ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Krystyna Anna PASYK1, Barbara Anna
JAKOBCZAK2
1 Institute of Gerontology, The University of
Michigan, 300 North Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, Michigan
48109-2007, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan,
930 N. University St., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055, USA
Article accepted on 11/05/2004
Our knowledge of vascular endothelium (VE) is relatively new.
Rudolf Virchow, in the 19th century postulated a passive
role of the VE in transferring nutrients from the bloodstream to
tissues, and functioning as an insulation barrier, separating
platelets from the thrombogenic subendothelial connective tissue
[1]. Major advances have been made during the last two decades, and
VE started to be considered a dynamic “widespread organ” with a
crucial homeostatic role in regulation of vascular tone,
thrombogenesis, and vascular remodeling. VE has vital functions in
the body, with numerous secretory properties, and is actively
involved in multiple physiological and pathological processes
[2].
Morphology
VE is formed of a monolayer of endothelial cells (ECs) that line
the circulatory system. The VE may be continuous, fenestrated, or
discontinuous. In human dermis, the blood vessels are lined by
continuous and fenestrated endothelium. The major ultrastructural
differences between dermal VE and other organs are greater
thickness of ECs in dermal vasculature and the presence of large
bundles of microfilaments in their cytoplasm. In the dermal
arterial vasculature, nuclei of ECs are elongated, giving a smooth
luminal surface, but in venous vessels they are round, indented,
and bulge into the lumen. ECs have three surfaces: cohesive,
adhesive, and luminal. The cohesive surface adjoins ECs to one
another and facilitates transport processes. This surface consists
of specialized intercellular junctions: gap junctions, tight
junctions, adherent junctions, and syndesmos [3]. Myoendothelial
junctions are involved in intercellular exchange of information.
The adhesive surface of ECs adheres to the basal lamina. The
luminal side of the VE consists of molecules and specific binding
proteins that regulate trafficking of circulating blood cells.
Microvilli and microfolds have been found in some pathological
conditions [4]. Their role is not clear. The pinocytotic vesicles
are involved in molecular transport and caveolae, in endothelial
vesicular trafficking and signal transduction [5]. The
Weibel-Palade bodies are EC cytoplasmic granules. They secrete von
Willebrand factor (vWF), glycoprotein, GMP-140, P-selectin, IL-8,
α1,3 fucosyltransferase VI, and tetraspanin CD63/lamp3
molecules. However, the nature and function of crystalloids (Fig. 1)
identified within the cytoplasm of ECs, in normal skin and some
diseases, are unknown [6]. The blood vessel ECs (BECs) are
supported externally by basal lamina; lymphatic ECs (LECs) by fine
collagenous and reticular fibrils only.
Physiology
The VE is a dispersed “organ” that synthesizes several peptides
and biologically active molecules taking part in vascular tone
regulation, vessel contraction and permeability. ECs have a role in
regulation of blood pressure and blood flow by releasing both
vasodilatators (nitric oxide [NO], endothelium-derived
hyperpolarizing factor [EDHF], prostacyclin [PGI2]), and
vasoconstrictions (endothelin-1 [ET], endoperoxides, thromboxane
A2, superoxide anions, platelet-activating factor [PAF]) [7, 8]. VE
is a source of arachidonate metabolites, tissue factors, and
numerous cytokines, GMP-140, fibronectin, collagen IV and VIII, and
proteoglycans [9]. Laminin 8 and 10, involved during wound
angiogenesis, are produced by dermal VE [10]. The VE synthesizes
basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), endothelial cell derived
growth factors (ECDGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF),
heparin-like growth inhibitor, growth factors and a mitogenic
factor which regulate the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells.
It was recently discovered that Nox 4 is abundant in ECs and
may act as a catalytic component [11].
A main function of VE is to sustain thromboresistance through
producing factors involved in blood clotting: vWF, vW Ag II,
plasminogen activator, factor V, heparin-like molecules,
thrombospondin, thrombomodulin, protein C, and protein S [12].
