Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version
  Version PDF

Alefacept modifies long-term disease severity and improves the response to other treatments


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 15, Number 5, 366-73, September-October 2005, Therapy


Summary  

Author(s) : MWF Van Duijnhoven, EMGJ de Jong, WJ Gerritsen, MC Pasch, PCM Van de Kerkhof , Dept of Dermatology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, PO Box 8101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Summary : Alefacept treatment has been shown in several multicentre studies to result in prolonged post-treatment remission periods (median duration 241 days). This communication describes the clinical responses of 10 patients to multiple courses of 12 weekly intramuscular injections with alefacept given in combination with available antipsoriatic treatments. It was shown that in this group of 10 patients with moderate-severe psoriasis, 8 were no longer candidates for any more long-term continuous systemic treatment with methotrexate or acitretin, 7 had no options for UVB/PUVA courses and 8 were not suitable for treatment with cyclosporine. In 5 out of these 10 patients alefacept had resulted in a considerable long-term improvement with only mild disease expression, which lasted one year or longer. Patients indicated that these responses were outstanding as compared to the troublesome years before. Another patient reported a major improvement in the quality of life by reduction of itch. In two patients alefacept vastly enhanced the efficacy of dithranol treatment, as compared to previous treatments. Another patient was able to discontinue methotrexate without relapsing during alefacept, in contrast to severe rebound episodes following discontinuation of methotrexate in the past. The long-term responses of 8 out of the 10 patients described in this report indicate that alefacept, in the context of individualised care of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, can have an important contribution. In particular, the long-term response after stopping alefacept makes this treatment a valuable tool, achieving prolonged disease control in at least some patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Keywords : alefacept, biologicals, inflammation, psoriasis

Pictures

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : MWF Van Duijnhoven, EMGJ de Jong, WJ Gerritsen, MC Pasch, PCM Van de Kerkhof

Dept of Dermatology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, PO Box 8101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

accepté le 17 Juin 2005

Memory T cells (CD4+CD45RO+ and CD8+CD45RO+) have been shown to be important in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis [1, 2]. Alefacept (Amevive, BiogenIdec Cambridge, Mass. USA) is a selective biological agent, consisting of the first extracellular domain of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA3) fused to the hinge, CH2 and CH3 sequences of IgG1. Alefacept binds with the LFA3 segment to the CD2 on the surface of the T cell, thereby inhibiting T-cell activation and proliferation [3-6]. Alefacept preferentially targets memory T cells (CD45RO+), as memory T cells, in contrast to naive T cells (CD45RA+), bear significant levels of CD2[7, 8]. In addition, the F-c portion of IgG1 of alefacept binds to FCγRIII on accessory cells and induces apoptosis of the memory T cells [9, 10] The clinical response in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis was correlated to some extent with decreases in circulating blood lymphocyte counts [11].Phase II and Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of alefacept through either 12 weekly injections of 7.5 mg i.v. or 15 mg i.m, followed by 12 weeks follow up. Clinical improvement correlated with reduction of the number of memory T cell subsets [10], without impairing immune responses to a neo antigen or recall antigen [12]. Repeated courses of alefacept proved to be well tolerated and had a consistent efficacy [13]. In the phase III study of i.v. administration, two repeated courses of alefacept proved to result in a better clinical improvement as compared to one course [14]. A remarkable observation was the prolonged remission following alefacept treatment. After one course of alefacept, patients who achieved a 75% or greater reduction in PASI at any time during one course maintained their 50% or greater improvement status for a median duration of 241 days. In patients who received 2 courses of alefacept and reached a 75% or greater improvement of PASI at any time during these 2 courses, more than 50% of them had maintained their 50% or greater improvement status at the final end point (48 weeks).In view of the prolonged remission periods in patients who have been treated with one alefacept course and the empowered efficacy of the second treatment course, alefacept can be regarded as a disease modifier, resulting in prolonged reduction of severity.The question arises as to what extent the long-term safety and efficacy is valid if alefacept treatment is combined with other available treatments. In this report we described 10 patients who suffered from severe psoriasis in terms of the extent of lesions, poor improvement by available systemic treatments and presence of contraindications for these treatments. These patients participated in a multi-centre study to find out the safety of repeated courses of alefacept in combination with the available antipsoriatic treatments, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. In view of the remarkable results in these patients, we wish to report as a case report the responses of these patients to available antipsoriatic treatments in the past before alefacept treatment, versus the responses to these treatments during alefacept treatment. After a brief presentation of the design of the trial we will describe the history of the 10 patients and their responses to alefacept.

