ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Janusz PROKOP1, Pawel P.
JAGODZINSKI2
1Department of Dermatology.
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University of Medical Sciences, 6 Świecickiego St., 60-781 Poznań,
Poland
Reprints: P. P. Jagodzinski, Fax:
(+ 48) 61 865 95 86 E-mail:
pjagodziam.poznan.pl
Article accepted on 09/04/2003
Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an autoimmune disease of unknown
etiopathogenesis that can be divided into cutaneous and systemic
forms of LE [1]. The cutaneous forms of lupus erythematosus are
discoid LE (DLE), discoid disseminated LE (DDLE) and subacute
cutaneous LE (SCLE) [2].
It has been observed that occupational exposure, drugs,
chemicals, food, viruses and other infectious factors might result
in profound changes of the immune system [3, 4]. Alterations in the
immune system include the production of autoantibodies with
different specificities, changes of T cell function, oncogene
expression as well as failure of phagocytosis [5]. Three major
mechanisms might cause the initiation and promotion of LE:
increased amounts of nuclear autoantigens as well as abnormal
presentation of them, T-cell-dependent stimulation of B cells for
the biosynthesis of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), damage of tissues
mediated by anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies and
immune complexes [5-7].
It has been reported that increased apoptosis or the decreased
efficiency of removal of apoptotic cells may contribute to the
formation of necrotic cells and the production of antibodies
directed against nuclear antigen [8]. The nuclear autoantigens were
also found in the surface blebs of apoptotic cells and were
accessible to immune cells [8-11]. It has been observed that the
transformation of the cutaneous form of LE to systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE) is associated with the elevation of anti-dsDNA
antibody production and increase of tissue damage [12, 13]. The
cationic anti-dsDNA antibodies may bind to heparan-sulfate, which
is a major constituent of glomerular basement membranes, and result
in the development of renal disease [12,13].
It has been suggested that expression of certain endogenous
retroviral components may mimic the nuclear autoantigens and result
in production of cationic anti-dsDNA autoantibodies [14]. Human
endogenous retroviruses (HERV), that generally do not undergo
through an extracellular phase, constitute 0.1% to 0.6% of the
human DNA genome [15]. Expression of human endogenous or exogenous
viral components and improper CD4+T cell dependent B
cell activation may result in breakdown of self-tolerance and
induction of LE related autoimmune disease [14, 16]. It has been
reported that expression of HERV proteins may correlate with
development of autoimmune diseases including SLE [17, 18].
In the present study, we attempted to determine the relationship
between production of ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-single stranded DNA
(anti-ssDNA) antibodies and the presence of HIV-1 pol
sequences in DNA isolated from serum of DLE, DDLE and SCLE
patients.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The investigated groups included DLE (n = 85), DDLE
(n = 51) and SCLE (n = 22) patients diagnosed
according to revised criteria of the 1982 American Rheumatism
Association [1, 2]. Control samples were obtained from age and sex
matched normal healthy volunteers. The patients of investigated
groups and healthy volunteers were HIV-1 and
HIV-2 negative.
Antinuclear antibodies detection and determination of
circulating immune complexes (CIC) concentration
The presence of ANA in the serum of LE patients was determined
by a test which uses mitotic human epithelioid cells (Hep-2) as a
substrate (Immuno Concepts, Sacramento, USA) [19].
The presence of anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA in the serum of LE
patients was detected by a staining test of the kinetoplast within
the organism Crithidia luciliae (Immuno Concepts Sacramento,
USA) [20].
The concentration of CIC in peripheral blood serum samples was
determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilising
monoclonal anti-C1q antibody (DRG International Inc. Mountainside,
USA). Results were expressed as μg/ml equivalent to heat-aggregated
IgG. CIC concentration values higher than 40 μg/ml in the
anti-C1q method were regarded as abnormal.
Isolation of DNA from serum of LE patients and healthy
individuals
Serum samples were mixed with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and
2.5 M NaCl solution and then were centrifuged at 4 °C
[21]. The supernatants were discarded and pellets were resuspended
in buffer, containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8. 3),
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.2% sodium dodecyl
sulphate (SDS) and 50 μg/ml of proteinase K. Samples were
incubated over night at room temperature and the mixture was
extracted with phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol method [21]. The
aqueous phase containing nucleic acids was collected, mixed with
equal volume of cold isopropanol and centrifugated. The DNA pellets
were washed by cold 70% ethanol and dried at room temperature. To
decompose the RNA traces, the DNA samples were incubated for
24 hr at 37 °C with 1 ml Rnase (5 mg/ml) and
dissolved in 0.1 M NaOH solution.