Antithrombotic EC properties are maintained by the balance between
plasminogen activators (PAs) and PA inhibitors (PAIs) [13].
Mediation and control of transendothelial exchange of materials
between the plasma and the interstitial fluid (including gas
exchange in the lungs) are also principal VE functions. Several
other functions of VE are mediated through membrane receptors
(IL-1, IL-4, IL-8, G- and GM-CSF, IFN gamma, MIP-2, PDGF, VEGF,
urokinase, OP4) [2, 14]. Receptors for steroid hormones,
neurotransmitters, and polypeptides provides evidence for the
potential hormone responsiveness of the VE [15]. Glycoproteins on
the EC surface are receptors for: fibrinogen, vWF, and fibronectin.
The EC receptors: NPY, VP and P2X are under investigation.
Angiopoietins and two receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2) expressed by
ECs, are important during embryonic development and in angiogenesis
[16]. Angiopoietins are the major ligands of the
endothelial-specific receptor Tie2. Upregulation of angiopoietins
and Tie2 receptor is associated with the microvascular
proliferation in psoriasis [17]. Vitronectin receptor αvβ3 probably
also plays a role in angiogenesis [2]. Recently lymphangiogenic
growth factors and their receptors have been discovered. These
molecules are involved in tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis and
lymphatic dissemination of tumor cells [18].
Apoptotic EC death is crucial during fetal development and is
important in cellular homeostasis. Balance of apoptosis and EC
proliferation is a major factor in angiogenesis [19]. Several
molecules synthesized by ECs regulate apoptosis and angiogenesis.
Some hormones and endocrine peptides, mediated by EC receptors, are
able to regulate capillary formation and regression of vasculature.
Control of angiogenesis in tumor growth inhibition, tumor invasion
and metastasis is a recent research topic.
Pathology
VE is involved in numerous pathological processes: inflammation,
tissue repair, tumor growth and metastasis, transplant rejection,
atherogenesis, immunity, etc. Under normal conditions VE has
anticoagulant and non-thrombogenic properties, but after injurious
stimuli, the antithrombotic surface of ECs may start to be
prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic and promote blood coagulation.
This occurs during high hydrodynamic shear stress or at sites of
inflammation, and may initiate disseminated intravascular
coagulation, atherosclerosis, and immune vasculitis. Injury of VE
can arise from mechanical or thermal trauma, hemodynamic stress,
hypercholesterolemia, oxygen free radicals, chemical agents such as
homocysteine, nicotine, immune/inflammatory mediators, bacterial
and viral infections, and bacterial toxins [20]. Herpes simplex
virus type I, influenza, or cytomegalovirus induce Fc and C3
receptors on VE. These receptors are attachment sites for immune
complexes and may initiate cell injury. ECs, after exposition to
bacterial endotoxins, IL-1 or TNF, may induce the synthesis and
expression of a procoagulant molecule on EC surface and alter EC
function [21]. Alloantibodies produced after transplantation may
also injure VE.
There are three types of EC responses to injury.
1. The immediate transient response: After mild injury
response begins immediately and terms 15 to 30 minutes
causing increased vascular permeability (edema, allergic
wheal).
2. The immediate - sustained response or the
immediate – prolonged reaction: This occurs after
severe injury and is associated with necrosis of ECs. Leakage
starts immediately after injury and may last for several days
(burn).
3. The delayed – prolonged response: Vascular
leakage takes place after direct injury of ECs caused by
mild-to-moderate thermal exposure, X-ray or UV irradiation, contact
with bacterial toxins, and in delayed type IV hypersensitivity
reactions. Leakage is delayed and lasts for several hours or days.