Methods

A multi-centre study was designed to determine the safety and tolerability of repeated courses of alefacept, administered as a 15 mg intramuscular injection (i.m.) to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis in the context of standard dermatology practice. Patients, at least 16 years of age, were included in this multicentre study after having given informed consent. Patients were included only if they required a systemic treatment. Patients with erythrodermic or pustular disease were also eligible to enter the study. In the Nijmegen department no patients with erythrodermic or pustular disease were included. Alefacept was administered as a 15 mg IM injection once a week for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Patients were eligible to receive up to 3 treatment courses of alefacept during this study. Each of these courses consisted of 12 once- weekly alefacept doses and a 12-week follow-up period. During the follow-up periods no alefacept was administered. Safety parameters, including physical examination, liver functions, creatinine, cholesterol triglycerides, white blood cell counts, CD4+ and CD8+ cells, antinuclear factor, rheumatoid factor, tuberculin tests and monitoring for infections, for concomitant therapies and for adverse events, were assessed with variable frequency, ranging from once weekly to once a month. Efficacy parameters, including physician global assessment psoriatic arthritis scores and a nail involvement score, were assessed at day 1, 43, 92, 120 and 162.

After completing the 12 week follow-up for a course, the patient was eligible for the next course if the disease had progressed to require a systemic therapy, provided that the CD4 counts were sufficiently high and no contra indications existed. Patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, requiring systemic therapy were eligible for the study provided that they had CD4 counts at or above 400 cells/mm3. The following exclusion criteria were used for this study; unstable erythrodermic or pustular psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, serious infections, HIV positive, within 5 years of enrolment an invasive malignancy, except for a history of squamous cell- or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, active tuberculosis, inadequate contraception in female patients of child bearing potential, pregnancy or breast-feeding, current enrolment in any other investigational drug, previous use of alefacept.

Patients were permitted to receive one combination with an established therapy per course. On a subsequent course, the patient was permitted to change to a different alefacept combination. Low potency topical corticosteroids were permitted during the entire study. One topical treatment and UVB phototherapy were permitted during the alefacept treatment course and subsequent follow-up. Systemic retinoids could be continued throughout the study. Cyclosporine had to be continued during the entire alefacept course and tapered down over 6 weeks in the follow-up, whilst methotrexate might overlap with alefacept only during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Fumarates, photochemotherapy and other immunosuppressant agents were not permitted.

The results of this multicentre study will be published after completion of the entire follow-up following three courses.

Case reports

Case 1, male, 42 years old

The patient had a 28-year history of widespread chronic plaque psoriasis. After various topical treatments, the severity of his extensive psoriasis required phototherapy and systemic treatments. The patient was treated with cyclosporine (2 months), methotrexate (45 months), systemic tacrolimus (10 months) and mycophenylate (4 months). These treatments had resulted in a temporary and partial improvement. However, pancytopenia, liver function impairment and kidney impairment prohibited further use of these medications. As a systemic treatment was really needed, the patient has been treated subsequently with acitretin (43 months) which had a modest efficacy but which did not result in a satisfactory improvement.

