ARTICLE
Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis (NEH) is an acute inflammatory
reaction that occurs most commonly in patients receiving cytarabine induction
chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) [1, 2]. It is characterized
clinically by erythematous papules, plaques, or solitary nodules and histologically
by neutrophilic infiltrates of eccrine glands and degeneration of eccrine
epithelial cells. Although NEH was first described in a patient with AML,
it was found subsequently that NEH might occur in patients with various
types of malignancies who were receiving chemotherapy. It has been speculated
that NEH is due to some toxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents excreted
and perhaps even concentrated in the eccrine glands. However, NEH also occurred
in HIV-infected patients treated with zidovudine [3] or stavudine [4] and
more rarely a similar condition might be occur spontaneously [5] or in conjunction
with a bacterial infection [6-9]. Since NEH sometimes precedes the onset
of leukemia [10, 11] or of a solid tumor [12, 13], it is postulated that
degenerative changes in the eccrine apparatus might result in the accumulation
of neutrophils. Therefore, NEH might be a paraneoplastic syndrome characterized
by neutrophilic infiltration such as Sweet's syndrome and atypical pyoderma
gangrenosum in patients with hematological abnormalities.
We report the first patient with NEH associated with actinic reticuloid
syndrome (AR), who developed a skin rash two weeks after cessation of
a four-month course of methotrexate therapy.
Case report
A 54-year-old male with a five-year history of pruritus and dermatitis
on sun-exposed areas had been treated with topical steroids and oral antihistamines
without benefit. He had no history of systemic exposure to photosensitizers
or oral administration of drugs capable of causing photoallergic and/or
phototoxic reactions or pseudolymphoma. He had not noticed any reaction
to sun exposure. When he visited our clinic, he presented with erythroderma
with plaque lesions, and lymphadenopathies on his neck, axillae, and groin.
A biopsy from one of the plaques showed histopathologic features consistent
with those of mycosis fungoides (MF); diffuse hyperkeratosis with pronounced
acanthosis, subepidermal band-like infiltrate consisting mainly of lymphocytes
with a few atypical cells and exocytosis of lymphocytes with Pautrier's
microabscess formation (Fig.
1). However, unlike typical MF, CD8+ lymphocytes were predominantly
infiltrating in the epidermis (data not shown). A lymph node biopsy from
the inguinal area showed characteristics of dermatopathic lymphadenitis.
Neither skin nor lymph node biopsies demonstrated clonal rearrangement
of T cell receptor (TCR) genes by Southern blotting using a TCR-Cbeta
probe. Laboratory results revealed a white blood cell count of 10,800/mul,
with 30% lymphocytes, 18% eosinophils, and 2% atypical lymphocytes. Biochemical
parameters were within normal limits except for elevated levels of lactate
dehydrogeneas (1,050 IU/l, normal range 250-410 IU/l) and C-reactive protein
(3.3 mg/dl, normal range < 0.3 mg/dl). Serum sIL-2R (3,170 U/ml, standard
value 246~742 U/ml) and IgE (1,880 U/ml, standard value 27.5-138.3 U/ml)
were markedly elevated. Serum anti HTLV-1 antibody was negative. Immunophenotyping
of peripheral blood lymphocytes revealed a normal CD4/CD8 ratio (1.33)
and a slightly increased number of CD8 positive cells (36.2%, normal value
19~32%). We considered both MF and erythrodermic AR, although we could
not evaluate the results of phototesting because of the severe erythrodermic
lesions. Since he was not aware of photosensitivity, he was treated with
oral prednisolone (15 mg/day) and a trial of 8-MOP-mediated photochemotherapy
(PUVA) since we suspected erythrodermic MF. The PUVA-treated lesions became
exacerbated after three trials, and PUVA treatment was discontinued. A
diagnosis of erythrodermic AR was considered. Further diagnostic phototesting
was impossible because of severe desquamative erythroderma. The treatment
was changed to intravenous interferon-gamma therapy, (2 x 106
IU, five times weekly) with oral prednisolone (15 mg/day), followed by
a low-dose of oral methotrexate (7.5-15 mg/week) together with a maintenance
dose of oral prednisolone of 15 mg. Because the erythroderma gradually
improved, we began to taper the dosage of methotrexate.
