ARTICLE
The term "epidermal growth factor" was coined in the early sixties by
Stanley Cohen to describe a polypeptide purified from mouse submaxillary
glands that affects epidermal growth and differentiation in the newborn
mouse [1, 2]. Specifically, EGF causes premature eyelid opening and incisor
eruption reflecting the accelerated differentiation of these structures
during neonatal development. Shortly after its discovery, EGF was found
to stimulate proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes [3] leading to the
characterization of a cell surface receptor specific for EGF [4, 5]. During
the last 15 years multiple EGF-related growth factors and at least four
different EGF receptor-like receptors (c-ErbBs) have been identified (Table
1) and these ligand-receptor systems have been shown to affect
development, regeneration, differentiation and transformation of cells
derived from multiple tissues. The analysis of EGFR-dependent events is
complicated not only by the presence of multiple ligands that bind to
either one or more members of a family of EGFR-like receptors but also
by the capacity of the EGFR to synergize with other EGFR family members
by dimerization and cross-phosphorylation.
In this review, we will first provide a brief overview of the EGFR family
of tyrosine kinases and their ligands. We will then focus on functional
contributions of the EGFR to different aspects of keratinocyte biology
including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival of normal
keratinocytes. Observations in cultured keratinocytes will be placed in
the context of findings in genetically engineered mice in which EGF receptor
function has either been ablated (knock-out mice) or enhanced (transgenic
mice). Due to space limitations only a fraction of the relevant literature
is cited; we apologize to those whose work could not be included here.
The EGF receptor family and its ligands
The EGFR is a type-1 tyrosine kinase characterized by an extracellular
ligand binding domain, a short transmembrane region, and an intracellular
signal transduction module consisting of a tyrosine kinase moiety and
several autophosphorylation sites [6] (Fig.
1). Upon phosphorylation these tyrosines serve as docking stations
for signaling molecules including phospholipase(PL)-Cgamma, phosphoinositol-3-kinase
(PI-3K), and various adaptor molecules (for example Shc, Grb2) which facilitate
additional downstream signaling events. Based on their sequence homology
to the EGF receptor a series of related molecules (termed c-erbB2, 3,
and 4) were identified (Table
1). The acronym "erbB" refers to a viral oncogene (v-erbB) derived
from the avian erythroblastosis virus, which is homologous to the intracellular
portion of the EGFR [6-8]. Interestingly, only the EGFR (ErbB1) and ErbB4
contain all three functional domains necessary for signal transduction
in the absence of other receptors of the same family. By contrast, ErbB2
has been called an "orphan" receptor because no ligand has been identified
as yet that would bind to its extracellular domain. Thus, signal transduction
by ErbB2 is thought to be triggered through heterodimerization with other
EGFR family members. ErbB3 contains an extracellular ligand-binding domain
but lacks an intracellular tyrosine kinase moiety. For more details of
the ErbB family of receptors please refer to recent excellent reviews
[9, 10].
Mature, bioactive EGF and EGF-like ligands are characterized by a triple
loop structure held in place by 3 intramolecular cysteine bridges [11].
The majority of these ligands (i.e. EGF, heparin binding (HB)-EGF,
amphiregulin (AR), transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha, and epiregulin
(EPI)) are exclusive EGFR ligands whereas betacellulin (BC) can bind to
both the EGFR and ErbB4. The heregulins/neuregulins bind to ErbB3 and/or
ErbB4 but not to the EGFR.
Upon ligand binding members of the ErbB family dimerize and their tyrosine
kinase domains are activated. Importantly, extensive heteromerization
occurs between different receptors of this family (for example the EGFR
and ErbB2; see Table 1)
if they are coexpressed by a particular cell type. The close proximity
of the dimerization partners allows cross-phosphorylation on tyrosine
residues, an important prerequisite for activation of ErbB2 which has
no known ligand but can be activated when it is paired with either the
EGFR or ErbB4.