Subsequently, the patient was treated with alefacept, whilst continuing acitretin. The patient received two courses of alefacept of 12 weeks each. At the start the patient had a widespread psoriasis although he was on acitretin treatment. His condition improved during treatment with the combination from moderate-severe to mild-moderate within 92 days. The first course was followed by a follow-up period of 120 days during which the patient maintained his favourable result. At that time the patient again had moderate-severe disease, which required the second course, which resulted in an improvement to mild-moderate within 92 days, an improvement which was maintained for at least 120 days (most recent visit). Side effects were limited to a transient decrease of CD4+ cells (338/μl) without clinical significance. The patients had one episode of bronchitis. The patient had psoriatic arthritis and joint complaints. These complaints were less during alefacept treatment as compared to the period before alefacept.

In this patient the combination of alefacept and acitretin resulted in a satisfactorily control of his psoriasis during 240 days.

Case 2, female, 68 years old

The patient had a 12-year history of extensive psoriasis, which started following radiotherapy for a mamma carcinoma. The severity of psoriasis required phototherapies or a systemic treatment. The patient had been treated with acitretin (11 months), PUVA (7 months), UVB (10 months) and sulfasalazine (9 months). All these treatments failed to achieve any marked improvement. Methotrexate was effective during 54 months and resulted in satisfactory improvement. However, liver fibrosis (grade IIIB) necessitated discontinuation of this otherwise very effective treatment in this patient. Cyclosporine was not considered as an option in view of the previous history of mamma carcinoma and for that reason cyclosporine is indicated for short-term interventions and not as a long-term management option to treat the disease. Several admissions to the inpatient department were required for dithranol treatment, but the efficacy in this patient was limited and individual treatment courses lasted for 3-4 months without a substantial improvement.

The patient was given two courses of alefacept of 12 weeks each, together with calcipotriol ointment once daily. The first course of alefacept resulted in a modest improvement at day 43 which lasted only to day 120. A second course of alefacept was given together with dithranol treatment at the in patient department. After 43 days, an impressive improvement was reached. For the first time a dithranol course virtually cleared the patient within one month, whereas courses of dithranol treatment had previously lasted 3-4 months without substantial improvement. However, 120 days after reaching virtually clearing, a relapse occurred which necessitated readmission for dithranol treatment and a third course of alefacept. No significant side effects were observed during alefacept treatment.

In this patient alefacept treatment improved the efficacy of dithranol treatment considerably. The total period of satisfactory control was 197 days.

Case 3, male, 55 years old

This patient had a 39-year history of widespread chronic plaque psoriasis. The severity required phototherapy or a systemic treatment. Multiple courses of UVB phototherapy (as long as 228 months in total) had had a partial effect and the last courses were not effective any more. Methotrexate (4 months) had had no effect. Cyclosporine (19 months) had been effective, however kidney impairment required discontinuation of the treatment.

The patient was treated with two courses of alefacept in combination with calcipotriol ointment. The treatment had an impressive effect and 43 days after the first alefacept injection the disease severity was decreased from moderate-severe to only minimal. At day 120 almost clearing was reached. At day 218 a relapse occurred and the second course resulted in a similar fast response, which was maintained for another 218 days (most recent follow-up visit). Another observation was that itch had improved substantially during alefacept treatment. The patient did not experience any significant side effects during alefacept treatment.

Although the patient was in an excellent condition with respect to his skin for more than 393 days, the complaints with respect to arthritis had not improved.

Case 4, male, 49 years old

This patient suffered from chronic plaque psoriasis for 36 years. During the last two decades the patient had extensive psoriasis, which was resistant to topical treatments. Several courses of phototherapy with UVB (42 months in total) had resulted in a temporarily improvement which was substantial, but of a relative short duration. Methotrexate (96 months) had a moderate effect at dosages above 20 mg per week; the efficacy of methotrexate was not experienced as satisfactorily. Acitretin (49 months) had some efficacy, which was satisfactorily during a few months of combination of acitretin with UVB.