Two weeks after the discontinuation of oral
methotrexate with a cumulative dose of 195 mg, multiple, slightly tender,
erythematous papules appeared suddenly on his upper and lower extremities
and trunk (Fig. 2). The
differential diagnoses included lymphomatoid papulosis, folliculitis,
deep mycosis, miliaria profunda, and NEH.
A biopsy from the erythematous papules on his right forearm was obtained.
Microscopic examination of the serially sectioned specimen revealed a
mixed inflammatory infiltrate composed of many neutrophils around the
eccrine sweat apparatus. The eccrine epithelial cells showed vacuolar
degeneration and cytoplasmic eosinophilia associated with exocytosis of
neutrophils (Fig. 3).
Although acanthosis and elongation of rete ridges remained in the epidermis,
dense lymphocytic infiltrates that had been observed in the initial erythroderma
had decreased. There was no evidence of vasculitis. Neither fungi nor
bacteria were detected by PAS and Grocott staining. There was no growth
of bacteria or fungi in several cultures obtained from the papules.
Based on the clinical and histological findings, we made a diagnosis
of NEH. The eruptions resolved rapidly within five or six days, but new
lesions appeared two weeks later. Similar episodes occurred three times
and the eruptions resolved without any additional treatment, except for
the maintenance dose of prednisolone.
Both erythroderma and the recurrence of NEH improved in response to
oral prednisolone, leaving chronic lichenified lesions on the sun-exposed
areas including the face, neck, and hands. Since there was the presence
of photosensitivity dermatitis, we performed phototesting on the normal-appearing
skin. The phototesting demonstrated a shortening of the minimal erythema
dose to UV-B (15 mJ/cm2, normal value 50-200 mJ/cm2)
and UV-A induced erythema (2.52 J/cm2). He was finally diagnosed
as having erythrodermic AR associated with NEH.
Discussion
The final diagnosis of erythrodermic AR was made based on the following
clinical and histological findings. Exacerbation of the eruptions following
PUVA treatment, the development of chronic lichenified lesions on the
sun-exposed skin, photosensitivity to UV-B and UV-A, and the predominance
of CD8+ cells in a band-like infiltration in the upper dermis
[14-16].
During the clinical course, the patient had transient, multiple similar-sized
papules on his trunk and extremities (Fig.
2). Microscopic examination revealed striking alterations in the eccrine
sweat gland apparatus, such as epithelial necrosis and infiltration by
neutrophils (Fig. 3).
These features were consistent with the clinicopathologic features of
NEH. Although there was no evidence of pathogenic organisms or provocative
factors, the cessation of methotrexate might have been a significant factor.
Since he had been treated with low doses of systemic methotrexate and
oral prednisolone, these may have had a pathogenic link to the development
of NEH. Most previously reported cases of NEH occurred in patients with
an underlying malignancy who were receiving a variety of chemotherapeutic
agents. Such patients mainly had leukemia [1, 2] or lymphoma [17, 18],
and sometimes they had a genitourinary tumor [12, 20], breast cancer [21],
or osteosarcoma [13]. The causative chemotherapeutic agents might be cytarabine,
doxorubicin and its related compounds (daunorbicin and daunoblastin),
mitoxantrone, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide [1, 2, 12, 13, 17-20], minocycline
[21], zidovudine [3], stavudine [4], granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
[22] or acetaminophen [5]. Several reports described in the absence of
an underlying malignancy [5], having a bacterial origin [6-9] or HIV [3,
4] infection. Although the true pathogenic mechanism of NEH remains unknown,
the T cell proliferative condition together with methotrexate-induced
immunosuppression may have led to the development of NEH in our patient.
