condylomas as a function of the number of sites on the body.
Post-laser control visits (M1) after the initial treatment
revealed relapses in 20 cases (18.8%), including 13 cases of
recurrence (12.6%) and 7 of persistence (6.6%), while in 86 cases
(81.2%) there were no clinical HPV-induced lesions (table 2). The remission rate at one month did not
differ significantly in the three groups (Fisher test, 2 ddl),
but immunocompetent patients exhibited a higher remission rate than
those with therapeutic or viral immunodepression (83.5% versus 74%,
ns). There was no significant difference between remission and
relapse in terms of the histological type of the lesions
treated.
The results at 6 months are summarised in table 3, although 13 patients (12.3%) were lost to
follow-up. 93% of patients in remission at 1 month were also in
remission at 3 months, and 65% of relapses at 1 month were in
remission at 3 months (67% persisting cases, 57% recurrences).
Intraepithelial neoplasms in remission at 1 month were always still
in remission at 6 months, but 50% and 70% respectively of patients
with persistence and recurrence at 1 month were in remission at 6
months. ImC and ImST patients presented more frequently with
recurrence than persistence when compared with HIV(+) patients, who
presented with identical recurrence and persistence rates.
Patients presenting with recurrence underwent 2.25 laser
treatments each, and the mean interval to the onset of recurrence
was 74 days. Patients presenting with persistence underwent 1.95
laser treatments per patient and the mean interval to persistence
was 112 days. In total, out of 93 patients, at 6 months, 87 (83%,
87/106) were in remission after a total number of 1.4 laser
sessions per patient. The principal post-operative incidents were
two cases of dyschromia on the genital zones treated, and two
patients presenting with anogenital pain requiring major analgesia.
We did not observe any cases of urethral narrowing, phimosis or
paraphimosis. One female patient experienced a tear to the vulvar
interlabial frenum, requiring a perineotomy. No post-treatment
infections were reported.
Statistical analysis of the entire population demonstrated a
lack of any significant difference between men and women regarding
lesion type (p = 0.79), the topography of lesions and the number of
remissions.
Prior to CO2 laser treatment, lesions in patients with a
recurrence had been developing on average for more than 10 months,
versus 29 months for persistent lesions. More than half (10/19,
52.6%) of HIV(+) patients relapsed, compared with ImST patients
(3/8, 37.5%) and ImC patients (18/79, 22.8%). There was no
significant difference between the three groups with respect to
recurrence. However, there was a significant difference between ImC
and HIV(+) patients with respect to relapse (table 4). Recurrence in HIV(+) patients was more
frequently associated with intraepithelial neoplasms (80%) versus
ImC patients (29.4%) (p = 0.01).
Table 1 Topography and histology of HPV-induced lesions
responding to CO2 laser treatment
|
Anatomical sites
|
Patients
|
43 women
|
IEN*
|
Patients
|
63 men
|
IEN
|
|
Condyloma
|
Condyloma
|
|
Vulva
|
39 (91%)
|
29** (74.3%)
|
10 (25.6%)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Penis
|
–
|
|
–
|
39 (62%)
|
27** (69.2%)
|
12 (30.7%)
|
|
Urethra
|
2 (5%)
|
2
|
–
|
11 (14%)
|
9
|
2 (18.2%)
|
|
Perineum
|
11 (25%)
|
11
|
–
|
3 (5%)
|
3
|
–
|
|
Pubis/inguinal folds
|
1 (2%)
|
1
|
–
|
9 (14%)
|
9
|
–
|
|
Scrotum
|
–
|
|
–
|
4 (6%)
|
4
|
–
|
|
Anal margin
|
12 (28%)
|
12**
|
2 (16.6%)
|
11 (17.5%)
|
10**
|
1 (10%)
|
|
Anal canal
|
0
|
–
|
–
|
4 (6%)
|
4
|
–
|
|
Anal margin/canal