In conclusion, in excess of 10 ligands can interact with either one
or more erbB family members. Depending on the availability of dimerization
partners these receptors will then transmit quantitatively or qualitatively
different signals in different cell types. Epidermal keratinocytes express
at least three erbB family members in vitro and in situ,
i.e., the EGFR [12-14], ErbB2 [15] and ErbB3 [16]. By contrast,
ErbB4 is not expressed in cultured mouse keratinocytes [15, 16] although
two studies reported weak expression of ErbB4 mRNA [17] and protein [18]
in human skin.
EGFR-dependent signal transduction
pathways
As outlined above, activation of the EGFR leads to dimerization and
autophosphorylation providing docking sites for a variety of intracellular
signal transducers. All of the known second messengers activated by either
the EGFR or its relatives are also activated by other growth factor receptors
and even adhesion receptors. This has been described for major pathways
including the RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK, the PLC-gamma/PKC, and the PI-3K/AKT cascades.
It also applies to additional EGFR-stimulatable pathways leading to STAT
or NFkappaB activation. These observations pose the question how EGFR
activation triggers specific changes in cellular phenotype (see below).
It is likely that, rather than eliciting any specific signal EGFR activation
affects the balance of multiple signal transducers shared with other receptors
present on the same cell. Thus, phenotypic changes seen after EGFR activation
are contingent upon the cooperation of an array of cooperating receptors
unique to each cell type and differentiation state.
Keratinocyte proliferation
Soon after its discovery EGF was found to increase epidermal thickness
and cellularity and to stimulate proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes
[2, 3]. More recent studies demonstrated that EGFR activation is indispensable
for DNA synthesis [19] and cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase
[20] in cultured keratinocytes. Interestingly, keratinocytes in vitro
and in situ can produce several EGFR ligands that contribute to
keratinocyte proliferation [21-24]. Autocrine keratinocyte-derived EGFR
ligands include TGF-alpha [22, 25, 26], amphiregulin [23, 24, 27], heparin-binding
EGF-like growth factor [24] and betacellulin [24]. In several studies,
inhibitors of EGFR activation have been used to confirm an essential role
of EGFR activation in keratinocyte proliferation. These inhibitors include
antagonistic antibodies which bind to the extracellular domain of the
EGFR [23, 28] and small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase
moiety of the EGFR [28-30].
The development of mice with targeted disruptions of the EGFR locus
allowed the examination of EGFR-dependent skin phenotypes induced by autocrine
and exogenous EGFR ligands in the intact animal [31-33]. Inactivation
of the EGFR by homologous recombination results in at least three different
phenotypes in different mouse strains ranging from peri-implantation lethality
to postnatal lethality. This complicates interpretation of the results
as any phenotype may or may not be relevant to the outbred human population.
Only the mildest phenotype allows limited postnatal development and this
form is associated with epithelial hypoplasia manifesting as thin skin.
Epidermal differentiation
The first biological activity of EGF to be recognized was its ability
to accelerate epidermal differentiation when administered in vivo,
causing premature eyelid opening in newborn mice [1] and increased epidermal
thickness [2]. These findings are contrasted by studies in cultured human
keratinocytes which showed that addition of EGF to keratinocyte cultures
markedly extends their life-span in culture and inhibits expression of
several differentiation markers [34]. Simlarly, Peus et al. [35]
demonstrated that EGF treatment inhibits expression of early molecular
markers of terminal differentiation (keratin 1 and keratin 10) whereas
inhibition of the EGFR in keratinocyte cultures induces keratin 1/10 expression.
EGF treatment of transformed keratinocytes was also found to inhibit late
markers of epidermal differentiation including cornified envelope formation
and type 1 transglutaminase expression [36]. In skin reconstructs, EGF
treatment depressed several indicators of differentiation including expression
of profilaggrin/filaggrin and led to nuclear retention in the upper layers
of the differentiated epidermal sheet [37]. However, in the absence of
extracellular matrix adhesion, EGF appears to promote expression in normal
keratinocytes of markers of late terminal differentiation including profilaggrin
and type 1 transglutaminase expression, and cornified envelope formation
[38].