Article accepted on 6/01/02
REFERENCES
1. Harrist TJ, Fine JD, Berman RS, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis: a distinctive type of neutrophilic dermatosis associated
with acute myelogeneous leukemia and chemotherapy. Arch Dermatol
1982; 118: 263-6.
2. Flynn TC, Harrist TJ, Murphy GF, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis: a distinctive rash associated with cytarabine therapy
and acute leukemia. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 11: 584-90.
3. Smith KJ, Skelton HG, James WD, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis in HIV-infected patients. J Am Acad Dermatol
1990; 23: 945-7.
4. Krischer J, Rutschmann O, Vollenweider RS, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis in a patient with AIDS. J Dermatol 1998; 25:
199-200.
5. Kuttner BJ, Kurban RS. Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis in
the absence of an underlying malignancy. Cutis 1988; 41: 403-5.
6. Moreno A, Barnadas MA, Ravella A, de Moragas JM. Infectious
eccrine hidradenitis in a patient undergoing hemodialysis. Arch Dermatol
1985; 121: 1106-7.
7. Allegue F, Rocamoro A, Martin-Gonzales M, et al. Infectious
eccrind Dermatol 1990; 22: 1119-20.
8. Taira JW, Gerber HB. Eccrine hidradenitis. Int J Dermatol
1992; 31: 433-4.
9. Combemale P, Faisant M, Azoulay-Petit C, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis secondary to infection with Serratia marcescens.
Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 784-8.
10. Pierson JC, Helm TN, Taylor JS, et al. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidradenitis heralding the onset of acute myelogenous leukemia.
Arch Dermatol 1993; 129: 791-2.
11. Saada V, Aractingi S, Leblond V. Hidradenite neutrophile
eccrine associée à une rechute de leucémie aiguë
myéloblastique. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1998; 125: 420-2.
12. Fitzpatrick JE, Bennion SD, Reed OM, Wilson T, Reddy VVB,
Golitz L. Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis associated with induction
chemotherapy. J Cutan Pathol 1987; 14: 272-8.
13. Scallan PJ, Kettler AH, Levy ML, Tschen JA. Neutrophilic
eccrine hidroadenitis: evidence implicating bleomycin as a causative agent.
Cancer 1988; 62: 2532-6.
14. Toonstra J, Henquet CJ, van Weelden H, van der Putte SC,
van Volten WA. Actinic reticuloid: a clinical, photobiologic, histopathologic,
and follow-up study of 16 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21:
205-14.
15. Rijlaarsdam JU, Scheffer E, Meijer CJLM, Willemze R. Cutaneous
pseudo-T-cell lymphomas: a clinicopathologic study of 20 patients. Cancer
1992; 69: 717-24.
16. Ploysangam T, Breneman DL, and Mutasim DF. Cutaneous pseudolymphomas.
J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 877-905.
17. Beutner KR, Packman CH, and Markowitch W. Neutrophilic eccrine
hidradenitis associated with Hodgkin's disease and chemotherapy. Arc
Dermatol 1986; 122: 809-11.
18. Bailey DL, Barron D, and Lucky AW. Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis:
a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dermatol 1989;
6: 33-8.
19. Greenbaum BH, Heymann WR, Reid CS, Travis SF, Donaldson MH.
Chemotherapy-associated eccrine hidradenitis: neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis
reevaluated: the role of neutrophilic infiltration. Med Pediatr Oncol
1988; 16: 351-5.
20. Burg G, Bieber T, Langecker P. Localized neutrophilic eccrine
hidradenitis in mitoxantrone therapy: a typical side-effect of cytostatic
drugs. Hautarzt. 1988; 39: 233-6.
21. Mouly F. Vignon-Pennamen MD, Morel P. Dermatose neutrophilique
aigue associant des aspects d'hidradenite neutrophile eccrine et de syndrome
de Sweet après prise de minocycline. Ann Dermatol Venereol
1997; 124: S51.
22. Okcu A, Soyer HP, Kaddu S. Ekkrine hidradenitis. Hautarzt.
1997; 48: 743-8.
|