Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version

Reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate as demonstrated by quantitative immunocytochemistry: evidence for oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 11, Number 2, 99-104, March - April 2001, Revues


Summary  

Author(s) : Carolyn M. WILLIS, Lezlie E. BRITTON, Louise REICHE, John D. WILKINSON, Department of Dermatology, Amersham Hospital, Whielden Street, Amersham, Bucks, HP7 0JD, UK..

Summary : There is increasing evidence that oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenesis of acute irritant contact dermatitis. As part of on-going studies into the effect of irritant chemicals on the anti-oxidant enzyme systems in the skin, we have examined the changing levels of two classes of glutathione S-transferase in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate, using quantitative immunocytochemistry. Although no changes were evident after 6 hrs, significant reductions in the density of staining for glutathione S-transferase alpha were seen with both irritants after 48 hrs and 96 hrs. Glutathione S-transferase pi levels were reduced to a lesser degree, reaching significance for dithranol at the 96 hrs time point only, and for sodium lauryl sulphate at 48 hrs only. The results support the hypothesis that oxidative stress plays a role in chemically-induced inflammation, not only in the case of irritants such as dithranol which are known to directly generate reactive oxygen species, but also with chemicals not generally associated with free radical generation.

Keywords : dithranol, image analysis, immunocytochemistry, irritant contact dermatitis, oxidative stress, sodium lauryl sulphate, glutathione S-transferase.

Pictures

ARTICLE

Acute irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a heterogeneous disorder, with many differing cellular mechanisms contributing to its pathogenesis [1]. One of the more recently identified of these is oxidative stress, a situation in which an imbalance in pro-oxidant/anti-oxidant equilibrium occurs within cells and tissues, resulting in damage to lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and DNA [2, 3]. Such an imbalance may result from excessive endogenous generation of free radicals during physiologic processes, but may also occur through exposure to exogenous sources of free radicals, such as tobacco smoke and ultraviolet radiation [4, 5]. Chemical irritants may also generate reactive oxygen species, both directly and indirectly, a well known example from a dermatological perspective being dithranol, which rapidly auto-oxidizes in aqueous solution to produce singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radicals [6, 7].

By way of defence against dangerously reactive species, a plethora of antioxidant enzymes and systems have evolved across the spectrum of microorganisms, plants and animals [8-10]. Recently, we applied quantitative image analysis techniques in the immunocytochemical study of one of these enzymes, Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (Cu, Zn-SOD), in man, and were able to demonstrate indirectly the presence of oxidative stress at sites of experimentally induced acute ICD [11]. Levels of Cu,Zn-SOD were reduced following topical exposure to chemical irritants, including not only dithranol, but also sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), an anionic detergent not normally associated with the direct generation of free radicals. As an extension to our studies of oxidative stress in ICD, we have now focussed on another of the protective enzyme systems present in many organisms, including man, namely the glutathione S-transferases (GST). These are a widely distributed family of multifunctional enzymes which catalyze the reaction between reduced glutathione and a variety of exogenously and endogenously derived electrophilic compounds [12]. Although there is some evidence of altered GST expression in animal models of skin inflammation [13, 14], relatively little is known about their activity in inflammatory responses in man, particularly that evoked by chemical irritants. Since the pi class of GST has been reported to predominate in normal human skin, with the alpha, but not the mu, isoenzyme also being detectable [15], antibodies against GST pi and alpha were selected and utilized in this quantitative immunocytochemical study of ICD.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Healthy, non-atopic, male subjects (n = 18; age range 18- 58 years, mean age 32 years), with no past or present history of skin disease, took part in the study. Approval was obtained from the Wycombe Local Research Ethics Committee and all volunteers gave written, informed consent.

Patch testing and biopsy

Nine of the volunteers were patch tested with 0.2% (w/w) dithranol in white soft paraffin (wsp), containing 0.25% (w/w) salicylic acid. The remaining nine were patch tested with 5% aqueous (w/v) SLS (purity > 99%, Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, Dorset, UK). Four 8 mm Finn Chambers (Epitest Ltd.) Oy, Rannankoukku, Tuusula, Finland) were applied in total, two on the mid-volar region of each forearm. One chamber on each arm was filled with the irritant (25 mg for dithranol/15 mul for SLS), the other with a similar quantity of the appropriate vehicle control. The patches remained in contact with the skin for either 5 hrs or 47 hrs, depending upon the biopsy time. Immediately prior to biopsy, the intensity of the inflammatory reactions was visually graded for erythema, according to the following scale: 0, no visible reaction; 0.5, faint, patchy erythema; 1, weak erythema; 2, moderate erythema; 3, marked erythema; 4, intense erythema.

