Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version

Type 2 segmental manifestation of Hailey-Hailey disease: poor therapeutic response to dermabrasion is due to severe involvement of adnexal structures


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 10, Number 4, 265-8, June 2000, Thérapeutique


Summary  

Author(s) : Arne KONIG, Stefan HORSTER, Fereydoun VAKILZADEH, Rudolf HAPPLE, Department of Dermatology, Philipp University, Deutschhausstrasse 9, D-35033 Marburg, Germany..

Summary : In autosomal dominant skin conditions, two different types of segmental manifestation can be distinguished. Type 1 represents heterozygosity for a postzygotic mutation, resulting in a degree of severity similar to that of the nonmosaic phenotype. Type 2 reflects loss of heterozygosity and shows an excessively pronounced involvement superimposed on the ordinary nonsegmental phenotype. We describe the clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects of the first case of type 2 segmental manifestation of Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD). A 24-year-old woman with a family history of HHD comprising four generations, presented with lesions of erythema and blistering arranged in a unilateral pattern following the lines of Blaschko. The disorder was first noted at the age of 3 months. At the age of 24 years, additional scattered symmetrical lesions involving the axillary and inguinal folds were noted. Histopathological examination of the severely involved linear skin areas revealed pronounced acantholysis within the deep adnexal structures, whereas clinically unaffected skin showed the typical histopathological features of the heterozygous phenotype with suprabasal clefting and acantholysis sparing the adnexae. Dermabrasion was performed in the areas of segmental involvement. During a follow-up period of one year, no recurrence was noted, but 18 months after dermabrasion a recurrence was present in the left submammary and left perianal regions. This therapeutic resistance to dermabrasion may be explained by the presence of acantholysis within the adnexal structures of the skin as found in type 2 segmental HHD.

Keywords : pemphigus benignus familiaris, loss of heterozygosity, lines of Blaschko, cutaneous mosaicism, genetic skin disease.

Pictures

ARTICLE

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is an autosomal dominant skin disorder characterized by vesicles, erosions, hemorrhagic crusts and eczematous changes showing an affinity for the body folds. The disorder runs a chronic course with waxing and waning lesions. In severe cases, patients experience painful, malodorous, and oozing lesions with secondary bacterial infection. In advanced stages, even immobility of limbs may be caused by the axillary or inguinal involvement [1, 2]. The phenotype usually becomes manifest in adulthood. Overweight and sweating can be triggering factors. Histopathologically, suprabasal clefting with marked acantholysis is noted [3]. Pronounced acanthosis with elongation of the rete ridges is usually seen. These microscopic changes do not affect the hair follicles and sweat glands which indicates that these adnexal structures do not usually express the intrinsic defect of cell adhesion [4]. Among the various proposed therapeutic approaches, dermabrasion bears the benefit of a definite eradication with a rather low rate of complications and convincing long-term results [5].

In 1985, one of us reported on a 5-year-old girl with unilateral manifestation of a "relapsing linear acantholytic dermatosis" [6]. The disease exhibited the histopathological and ultrastuctural features of severe HHD. At the age of 24 years, the same patient presented again and asked for a therapeutic approach.

This is a follow-up report of a case that represents a segmental manifestation of HHD [7]. By documenting the clinical and histopathological features of this case, we provide further evidence for the recently proposed rule of dichotomy regarding mosaicism in autosomal dominant skin disorders [8]. According to this hypothesis, the presented case can be characterized as a type 2 segmental manifestation reflecting loss of heterozygosity for the HHD mutation. We provide evidence that, unlike the heterozygous phenotype, this mosaic type of HHD is characterized by pronounced acantholytic involvement of adnexal structures. As a consequence, the therapeutic response to dermabrasion was limited.

Case report

The 24-year-old woman reported a family history of ordinary Hailey-Hailey disease involving four generations. Her mother, her grandmother and a great-grandmother were affected. The patient's mother was examined by us and showed typical lesions of HHD involving the axillary and submammary regions. The proposita had shown, since the age of 3 months, relapsing episodes of blistering and erosions arranged on the left side of her body in a pattern following the lines of Blaschko.

On physical examination, lesions of inflammation and blistering involved the left side of her abdomen and her back in a linear and whorled arrangement. On the left leg and foot as well as the left palm perpendicular streaks of involvement were present (Fig. 1). The involved areas were slightly hypopigmented and showed multiple blisters, erosions and hemorrhagic crusts (Figs. 2, 3). In addition, the axillary regions and the groin on both sides as well as the gluteal fold showed erythematous lesions that had only been noted some weeks previously. Histological examination of multiple biopsy specimens from the areas of severe involvement showed broad acanthosis with acantholytic vesicles and bullae containing clumps of acantholytic cells. The upper part of the dermis showed inflammatory infiltrates. The adnexal structures were rather deeply affected by acantholysis (Fig. 4). Clinically unaffected skin from the right side of her body showed mild acantholytic changes that spared the adnexae (Fig. 5).