Morphologic changes in VE after injurious stimuli have been
observed in light and electron microscopy. Altered plump ECs,
containing increased number of organelles, were called “activated
cells” almost four decades ago [22]. The nature of the activation
was unknown at that time. Alteration of ECs after various stimuli
may cause either fluctuations in normal cellular activity or
initiation of new EC functions and formation of new molecules which
take part in coagulation, inflammation, and immunity [23]. The term
“endothelial activation” was introduced for this stimulating
process [24]. Quiescent ECs cannot interact with circulating
leukocytes, but upon signal-induced changes, they become
responsible for local recruitment of leukocytes and T cells. After
EC activation, T cells as well as leukocytes are tethered by
selectins to the luminal EC surface and are propelled in the
direction of blood flow, which rolls them along the EC surface. The
adherence and transmigration of white cells through VE are mediated
by β2 integrins and ICAM-1 [21].
VE may respond to cytokines in three ways: 1. ECs may be injured
by cytokine binding to EC receptors. This takes place during
transplant rejection. 2. ECs may migrate, proliferate, and form new
capillaries (angiogenesis). 3. Activated ECs may perform new
functions. Usually EC activation is beneficial, especially in host
defense, because it can cause development of cell-mediated immune
reactions. Activation of ECs, however, can cause their dysfunction
and can lead to pathological processes (vascular leak syndrome,
vasculitis in Kawasaki disease). Proliferation of ECs may result
from infection, immunologic disturbances, trauma, or other
etiologies and is observed in: bacilliary angiomatosis, verruga
peruana (Carrion’s disease), papillary endothelial hyperplasia,
benign (reactive) angioendotheliomatosis, ALHE, and some
hemangiomas. Inflammation-induced angiogenesis is the main site of
leukocyte-EC interaction which causes inflammatory infiltrates in
giant cell arteritis. Vascular adhesion molecules (E-selectin,
ICAM-1, VCAM-1) play a role in inflammatory skin diseases. In
pathological conditions presence of these molecules is detected
along the dermal capillary loop, which leads T cells and leukocytes
to transmigration through the VE [25]. Hypoxia stimulates
angiogenesis and enhances VEGF mRNA [26, 27]. Increased oxygen
tension causes inhibition of EC proliferation and decreases the
synthesis of a major surface protein (PECAM-1) and type IV collagen
[28]. Potent angiogenesis inhibitors are: endostatin,
thrombospondin-1, fragments of basal lamina collagens type IV, XV,
and XVIII, rhuMAb-VEGF, constatin, tumstatin, and edible berry
[29-31].
VE is exposed to circulating antibodies, antigens, and immune
complexes, and for this reason, VE may regulate the transport of
these agents into the tissues. In this way, VE is involved in
initiation of immune reactions and plays a pivotal role in
immunological diseases [32]. Cutaneous VE strongly express class I
and class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The
ability to activate memory T cells allows differentiation of ECs
from other cells, which also express class I and class II MHC
molecules, but cannot activate memory T cells. ECs can costimulate
memory and naïve T cells which are mediated by LFA-3 (CD58)
[33].
Apoptosis is induced not only by various stimuli, but also by
several molecules (caspases, Bcl-2-like proteins, mitochondrial
factors, FasL, stress-activated protein kinases, sphingomyelinases,
etc) [34]. Some anti-EC antibodies activate ECs, others trigger
apoptosis. Staphylococcus aureus induces rapid apoptosis of ECs and
causes a break of the endothelial barrier, permitting invasion of
the bacterium to the organs [35]. Conditions such as high
concentration of homocysteine-thiolactone and reoxygenation after
hypoxia, initiate EC apoptosis. Similarly, hyperbaric oxygenation
of hematopoietic cells enhances apoptosis by increasing the
intracellular accumulation of H2O2 [36].
Acidosis may protect ECs from apoptosis and inhibit their
proangiogenic tendency. Dysregulation of the apoptotic process may
be associated with cancer, AIDS, neurodegeneration, heart disease,
autoimmunity, and allergy [37]. Apoptosis of ECs plays an important
role in development of atherosclerosis. Further research studies on
proapoptotic markers (Bax, Bak), antiapoptotic markers (Bcl-2,
p53), and the proliferation marker (ki-67) may help early detection
of dysregulation of apoptosis [38, 39]. It has recently been
discovered that proteosome selective inhibitor (PSI) inhibits
growth of tumors not only by induction of apoptosis, but also by
inhibition of angiogenesis [40].