Each subject had five elliptical biopsies (4 mm diameter) removed, following injection of lignocaine. Two biopsies were taken from the irritant patch test sites, two from the vehicle control sites, and one from an area of untreated, normal skin adjacent to the patch test sites on one arm. Two time periods were selected for each subject from the following three sampling times: 6 hrs (chamber application time, 5 hrs), 48 hrs or 96 hrs (chamber application time for both, 47 hrs). Vehicle control sites were biopsied at the same time as the irritant test sites, with the normal skin sample being removed during the first biopsy session. Biopsies were immediately embedded in OCT compound, and snap frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. A total of five to seven samples per irritant and control time point was ultimately obtained.

Immunocytochemistry and image analysis

A detailed account of the immunostaining and quantitative image analysis methodologies employed is given in a previous publication [11]. Briefly, 4 mum sections were cut from three different areas of each biopsy and dried overnight on Vectabond-subbed (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) slides. Following fixation in acetone for 10 min, sections were incubated for 30 min in the following rabbit polyclonal antibodies: anti-GST alpha, 1:100 and anti-GST pi, 1:100 (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). Negative controls, using an irrelevant rabbit polyclonal antibody were included. The Vectastain ABC Elite peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories), with 3',3 diaminobenzidine as chromogen, was used to visualize the antibody/antigen reaction. All incubations were conducted at room temperature. No counterstaining was performed. For consistency, test and control samples were prepared and immunostained in parallel throughout. Microscopy and analysis were performed blind, using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope linked to a Power Macintosh 8100 computer, loaded with Optilab Pro 2.6 and GEMStain software (ME Electronics, Reading, UK), the latter permitting measurements of the total quantity of stain present on an area basis (expressed in terms of the total number of grey levels/mum2 epidermis) to be made.

Routine haematoxylin and eosin staining was also performed on representative sections from each biopsy.

Statistics

The mean staining density (+ SD) for each of the sample groups was calculated. Irritant and vehicle control values were compared using the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied.

Results

Intensity of patch test reactions

Visual assessments of the intensity of response for the irritant groups are given in Table I. Of the controls, water produced slight reactions (0.5) in five individuals after 48 hrs only, whilst white soft paraffin caused a mild reaction of 0.5 in one individual alone, again after 48 hrs.

Histopathology

SLS induced small areas of mild spongiosis after 6 hrs, which became more overt after 48 hrs, with marked parakeratosis also being present. By 96 hrs, parakeratosis, spongiosis and, in some cases, acanthosis, were apparent.

Dithranol gave little histopathological change after 6 hrs. At the two later time periods, spongiosis and some swelling of upper keratinocytes were seen, with one severe reaction showing marked cellular damage.

Little or no evidence of pathological change was present in the vehicle controls.

Distribution of GST labelling

In normal skin samples, GST alpha was cytoplasmically located and distributed throughout the epidermis, with a slightly greater intensity of staining being present in the stratum granulosum. GST pi expression was similarly evident within the cytoplasm at all levels of the epidermis, but with this isoenzyme a greater density of staining was seen in the basal layers.

Positive immunolabelling for both isoenzymes was present in the sebaceous glands and outer root sheath of hair follicles. Endothelial cells, fibroblasts and scattered mononuclear cells within the dermis were also positively stained.

There were no discernable changes in the density or distribution of staining of either GST alpha or GST pi after 6 hrs exposure to the two irritants. However, at the 48 hrs and 96 hrs time-points, the intensity of GST alpha staining was considerably reduced within the epidermis of both dithranol (Fig. 1) and SLS treated sites (Fig. 2). A reduction in labelling density, although to a lesser degree, was also evident for GST pi in some of these samples (Figs. 3, 4). The inflammatory cell infiltrate present in most SLS and dithranol biopsies at the two later time periods showed consistently strong labelling for GST alpha and pi throughout.

