ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Nicoletta CASSANO, Carmela COVIELLO,
Francesco LOCONSOLE, Antonio MIRACAPILLO, Gino Antonio VENA
Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious
Diseases – 2nd Dermatology Clinic, University of Bari, Policlinico
- Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11 70124 Bari, Italy
<g.vena@dermatologia.uniba.it>
A 35-year-old man had a severe plaque psoriasis and a disabling
psoriatic arthritis, which had been poorly controlled by
conventional systemic therapies. The patient’s history revealed an
unstable course of psoriasis with recurrent episodes of
erythroderma or pustular exanthematic psoriasis after intercurrent
infections and/or inadequate topical treatments. The patient
underwent treatment with s.c. etanercept 25 mg twice per week;
baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 24. After
8 weeks of treatment, the patient consulted us because of a
sudden aggravation of skin lesions (figure 1), despite the
disappearance of joint pain and stiffness. Diffuse skin lesions
were noted (PASI: 36) and some areas showed signs of pustulation.
There was a modest sub-mandibular lymphadenopathy and a slight
hyperpyrexia (38-38.5 °C). Routine laboratory examinations
showed a modest neutrophilic leucocytosis with a slight increase of
the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. ANA and anti-DNA antibodies
were normal. Extensive searches for infectious foci failed to
disclose any abnormal finding. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
serology was also negative. Histological features were consistent
with psoriasis and immunofluorescence analysis of skin samples was
negative. After repeated questioning, the patient reported that
10 days prior to the skin changes, he had suffered from
flu-like symptoms with upper respiratory tract involvement. Despite
this event, the patient had continued treatment with etanercept. He
denied the use of other drugs.
After discontinuation of etanercept, the patient was initially
treated with topical therapy (liniments, diluted antiseptic
solutions, and corticosteroids) and oral paracetamol for one week
until the fever faded away. Thereafter, treatment with methotrexate
10 mg weekly and cyclosporin 2.5 mg/kg was introduced,
which caused the regression of pustular lesions and a per day
noticeable reduction of erythema after 2 months. However,
articular symptoms reappeared and treatment with etanercept was
restarted with a good clinical response and without any
complications.
Infectious foci are traditionally included among the factors which
can elicit or worsen psoriasis, although a pathogenic role has been
proved only for a few types of infections, such as streptococcal
and HIV infections. An epidemiological survey has recently
supported the existence of a subgroup of psoriasis patients, who
are prone to disease exacerbation following infections, especially
those of the upper respiratory tract [1]; the risk of
infection-triggered exacerbation was associated with an unstable
and severe course of psoriasis. In our patient, the aggravation of
psoriasis skin lesions occurred after a flu-like syndrome during
treatment with etanercept, a recombinant human TNF receptor:Fc
fusion protein whose effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis and
plaque psoriasis is well established [2]. This event did not appear
to be directly related to etanercept, as the patient’s history
included previous episodes of psoriasis flare after intercurrent
infections. The analysis of clinical trials does not show an
increased incidence of infections in patients treated with
etanercept as compared with a placebo group. However, considering
the mechanism of action, etanercept should not be administered to
patients with sepsis or active infections, including chronic or
localized infections [2]. The reaction which occurred in our
patient suggests that extreme caution is also advisable when focal
infections develop in patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha therapy,
especially in those with unstable psoriasis, in whom a temporary
withdrawal is recommended.
There are only sporadic reports of paradoxical de novo
appearance or aggravation of psoriasis in patients treated with
anti-TNF-alpha biologicals [3-6], but, to the best of our
knowledge, the association with an intercurrent infection has never
been reported. Possibly, this correlation may have been
underestimated because focal infections can be neglected or ignored
by patients, as in our case. Interestingly, the persistence of an
excellent response on arthritis in spite of the aggravation of skin
lesions indicates that the mechanisms triggering psoriasis may be,
at least in some situations, different from those responsible for
the exacerbation of psoriatic arthritis. n
1. Blok S, Vissers WH, van Duijnhoven M, van de
Kerkhof PC. Aggravation of psoriasis by infections: a
constitutional trait or a variable expression? Eur J
Dermatol 2004; 14: 259-61.
2. Goffe B, Cather JC. Etanercept: An overview. J
Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49 (2 Suppl): S105-11.
3. Thurber M, Feasel A, Stroehlein J, Hymes SR.
Pustular psoriasis induced by infliximab. J Drugs Dermatol
2004; 3: 439-40.
4. Dereure O, Guillot B, Jorgensen C, Cohen JD,
Combes B, Guilhou JJ. Psoriatic lesions induced by antitumour
necrosis factor-alpha treatment: two cases. Br J Dermatol
2004; 151: 506-7.
5. Grinblat B, Scheinberg M. Unexpected onset of
psoriasis during infliximab treatment: comment on the article by
Beuthien et al. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 1333-4.
6. Starmans-Kool MJ, Peeters HR, Houben HH. Pustular
skin lesions in patients treated with infliximab: report of two
cases. Rheumatol Int 2005; 25: 550-2.
|