The studies cited above focused primarily on the effects of exogenous
EGFR ligands on keratinocyte differentiation but did not address the contribution
of endogenous, keratinocyte-derived EGFR ligands to this phenomenon. By
contrast, EGFR knock-out mice enabled the examination of epidermal differentiation
in the absence of any EGFR signaling. The skin in these mice reveals only
subtle and strain-specific changes in differentiation. Specifically, Miettinen
et al. [39] described disturbed terminal differentiation in EGFR/
mice whereas Hansen et al. [33] described normal expression and
localization of markers of epidermal differentiation. It is possible that
compensatory effects exerted by other erbB family members mask the phenotypic
manifestation of EGFR-dependent epidermal differentiation.
Taken together, these studies suggest complex and sometimes opposite
regulation of keratinocyte differentiation by exogenous and endogenous
EGFR ligands depending on experimental conditions.
Keratinocyte migration
Barrandon and Green first recognized the ability of EGF and TGF-alpha
to enhance migration of normal keratinocytes on tissue culture-treated
surfaces [40]. Concurrently, both EGFR ligands were found to accelerate
wound healing in mice [41], an effect which may be partially attributed
to enhanced wound closure by lateral migration of keratinocytes during
re-epithelialization [42]. Subsequently, activation of the EGFR was found
to be also required for directional migration of keratinocytes in electric
fields of physiological strength [43]. As cell migration is an obligatory
step not only in physiological processes including development and wound
healing but also in pathological states such as metastasis formation,
the signaling pathways required for EGFR-dependent migration are of great
interest.
Cell survival
In normal, self-renewing epithelia, including epidermis, a tight balance
must be maintained between proliferation of cells in the basal layer and
loss of terminally differentiated, dead cells from the surface. During
the later stages of terminal differentiation (i.e. the conversion
of granular layer cells to cornified cells), keratinocytes exhibit some
features characteristically associated with programmed cell death or apoptosis.
Specifically, DNA nicking, nuclear fragmentation and activation of transglutaminase
have been described [44]. It is of great importance to epidermal homeostasis
that keratinocyte apoptosis be tightly regulated. If it is initiated too
early, the epidermis would likely be thin and compromised with regard
to its barrier function. Conversely, the loss of ability to initiate apoptosis
has been correlated with the development of neoplasia (reviewed in [45]).
Specific growth factors have been implicated in regulation of cell survival.
For example, fibroblasts depend on IGF-1 [46, 47] and certain hemopoietic
cell on interleukin-3 [48-50] for survival in culture; removal of these
cytokines or blockade of their receptors leads to cell death in the respective
target cells. Recent studies by us [51-53] and others [54] demonstrated
that the EGFR similarly regulates programmed cell death in human keratinocytes.
If the EGFR is blocked either by antagonistic antibodies or by EGFR-selective
inhibitors of the tyrphostin class, keratinocytes become highly susceptible
to induction of cell death by cell stress, for example stress imposed
by ultraviolet irradiation (Jost, Gasparro and Rodeck, unpublished observation).
This apoptosis-prone phenotype is associated with downregulation of a
protector against apoptotic cell death, Bcl-xL [52-54]. The signal transduction
pathways which lead from the EGFR to Bcl-xL expression or survival, represent
an area of intense investigation. This is partly due to the realization
that inappropriate signaling from the EGFR and other ErbB family members
is frequent in epithelial neoplasms including squamous cell carcinomas
(see next paragraph) and is likely to provide a worthwhile target for
improving the sensitivity of such tumors to chemotherapeutic attack.
The EGF-R in skin diseases
Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) has been
shown to stimulate cell cycle progression of normal epidermal keratinocytes
through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms [23, 25, 27, 34]. In normal
skin, the EGF-R is most strongly, although not exclusively, expressed
in the basal layer of the epidermis [13, 55], consistent with the involvement
of the EGF-R in epidermal growth control. Several observations indicate
that abnormalities in expression of the EGF-R and/or its ligands TGF-alpha
and AR are common features of hyperproliferative and neoplastic epithelia.
