ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Jörg Christoph PRINZ
Department of Dermatology and Allergology,
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Frauenlobstr. 9-11,
D-80337 Munich, Germany
Reprints: J. Wechsler Fax:
(+ 33) 1 48 81 27 33 E-mail:
janine.wechslerhmn.ap-hop-paris.fr
Sir,
With great interest we read the Letter to the Editor by K. Peris
and colleagues of this issue of the European Journal of Dermatology
[1]. The authors report on the successful treatment of
keratoacanthoma (KA) with imiquimod 5% cream and thus confirm our
recent experience that immunostimulation may be a novel treatment
modality for this rapidly growing obnoxious skin tumor
[2].
Although KA has a tendency for self-involution after several
months, it represents a dilemma for the physician. In daily
clinical work histopathology of lesional biopsies often does not
clearly distinguish KA from squamous cell carcinoma. Final size of
KA and potential tissue destruction are unpredictable. All these
aspects argue for active treatment. On the other hand, KA usually
occurs in heavily sun-exposed skin and is thus generally observed
on the face or hands of elderly people. These sites require
particular surgical skills. Surgical treatment may be impeded by
relative or absolute contraindications resulting from comorbidities
and systemic medication of the affected age group. This situation
has lead various physicians to suggest a « wait and see »
strategy without any specific treatment [3-5], putting both patient
and physician at risk.
The efficacy of imiquimod may solve this problem for at
least a subgroup of patients. When a short history with rapid
tumour growth strongly favours the diagnosis of KA instead of
squamous cell carcinoma clinically and the patient shows restraints
to other treatment modalities, the use of imiquimod 5% cream could
avoid both surgery and a « wait and see » policy. In the
age of evidence-based medicine, however, controlled clinical
studies will have to prove efficacy in a larger number of patients
to make imiquimod a standard regimen for KA [6]. n
References
1. Peris K, Micantonio T, Fargnoli MC. Successful
treatment of keratoacanthoma and actinic keratoses with imiquimod
5% cream. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13: 413-4
2. Dendorfer M, Oppel T, Wollenberg A, Prinz JC.
Topical treatment with imiquimod may induce regression of facial
keratoacanthoma. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13: 80-2.
3. Lucente FE. Giant keratoacanthoma of the nose.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 112-6.
4. de Visscher JG, van der Wal JE, Starink TM,
Tiwari RM, and van der Waal I. Giant keratoacanthoma of the lower
lip: Report of a case of spontaneous regression. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 81: 193-6.
5. Saito M, Sasaki Y, Yamazaki N, Shimizu H.
Self-involution of giant keratoacanthoma on the tip of the nose.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1561-2.
6. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB,
Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it
isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2.
|