As a tentative therapeutic approach, dermabrasion was performed in a severely affected 5 x 5 cm area on the abdomen. This rectangular area was dermabraded under local anesthesia by use of a rotating diamond fraise. Ten weeks later, the result obtained appeared to be good, and this prompted us to perform, under general anaesthesia, dermabrasion of all of the lesional segmental areas.

The dermabraded areas healed within a few days. One year after the procedure, the area appeared hypopigmented but without scarring (Fig. 6). During this follow-up period, no recurrence of blistering was noted in these regions. The patient reported that, for the first time in her life, she had been free of erosions and blistering for a period longer than 6 weeks. However, another 6 months later a recurrence was noted in the left submammary area (Fig. 7) and in the left perianal region.

Discussion

Autosomal dominant skin disorders sometimes occur in a segmental form showing a unilateral, linear, patchy or otherwise confined involvement. The segmental lesions often follow the lines of Blaschko and reflect cutaneous mosaicism. On the basis of clinical evidence, two different types of mosaic manifestation can be distinguished. In an otherwise healthy individual, type 1 represents heterozygosity for a postzygotic mutation and the degree of severity in the segmental area corresponds to that observed in the nonmosaic phenotype. Type 2 reflects loss of heterozygosity and shows a far more pronounced involvement which is superimposed on the ordinary nonsegmental phenotype (Fig. 8). In other words, the type 2 originates from postzygotic loss of the wild type allele in a heterozygous embryo [8]. Genetic mechanisms that may account for such a postzygotic mutation include mitotic recombination, nondisjunction, deletion, or a point mutation of the corresponding wildtype allele. A type 2 segmental involvement has been described in various genodermatoses such as epidermolytic hyperkeratosis of Brocq, neurofibromatosis 1, Darier disease, multiple syringomas, cutaneous leiomyomatosis, multiple glomus tumors, and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis [7, 9].

So far, a type 1 segmental manifestation of Hailey-Hailey disease has not been reported. On the other hand, a case reported in 1985 under the title "relapsing linear acantholytic dermatosis" [6] has recently been reclassified as a first description of type 2 segmental manifestation of HHD [7]. The same patient is presented in this article. We emphasize the following features that fulfill the criteria of type 2 segmental involvement. Firstly, unilateral areas following the lines of Blaschko and showing clinical, histopathological and ultrastructural features of HHD were noted as early as at the age of 3 months. Secondly, this segmental involvement is now superimposed on the ordinary phenotype that reflects heterozygosity and is characterized by symmetrical erythema and blistering involving the body folds, with onset in adulthood. Thirdly, several family members are affected with the ordinary form of HHD.

Dermabrasion for the treatment of HHD, as first described by Belhaouari et al. [10], represents an effective surgical approach. Complete eradication has been demonstrated and excellent long-term results with disease-free follow-up periods of more than 6 years have been documented [5, 11]. After removal of the epidermis, regeneration occurs from the adnexal structures that apparently do not express the intrinsic defect of cell adhesion in the heterozygous state [4]. Our report is the first to provide evidence that this does not hold true to the same degree for a segmental type 2 manifestation of HHD: histopathologically, adnexal structures are rather deeply and markedly involved by acantholysis. This phenomenon can be taken as a hallmark reflecting the severity of involvement caused by loss of heterozygosity. Hence it is not surprising that after dermabrasion a recurrence may be seen especially in those areas where a type 2 segmental manifestation reaches into the body folds. *

Article accepted on 7/2/00

CONCLUSION

{conclusion}

REFERENCES

1. Burge SM. Hailey-Hailey disease: the clinical features, response to treatment and prognosis. Br J Dermatol 1992; 126: 275-82.

2. Michel B. Hailey-Hailey disease: familial benign chronic pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 1982; 118: 781-3.

3. Haber H, Russel LB. Sisters with familial benign chronic pemphigus. Br J Dermatol 1950; 62: 458-60.

4. Metze D, Hamm H, Schorat A, Luger T. Involvement of the adherens junction-actin filament system in acantholytic dyskeratosis of Hailey-Hailey disease: a histological, ultrastructural, and histochemical study of lesional and non-lesional skin. J Cutan Pathol 1996; 23: 211-22.

5. Hamm H, Metze D, Bröcker EB. Hailey-Hailey disease: eradication by dermabrasion. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 1143-9.

6. Vakilzadeh F, Kolde G. Relapsing linear acantholytic dermatosis. Br J Dermatol 1985; 112: 349-55.

7. Happle R. A rule concerning the segmental manifestation of autosomal dominant skin disorders: review of clinical examples providing evidence for dichotomous types of severity. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 1505-9.

8. Happle R. Segmental forms of autosomal dominant skin disorders: different types of severity reflect different states of zygosity. Am J Med Genet 1996; 66: 241-2.

9. Happle R, König A. Type 2 segmental manifestation of multiple glomus tumors: a review and reclassification of 5 case reports. Dermatology 1999; 198: 270-2.

10. Belhaouari L, Chavion JP, Cantala P, Bonafé JL, Costagliola M. Indications peu communes de dermabrasion (abstract). Ann Dermatol Venereol 1983; 110: 298.

11. Kirtschig G, Gieler U, Happle R. Treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease by dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 784-6.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]