The patient was treated with alefacept. The first course was started when the patient was still being treated with methotrexate, which had an unsatisfactorily response, with widespread lesions remaining. During the first course methotrexate was gradually discontinued without an aggravation of disease severity. Previously, discontinuation of methotrexate had always resulted in severe relapses with severe expression of the disease. The second course of alefacept was given 12 weeks after the last alefacept injection of the first course and was given in combination with phototherapy (UVB). Within 92 days after starting the second course of alefacept with UVB, a significant improvement was experienced, resulting in a mild expression of the disease during 117 days. However, the patient indicated that the response to UVB during alefacept was similar to UVB monotherapy in the past.

The patient had not experienced any significant side effects to alefacept treatment. The patient experienced less complaints of his psoriatic arthritis.

It is likely that alefacept had helped to prevent a relapse following discontinuation of methotrexate.

Case 5, male, 61 years old

During the last 27 years the patient had psoriasis, involving a large part of the body surface. The severity of the lesions justified phototherapy or a systemic treatment. Several courses of phototherapy, during 30 months in total, had had a good efficacy. Methotrexate, during 3 months, had to be discontinued for reasons of liver function abnormalities. Acitretin was given for a few months without substantial improvement, and hair loss as a side effect of retinoid treatment was the reason for discontinuation of this treatment.

Two courses of alefacept in combination with calcipotriol ointment were given. The first course of alefacept together with calcipotriol ointment resulted in almost clearing at day 92, an effect which was maintained for 274 days. At that time he had recovered from his hair loss.

The second course of alefacept again resulted in almost clearing within 92 days, an effect which persisted up to the most recent visit (170 days). ( Figure 1 ) illustrates the improvement in this patient. No significant side effects occurred.

The patient experienced an excellent control of psoriasis during 344 days, which was in striking contrast to the years before alefacept treatment.

Case 6, male, 47 years old

The patient had extensive chronic plaque psoriasis for the past 24 years. Topical therapies had resulted in an insufficient long-term improvement of the skin conditions. Therefore, phototherapy and systemic treatments were indicated. Many courses of phototherapy (UVB) were given during 118 months in total, resulting in a substantial improvement. Methotrexate (3 months) had no effect and alcohol abuse restricted prolonged treatment.

One course of alefacept treatment was started in combination with calcipotriol ointment. Within 92 days an impressive improvement was observed, resulting in a mild severity disease classification. At day 162 the patient was virtually clear, which was the first time in 20 years. No side effects to alefacept were reported.

This improvement to alefacept was maintained during 442 days.

Case 7, female, 64 years old

The patient had a 10-year history of chronic plaque psoriasis of moderate extent. Topical treatments were not effective and therefore the patient had to be treated with phototherapy and systemic treatments. Phototherapy (several courses, in total 6 months) and photochemotherapy (3 months) had not resulted in a significant improvement. Methotrexate had to be discontinued for reasons of liver function impairment.

The patient was treated with alefacept in combination with calcipotriol ointment. The patient received one course of 12 weeks and at day 92 of the treatment the patient was almost clear. Now 442 days later the patient is still almost clear. No side effects were recorded.

Alefacept, in combination with calcipotriol has resulted in this patient in a long-term improvement.

Case 8, male, 41 years old

The patient suffered from psoriasis for 23 years. He had extensive plaque psoriasis and a psoriatic arthritis with joint complaints. Topical treatments had not been effective. The patient was treated with fumarates for 13 months without a substantial improvement. The patient never received photo(chemo)therapy with UVB or PUVA, methotrexate, cyclosporine or retinoids and had no contraindications for these treatments.

The patient received two courses of alefacept. Both courses were combined with a topical treatment with calcipotriol. The first course resulted in a reduction of severity to mild disease and almost clearing at day 43 till day 162. A second course had to be given, resulting in only a temporary reduction to mild-moderate psoriasis. No side effects were recorded. No improvement of the psoriatic arthritis was experienced by the patient.

The patients was not as dissatisfied with the efficacy of alefacept as he was with his previous treatments ( (figure 2) ).