Vascular endothelial cell markers
Immunohistochemical or immunofluorescence techniques currently
are commonly used to localize EC markers. Molecular markers of VE
are still in the growing phase. The basal lamina of small blood
vessels is visible in the presence of antibodies against the basal
lamina components [9]. However EC of lymphatics give a negative
reaction in immunologic staining because the basal lamina is
absent. In electron microscopy Weibel-Palade bodies are recognized
as morphologic EC markers.
The earliest markers used for identification of ECs were:
angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), vWF, and Ulex europaeus
lectin [2, 41]. Monoclonal antibodies (B721, E431) recognize EC
surface antigens, and together with other known EC markers (F8rAg,
Ia, HCL-1) they are used in the study of Kaposi’s sarcoma in
patients with AIDS. Monoclonal antibodies (E92, OKM5, HCL-1) react
with BECs, but not with LECs [42]. Monoclonal antibodies to ICAM-1
are excellent markers of the VE. Staining with anti-CD34 may
differentiate Kaposi’s sarcoma from hemosiderotic dermatofibromas.
Similarly, tumor cells in tufted angioma can be detected with this
technique [41].
Monoclonal antibody CD31 (PECAM-1) is also a reliable VE marker,
but CD36 is present on VE as well as on monocytes and platelets [9,
43]. A new monoclonal antibody (S-Endo-1), which recognizes CD146,
allows detection of ciculating ECs in thrombotic, infectious or
immunologic disorders and is a useful marker for vascular wall
injury [44]. Other EC markers are cytokeratin 8, 18, 19, vimentin,
EN7/44, EN4, 1F10, BMA120, ELAM-1, sVCAM-1, sTM, E-selectin, and
P-selectin [45]. E-selectin and VEGF are present in proliferating
ECs in hemangiomas [9, 46]. The bFGF is positive in the
proliferative and only in the early involuting phases of hemangioma
[9]. Glut-1 is recently used for distinguishing hemangiomas from
vascular malformations [47, 48]. Other EC markers are: alkaline
phosphatase (ALPase), adenylate and guanylate cyclase (AC and GC),
VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, fms tyrosine kinase 4 gene (Flt-4),
5’-nucleotidase (5’Nase), PAL-E, beta-chemokine receptor D6, and
VE-cadherin or cadherin-5 [2, 49, 50, 51]. A number of these
markers are expressed with variable sensitivity on VE, whereas
others are also present in different cells. VEGFR-3, Prox-1,
Lyve-1, and podoplanin are specific markers for LECs [52-55]. Fli-1
is a novel nuclear marker of ECs of vascular tumors [56]. Integrin
αvβ3 is a marker for activated and proliferating ECs [57, 58].
Fibronectin isoform (B-FN), and CD105 (endoglin) are markers of
angiogenesis [59]. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue
inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TiMPs), as well as VEGF and bFGF
are also markers for new vessel formation [60]. Endomucin is a new
marker identified on VE of each tissue [61]. Guanylate-binding
protein-1 (GPB-1), also a new molecular marker, identifies
inflammatory cytokines-activated ECs in psoriasis, adverse drug
reaction, and Kaposi’s sarcoma [62]. Anionic phospholipids are
expressed on ECs in tumor vasculature, apoptotic, necrotic,
injured, activated and malignant cells, and for this reason they
can be used in the future, as receptors for vascular target
substances during cancer treatment [63]. Recent studies
demonstrated that antimouse VEGFR-2 antibodies may be used as
antiangiogenic or vascular targeting agents in tumor therapy
[64].
Conclusion
This brief and rather fragmentary review of VE morphology,
physiology, and pathology, which focused on ECs in the skin, shows
how these cells are pluripotent and have vital functions.
