Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version
  Version PDF

A comparative study of focal medium-depth chemical peel versus cryosurgery for the treatment of solar lentigo


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 17, Number 1, 26-9, January-February 2007, Investigative report

DOI : 10.1684/ejd.2007.0104

Summary  

Author(s) : Engin Sezer, Hakan Erbil, Zafer Kurumlu, Halis Bülent Taştan, Ilker Etikan , Department of Dermatology, Gaziosmanpasa University School of Medicine Tokat, 60100, Turkey, Department of Dermatology, Gulhane Military School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, Department of Biostatistics, Gaziosmanpasa University School of Medicine Tokat, Turkey.

Summary : Recently, focal chemical peels with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) have been introduced for the treatment of pigmentary disorders to minimize the side effects such as pain or scarring associated with medium-to-deep chemical peeling. This is a controlled, prospective study to compare the efficacy of a focal medium-depth chemical peel regimen using 70% glycolic acid and 35% TCA with cryosurgery, in the treatment of solar lentigines of the hands. Twenty-five patients were treated with either focal medium-depth chemical peel or cryosurgery, which was randomly assigned to the left or right hand. Clinical improvement was graded by the three blinded investigators 2-months after the treatment. In the focal medium-depth chemical peel treated side, clearing was achieved in four out of 23 patients (17.4%) compared with five out of 23 patients (21.7%) in the cryosurgery treated side. Statistically, the difference between the clinical improvement of solar lentigines with chemical peel and cryosurgery was not significant, according to chi-square test (p \= 0.940). However, we suggest that treatment of the solar lentigines with a focal medium-depth chemical peel may be clinically superior to treatment with cryosurgery, due to the paucity of side effects, such as hypopigmentation and pain, associated with the chemical peel regimen.

Keywords : cryosurgery, glycolic acid, medium-depth chemical peel, solar lentigo, treatment, trichloroacetic acid

Pictures

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Engin Sezer1, Hakan Erbil2, Zafer Kurumlu2, Halis Bülent Taştan2, Ilker Etikan3

1Department of Dermatology, Gaziosmanpasa University School of Medicine Tokat, 60100, Turkey
2Department of Dermatology, Gulhane Military School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
3Department of Biostatistics, Gaziosmanpasa University School of Medicine Tokat, Turkey

accepté le 5 Septembre 2006

Solar lentigo is a benign pigmented lesion that commonly occurs on the sun-exposed areas such as the face, neck, hands, and forearms. Solar lentigo is usually observed in fair-skinned Caucasians between the fourth and sixth decades of life. The lesions are characterized by round or oval, irregularly shaped hyperpigmented macules, varying in size from a few millimeters to one centimeter or more [1, 2]. The coloration varies from yellow-brown to dark brown. Histologically, an elevated melanin content in the melanocytes and basal keratinocytes, and irregular elongation of the rete ridges are observed. Focal excess in the eumelanin load secondary to uneven distribution and synthetic activity of melanocytes induced by ultraviolet irradiation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of solar lentigo [3].Various treatment modalities including chemical peels, cryosurgery, laser surgery, dermabrasion, and topical bleaching agents have been indicated to treat solar lentigo [1, 3-6]. A medium-depth chemical peel regimen using 70% glycolic acid plus 35% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is an effective treatment method for pigmentary dyschromias of actinically damaged non-facial skin, although complications such as pain and scarring limits its use [4, 7]. Recently focal chemical peel with TCA has been introduced for the treatment of pigmentary disorders and atrophic acne scars, to reduce the risk of hypopigmentation and scarring [8, 9].The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a focal medium-depth chemical peel regimen with glycolic acid plus TCA for the treatment of solar lentigines of the hands and to compare with cryosurgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effectiveness of a focal medium-depth chemical peel for the treatment of solar lentigo.

Patients and methods

Study population

Twenty-five subjects (8 male, 17 female), ranging in age from 44 to 72 years, participated in the study. The inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of solar lentigines of the hands with clinical findings of brownish-coloured pigmented macules which occurred after adolescence and increased in number with higher age. Dermoscopic examination (Delta 10, Heine, Germany) was also carried out to rule out malignant melanoma.

The exclusion criteria included topical treatment with bleaching agents within the last 2 months and any history of prior cosmetic surgery, hypersensitivity to glycolic acid or TCA, Raynaud’s disease, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria, and keloidal tendencies. The study was approved by the local ethical committee and all the patients gave written informed consent before enrolment.

Study design

This investigation was designed as a randomized, controlled, paired study based on a left to right comparison pattern, to compare the efficacy of focal medium-depth chemical peel and cryosurgery. Treatment with focal medium-depth chemical peel and cryosurgery was randomly assigned to the left or right hand using a computer-based program. Focal medium-depth chemical peel with 70% glycolic acid and 35% TCA was applied to solar lentigines of one hand of the patient and cryosurgery was performed for the other hand. The colour photographs were taken before treatment and 2 months after the treatment period using a Nikon D70 camera with a macro lens from a distance of 25 cm. Two SB-30 Nikon flashes positioned at a 45-degree angle were used against a black unlit background.