Case 9, male, 49 years old

This patient had plaque psoriasis for 19 years. The patient developed widespread disease with indurated plaques. Topical treatments were not effective. Therefore phototherapy with UVB and phototherapy with PUVA were given (8 months in total) with, at first, a transient effect but without substantial improvement. During 2 months the patient was treated with acitretin without any improvement. Methotrexate, cyclosporine and fumarates had not been considered although no contraindications existed.

The patient received two courses of alefacept in combination with calcipotriol ointment. The first course had virtually no visible effect, although the patient felt some improvement with respect to tenderness of the skin. The second course resulted in a partial improvement from moderate-severe disease to moderate disease, 6 weeks after the first alefacept injection of the second course, an improvement which remained 120 days (most recent visit). No side effects of alefacept were experienced.

The patient interpreted the effect of alefacept as a limited response.

Case 10, female, 45 years old

This patient had suffered from extensive psoriasis for 24 years. Psoriatic arthritis caused joint pain. Topical treatments were not sufficiently effective to provide adequate control. The patient received several courses of phototherapy with UVB (total duration 21 months) and some courses of PUVA. These courses had a limited efficacy. The patient was treated for 24 months with methotrexate with a partial improvement but it was not completely satisfactorily; liver function abnormalities further complicated treatment. For a total of 107 months, she was treated with fumarates, which resulted in an acceptable improvement. However, liver function abnormalities and a drug rash to fumarates made continuation of this treatment impossible. Cyclosporine was not prescribed as a long-term control was aimed for. Several courses of dithranol treatment were given at the in-patient department. However, the improvement due to this treatment was limited and required 2-4 months hospitalization. No other treatment options were available. Even 11 months treatment with Chinese Herbs was tried, also without a meaningful improvement.

Alefacept treatment was started and two courses were given, both in combination with topical treatment with clobetasol-17-propionate. The first course resulted in an improvement, which she had not experienced with any treatment before. After 43 days the severity was reduced to mild-moderate severity. This improvement was maintained for 119 days and aggravation occurred following an erysipelas. A second course of alefacept was given in combination with topical clobetasol-17-propionate, which was less effective. During this course the patient experienced aggravation of a bronchitis (a chronic aspecific hyperreactivity) and two alefacept injections were not given. The patient was admitted again for in-patient treatment with dithranol and, remarkably, dithranol resulted on this occasion in almost clear within 8 weeks, a response to dithranol which was never reached by this patient before alefacept treatment. The patient did not experience an improvement of arthritis during treatment.

The first course of alefacept was regarded as very successful and the second course might have been counteracted by an erysipelas and intercurrent bronchitis. It is of interest that the efficacy of dithranol was enhanced by alefacept.

Discussion

Currently available systemic treatments for psoriasis have serious limitations with respect to cumulative toxicity potential [15]. In general, long-term management of moderate to severe psoriasis may require a continuous long-term treatment or an interval treatment with a short-term intervention in case of exacerbation of the disease.

Of the currently available systemic therapies MTX and acitretin can be used for long-term continuous treatment. Side effects have been reported [16, 17]. Methotrexate is a first line treatment for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, if topical treatments and phototherapy are not successful. Eight of the ten patients in the present study had received MTX. In 4 of 10 patients MTX had been given for more than two years. Two patients were satisfied with the efficacy of MTX and 4 described the long-term efficacy as questionable or none at all. In 5 patients, liver function abnormalities required discontinuation of MTX. All eight MTX treated patients discontinued MTX for reason of insufficient long-term effects or liver function abnormalities. Two out of 10 patients had not received MTX although no contra-indications existed. However these patients did not want treatment with MTX for fear of side effects. Seven out of 10 patients had received acitretin treatment and 2 of them had received acitretin for more than 3 years. In 3 of them acitretin was not effective at all, in 2 of them a partial effect was observed and in 2 patients the efficacy was uncertain. In two patients treatment was discontinued for reason of hair loss or alcohol abuse. In one of the 3 remaining patients acitretin might have been a treatment option and in 2 of these patients contra-indications had prohibited acitretin treatment.