For example, in psoriatic epidermis, the EGF-R is overexpressed not just
in the basal layer, but in all nucleated strata of the epidermis [56-58],
consistent with the suprabasal proliferation that occurs in this disease.
Furthermore, both TGF-alpha and AR are found at elevated levels throughout
the nucleated layers of psoriatic epidermis [59-62]. In squamous carcinomas,
overexpression of the EGFR is commonly observed [63-67] consistent with
the view that EGFR signaling is upregulated and constitutive in such tumors.
Furthermore, epithelial neoplasms frequently coexpress high levels not
only of the EGF-R but also of its ligands, TGF-alpha [68] or AR [69, 70],
thereby creating constitutive autocrine loops dependent on the EGF-R.
Direct support for a role of EGFR activation in the development of skin
tumors comes from studies in transgenic mice, in which overexpression
of TGF-alpha targeted to the epidermis elicits hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis,
papillomas, and squamous cell carcinomas [71-74].
Abbreviations
AR Amphiregulin
BC Betacellulin
EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor
EPI Epiregulin
HB Heparin binding
IGF Insulin-like growth factor
NF Nuclear factor
PI-3K Phosphoinositol-3-kinase
PLC Phospholipase
PK Protein kinase
STAT Signal transducer and activator of transcription
TGF Transforming growth factor
CONCLUSION
The EGFR family has been found to control multiple aspects of epithelial
biology including cell survival, proliferation, migration, and differentiation.
Any of these may serve distinct functions in the establishment of a hyperproliferative
or neoplastic epidermal phenotype. Current investigations focus on the
relative contribution and integration of EGFR-dependent intracellular
signals as they relate to the malignant phenotype in keratinocytes. Insights
from these studies are likely to have wider implications for other epithelial
neoplasms which, like squamous cell carcinomas, are characterized by deregulated
EGFR-dependent signaling pathways.
Accepted on 15/5/00
REFERENCES
1. Cohen S. Isolation of a mouse submaxillary gland protein accelerating
incisor eruption and eyelid opening in the new-born animal. J Biol
Chem 1962; 237: 1555-62.
2. Cohen S, Elliott GA. The stimulation of epidermal keratinization
by a protein isolated from the submaxillary gland of the mouse. J Invest
Dermatol 1963; 40: 1-5.
3. Cohen S. The stimulation of epidermal proliferation by a specific
protein (EGF). Dev Biology (Orlando) 1965; 12: 394-407.
4. Carpenter G, Lembach KJ, Morrison MM, Cohen S. Characterization
of the binding of 125-I-labeled epidermal growth factor to human fibroblasts.
J Biol Chem 1975; 250: 4297-304.
5. Buhrow SA, Cohen S, Staros JV. Affinity labeling of the protein
kinase associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor in membrane
vesicles from A431 cells. J Biol Chem 1982; 257: 4019-22.
6. Ullrich A, Coussens L, Hayflick JS, Dull TJ, Gray A, Tam AW,
Lee J, Yarden Y, Libermann TA, Schlessinger J, et al. Human epidermal
growth factor receptor cDNA sequence and aberrant expression of the amplified
gene in A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells. Nature 1984; 309: 418-25.
7. Sergeant A, Saule S, Leprince D, Begue A, Rommens C, Stehelin
D. Molecular cloning and characterization of the chicken DNA locus related
to the oncogene erbB of avian erythroblastosis virus. EMBO Journal
1982; 1: 237-42.
8. Downward J, Yarden Y, Mayes E, Scrace G, Totty N, Stockwell
P, Ullrich A, Schlessinger J, Waterfield MD. Close similarity of epidermal
growth factor receptor and v-erb-B oncogene protein sequences. Nature
1984; 307: 521-7.