Dot blot hybridisation
The DNA samples were applied to Hybond-N filters (Bio-Rad,
Mnchen, Germany) 30 μg per dot and washed with SSC buffer
(3 M NaCl; 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0). Filters were
kept for 6 hr at 42-43 0C in prehybridization
solution (50% formamide, 6xSSC, 5xDenhard’s, 0.1% SDS, and
1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA) prior to hybridization with a
32P-labeled single stranded DNA probe (196 bp).
The probe sequence corresponds to the HIV-1 pol
fragment: (5’-ATA AAC AAT GAG ACA CCA GGG ATT AGA TAT CAG TAC AAT
GTG CTT CCA CAG GGA TGG AAA GGA TCA CCA GCA ATA TTC CAA AGT AGC ATG
ACA AAA ATC TTA GAG CCT TTT AGA AAA CAA AAT CCA GAC ATA GTT ATC TAT
CAA TAC ATG GAT GAT TTG TAT GTA GGA TCT GAC TTA GAA ATA GGG CAG CAT
AGA A-3’) [21]. This HIV-1 pol fragment corresponds to
conservative sequence of retroviruses genome and the similarity
between this probe and corresponding HERV sequences was found to be
in the range of 60-88% [21]. The hybridisation was conducted for
24 hr at 65 0C. Then filters were washed three
times, dried and exposed to the film (DuPont NEN Company, Boston,
USA) (Fig. 1).
The DNA isolation and hybridisation procedures were performed in
triplicate.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significant of the association between positive
results of the dot blot hybridization and the presence of ANA,
anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies was evaluated by the v-square,
Yates-corrected chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The strength of
the association was assessed by
Φ =
√χ2/N [22]
Results
The presence of antinuclear antibodies in serum of LE
patients
Our studies revealed that in the group of DLE patients
(n = 85): 19 (22.4%), 11 (12.9%), 5 (5.9%) were positive
for ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies respectively. In the
same group, 66 (77.6%) patients exhibited lack of ANA antibodies in
serum (Table I). In the group of DDLE
patients (n = 51), ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA
antibodies were found in 15 (29.4%), 8 (15.7%), 5 (9.8%) subjects,
respectively. We also observed that in this group 36 (70.6%)
patients did not produce the ANA antibodies (Table I). The determination of antibody production
in the group of SCLE patients (n = 22) showed that 17
(77.3%), 7 (31.8%) and 4 (18.2%) were respectively positive for
ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies (Table
I). We were not able to detect ANA antibodies in 5 (22.7%)
SCLE patients. We found that most of ANA positive individuals
exhibited the presence of anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies
(Table I). We also determined that ANA,
anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies in the groups of DLE, DDLE and
SCLE patients mainly belonged to the IgG class.
Table I. ANA, anti-dsDNA
and anti-ssDNA antibodies in the groups of DLE, DDLE and SCLE
patients.
|
Diagnosis
|
G/R
|
Antibodies
|
|
|
|
ANA+
|
Anti-dsDNA
|
Anti-ssDNA
|
ANA-
|
|
DLE
n = 85
|
3.25
|
19
(22.4%)
|
11
(12.9%)
|
5
(5.9%)
|
66
(77.6%)
|
|
DDLE
n = 51
|
3.25
|
15
(29.4%)
|
8
(15.7%)
|
5
(9.8%)
|
36
(70.6%)
|
|
SCLE
n = 22
|
3.4
|
17
(77.3%)
|
7
(31.8%)
|
4
(18.2%)
|
5
(22.7%)
|
G/R, gender ratio, women/men
ANA+ or ANA- represents the presence or
absence of antinuclear antibodies in-patients serum samples,
respectively. Anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA represent the ANA+
samples, which also contain antibodies directed against anti-double
and anti-single stranded DNA, respectively.
The correlation between ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA
antibodies and the presence of HIV-1 pol DNA sequences
in the serum of LE patients
We attempted to determine the relationship between the
production of ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and the
presence of homologous HIV-1 pol sequences in DNA
isolated from the serum of cutaneous form of LE patients.