Stimulated ECs may respond by vasodilatation and increased
permeability, production of cytokines and cell mediators,
activation, converting adherent leukocytes into mobile cells
migrating to the inflammatory sites, antigen presentation,
angiogenesis, and apoptosis. Currently much has been discovered
about this dynamic organ, through genetic manipulation to engineer
ECs. The number of discoveries of new EC functions, their
biosynthetic and metabolic activities, as well as the markers
expressed by VE is still growing. Studies on limitation or
promotion of angiogenesis and apoptosis will be promising in the
progress of opening new horizons for future therapy of various
diseases. n
References
1. Virchow R. Phlogose and Thrombose in Gefessystem.
In: Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur wissenschaftlichen Medicine.
Frankfurt-am-Main. Meidinger Sohn and Company, 1856: 458.
2. Risau W. Differentiation of endothelium. FASEB
J 1995; 9: 926-33.
3. Dejana E, Carada M, Lampugnani MG. Endothelial
cell-to-cell junctions. FASEB J 1999: 910-8.
4. Pasyk K. Studies on subcutaneous fat necrosis of
the newborn. Virchows Arch A 1978; 379: 243-59.
5. Frank FG, Woodman SE, Park DS, Lisanti MP.
Caveolin, caveolae, and endothelial cell function. Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 1161-8.
6. Pasyk KA, Hassett CA, Cherry GW, Argenta LC.
Endothelial cell crystalloids in newborn human foreskin. J Cutan
Pathol 1988; 15: 84-91.
7. Aljada A. Endothelium, inflammation, and
diabetes. Metabol Syndr Relat Disord 2003; 1: 3-21.
8. Vanhoutte PM. Say NO to ET. J Auton Nerv
System 2000; 81: 271-7.
9. Tan ST, Velickovic M, Ruger BM, Davis PF.
Cellular and extracellular markers of hemangioma. Plast Reconstr
Surg 2000; 106: 529-38.
10. Li J, Zhang Y-P, Kirsner RS. Angiogenesis in
wound repair: angiogenic growth factors and the extracellular
matrix. Microscopy Res Techn 2003; 60: 107-14.
11. Ago T, Kitazono T, Ooboshi H, et al. Nox4
as the major catalytic component of an endothelial NAD(P)H oxidase.
Circulation 2004; 109: 227-33.
12. McCarroll DR, Levin EG, Montgomery RR.
Endothelial cell synthesis of von Willebrand Antigen II, von
Willebrand factor, and von Willebrand factor/von Willebrand Antigen
II complex. J Clin Invest 1985; 75: 1089-95.
13. Światkowska M, Cierniewska-Cieślak A, Pawłowska
Z, Cierniewski CS. Dual regulatory effects of nitric oxide on
plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 expression in
endothelial cells. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267: 1001-7.
14. Granata F, Potenza RL, Fiori A, et al.
Expression of OP4 (ORL1, NOP1) receptors in vascular endothelium.
Europ J Pharm 2003; 482: 17-23.
15. Suzuki T, Nakamura Y, Moriya T, Sasano H.
Effects of steroid hormones on vascular functions. Microscopy
Res Techn 2003; 60: 76-84.
16. O’Toole G, MacKenzie D, Poole M. Therapeutic
angiogenesis. Br J Plastic Surg 2004; 57: 179.
17. Kuroda K, Sapadin A, Shoji T, et al.
Altered expression of angiopoietins and Tie2 endothelium receptor
in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 116: 713-20.
18. Wilting J, Schweigerer L. Development and
engineering of lymphatic endothelial cells: clinical implications.
Curr Pharmaceut Design 2004; 10: 75-80.
19. Jekunen A, Kairemo K. Inhibition of angiogenesis
at endothelial cell level. Microscopy Res. Techn 2003; 60:
85-97.
20. Weis M, Kledal TN, Lin KY, et al.
Cytomegalovirus infection impairs the nitric oxide synthase
pathway. Circulation 2004; 109: 500-5.
21. Blake GJ, Ridker PM. Novel clinical markers of
vascular wall inflammation. Circulation Res 2001; 89:
763-71.