9. Alroy I, Yarden Y. The ErbB signaling network in embryogenesis
and oncogenesis: signal diversification through combinatorial ligand-receptor
interactions. FEBS Letters 1997; 410: 83-6.
10. Klapper LN, Kirschbaum MH, Sela M, Yarden Y. Biochemical
and clinical implications of the ErbB/HER signaling network of growth
factor receptors. Adv Cancer Res 2000; 77: 25-79.
11. Prestrelski SJ, Arakawa T, Wu CS, O'Neal KD, Westcott KR,
Narhi LO. Solution structure and dynamics of epidermal growth factor and
transforming growth factor alpha. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 319-22.
12. O'Keefe E, Battin T, Payne R Jr. Epidermal growth factor
receptor in human epidermal cells: direct demonstration in cultured cells.
J Invest Dermatol 1982; 78: 482-7.
13. Nanney LB, McKanna JA, Stoscheck CM, Carpenter G, King LE.
Visualization of epidermal growth factor receptors in human epidermis.
J Invest Dermatol 1984; 82: 165-9.
14. King LE Jr, Gates RE, Stoscheck CM, Nanney LB. The EGF/TGF
alpha receptor in skin. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94: 164S-70S.
15. Xian W, Rosenberg MP, DiGiovanni J. Activation of erbB2 and
c-src in phorbol ester-treated mouse epidermis: possible role in mouse
skin tumor promotion. Oncogene 1997; 14: 1435-44.
16. Marikovsky M, Lavi S, Pinkas-Kramarski R, Karunagaran D,
Liu N, Wen D, Yarden Y. ErbB-3 mediates differential mitogenic effects
of NDF/heregulin isoforms on mouse keratinocytes. Oncogene 1995;
10: 1403-11.
17. Srinivasan R, Poulsom R, Hurst HC, Gullick WJ. Expression
of the c-erbB-4/HER4 protein and mRNA in normal human fetal and adult
tissues and in a survey of nine solid tumour types. J Pathol 1998;
185: 236-45.
18. Ibrahim SO, Vasstrand EN, Liavaag PG, Johannessen AC and
Lillehaug JR. Expression of c-erbB proto-oncogene family members in squamous
cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Anticancer Res 1997; 17: 4539-46.
19. Coffey RJ Jr, Sipes NJ, Bascom CC, Graves-Deal R, Pennington
CY, Weissman BE, Moses HL. Growth modulation of mouse keratinocytes by
transforming growth factors. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 1596-602.
20. Kobayashi T, Hashimoto K, Okumura H, Asada H, Yoshikawa K.
Endogenous EGF-family growth factors are necessary for the progression
from the G1 to S phase in human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol
1998; 111: 616-20.
21. Cook PW, Pittelkow MR, Shipley GD. Growth factor-independent
proliferation of normal human neonatal keratinocytes: production of autocrine-
and paracrine-acting mitogenic factors. J Cell Physiology 1991;
146: 277-89.
22. Pittelkow MR, Cook PW, Shipley GD, Derynck R, Coffey R Jr.
Autonomous growth of human keratinocytes requires epidermal growth factor
receptor occupancy. Cell Growth Differ 1993; 4: 513-21.
23. Vardy DA, Kari C, Lazarus GS, Jensen PJ, Zilberstein A, Plowman
GD, Rodeck U. Induction of autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor
ligands in human keratinocytes by insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1.
J Cell Physiol 1995; 163:257-65.
24. Dlugosz AA, Cheng C, Williams EK, Darwiche N, Dempsey PJ,
Mann B, Dunn AR, Coffey R Jr,Yuspa SH. Autocrine transforming growth factor
alpha is dispensible for v-rasHa-induced epidermal neoplasia: potential
involvement of alternate epidermal growth factor receptor ligands. Cancer
Res 1995; 55: 1883-93.