In summary, long-term continuous treatment with available treatments was no longer possible in 8 out of 10 patients. One patient still had two treatment options and one patient only one option. Therefore the need for development of other options, which can provide a continuous long-term disease control, is of utmost importance. In this respect the further commercial development of fumarates is of importance [18-21]. Fumarate treatment is given in the Netherlands as a compassionate use treatment. Three out of 10 patients had received fumarates: One patient had no effect following 13 months treatment, and two patients had to discontinue fumarates for reason of side effects (liver function disturbances, a drug eruption and kidney function impairment). One patient had contra-indications for fumarates. If fumarates had been available as a routine treatment the number of patients without continuous systemic treatment options would have decreased from 8 to 6, which implies that in the majority of the 10 cases new systemic treatment options still remain urgently needed.

Short-term intervention of relapses is another treatment approach for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Phototherapy with UVB and PUVA are treatments which can be used exclusively as short-term intervention treatment, clearly with a cumulative toxicity potential in view of their carcinogenicity [22-24]. In the group of 10 patients, UVB phototherapy was given in 9 subjects. In 5 patients UVB had been given for a cumulative duration of at least 20 months and in the remaining 4 patients the efficacy had been too low. In fact, PUVA therapy might have been an extra option as intervention therapy in two patients. So, 7 out of the 10 patients also did not have the option of intervention treatment with photo(chemo)therapy.

Cyclosporine can be given over a one year cumulative duration, according to the guidelines of the Dutch Association of Dermatologists. Long-term treatment has a serious risk for kidney impairment [25, 26]. In 2 out of 10 patients cyclosporine had been given, in one patient without efficacy and in the other resulting in kidney damage. Taking into consideration that 7 patients had had substantial cumulative doses of UVB and PUVA, only 2 patients were eligible for cyclosporine.

This analysis demonstrates that 8 out of 10 patients had no option for continuous long-term treatment, although interval treatment to manage relapses was possible in 3 patients by photo(chemo)therapy and in 2 patients by cyclosporine.

In the group of 10 patients presented in this report only one patient had a slight and transient decrease of CD4 counts. No patient had significant side effects to alefacept. Alefacept proved to have a substantial benefit, transforming severe psoriasis into a mild disease expression during one year or longer, in as many as 4 out of 10 patients. Table 1( Table 1 ) provides the long-term efficacy data. These patients indicated that their long-term response to a treatment had been substantially better with alefacept as compared to the responses to treatments before alefacept.

Another patient indicated that the overall extent of the lesions was not reduced by alefacept treatment but the remarkable decrease in the thickness of the plaques had been a substantial improvement in the quality of life (case 9). The decrease of itch improved the quality of life in another patient (case 3). This is in line with the reported improvement of quality of life following alefacept in multicentre studies [27, 28]. Four patients indicated that the long-term efficacy during alefacept had not been better as compared to the years that no alefacept was used, although two of these patients indicated a major and clinically relevant improvement of the short-term response to dithranol treatment.The most impressive response with long-term reduction of disease severity to only mild disease was seen in case 7. This patient had been treated with few treatment options in the past and was not eligible for several treatment options for reason of liver function abnormalities.

In 7 patients alefacept was combined with at least one course of calcipotriol, one patient had two courses of clobetasol-17-propionate and two patients had a course of dithranol during or following alefacept treatment. Comparison of the responses to topical treatments in combination with alefacept vs these treatments without alefacept in the past, revealed a remarkable modification of the response to dithranol. Before alefacept, two patients had required 3-4 months of dithranol treatment with only a modest improvement, in contrast to a major improvement with only one month of dithranol treatment in combination with alefacept. In one of these patients the long-term response was not satisfactory, but the relatively short improvement had been important to this patient. In a previous study by our group it was shown that dithranol did not have a significant effect on T-cell subsets, whilst decreasing epidermal proliferation substantially and decreasing the clinical severity of the lesions markedly [29]. It is attractive to speculate that the modes of action of alefacept and dithranol may be complimentary.