We found that 47.0% of ANA-, 78.9% of ANA+,
81.8% of anti-dsDNA and 100% of anti-ssDNA positive DLE patients
exhibited a strong reaction with pol probes (Table II). In the group of DDLE patients, we
observed that 47.2% of ANA– subjects exhibited a
positive reaction with pol sequences (Table II). In the same group, we also found that
80.0% of ANA+, 100% of anti-dsDNA and 100% of anti-ssDNA
positive patients of DDLE exhibited a presence of
HIV-1 pol sequences (Table
II). In the group of SCLE patients 20.0% of
ANA , 82.4% of ANA+, 100% of anti-dsDNA
and 100% of anti-ssDNA exhibited the presence of
HIV-1 pol sequences (Table
II). In the control group we did not identify homologous
HIV-1 pol sequences as well as ANA, anti-dsDNA and
anti-ssDNA antibodies.
Table II. Correlation
between the biosynthesis of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA
antibodies and the presence of HIV-1 pol sequence.
|
Number
of Patients
|
Antibodies
|
Number
of patients
|
Percentage
of antibodies
positive cases
|
Number of negative and
positive cases
of dot hybridisation
|
|
|
+
|
Percentage of
positive cases in
antibody groups
|
|
DLE
n = 85
|
ANA
|
66
|
77.6%
|
35
|
31
|
47.0%
|
|
ANA+
|
19
|
22.4%
|
4
|
15
|
78.9%
|
|
dsDNA
|
11
|
12.9%
|
2
|
9
|
81.8%
|
|
ssDNA
|
5
|
5.9%
|
0
|
5
|
100%
|
|
DDLE
n = 51
|
ANA
|
36
|
70.6%
|
19
|
17
|
47.2%
|
|
ANA+
|
15
|
29.4%
|
3
|
12
|
80.0%
|
|
dsDNA
|
8
|
15.7%
|
0
|
8
|
100%
|
|
ssDNA
|
5
|
9.8%
|
0
|
5
|
100%
|
|
SCLE
n = 22
|
ANA
|
5
|
22.7%
|
4
|
1
|
20%
|
|
ANA+
|
17
|
77.3%
|
3
|
14
|
82.4%
|
|
dsDNA
|
7
|
31.8%
|
0
|
7
|
100%
|
|
ssDNA
|
4
|
18.2%
|
0
|
4
|
100%
|
ANA- or ANA+ represent the absence or
presence of antinuclear antibodies in-patients serum samples,
respectively. Anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA represent the ANA+
samples, which also contain antibodies directed against anti-double
and anti-single stranded DNA, respectively.
–, + represent negative or positive result of dot blot
hybridisation, respectively.
In the group of SCLE patients we observed the greatest strength
of association (Φ) between the presence of anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA
antibodies and a positive result of dot blot hybridisation, with Φ
being equal to 0.837 and 0.800 (Table
III). However, in the groups of DDLE and DLE patients,
strength of association between production of anti-dsDNA and
anti-ssDNA antibodies and a positive result of dot blot
hybridisation was respectively two to four times lower than in the
group of SCLE patients (Table III).
Table III. Correlation
between the presence of HIV-1 pol sequences and the
biosynthesis of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies in DLE,
DDLE and SCLE patients.
|
Diagnosis
|
Strength of
association (Φ)
|
|
ANA
|
Anti-dsDNA
|
Anti-ssDNA
|
|
DLE
|
0.267
|
0.244
|
0.271
|
|
|
p = 0.014
|
p = 0.033
|
p = 0.068
|
|
DDLE
|
0.302
|
0.411
|
0.346
|
|
|
p = 0.033
|
p = 0.02
|
p = 0.082
|
|
SCLE
|
0.561
|
0.837
|
0.800
|
|
|
p = 0.021
|
p = 0.010
|
p = 0.048
|
ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA represent the antibodies directed
against nuclear antigen; double and single stranded DNA,
respectively.
Measurement of CIC concentration in serum of LE patients
We found that the average concentration of CIC was higher in
ANA+ than ANA– blood samples of DLE,
DDLE and SCLE patients (Table IV). The
concentration of CIC in ANA+ serum samples, which were
also positive for anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and dot
hybridisation were found to be in the range of 42.8-58.1 μg/ml
(Table IV).