Treatment procedures

All patients were instructed to apply 0.05% tretinoin cream (Tretin cream 0.05%, Triax pharmaceuticals, US) to both sides of the hands every night for 3 weeks before the treatment. Focal medium-depth chemical peel and cryosurgery was performed by the same investigator (E. S.). Patients were advised to protect their hands from sun exposure and use sunscreens in daytime for a 2 month period after the treatment.

The hand to be treated with chemical peel was cleansed with acetone. Using a cotton-tipped applicator, unbuffered 70% glycolic acid solution (Neostrata 70% solution, US) was applied focally to solar lentigines of the hand for 2 minutes and then neutralized with 10% sodium bicarbonate solution. Next, 35% TCA wt/vol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, US) was applied focally to the lesions using a cotton-tipped applicator until a uniform white frost was achieved, and then neutralized with tap water. After the chemical peel, the patients were instructed to apply mupirocin ointment twice a day until peeling was completed.

Cryosurgery was performed using a jet spray (Brymill CRY-AC, US) with a 0.4 mm tip size for 2-5 seconds after initial freezing of each lesion from a distance of 3 cm.

Determination of clinical response

For independent clinical assessment, three blinded investigators examined the pre-treatment and 2-month post-treatment photographs and graded the clinical response using a 5-point grading scale determined by Todd et al. [10]: poor, 0% to 25%; fair, 26% to 50%; good, 51% to 75%; excellent, 76% to 90%; and clear, 91% to 100%.

Assessment of pain

The patients were asked to assess the pain for each treatment modality with a pain scale varying between 0 (none) to 10 (maximum).

Statistical analysis

Assessment of statistical significance of clinical improvement within both treated sides was performed on the basis of chi-square test. Analysis of pain scores for chemical peel and cryosurgery treated sides were plotted according to chi-square test. The Z test was used to determine the significance of post-treatment complications such as hypopigmentation between the chemical peel and cryosurgery treatments. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Twenty-three of the original 25 patients completed the study. Two patients were lost to follow-up for post-treatment evaluation. The results of clinical improvement in each treatment modality are shown in table 1( Table 1 ) and ( figure 1 ).

In the focal medium-depth chemical peel treated side, clearing was achieved in 17.4% of patients. In the cryosurgery treated side, clearing was achieved in 21.7% of patients. Statistically, the differences between the clinical improvement of solar lentigines with chemical peel and cryosurgery was not significant (χ2 = 0.786, p = 0.940, chi-square test).

Pain scores were found to be lower in the focal medium-depth chemical peel treated side, compared with cryosurgery treated side, according to the chi-square test (χ2 = 22.319, p = 0.004).

No scarring was detected with both treatments. In the cryosurgery treated side, hypopigmentation was observed in six out of 23 patients (26.1%), compared with one out of 23 patients (4.3%) in the chemical peel treated side (as shown in ( figure 2 )). The risk of development of post-treatment hypopigmentation was significantly reduced with focal medium-depth chemical peel compared with cryosurgery (Z test for the difference between sample portions, p = 0.046).
Table 1 Results of clinical improvement of solar lentigines at 2-months following focal medium-depth chemical peel and cryosurgery

Clinical improvement

Chemical Peel (n = 23)

Cryosurgery (n = 23)

Clear

4 (17.4%)

5 (21.7%)

Excellent

10 (43.5%)

10 (43.5%)

Good

7 (30.4%)

5 (21.7%)

Fair

1 (4.3%)

2 (8.7%)

Poor

1 (4.3%)

1 (4.3%)

Discussion

In this study, the clinical results of a focal medium-depth chemical peel technique using 70% glycolic acid and 35% TCA for the treatment of solar lentigines of the hands was comparable to that of cryosurgery. A recent study comparing the efficacy of chemical peel with 30% TCA with cryosurgery for the treatment of solar lentigines showed cryosurgery to be superior to TCA peels [11]. The better results obtained in our study may be explained with the depth of the chemical peel that we use. The clinical results of a chemical peel regimen has been considered to correlate with the depth of the histological changes exerted by the peel [7]. Medium-depth chemical peels are defined as the application of peeling agents to produce a dermal wound to the level of papillary dermis and upper reticular dermis. Medium-depth chemical peels are indicated for the treatment of pigmentary alterations such as solar lentigines, superficial rhytides, and for the removal of the actinic keratoses and acne scars [4, 12]. TCA, a chemical agent that causes epidermal necrosis by protein precipitation, produces superficial peeling when used in strengths from 10% to 35%. Combination of solid CO2, Jessner’s solution, and 70% glycolic acid along with a 35% TCA formula results in a medium-depth chemical peel. As in our study, glycolic acid causes detachment of keratinocytes and epidermolysis when applied prior to TCA, thus allowing deeper and more even penetration of the TCA solution [13].