|
9 (21%)
|
9
|
–
|
17 (27%)
|
17
|
–
|
Table 2 Characteristics of patients in remission or not
at 1 month
|
Remission
|
- Relapse
- Recurrence/persistence
|
|
Number
|
86
|
20
|
|
Sex M/F (SR)
|
52/34 (1.5)
|
11/9 (1.2)
|
|
Age
|
Males
|
35 years
|
39 years
|
35 years
|
37 years
|
|
Females
|
31 years
|
32 years
|
|
ARRAY(0x244678)
|
|
Immune status
|
- ImC (79)
- ImST (8)
- HIV+ (19)
|
|
- 13 (16.5%)
- 2 (25%)
- 5 (26.4%)
|
|
Total (106)
|
86 (81.2%)
|
20 (18.8%)
|
|
ARRAY(0x242594)
|
|
Surface area of lesions
|
|
S ≤ 4 cm2
|
35 (40.7%)
|
2 (10%)
|
|
4 < S < 8 cm2
|
38 (44.2%)
|
9 (45%)
|
|
S > 8 cm2
|
13 (15.1%)
|
9 (45%)
|
|
ARRAY(0x240a50)
|
|
Number of affected sites
|
|
1
|
37 (43%)
|
4 (20%)
|
|
2
|
25 (29%)
|
7 (35%)
|
|
> 3
|
24 (27.9%)
|
9 (45%)
|
|
ARRAY(0x240208)
|
|
Histological type of lesions
|
|
Condyloma: 79
|
64 (81%)
|
15 (19%)
|
|
Intraepithelial neoplasm: 27
|
22 (81.5%)
|
5 (18.5%)
|
Table 3 Results concerning relapses and remissions at
the three control visits, at 6 months
|
Remission (%)
|
Recurrence (%)
|
Persistence (%)
|
Lost to follow-up (%)
|
|
1 month
|
86 (81.2)
|
13 (12.2)
|
7 (6 .6)
|
0
|
|
3 months
|
86 remissions
|
80 (93)
|
6 (7)
|
0
|
0
|
|
13 recurrences
|
9 (69.3)
|
1 (7.7)
|
3 (23)
|
0
|
|
7 persistences
|
4 (57.2)
|
1 (14.3)
|
2 (28.5)
|
0
|
|
6 months*
|
93 remissions
|
81 (87.1)
|
2 (2.2)
|
0
|
10 (10,7)
|
|
8 recurrences
|
3 (37.5)
|
2 (25)
|
1 (12.5)
|
2 (25)
|
|
5 persistences
|
3 (60)
|
1 (20)
|
0
|
1 (20)
|
|
Results at 6 months
|
87 (83)
|
5 (5.4)
|
1 (1)
|
13 (12.3)
|
Table 4 Number of patients presenting with
recurrence/persistence over 6 months
|
Total
|
Recurrence
|
Persistence
|
|
|
No. of patients
|
31
|
20
|
11
|
|
|
Sex M/F (SR)
|
18/13 (1.38)
|
11/9 (1.3)
|
7/4 (1.75)
|
|
|
Age (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Males
|
37 years
|
35 years
|
40 years
|
|
|
Females
|
32 years
|
33 years
|
31 years
|
|
|
History
|
|
|
|
|
|
ImC (79)
|
18
|
13 (16.5%)
|
5 (6.3%)
|
p < 0.01
|
|
HIV+ (19)
|
10
|
5 (26.3%)
|
5 (26.3%)
|
ns
|
|
ImST (8)
|
3
|
2 (25%)
|
1 (12.5%)
|
ns
|
|
Duration of course
|
19.8 months
|
10.5 months
|
29.2 months
|
|
|
Previous treatment
|
12/31 (38.7%)
|
6/20 (30%)
|
6/11 (54.5%)
|
|
|
Histological type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condyloma
|
79
|
13 (16.45%)
|
9 (11.4%)
|
ns
|
|
IEN*
|
27
|
7 (25,9%)
|
2 (7,4%)
|
p < 0.01
|
Discussion
Opinions vary in the literature with respect to CO2 laser
treatment. Different studies have demonstrated remission rates
ranging from 32% to 94%, and relapse rates ranging from 6% to 68%
[10, 11]. In addition, the laser excision of HPV-induced lesions in
the anogenital tract requires a margin in an optically healthy zone
in order to reduce the relapse rates of condylomas or
intraepithelial neoplasms [10, 12].
Krebs et al. saw a 79% success rate after the first session of
laser treatment, which reached 87% after a second session [13].
Similarly, Lassus et al. showed that in patients suffering from an
infection due to HPV which was resistant to conventional therapy,
laser treatment was effective in treating macroscopically visible
lesions, but the HPV genome was not eradicated. They also
demonstrated that CO2 laser treatment reduced the relapse rate in
patients with bowenoid papulosis [14].
Furthermore, relapses of condylomas appear to be linked to a
persistence of HPV DNA in an epithelium of normal appearance [10].
In healthy skin, taken 5 to 15 mm from the zone treated with
laser sequences, Ferenczy et al. demonstrated the presence of HPV
in 45% of these biopsies, suggesting that HPV could be clinically
and histologically latent close to the treated area [15].