Table IV. Average
concentration of CIC in-groups of DLE, DDLE and SCLE patients.
|
Concentration of CIC
(μg/ml)
|
|
DLE
|
DDLE
|
SCLE
|
Control
samples
|
|
ANA–
|
ANA+
|
ANA–
|
ANA+
|
ANA–
|
ANA+
|
35.6 ± 5.5
|
|
n = 66
|
n = 19
|
n = 36
|
n = 15
|
n = 5
|
n = 17
|
|
|
38.6 ± 3.8
|
47.0 ± 5.7
|
37.1 ± 3.3
|
49.2 ± 4.8
|
38.7 ± 4.1
|
50.6 ± 6.1
|
|
|
(35.4-43.2)
|
(44.6-53.2)
|
(33.4-42.3)
|
(43.1-58.1)
|
(37.2-42.1)
|
(42.8-57.8)
|
|
ANA or ANA+ represent the absence or
presence of antibodies directed against nuclear antigens,
respectively. Most of ANA+ samples were also positive
for anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies (Table
I). Data in parenthesis represent the lowest and the
highest concentration of CIC in-antibody group of DLE, DDLE and
SCLE patients. Control samples represent the average concentration
of CIC in-group of healthy individuals (n = 20). n-
numbers of individuals.
Discussion
The increase of apoptosis and decrease of clearance of apoptotic
cells might be responsible for the elevation of genome DNA debris
in peripheral blood plasma of patients with various forms of lupus
erythematosus [8-11].
We attempted to determine the correlation between the biosynthesis
of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies and the presence of
HIV-1 pol sequences in DNA isolated from serum of DLE, DDLE
and SCLE patients.
It has been reported that the presence and expression of HERV
sequences in the human genome might trigger various autoimmune
diseases [18]. The complete pol sequences are presented in
the genome of retroviruses and encode viral enzymes such as reverse
transcriptase, protease and integrase [23]. The presence of
homologous HIV-1 pol sequences in DNA isolated from the
serum of SLE patients has been described and may support the role
of certain HERV viruses in the etiopathogenesis of SLE [17,
21].
Our results revealed a significant correlation between the
biosynthesis of anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and the presence
of homologous HIV-1 pol sequences in DNA debris
isolated from the serum of SCLE patients. In contrast, the same
studies conducted in groups of DLE and DDLE patients revealed a
lower correlation between anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and the
presence of pol sequences than in SCLE patients. We also
observed that ANA+ serum samples, which were positive
for anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and pol sequences
exhibited a higher concentration of CIC than other serum samples of
LE patients.
Our findings suggest that the presence of pol sequences
might be responsible for expression of viral components and
induction of an improper immune response in the cutaneous form of
LE patients. These results are similar to those of Herrman et
al. [21], who reported that DNA isolated from serum of SLE
patients contained homologous HIV-1 pol sequences.
Antibodies against retroviral components and particles have been
detected in serum and tissues of patients with lupus erythematosus
[24]. The involvement of viral sequences in autoimmune disease can
be supported by the similarity of immune deregulation between lupus
erythematosus patients and those infected with HIV-1 [25].
Our observations suggest that the presence of endogenous viruses
or incorporation of defective exogenous viruses into the human
genome might exhibit a relationship with the emergence of a
cutaneous form of LE disease. The viral components mimic the
various nuclear antigens and the presentation of viral antigen on
the cell surface may trigger immune responses resulting in the
biosynthesis of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ssDNA antibodies [26]. The
production level of viral components might also be one of the
factors responsible for the transformation of cutaneous forms of LE
to SLE [10]. Though our results show a relationship between the
biosynthesis of anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA antibodies and the presence
of homologous HIV-1 pol sequences, further studies are
required to determine the antigens which may participate in the
development of these autoimmune diseases.
Acknowledgements. Supported by a grant No.
6PO5B09221 from the State Committee for Scientific Research
(KBN).
References
1. Wolska H, Blaszczyk M, Jablonska S. Phototests in
patients with various forms of lupus erythematosus. Int J
Dermatol 1989; 28: 98-103.
2. Beutner EH, Blaszczyk M, Jablonska S, Chorzelski
TP, Kumar V, Wolska H. Studies on criteria of the European Academy
of Dermatology and Venerology for the classification of cutaneous
lupus erythematosus. I. Selection of clinical groups and study
factors. Int J Dermatol 1991; 130: 411-27.
3. Love LA. New environmental agents associated with
lupus-like disorders. Lupus 1994; 3: 467-71.
4. Norris DA. Pathomechanisms of photosensitive
lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100: 58-68.
5. Kalden JR. Defective phagocytosis of apoptotic
cells: possible explanation for the induction of autoantibodies in
SLE. Lupus 1997; 6: 326-7.
6. Casciola-Rosen L, Rosen A. Ultraviolet
light-induced keratinocyte apoptosis: a potential mechanism for the
induction of skin lesions and autoantibody production in LE. Lupus
1997; 6: 175-80.