25. Coffey RJ Jr, Derynck R, Wilcox JN, Bringman TS, Goustin
AS, Moses HL, Pittelkow MR. Production and auto-induction of transforming
growth factor-alpha in human keratinocytes. Nature 1987; 328: 817-20.
26. Coffey R Jr, Graves-Deal R, Dempsey PJ, Whitehead RH, Pittelkow
MR. Differential regulation of transforming growth factor alpha autoinduction
in a nontransformed and transformed epithelial cell. Cell Growth Differ
1992; 3: 347-54.
27. Cook PW, Mattox PA, Keeble WW, Pittelkow MR, Plowman GD,
Shoyab M, Adelman JP, Shipley GD. A heparin sulfate-regulated human keratinocyte
autocrine factor is similar or identical to amphiregulin. Mol Cell
Biol 1991; 11: 2547-57.
28. Stoll S, Garner W, Elder J. Heparin-binding ligands mediate
autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor activation In skin organ culture.
J Clin Invest 1997; 100: 1271-81.
29. Dvir A, Milner Y, Chomsky O, Gilon C, Gazit A, Levitzki A.
The inhibition of EGF-dependent proliferation of keratinocytes by tyrphostin
tyrosine kinase blockers. J Cell Biol 1991; 113: 857-65.
30. Ben-Bassat H, Rosenbaum-Mitrani S, Hartzstark Z, Shlomai
Z, Kleinberger-Doron N, Gazit A, Plowman G, Levitzki R, Tsvieli R, Levitzki
A. Inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase and of cyclin-dependent
kinase 2 activation induce growth arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis
of human papilloma virus 16-immortalized human keratinocytes. Cancer
Res 1997; 57: 3741-50.
31. Sibilia M, Wagner EF. Strain-dependent epithelial defects
in mice lacking the EGF receptor. Science 1995; 269: 234-8.
32. Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, Tennenbaum T, Lichti
U, Yee D, LaMantia C, Mourton T, Herrup K, Harris RC, et al. Targeted
disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant
phenotype. Science 1995; 269: 230-4.
33. Hansen LA, Alexander N, Hogan ME, Sundberg JP, Dlugosz A,
Threadgill DW, Magnuson T, Yuspa SH. Genetically null mice reveal a central
role for epidermal growth factor receptor in the differentiation of the
hair follicle and normal hair development. Am J Pathol 1997; 150:
1959-75.
34. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Epidermal growth factor and the multiplication
of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. Nature 1977; 265: 421-4.
35. Peus D, Hamacher L, Pittelkow MR. EGF-receptor tyrosine kinase
inhibition induces keratinocyte growth arrest and terminal differentiation.
J Invest Dermatol 1997; 109: 751-6.
36. Monzon RI, McWilliams N, Hudson LG. Suppression of cornified
envelope formation and type 1 transglutaminase by epidermal growth factor
in neoplastic keratinocytes. Endocrinology 1996; 137: 1727-34.
37. Chen CS, Lavker RM, Rodeck U, Risse B, Jensen PJ. Use of
a serum-free epidermal culture model to show deleterious effects of epidermal
growth factor on morphogenesis and differentiation. J Invest Dermatol
1995; 104: 107-12.
38. Wakita N, Takigawa M. Activation of epidermal growth factor
receptor promotes late terminal differentiation of cell-matrix interaction-disrupted
keratinocytes. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 37285-91.
39. Miettinen PJ, Berger JE, Meneses J, Phung Y, Pedersen RA,
Werb Z, Derynck R. Epithelial immaturity and multiorgan failure in mice
lacking epidermal growth factor receptor. Nature 1995; 376: 337-41.
40. Barrandon Y, Green H. Cell migration is essential for sustained
growth of keratinocyte colonies: the roles of transforming growth factor-alpha
and epidermal growth factor. Cell 1987; 50: 1131-7.
41. Schultz GS, White M, Mitchell R, Brown G, Lynch J, Twardzik
DR, Todaro GJ. Epithelial wound healing enhanced by transforming growth
factor-alpha and vaccinia growth factor. Science 1987; 235: 350-2.
