ARTICLE
Extramammary Paget’s disease of the scrotum with Bowenoid
features
Auteur(s) : Serafinella P. CANNAVÒ1, Fabrizio
GUARNERI1, Patrizia NAPOLI2
1 Department of Territorial Social Medicine, Section
of Dermatology, University of Messina (Italy),
2 “Piemonte” Hospital, Section of Pathologic
Anatomy – Messina (Italy)
Fax + 39 090 2927691
< patrizia.cannavo@unime.it >
A 76-year-old man, in good general health, presented to our
department with a 15-year history of an erythematous, infiltrative
lesion, asymptomatic and slow-growing, involving the scrotum.
Examination revealed an 11 x 5 cm brownish, rough
patch with a verrucous surface covering much of the surface of the
scrotum. No inguinofemoral lymphadenopathy was present. The lesion
was removed surgically (figure 1A).
Microscopic examination of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections
showed intraepidermal nests of light-colored cells dispersed in a
pagetoid pattern (figure
1B) among keratinocytes that, in some areas, demonstrated
cytological pleomorphism and mitoses (figure 1C). An inflammatory
reaction was evident in the papillary dermis. Sections stained with
periodic acid-Schiff revealed focal cytoplasmic staining of the
characteristic Paget cells. Immunohistochemical stains for CEA
(figure 1D),
EMA, and CK7 (figure
1E) were strongly positive. The atypical keratinocytes
expressed CK19 (high-molecular-weight cytokeratin). Both the
pagetoid cells and the atypical keratinocytes were negative for
S100 and HMB45.
No relapse or metastasis was detected 2 years after
surgery.
Discussion
First reported by Crocker more than a century ago [1],
extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) is an uncommon intraepithelial
neoplasm, which arises most commonly on the vulva and in the
perianal region and less frequently on the male genitalia (14%) [2,
3]. Whereas mammary Paget’s disease is almost always associated
with a neoplasm involving the apocrine glands or the mammary
glands, an equally close link between EMPD and an underlying
neoplasm has not been reported. Different variants of EMPD have
been proposed: a primary limited cutaneous form, a primary
cutaneous form with secondary contiguous or lymphatic metastases, a
secondary form arising from an underlying neoplasm, and a form
associated with a visceral malignancy (rectal, genitourinary,
uterine, hepatic, pancreatic or adnexal carcinomas) [4].
Due to the clinical picture, which is generally characterized by
an erythematous, desquamative, frequently pruritic (60%) patch,
EMPD may be confused with other dermatoses, such as intertrigo,
contact dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen simplex chronicus, and
pagetoid basal cell carcinoma. For this reason the correct
diagnosis is often achieved late and intervention occurs when the
lesion is very extensive.
The therapeutic approach is still difficult nowadays, due to the
high relapse rate, the wide extent of the lesions and the
involvement of particular anatomical areas that make surgical
excision difficult. When possible, however, this remains the
treatment of first choice; alternative treatment comprises
photodynamic therapy associated with Mohs micrographic surgery,
laser ablation [5], topical 5-fluorouracil 1% [6], radiation
therapy [7], and topical imiquimod 5% [4].
The hypothesis that Paget’s cells in mammary Paget’s disease and
in many cases of EMPD are of apocrine gland derivation is today the
most widely accredited and is supported by immunohistochemical
studies that show strong CEA expression by Paget’s cells; other
immunohistochemical stains include CK7 and CAM 5.2 (low
molecular-weight cytokeratins) [8, 9]. It is believed that EMPD
derives from the malignant transformation of a pluripotent basal
stem cell, from which the squamous epithelium, pilary structures
and glandular structures originate, and that, in the case of EMPD,
it expresses apocrine gland differentiation [1]. This hypothesis
moreover provides an explanation for the polymorphism of cases such
as ours, characterized by an unusual verrucous clinical
presentation and by histological features that in some areas are
suggestive of Bowen’s disease [10]. n
References
1. Balducci L, Crawford D, Smith G, et al.
Extramammary Paget’s disease: an annotated review. Cancer
Invest 1988; 6: 293-303.
2. Park S, Grossfeld GD, Mcannish JW, Santucci R.
Extramammary Paget’s disease of the penis and scrotum: excision,
reconstruction and evaluation of occult malignancy. J Urol
2001; 88: 297-8.
3. Kageyama N, Izumi AK. Bilateral scrotal
extramammary Paget’s disease in a Chinese man. Int J
Dermatol 1997; 36: 695-7.
4. Zampogna JC, Flowers FP, Roth WI, Hassenein AM.
Treatment of primary limited cutaneous extramammary Paget’s disease
with topical imiquimod monotherapy: two case reports. J Am Acad
Dermatol 2002; 47: S229-35.
5. Becker-Wegerich PM, Fritsch C, Schulte KW, et
al. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of extramammary Paget’s
disease guided by photodynamic diagnosis. Br J Dermatol
1998; 138: 169-72.
6. Bewley AP, Bracka A, Staughton RCD, Bunker CB.
Extramammary Paget’s disease of the scrotum: treatment with topical
5-fluorouracil and plastic surgery. Br J Dermatol 1994; 131:
445-6.
7. Zollo JD, Zeitouni NC. The Roswell Park Cancer
Institute experience with extramammary Paget’s disease. Br J
Dermatol 2000; 142: 59-65.
8. Helm KF, Goellner JR, Peters MS.
Immunohistochemical stains in extramammary Paget’s disease. Am J
Dermatopathol 1992; 14: 402-7.
9. Mazoujian G, Pinkus GS, Haagensen DF.
Extramammary Paget’s disease: evidence for an apocrine origin.
Am J Surg Pathol 1984; 8: 43-50.
10. Quinn AM, Sienko A, Basrawala Z, Campbell SC.
Extramammary Paget disease of the scrotum with features of Bowen
disease. A case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol
Lab Med 2004; 128: 84-6.
|