Recently, Chun et al. introduced a focal chemical peel technique for the treatment of pigmentary skin diseases including solar lentigines, seborrheic keratosis and melasma. The authors had used focal application of 50 to 65% TCA solution by pressing firmly a sharpened wooden applicator to the pigmented lesions [8]. A good clinical response was achieved in 82% of the patients without significant complications at the treatment sites. The authors suggest that this technique can avoid scarring and reduce the risk of developing hypopigmentation by sparing the adjacent normal skin and adnexal structures. In another study, focal treatment of acne scars with the same technique had resulted in good clinical response in the majority of the patients [9]. Compared with these studies, our technique is unique in that we performed focal application of 70% glycolic acid and 35% TCA by using cotton-tipped applicators to obtain a level of medium-depth chemical peel. The results were comparable to that of cryosurgery with optimal patient tolerance and minimal side effects.

One major concern with the use of TCA chemical peeling is the potential tumorigenesis of TCA. Dainichi et al. showed an increase in the rate of tumor development on the skin areas of hairless mice undergoing ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation treated with 35% TCA, compared with the non-treated areas [14]. The authors suggest that TCA chemical peel may increase the risk of mutations leading to tumorigenesis. On the other hand, a statistically significant change in the expression of p53, which is a tumor suppressor protein, has not been detected in facial skin treated with superfical 10-30% TCA chemical peeling [15]. Another study showed a reduction in the number of epidermal Langerhans cells of the normal human skin subject to 40-60% TCA chemical peeling, indicating a temporary impairment of the skin defence system with TCA peeling, which may result in cutaneous carcinogenesis [16]. These data suggest that patients treated with long-term and frequent TCA chemical peeling should be monitored for the development of skin cancer.

Post-treatment hypopigmentation is a common side effect of cryosurgery [1]. We claim that the treatment of solar lentigines of the hands with focal medium-depth chemical peel has some additional advantages over cryosurgery such as being a less painful procedure and with a diminished risk of hypopigmentation, although cryosurgery is less time-consuming compared with this technique.

In summary, we conclude that focal medium-depth chemical peel with 70% glycolic acid plus 35% TCA may be considered as an efficacious and safe method for the treatment of solar lentigines of the hands.

Acknowledgements

Financial support: None. Conflict of interest: None.

References

1 Hexsel DM, Mazzuco R, Bohn J, Borges J, Gobbato DO. Clinical comparative study between cryotherapy and local dermabrasion for the treatment of solar lentigo on the back of the hands. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 457-62.

2 Ortonne JP, Camacho F, Wainwright N, et al. Safety and efficacy of combined use of 4-hydroxyanisole (mequinol) 2%/tretinoin 0.01olution and sunscreen in solar lentigines. Cutis 2004; 74: 261-4.

3 Hermanns JF, Petit L, Pierard-Franchimont C, Paquet P, Pierard GE. Assessment of topical hypopigmenting agents on solar lentigines of Asian women. Dermatology 2002; 204: 281-6.

4 Cook KK, Cook Jr. WR. Chemical peel of nonfacial skin using glycolic acid gel augmented with TCA and neutralized based on visual staging. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 994-9.

5 Bukvic Mokos Z, Lipozencic J, Pasic A, Fattorini I. Laser therapy for solar lentigines: review of the literature and case report. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 2006; 14: 81-5.

6 Jarratt M. Mequinol 2%/tretinoin 0.01olution: an effective and safe alternative to hydroquinone 3 0n the treatment of solar lentigines. Cutis 2004; 74: 319-22.

7 Coleman 3rd WP, Brody HJ. Advances in chemical peeling. Dermatol Clin 1997; 15: 19-26.

8 Chun EY, Lee JB, Lee KH. Focal trichloroacetic acid peel method for benign pigmented lesions in dark-skinned patients. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 512-6.

9 Lee JB, Chung WG, Kwahck H, Lee KH. Focal treatment of acne scars with trichloroacetic acid: chemical reconstruction of skin scars method. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 1017-21.

10 Todd MM, Rallis TM, Gerwels JW, Hata TR. A comparison of 3 lasers and liquid nitrogen in the treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized, controlled, comparative trial. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 841-6.

11 Lugo-Janer A, Lugo-Somolinos A, Sanchez JL. Comparison of trichloroacetic acid solution and cryosurgery in the treatment of solar lentigines. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42: 829-31.

12 Ortonne JP, Pandya AG, Lui H, Hexsel D. Treatment of solar lentigines. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: 262-71.

13 Horikoshi T, Matsumoto M, Usuki A, et al. Effects of glycolic acid on desquamation-regulating proteinases in human stratum corneum. Exp Dermatol 2005; 14: 34-40.

14 Dainichi T, Koga T, Furue M, Ueda S, Isoda M. Paradoxical effect of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) on ultraviolet B-induced skin tumor formation. J Dermatol Sci 2003; 31: 229-31.

15 El-Domyati MM, Attia SK, Saleh FY, Ahmad HM, Gasparro FP, Uitto JJ. J Dermatol Sci 2003; 31: 229-31.

16 Sakai A, Yamamoto Y, Uede K, Furukawa F. Changes of epidermal Langerhans cells in skin treated with trichloroacetic acid. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15: 239-42.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]