42. Ando Y, Jensen PJ. Epidermal growth factor and insulin-like
growth factor I enhance keratinocyte migration. J Invest Dermatol
1993; 100: 633-9.
43. Fang KS, Ionides E, Oster G, Nuccitelli R, Isseroff RR. Epidermal
growth factor receptor relocalization and kinase activity are necessary
for directional migration of keratinocytes in DC electric fields. J
Cell Science 1999; 112: 1967-78.
44. Polakowska RR, Piacentini M, Bartlett R, Goldsmith LA, Haake
AR. Apoptosis in human skin development: morphogenesis, periderm, and
stem cells. Dev Dyn 1994; 199: 176-88.
45. White E. Life, death, and the pursuit of apoptosis. Genes
Dev 1996: 101.
46. Harrington EA, Bennett MR, Fanidi A, Evan GI. c-Myc-induced
apoptosis in fibroblasts is inhibited by specific cytokines. Embo Journal
1994; 13: 3286-95.
47. Kulik G, Klippel A, Weber MJ. Antiapoptotic signalling by
the insulin-like growth factor I receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
and Akt. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 1595-606.
48. Baffy G, Miyashita T, Williamson JR, Reed JC. Apoptosis induced
by withdrawal of interleukin-3 (IL-3) from an IL-3-dependent hematopoietic
cell line is associated with repartitioning of intracellular calcium and
is blocked by enforced Bcl-2 oncoprotein production. J Biol Chem
1993; 268: 6511-9.
49. Mekori YA, Oh CK, Metcalfe DD. IL-3-dependent murine mast
cells undergo apoptosis on removal of IL-3. Prevention of apoptosis by
c-kit ligand. J Immunol 1993; 151: 3775-84.
50. Kinoshita T, Yokota T, Arai K, Miyajima A. Suppression of
apoptotic death in hematopoietic cells by signalling through the IL-3/GM-CSF
receptors. Embo J 1995; 14: 266-75.
51. Rodeck U, Jost M, Kari C, Shih DT, Lavker RM, Ewert DL, Jensen
PJ. EGF-R dependent regulation of keratinocyte survival. J Cell Science
1997; 110: 113-21.
52. Rodeck U, Jost M, DuHadaway J, Kari C, Jensen PJ, Risse B,
Ewert DL. Regulation of Bcl-xL expression in human keratinocytes by cell-substratum
adhesion and the epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America 1997; 94: 5067-72.
53. Jost M, Class R, Kari C, Jensen PJ, Rodeck U. A central role
of Bcl-X(L) in the regulation of keratinocyte survival by autocrine EGFR
ligands. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 112: 443-9.
54. Stoll SW, Benedict M, Mitra R, Hiniker A, Elder JT, Nunez
G. EGF receptor signaling inhibits keratinocyte apoptosis: evidence for
mediation by Bcl-XL. Oncogene 1998; 16: 1493-9.
55. Nanney LB, Stoscheck CM, King L Jr, Underwood RA, Holbrook
KA. Immunolocalization of epidermal growth factor receptors in normal
developing human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94: 742-8.
56. Nanney LB, Stoscheck CM, Magid M, King L Jr. Altered [125I]epidermal
growth factor binding and receptor distribution in psoriasis. J Invest
Dermatol 1986; 86: 260-5.
57. King L Jr, Gates RE, Stoscheck CM, Nanney LB. Epidermal growth
factor/transforming growth factor alpha receptors and psoriasis. J
Invest Dermatol 1990; 95: 10S-2S.
58. Nanney LB, Yates RA, King LE Jr. Modulation of epidermal
growth factor receptors in psoriatic lesions during treatment with topical
EGF. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 98: 296-301.
59. Gottlieb AB, Chang CK, Posnett DN, Fanelli B, Tam JP. Detection
of transforming growth factor alpha in normal, malignant and hyperproliferative
human keratinocytes. J Exp Med 1988; 167: 670-5.