In our study population, we saw a higher incidence of the
development of HPV-induced lesions affecting the urethra in men
(14%) than in women (5%). In contrast, there was an identical
incidence of localisation in the anal sphere: 44% of cases in men
involved the anal margin versus 50% of cases in women, and 33% of
cases in men involved the anal canal, versus 26% of cases in women.
However, the development of a lesion more frequently unique in the
anal sphere in men (41.3% of cases versus 34.9% in women) was due
to a recruitment bias concerning homosexual men. Little reference
is made to these data in the literature. Krebs found 12% of
urethral (meatus and peri-meatic) and 3% of anal cases, this bias
arising from the recruitment of patients amongst the partners of
women infected by HPV [16]. More than one-third of these patients
had several affected sites. It is therefore necessary to screen for
HPV-induced lesions throughout the anogenital region, and ensure
the global management of these lesions.
Among the different types of lesions diagnosed, our study
differed in that it found 25% of high-grade intraepithelial
neoplasms. The figures in the literature suggest a rate of between
10 and 15% [2, 16]. It is currently acknowledged that patients with
an immune deficit have a higher risk of developing dysplastic
anogenital lesions [17, 18], and our patient series contained a
high proportion of individuals with therapeutic or viral
immunodeficiency (25.5% of cases), which might explain this
incidence of anogenital intraepithelial neoplasms.
The remission rate at 6 months among patients followed after the
laser treatment of HPV-induced anogenital lesions was 93.5%, but
12.3% of patients had been lost to follow-up by that stage; if the
latter were considered as failures, the remission rate we achieved
reached 83%. On average, we performed 1.4 CO2 laser sessions per
patient to achieve a remission, or 1.95 laser sessions for patients
presenting with persistent lesions versus 2.25 sessions in each
patient with a recurrence.
Following the first session of laser treatment, we observed a
remission rate of 81.2%, all types of immune status taken together.
This result was comparable to the majority of the findings
published in the literature, which refer to remission rates of
between 34 and 100% [16]. On the other hand, we achieved a slightly
higher remission rate in immunocompetent patients (83.5%) versus
75% in the group with therapeutic immunodepression and 73.7% in
HIV+ patients, although these differences were not significant.
Furthermore, it is necessary to follow patients for up to 6
months, because although 93% of patients in remission at 1 month
remain so at 3 months, this figure only reaches 87% at 6 months. In
most cases, relapses took the form of recurrences, thus confirming
the importance of patient follow-up, including a clinical
anogenital examination, particularly since the median intervals for
the detection of relapses were 74 days and 128 days, for recurrence
and persistence, respectively.
The prognosis for remission was more favourable with lesions
limited to one or two sites on the body (73% of remissions) than in
patients with more than two affected sites (50% of remissions). The
surface area of the lesion was also a factor in favour of early
remission, as 40.7% of patients in remission had lesions ≤
4 cm2, versus 10% in the other group.
Individuals presenting with anogenital intraepithelial neoplasms
experienced recurrence (37.5%) more frequently than persistence
(20%). This suggests that intraepithelial neoplasms may be diseases
which initially develop infra-clinically, the lesions tending to
develop at several sites (as is the case in bowenoid papulosis),
and more frequently in immunodeficient individuals, particularly
since the mean age of this population is 36 years.
During this study, we did not demonstrate any significant
difference with respect to the surface area of lesion development
between the three groups (HIV(+), ImST, ImC). This was probably
linked to the fact that in the patients recruited, the indication
for laser treatment was made because of a marked development of
lesions and/or their resistance to other therapies. In contrast,
intraepithelial neoplasms were significantly more common in HIV(+)
patients (47.4% versus 20.2%), and lesions covered a larger surface
area (p < 0.05). In these patients, relapses more frequently
took the form of recurrence, which could correspond to the mode of
expression of the evolving primary HPV infection, in the context of
cellular immune deficiency [17, 19].
The excision of HPV-induced anogenital lesions by CO2 laser
remains an effective treatment when compared with the other
therapeutic options proposed for this type of disorder. After the
initial lesions have been diagnosed and treated by laser, HPV
infection may continue to develop around the lesion and at other
sites which favour recurrence. This type of relapse is more easily
treated again using CO2 excision. It is therefore possible to
consider the possibility of adapting the management of patients as
a function of persistence or recurrence. Among proposed treatments,
podophyllotoxine gave the best results on mucosal lesions with a
relapse rate between 30 to 45% with no distinction between
persistence or recurrence. The rate of relapse with imiquimod was
comprised between 20% to 60% and in most of the cases it was
described as a persistence [9, 20].