The combination of alefacept with UVB (case 4) was not better as compared to UVB monotherapy, however this patient, who was not satisfied with the long-term response, indicated that the discontinuation of methotrexate during alefacept was not accompanied by a flare, whereas severe relapses following MTX discontinuation had been observed in the years before alefacept.

Considering the value of alefacept in combination with available treatment in the long-term management of psoriasis, the present cases illustrate that long-term satisfactory improvement is seen in those patients without treatment options, 4 of 10 patients realising improvement from moderate to severe psoriasis to only mild disease for more than one year. Furthermore, alefacept proved to improve markedly dithranol treatment in dithranol-unresponsive patients and to reduce the relapse following discontinuation of methotrexate.

The positioning of alefacept amongst other systemic treatments for severe psoriasis is a challenge. Based on criteria such as the percentage of patients reaching within 3 months the PASI 75, alefacept is not superior to other systemic treatments. However, the present communication illustrates that some patients with severe psoriasis with restricted treatment options may benefit very much for a prolonged duration from alefacept treatment. The challenge is to identify those patients who are responders to alefacept treatment. Better characterization of psoriasis subtypes, and hopefully, pharmacogenetic approaches may help us.
Table 1 Long term efficacy data in 10 patients with high need psoriasis treated with alefacept in combination with other antipsoriatic treatments

Case

Combined treatment

Duration of improvement (days)

Remarks

1

1. Acitretin

120

2. Acitretin

120

2

1. Calcipotriol

-

2. Dithranol

120

Dithranol treatment highly effective

3

1. Calcipotriol

175

2. Calcipotriol

218

4

1. Methotrexate

-

MTX discontinuation without flare

2. UVB

117

5

1. Calcipotriol

274

2. Calcipotriol

170

6

1. Calcipotriol

442

7

1. Calcipotriol

442

8

1. Calcipotriol

119

2. Calcipotriol

-

9

1. Calcipotriol

-

2. Calcipotril

120

10

1. Clobetasol

119

2. Clobetasol/Dithranol

-

Dithranol treatment highly effective

References

1 Friedrich M, Krammig S, Henze M, Docke WD, Sterry W, Asadullah K. Flow cytometric characterization of lesional T cells in psoriasis: intracellular cytokine and surface antigen expression indicates an activated, memory/effector type 1 immunophenotype. Arch Dermatol Res 2000; 292: 519-21.

2 Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariotti F, Dattilo C, Girolomoni G. Chemokine networks in inflamatory skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14(4): 203-8.

3 Miller GT, Hochman PS, Meier W, Tizard R, Bixler SA, Rosa MD. Specific interaction of lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3 with CD2 can inhibit T cell responses. J Exp Med 1993; 178: 211-22.

4 Chisholm PL, Williams CA, Jones WE, Majeau GR, Oleson FB, Burrus-Fischer B. The effects of an immunomodulatory LFA3-IgG1 fusion protein on nonhuman primates. Ther Immunol 1994; 1: 205-16.

5 Meier W, Gill A, Rogge M, Dabora R, Majeau GR, Oleson FB. Immunomodulation by LFA3TIP, an LFA-3/IgG1 fusion protein: cell line dependent glycocylation effects on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic markers. Ther Immunol 1995; 2: 159-71.

6 Ortonne JP, Prinz JC. Alefacept: a novel and selective biologic agent for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14(1): 41-5.

7 Sanders ME, Makgoba MW, Sharrow SO, Stephany D, Springer TA, Young HA. Human memory T lymphocytes express increased levels of three cell adhesion molecules (LFA-3,CD2,and LFA-1) and three other molecules (UCHL1, CDw29, and Pgp-1) and have enhanced IFN-γ production. J Immunol 1988; 140: 1401-7.

8 Majeau GR, Whitty A, Yim K, Meier W, Hochman PS. Low affinity binding of an LFA-3/IgG1 fusion protein to CD2+ T cells independent of cell activation. Cell Adhes Commun 1999; 7: 267-79.