Vehicle control samples closely resembled normal skin biopsies, both in terms of intensity and distribution of staining for GST alpha and pi.

Quantification of GST labelling

Neither of the two irritants induced changes in the levels of the two enzymes after 6 hrs. However, significant decreases in epidermal GST alpha density were detected after 48 hrs and 96 hrs in both the dithranol (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 5) and SLS (p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively) (Fig. 6) treated skin biopsies. Reductions in GST pi were less marked, occurring in the 96 hrs samples only of dithranol patch tests (p < 0.05) (Fig. 7), and the 48 hrs samples only of SLS exposed sites (p < 0.05) (Fig. 8).

Vehicle controls did not differ significantly from normal skin samples at any time point.

Discussion

This quantitative immunocytochemical study has demonstrated that the levels of GST alpha in the epidermis decrease significantly in acute ICD, with epidermal GST pi levels also reducing, although to a lesser extent. Such a finding is highly suggestive of the presence of oxidative stress in the inflammatory lesions induced by chemical irritants, and extends our earlier findings of reduced levels of another anti-oxidant enzyme, Cu,Zn-SOD, in this same biopsy material [11]. As before, the changes were not confined to the irritant, dithranol, which is a known generator of reactive oxygen species, but also extended to the anionic detergent, SLS, which is not generally associated with direct free radical production.

As stated above, little is known about the behaviour of GST in acute ICD in man. Depressed levels have been demonstrated, however, in peripheral blood lymphocytes collected from patients with chronic irritant hand dermatitis [16] and there is evidence from rodent experimental models that cutaneous inflammation, in general, may be associated with changes in the levels of GST isoenzymes in the skin. Raza et al. [13] described a reduction in GST activity of some 30-40% following the topical application of gasoline in mice, whilst cutaneous inflammation subsequent to mechanical wounding was, likewise, found to cause a significant reduction in GST, accompanied by decreases in other anti-oxidant enzymes, including Cu,Zn-SOD and glutathione peroxidase [14].

GSTs are a complex family of multifunctional enzymes which catalyze the conjugation of reduced glutathione with a variety of electrophilic compounds. The different classes of GST which exist in man and other organisms exhibit different catalytic properties, suggesting separate or complimentary activities [12]. Decreased levels of GST, as seen in the present study, point to the formation, during oxidative metabolism, of such reactive products as alkenes, epoxide derivatives and organic hydroperoxides [17], the latter being a particularly favourable substrate for GST alpha, the class which showed the greatest change in level with both dithranol and SLS.

During the course of the cellular response to irritants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be produced in excess through a variety of means. Dithranol, as mentioned earlier, is a somewhat atypical irritant in that it provides an exogenous source of oxidants by directly generating singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radicals when in aqueous solution [6, 7]. For most irritants, including SLS, the major sources of free radicals will be of endogenous origin. Principal amongst these will almost certainly be infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages, which generate and release an array of ROS into the extracellular milieu [5]. They are a feature of virtually all irritant patch test sites [18] and are particularly prominent at the later time periods, coinciding with our observed changes to GST levels. Of possible significance also, is the association between pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is known to induce the up-regulation of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-8 and TNF-alpha [19, 20], but, paradoxically, increased levels of TNF-alpha, a cytokine known to be produced in ICD [21], can themselves induce oxidative stress [22].

In interpreting the data derived from this study, it is also important to consider the fact that GSTs are not only involved in the detoxification of products of oxidative metabolism, but, amongst other activities, also play a role in the biotransformation of leukotriene A4 to leukotriene C4 [23]. Leukotrienes may act as inflammatory mediators in the response to at least some irritants [24] and the pathways involved in their metabolism may therefore have an influence on the levels of GST present in inflamed skin.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our findings add to the body of evidence that GSTs play a role in cutaneous inflammation, and further support the hypothesis that oxidative stress is one of the mechanisms which contributes to the pathogenesis of ICD.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the subjects who participated in the study and the expert nursing assistance given by Sally Barth and Maria Nicholson. Financial support was given by the British Occupational Health Research Foundation and the Erasmus Wilson Dermatological Research Fund.