60. Elder JT, Fisher GJ, Lindquist PB, Bennett GL, Pittelkow
MR, Coffey RJ Jr, Ellingsworth L, Derynck R, Voorhees JJ. Overexpression
of transforming growth factor alpha in psoriatic epidermis. Science
1989; 243: 811-4.
61. Finzi E, Harkins R, Horn T. TGF-alpha is widely expressed
in differentiated as well as hyperproliferative skin epithelium. J
Invest Dermatol 1991; 96: 328-32.
62. Cook PW, Pittelkow MR, Keeble WW, Graves-Deal R, Coffey RJ
Jr, Shipley GD. Amphiregulin messenger RNA is elevated in psoriatic epidermis
and gastrointestinal carcinomas. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 3224-7.
63. Ozawa S, Ueda M, Ando N, Shimizu N, Abe O. Prognostic significance
of epidermal growth factor receptor in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.
Cancer 1989; 63: 2169-73.
64. Mukaida H, Toi M, Hirai T, Yamashita Y, Toge T. Clinical
significance of the expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor
in esophageal cancer. Cancer 1991; 68: 142-8.
65. Scambia G, Panici PB, Battaglia F, Ferrandina G, Almadori
G, Paludetti G, Maurizi M, Mancuso S. Receptors for epidermal growth factor
and steroid hormones in primary laryngeal tumors. Cancer 1991;
67: 1347-51.
66. Shirasuna K, Hayashido Y, Sugiyama M, Yoshioka H, Matsuya
T. Immunohistochemical localization of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and
EGF receptor in human oral mucosa and its malignancy. Virchows Arch
A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1991; 418: 349-53.
67. Maurizi M, Scambia G, Benedetti Panici P, Ferrandina G, Almadori
G, Paludetti G, De Vincenzo R, Distefano M, Brinchi D, Cadoni G, et
al. EGF receptor expression in primary laryngeal cancer: correlation
with clinico-pathological features and prognostic significance. Int
J Cancer 1992; 52: 862-6.
68. Derynck R, Goeddel DV, Ullrich A, Gutterman JU, Williams
RD, Bringman TS, Berger WH. Synthesis of messenger RNAs for transforming
growth factors alpha and beta and the epidermal growth factor receptor
by human tumors. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 707-12.
69. Le Jeune S, Leek R, Horak E, Plowman G, Greenall M, Harris
AL. Amphiregulin, epidermal growth factor receptor and estrogen receptor
expression in human primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 1993;
53: 3597-602.
70. Barnard JA, Graves-Deal R, Pittelkow MR, DuBois R, Cook P,
Ramsey GW, Bishop PR, Damstrup L, Coffey RJ. Auto- and cross-induction
within the mammalian epidermal growth factor-related peptide family. J
Biol Chem 1994; 269: 22817-22.
71. Vassar R, Fuchs E. Transgenic mice provide new insights into
the role of TGF-alpha during epidermal development and differentiation.
Genes Dev 1991; 5: 714-27.
72. Vassar R, Hutton ME, Fuchs E. Transgenic overexpression of
transforming growth factor alpha bypasses the need for c-Ha-ras mutations
in mouse skin tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12: 4643-53.
73. Dominey AM, Wang XJ, King L Jr, Nanney LB, Gagne TA, Sellheyer
K, Bundman DS, Longley MA, Rothnagel JA, Greenhalgh DA, et al.
Targeted overexpression of transforming growth factor alpha in the epidermis
of transgenic mice elicits hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis, and spontaneous,
squamous papillomas. Cell Growth Differ 1993; 4: 1071-82.
74. Amundadottir LT, Nass SJ, Berchem GJ, Johnson MD, Dickson
RB. Cooperation of TGF alpha and c-Myc in mouse mammary tumorigenesis:
coordinated stimulation of growth and suppression of apoptosis. Oncogene
1996; 13: 757-65.
|