22. Willms-Kretschmer K, Flax MH, Cotran RS. The
fine structure of the vascular response in hapten-specific delayed
hypersensitivity and contact dermatitis Lab Invest 1967; 17:
334-49.
23. Cotran RS. New roles for the endothelium in
inflammation and immunity. Am J Pathol 1987; 129:
407-13.
24. Cotran RS, Pober JS. Endothelial activation: Its
role in inflammatory and immune reactions. In: Endothelial Cell
Biology in Health and Disease. Simionescu N, Simionescu M, eds.
New York: Plenum Press, 1988: 335.
25. Campbell JJ, Butcher EC. Chemokines in
tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing.
Curr Opin Immunol 2000; 12: 336-41.
26. Clauss M, Schaper W. Vascular endothelial growth
factor. A Jack-of all-trades or nonspecific stress gene?
Circulation Res 2000; 86: 251-2.
27. Fukumura D, Xu L, Chen Y, et al. Hypoxia
and acidosis independently up-regulate vascular endothelial growth
factor transcription in brain tumors in vivo. Cancer Res
2001; 61: 6020-8.
28. Zhou L, Dosanjh A, Chen H, Karasek M. Divergent
effects of extracellular oxygen on the growth, morphology, and
function of human skin microvascular endothelial cells. J Cell
Physiol 2000; 182: 134-40.
29. Marneros AG, Olsen BR. The role of
collagen-derived proteolytic fragments in angiogenesis. Matrix
Biol 2001; 20: 337-45.
30. Atalay M, Gordillo G, Roy S, et al.
Anti-angiogenic property of edible berry in a model of hemangioma.
FEBS Letters 2003; 544: 252-7.
31. Hampton T. Cancer research target
angiogenesis. JAMA 2003; 290: 2529-33.
32. Pober JS. The endothelium as an antigen
presenting cell. In: Immune Functions of the Vessel Wall.
Hansson GK, Libby P. eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harwood
Academic Publisher, 1996: 1-27.
33. Murray AG, Libby P, Pober JS. Human vascular
smooth muscle cells poorly co-stimulate and actively inhibit
allogenic CD4+ T cell proliferation in vitro. J Immunol
1995; 154: 151-61.
34. Grassmé H, Jendrossek V, Gulbins E. Molecular
mechanisms of bacteria induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 2001; 6:
441-5.
35. Esen M, Schreiner B, Jendrossek V, et al.
Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus induced apoptosis of human
endothelial cells. Apoptosis 2001; 6: 431-9.
36. Ganguly BJ, Tonomura N, Osborne BA, Granowith
EV. Hyperbaric oxygen enhances apoptosis in hematopoietic cells.
Apoptosis 2002; 7: 499-510.
37. Fumarola C, Guidotti GG. Stress-induced
apoptosis: toward a symmetry with receptor-mediated cell death.
Apoptosis 2004; 9: 77-82.
38. Feinmesser M, Tsabari C, Fichman S, et
al. Differential expression of proliferation – and
apoptosis – related markers in lentigo maligna and solar
keratosis keratinocytes. Am J Dermatopathol 2003; 25:
300-7.
39. Štefanec T, Endothelial apoptosis could it have
a role in the pathogenesis and treatmenmt of disease? CHEST
2000; 117: 841-54.
40. Stokłosa T, Gołab C, Wójcik P, et al.
Increased local vascular endothelial growth factor expression
associated with antitumor activity of proteosome inhibitor.
Apoptosis 2004; 9: 193-204.
41. Okada E, Tamura A, Ishikawa O, Miyachi Y, Tufted
angioma (angioblastoma): case report and review of 41 cases in
the Japanese literature. Clin Exp Dermatol 2000; 25:
627-30.
42. Rutgers JL, Wieczorek R, Bonetti F, et
al. The expression of endothelial cell surface antigens by
AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma: Evidence for a vascular
endothelial cell origin. Am J Pathol 1986; 122: 493-9.
43. Satter EK, Graham BS, Gibbs NF. Congenital
tufted angioma. Ped Dermatol 2002; 19: 445-7.
