ARTICLE
Excimer-laser (308 nm) treatment of large plaque
parapsoriasis and long-term follow-up
Auteur(s) : Susanne GEBERT, Christian RAULIN, Hans
Michael OCKENFELS, Cüneyt GÜNDOGAN, Bärbel GREVE
Laserklinik Karlsruhe Kaiserstrasse
104 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
< greve@raulin.de >
Large plaque parapsoriasis is a form of chronic
erythemato-squamous dermatosis which is difficult to treat;
creating a clinical distinction from early mycosis fungoides is
still controversial. UV treatment is a significant component among
the therapeutic options [1-3]. Currently there are only studies
examining the impact of excimer laser (308 nm) for early stage
mycosis fungoides [4-6].
A 70-year-old male presented with a three-year history of
erythematous, round, scaly patches of different sizes
(< and > 5 cm) on the backs of his knees,
upper arms and forearms. Discontinuing topical steroids (Class B
and C) regularly led to recurrence. Broad-band UVB treatment
conducted elsewhere was unsuccessful even after multiple sessions,
and so was discontinued.
After histological/immunhistological examinations and a T-cell
receptor gene rearrangement at Mannheim University, the diagnosis
of large plaque parapsoriasis was confirmed. The findings did not
confirm the presence of a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, particularly
of mycosis fungoides.
Continued treatment with UVA-1 therapy was advised, but there
was no improvement even after 20 sessions
(90-130 J/cm2 per session). We thus decided to
treat with an excimer laser (wavelength 308 nm, frequency
200 Hz, square diameter 1.41 cm2, Tuilaser
Germany, Stella 1.0). The patient was thoroughly advised about the
experimental character of the treatment and concomitant reactions.
We received consent and began treating a defined representative
test area on the right forearm (figure 1A).
After 7 sessions (single dose 400-600 mJ/cm2,
cumulative dose 3.45 J/cm2) on the test area, there
was complete resolution which lasted for a follow-up period of
3 months. We consequently treated all patches over a period of
2 months (10 sessions, 1 week intervals, individual
dose 500-750 mJ/cm2, cumulative
5.9 J/cm2). There was 5-10% overlapping in the
treatment pulses. The concomitant reactions were mild erythema,
scaling and one instance of blisters and crusting.
Before treating all patches we took another biopsy from the laser
treated and an untreated site. The histological findings in the
area treated with the laser (2 months after the last laser
treatment) revealed dermal tissue normal for that site; the
untreated area showed the same histological profile as the first
biopsy.
After 2 years the patient showed no clinical evidence of
recurrence in over 90% of the affected areas (figure 1B).
So far, few studies have been published on this topic. Mori et
al. reported treating stage IA mycosis fungoides in
4 patients (7 individual plaques) using an excimer laser.
All the lesions resolved completely from a clinical and
histological perspective. No patient experienced a remission in the
follow-up period of 3 to 28 months [4]. Nisticò et
al. studied 5 patients who had 10 lesions and early
stage mycosis fungoides; the patients achieved complete remission
by the last follow up (1 year) [5]. Passeron et al.
recently demonstrated the efficacy of excimer laser treatment in
4 of 5 cases in patch and plaque stages of mycosis
fungoides with a follow up time of 3 months [6].
The areas in which excimer laser treatment is superior to
conventional UVB treatment (311 nm) needs further
investigation. The use of an excimer laser in treating large plaque
parapsoriasis is only recommendable when there are individual
localized areas.
The major advantages of laser treatment over UVB treatment are the
much lower average cumulative dose, greater efficacy and higher
long-term remission rates [4-8]. Also noteworthy is the comparative
number of sessions required: 4-10 sessions for excimer
treatment versus 5-90 sessions for narrow-band UVB treatment,
a clear-cut argument in favor of the laser.
We conclude that excimer laser treatment is an effective method of
achieving a beneficial and lasting impact on large-plaque psoriasis
and early stage MF. If the plaques exist on over 20% of the body
surface, however, the treatment is currently not advisable because
it is too time consuming. n
References
1. Morita A, Takashima A, Nagai M, et al.
Treatment of a case of mycosis fungoides and one parapsoriasis en
plaques with topical PUVA using a monofunctional furocoumarin
derivate, 4,6,4’-trimethylengelicin. J Dermatol 1990; 17:
545-9.
2. Rosenbaum MM, Roenigk HH Jr, Caro WA et
al. Photochemotherapy in cutaneous T cell lymphoma and
parapsorasis en plaques: long-term follow-up in forty-three
patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 13: 613-22.
3. Westphal HJ, Walter A. Phototherapy of
Parapsoriasis. Dermatol Monatsschr 1989; 175: 555-60.
4. Mori M, Campolmi P, Mavilia L, et al.
Monochromatic excimer light (308 nm) in patch-stage IA mycosis
fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 943-4.
5. Nisticò S, Costanzo A, Saraceno R, Chimenti S.
Efficacy of monochromatic excimer laser radiation (308 nm) in
the treatment of early stage mycosis fungoides. Br J
Dermatol 2004; 151: 877-9.
6. Passeron T, Zakaria W, Ostovari N, et al.
Efficacy of the 308-nm excimer laser in treatment of mycosis
fungoides. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140: 1291-3.
7. Hofer A, Cerroni L, Kerl H, et al.
Narrowband (311-nm) UV-B therapy for small plaque parapsoriasis and
early-stage mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135:
1377-80.
8. Gathers RC, Scherschun L, Maick F, et al.
Narrowband UVB phototherapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides. J
Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 191-7.
|