7. Kalden JR, Winkler TH, Herrmann M, Krapf F.
Pathogenesis of SLE: immunopathology in man. Rheumatol Int
1991; 11: 95-100.
8. Nakajima M, Nakajima A, Kayagaki N, Honda M,
Yagita H, Okumura K. Expression of Fas ligand and its receptor in
cutaneous lupus: implication in tissue injury. Clin Immunol
Immunopathol. 1997; 83: 223-9.
9. Rosen A, Casciola-Rosen L, Ahearn J. Novel
packages of viral and self-antigens are generated during apoptosis.
J Exp Med 1995; 181: 1557-61.
10. Provost TT, Watson R. Anti-Ro (SS-A)
HLA-DR3-positive women: the interrelationship between some ANA
negative, SS, SCLE, and NLE mothers and SS/LE overlap female
patients. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100: 14-20.
11. Datta SK, Patel H, Berry D. Induction of a
cationic shift in IgG anti-DNA autoantibodies. Role of T helper
cells with classical and novel phenotypes in three murine models of
lupus nephritis. J Exp Med 1987; 165: 1252-68.
12. Pirner K, Rascu A, Nurnberg W, Rubbert A, Kalden
JR, Manger B. Evidence for direct anti-heparin-sulphate reactivity
in sera of SLE patients. Rheumatol Int 1994; 14: 169-74.
13. Fillit H, Shibata S, Sasaki T, Spiera H, Kerr
LD, Blake M. Autoantibodies to the protein core of vascular
basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Autoimmunity 1993; 14: 243-9.
14. Hishikawa T, Ogasawara H, Kaneko H, Shirasawa T,
Matsuura Y, Sekigawa I, Takasaki Y, Hashimoto H, Hirose S, Handa S,
Nagasawa R, Maruyama N. Detection of antibodies to a recombinant
gag protein derived from human endogenous retrovirus clone
4-1 in autoimmune diseases. Viral Immunol 1997; 10:
137-47.
15. Leib-Mosch C, Brack-Werner R, Werner T, Bachmann
M, Faff O, Erfle V, Hehlmann R. Endogenous retroviral elements in
human DNA. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 5636-42.
16. Talal N, Garry RF, Schur PH, Alexander S,
Dauphinee MJ, Livas IH, Ballester A, Takei M, Dang H. A conserved
idiotype and antibodies to retroviral proteins in systemic lupus
erythematosus. J Clin Invest. 1990; 85: 1866-71.
17. Ogasawara H, Naito T, Kaneko H, Hishikawa T,
Sekigawa I, Hashimoto H, Kaneko Y, Yamamoto N, Maruyama N, Yamamoto
N. Quantitative analyses of messenger RNA of human endogenous
retrovirus in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J
Rheumatol 2001; 28: 533-8.
18. Urnovitz HB, Murphy WH. Human endogenous
retroviruses: nature, occurrence, and clinical implications in
human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9: 72-99.
19. Weller TH, Coons AH. Fluorescent antibody
studies with agents of varicella and herpes zoster propagated in
vitro. Proc So Exp Biol Med 1954; 86: 789-94.
20. Simpson L. Behavior of the kinetoplast of
Leishmania tarentolae upon cell rupture. J Protozool 1968;
15: 132-6.
21. Herrmann M, Kalden JR. PCR and reverse dot
hybridization for the detection of endogenous retroviral
transcripts. J Virol Methods 1994; 46: 333-48.
22. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical
research 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications
1971.
23. Zack JA, Arrigo SJ, Weitsman SR, Go AS, Haislip
A, Chen IS. HIV-1 entry into quiescent primary lymphocytes:
molecular analysis reveals a labile, latent viral structure.
Cell 1990; 20: 213-22.
24. Haraguchi S, Good RA, Cianciolo GJ, Engelman RW,
Day NK. Immunosuppressive retroviral peptides: immunopathological
implications for immunosuppressive influences of retroviral
infections. J Leukoc Biol 1997; 6: 654-66.
25. Koshino K, Tokano Y, Hishikawa T, Sekigawa I,
Hashimoto TY. Detection of antibodies to HIV-1 gp41- and HLA
class II antigen-derived peptides in SLE patients. Scand J
Rheumatol 1995; 24: 288-92.
26. Perl A. Endogenous retroviruses in pathogenesis
of autoimmunity. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 461-64.
|