9 Majeau GR, Meier W, Jimmo B, Kioussis D, Hochman PS. Mechanism of lymphocyte function-associated molecule 3-Ig fusion proteins inhibition of T cell responses: structure/function analysis in vitro and in human CD2 transgenic mice. J Immunol 1994; 152: 2753-67.

10 Ellis CN, Krueger GG, for the Alefacept Clinical Study Group. Treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis by selective targeting of memory effector T lymphocytes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 248-55.

11 Ortonne JP, Lebwohl M, Griffiths C. Alefacept Clinical Study Group. Alefacept-induced decreases in circulating blood lymphocyte counts correlate with clinical respons in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13(2): 117-23.

12 Gottlieb A, Casale T, Goffe B, Gordon K, Korman N, Lowe N. Impast of a 12-week course of alefacept therapy on primary and secondary immune responses in psoriasis patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15(Suppl 2): 242; [abstract (Abstract P24-21)].

13 Ellis C, Krueger G, Shrager D. Repeated courses of alefacept therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis provide consistent efficacy and safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15(Suppl 2): 246; [(abstract) Abstract P24-38].

14 Krueger GG, Papp KA, Stough DB, Loven KH, Gulliver WP, Ellis CN. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating efficacy and tolerability of 2 courses of alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 821-33.

15 Sterry W, Barker J, Boehncke WH, Bos JD, Chimenti S, Christophers E. Integrating biological therapies into psoriasis management: International Consensus Conference. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151(suppl 69): 3-17.

16 Lederle Pharmaceutical. Methotrexate sodium tablets, methotrexate sodium for injection, methotrexate LPF® sodium (methotrexate sodium injection) and methotrexate sodium injection. Pearl River, NY: Lederle Pharmaceutical, August 2001; (package insert).

17 Roche Laboratories Inc. Soriatane® (acitretin) capsules. Nutley, NJ: Roche Laboratories Inc, 1998; (package insert).

18 Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Altmeyer P. Treatment of severe psoriasis with fumaric acid ester: scientific background and guidelines for therapeutic use. The German Fumaric Acid Ester Consensus Conference. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 424-9.

19 Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Altmeyer P. Treatment of psoriasis with furnatic acid ester: results of a prospective multicentre study. German Multicentre Study. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 456-60.

20 Hoefnagel JJ, Thio HB, Willemze R, et al. Long-term safety aspects of systemic therapy with fumaric acid esters in severe psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 363-9.

21 Kolbach DN, Nieboer C. Fumaric acid therapy in psoriasis. Results and side effects of 2 years treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27: 769-71.

22 Calzavara-Pinton PG, Carlino A, Manfredi E, et al. Ocular side effects of PUVA-treated patients refusing eye sun protection. Acta Derm Venereol 1994; 186(Suppl.): 164-5; (Stockh).

23 ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc. Oxsoralen-Ultra® capsules(methoxsalen capsules, USP, 10 mg). Costa Mesa, CA: ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc, 1998; (package insert).

24 Ashcroft DM, Li Wan Po A, Griffiths CE. Therapeutic strategies for psoriasis. J Clin Pharm Ther 2000; 25: 1-10.

25 Grossman RM, Chevret S, Abi-Rached J, et al. Long-term safety of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 623-9.

26 Zachariae H. Renal toxicity of long-term cyclosporin. Scand J Rheumatol 1999; 28: 65-8.

27 Finlay AY, Salek MS, Haney J. Intramuscular alefacept improves health-related quality of life in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Dermatology 2003; 206: 307-15.

28 Ellis CN, Mordin MM, Adler EY. Effects of alefacept on health-related qualify of life in patients with psoriasis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4: 131-9.

29 Swinkels OQ, Prins M, Gerritsen MJ, et al. An immunohistochemical assessment of the response of the psoriatic lesion to single and repeated application of high dose dithranol cream. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2002; 15: 393-400.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]