Human papillomaviruses are the cause of frequent, transmissible
and often unpleasant conditions, some of which may evolve towards
invasive carcinoma. Their treatment is necessary to reduce the
discomfort caused to the patient, to limit transmission and to
prevent a malignant outcome. At present, no treatment is able to
eliminate HPV with certainty. In this patient series, the treatment
with CO2 laser, under colposcopic guidance, of HPV-induced
anogenital lesions, achieved satisfactory results in patients with
longstanding lesions resistant to other treatments, as well as in
immunodeficient patients, with good post-operative tolerance.
However, it may be possible to couple immunomodulating therapies
with laser excision in order to accelerate the host response and
reduce the relapse rate in patients.
Acknowledgments
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Duffy S, Cawdell G, Fieldman N. Sexually
transmitted diseases: extract from the annual report of the Chief
Medical Officer of Health and Social Security. Genitourin Med 1985;
61: 204-47.
2 Koutsky L. Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus
infection. Am J Med 1997; 102: 3-8.
3 Sturgeon SR, Brinton CA, Devesa SS, et al.
In situ and invasive vulvar cancer trends (1973-1987). Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1992; 166: 1482-6.
4 Aynaud O, Asselain B, Bergeron C, et al.
Intraepithelial carcinoma and invasive carcinoma of the vulva,
vagina and penis in Ile-de-France. Enquete PETRI on 423 cases. Ann
Dermatol Venereol 2000; 127: 479-83.
5 Frazer IH. The role of immune system in anogenital human
papillomavirus. Austr J Dermatol 1998; 39: S5-S7.
6 Aynaud O. Pathologies infectieuses virales génitales. In:
Aynaud O, Casanova JM, eds. Pathologie de la verge.
Paris: Masson, 1998; (chapitre 7).
7 Gross G, Von Krogh G. Therapy of anogenital
HPV-induced lesions. Clin Dermatol 1997; 15: 457-70.
8 Von Krogh G, Lacey C, Gross G, et al.
European course on HPV associated pathology: guideline for primary
care physicians for the diagnosis and management of angenital
warts. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76: 162-8.
9 Schöfer H, Van Ophoven A, Henke U, et al.
Randomized, comparative trial on the sustained efficacy of topical
imiquimod 5% cream versus conventional ablative methods in external
angenital warts. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16: 642-8.
10 Ferenczy A, Mitao M, Nagai N, et al.
Latent papillomavirus and recurring genital warts. N Engl J Med
1985; 313: 784-8.
11 Carpiniello VL, Malloy TR, Sedlacek TV,
et al. Results of carbon dioxide laser therapy and topical
5-fluorouracil treatment for subclinical condyloma found by
magnified penile surface scanning. J Urol 1988; 140: 53-4.
12 Riva JM, Sedlacek TV, Cunnane MF, et al.
Extended carbon dioxide laser vaporization in the treatment of
subclinical papillomavirus infection of the lower genital tract.
Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 25-30.
13 Krebs HB, Wheelock JB. The CO2 laser for recurrent
and therapy-resistant condylomata acuminata. J Reprod Med 1985; 30:
489-92.
14 Lassus J, Happonen HP, Niemi KM, Ranki A.
Carbon Dioxide-Laser therapy cures macroscopic lesions, but viral
genome is not eradicated in men with therapy-resistant HPV
infection. Sex Transm Dis 1994; 21: 297-302.
15 Rosemberg SK. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of external
genital lesions. Urology 1985; 25: 555-8.
16 Krebs HB. Management of Human Papillomavirus-Associated
Genital Lesions in Men. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 312-6.
17 Petry KU, Kochel H, Bode U, et al. Human
papillomavirus is associated with the frequent detection of warty
and basaloid high-grade neoplasia of the vulva and cervical
neoplasia among immunocompromised women. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 60:
30-4.
18 Leigh IM, Glover MT. Skin cancer and warts in
immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. Recent Results Cancer
Res 1995; 139: 69-86.
19 Sun XW, Khun L, Ellerbrock TV, et al.
Human papillomavirus infection in women infected with the human
immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 690-4.
20 Edwards L, Ferenczy A, Eron L, et al.
Self-administered topical 5% imiquimod cream for external
anogenital warts. HPV study group. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:
25-30.
|