44. Dignat-Gorge F, Sampol J. Circulating
endothelial cells in vascular disorders: new insights into an old
concept. Eur J Haematol 2000; 65: 215-20.
45. de Larranaga GF, Bocassi AR, Puga LM, et
al. Endothelial markers and HIV infection in the era of highly
active antiretroviral treatment. Thromb Res 2003; 110:
93-8.
46. Bell CD. Endothelial cell tumors. Microscopy
Res Techn 2003; 60: 165-70.
47. North PE, Waner M, Mizeracki A, Mihm MC. GLUT1:
A newly discovered immunohistochemical marker for juvenile
hemangiomas. Human Pathol 2000; 31: 11-22.
48. Enjolras O, Mulliken JB, Boon LM, et al.
Noninvoluting congenital hemangioma: a rare cutaneous vascular
anomaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1647-54.
49. Folpe AL, Veikkola T, Valtola R, Weiss SW.
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3): a marker
of vascular tumors with presumed lymphatic differentiation,
including Kaposi’s sarcoma, kaposiform and Dabska-type
hemangioendotheliomas, and a subset of angiosarcomas. Mod
Pathol 2000; 13: 180-5.
50. Coindre JM. Immunohistochemistry in the
diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Histopathology 2003; 43:
1-16.
51. Hirakawa S, Hong Y-K, Harvey N, et al.
Identification of vascular lineage-specific genes by
transcriptional profile isolate blood vascular and lymphatic
endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 2003; 162: 575-86.
52. Reis-Filho JS, Schmitt FC. Lymphangiogenesis in
tumors: what do we know? Microscopy Res Techn 2003; 60:
171-80.
53. Banerji S, Ni J, Wang SX, et al. LYVE-1,
a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific
receptor for hyaluronan. J Cell Biol 1999; 144: 789-801.
54. Cunnick GH, Jiang WG, Gomez KF, Mansel RE.
Lymphangiogenesis and breast cancer metastasis. Histol
Histopathol 2002; 17: 863-70.
55. Sangeza OP, Requena L. Pathology of Vascular
Skin Lesions, Clinicopathologic Correlations. New Jersey:
Humana Press, Totowa 2003: 7-13.
56. Folpe AL, Chand EM, Goldblum JR, Weiss SW.
Expresssion of Fli-1, a nuclear transcription factor, distinguishes
vascular neoplasms from potential mimics. Am J Surg Pathol
2001; 25: 1061-6.
57. Karkkainen MJ, Alitalo K. Lymphatic endothelial
regulation, lymphedema, and lymph node metastasis. Semin Cell
Dev Biol 2002; 13: 9-18.
58. Pezzella F, Harris AL, Gatter KC. Ways of
escape: are all tumours angiogenic? Histopathol 2001; 39:
551-3.
59. Kumar S, Ghellal A, Li C, et al. Breast
carcinoma: vascular density determined using CD105 antibody
correlates with tumour prognosis. Cancer Res 1999; 59:
856-61.
60. Vikkula M, Boon LM, Mulliken JB. Molecular
genetics of vascular malformations. Matrix Biol 2001; 20:
327-35.
61. Kuhn A, Brachtendorf G, Kurth F, et al.
Expression of endomucin, a novel endothelial sialomucin, in normal
and diseased human skin. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119:
1388-93.
62. Lubeseder-Martellato C, Guenzi E, Jörg A, et
al. Guanylate-binding protein-1 expression is selectively
induced by inflammatory cytokines and is an activation marker of
endothelial cells during inflammatory diseases. Am J Pathol
2002; 161: 1749-59.
63. Ran SD, Downes A, Thorpe PE. Increased exposure
of anionic phospholipids on the surface of tumor blood vessels.
Cancer Res 2002; 62: 6132-40.
64. Ran S, Huang X, Downes A, Thorpe PE. Evaluation
of novel antimouse VEGFR2 antibodies as potential antiangiogenic or
vascular targeting agents for tumor therapy. Neoplasia 2003;
5: 297-307.
|