REFERENCES

1. Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I, Willis CM. Contact irritation mechanisms. In: Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis - Allergy, Irritancy and Urticaria. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1999: 11-38.

2. Halliwell B. Free radicals, reactive oxygen species and human disease. Br J Exp Path 1989; 70: 737-57.

3. Darr D, Fridovich I. Free radicals in cutaneous biology. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102: 671-5.

4. Fridovitch I. The biology of superoxide and superoxide dismutases. In: Hayaishi D, Imamura S, Miyachi Y, eds. The Biological Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Skin. Elsevier, New York, 1987: 9.

5. Athar M, Agarwal R, Bickers DR, Mukhtar H. Role of reactive oxygen species in skin. In: Mukhtar H, ed. Pharmacology of the Skin. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1992: 270.

6. Muller K, Wiegrebe W, Younes M. Formation of active oxygen species by dithranol III. Dithranol, active oxygen species and lipid peroxidation in vivo. Arch Pharm 1987; 320: 59-66.

7. Fuchs J, Packer L. Investigations of anthralin free radicals in model systems and in skin of hairless mice. J Invest Dermatol 1989; 92: 677-82.

8. Shindo Y, Witt E, Han D, Epstein W, Packer L. Enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidants in epidermis and dermis of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102: 122-4.

9. Applegate LA, Frenk E. Cellular defense mechanisms of the skin against oxidant stress and in particular UVA radiation. Eur J Dermatol 1995; 5: 97-103.

10. Fuchs J, Freisleben HJ, Packer L. Antioxidants in the skin. In: Mukhtar H, ed. Pharmacology of the Skin. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1992: 250.

11. Willis CM, Reiche L, Wilkinson JD. Immunocytochemical demonstration of reduced Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase levels following topical application of dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate: an indication of the role of oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 1: 8-12.

12. Raza H, Agarwal R, Mukhtar H. Cutaneous glutathione S-transferases. In: Mukhtar H, ed. Pharmacology of the Skin. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1992: 131-7.

13. Raza H, Qureshi MM, Montague W. Alteration of glutathione, glutathione S-transferase and lipid peroxidation in mouse skin and extracutaneous tissues after topical application of gasoline. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1995; 27: 271-7.

14. Shukla A, Mohan Rasik A, Kumar Patnaik G. Depletion of reduced glutathione, ascorbic acid, vitamin E and antioxidant defence enzymes in a healing cutaneous wound. Free Rad Res 1997; 26: 93-101.

15. Raza H, Awasthi YC, Zaim MT, Eckert RL, Mukhtar H. Glutathione S-transferases in human and rodent skin: multiple forms and species-specific expression. J Invest Dermatol 1991; 96: 463-7.

16. Singh N, Hamann K, Clausen J. Decreased lymphocyte aryl hydrocarbon hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase activites in patients with hand dermatitis. Acta Derm (Stockh) 1981; 62: 61-3.

17. Mannervik B, Danielson UH. Glutathione transferases - structure and catalytic activity. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 1988; 23: 283-337.

18. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD. Differential patterns of epidermal leucocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally-unrelated irritants. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101: 364-70.

19. Janssen YM, Van Houten B, Borm PJ, Mossman BT. Cell and tissue responses to oxidative stress. Lab Invest 1993; 69: 261-74.

20. Verhasselt V, Goldman M, Willems F. Oxidative stress up-regulates IL-8 and TNF-alpha synthesis in human dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 1998; 28: 3886-90.

21. Enk AH, Katz SI. Early molecular events in the induction phase of contact sensitivity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 1398-402.

22. Adamson GM, Billings RE. Tumour necrosis factor induced oxidative stress in isolated mouse hepatocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys 1992; 294: 223-9.

23. Mukhtar H, Raza H, Allyn DR, Bickers DR. Glutathione S-transferase catalyzed metabolism of leukotriene A4 to leukotriene C4 in rodent and human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94: 557S.

24. Dickson FM, Lawrence JN, Benford DJ. Release of inflammatory mediators in human keratinocyte cultures following exposure to a skin irritant. Toxic in Vitro 1993; 7: 385-8.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]