Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version

Topical 1% cidofovir for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 12, Number 6, 562-4, November - December 2002, Thérapie


Summary  

Author(s) : Donato CALISTA, Department of Dermatology, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, 47023 Cesena, Italy..

Summary : Cidofovir, a purine nucleotide analogue of deoxycytidine, is a drug effective against a wide number of DNA viruses. Recently, cidofovir has been supposed to exert antineoplastic activity, through the induction of apoptosis and the inhibition of angiogenesis. Four patients affected by basal cell carcinoma (BCC), who refused conventional surgery, were treated with a cream containing 1% cidofovir. The cream was applied every day for 10 days, then every other day for another 50 days. Histopathologic clearing was assessed with a skin biopsy performed on the previous lesional area 3 months after the end of treatment. All four patients achieved clinical healing of their lesion. Histological tumour regression was achieved in three patients. The treatment was well tolerated and the cosmetic results were excellent. No recurrences after an average 24-month follow up period were detected. The potential effectiveness of topical cidofovir for the non-surgical treatment of BCC have been shown. Nevertheless, appropriate clinical trials and prolonged follow-up periods are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of topical cidofovir.

Keywords : cidofovir, basal cell carcinoma, topical therapy.

Pictures

ARTICLE

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a locally aggressive tumour that originates from epidermal or hair follicle basal cells. Its management depends on the tumour size, the area involved, the age and medical status of the patient [1]. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice, but electrodesiccation, CO2 laser photocoagulation, cryosurgery or radiation are also recommended [1, 2]. Alternatively, non-surgical modalities such as intralesional 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, photodynamic therapy or imiquimod have been used with varying outcomes [2-6]. Cidofovir is a nucleotide analogue, active both intravenously and topically against a variety of DNA viruses [7]. Intralesional doses of cidofovir were found to be effective for the treatment of DNA virus related tumours both in animals and patients [8-14]. Cidofovir has been supposed to exert direct anti-neoplastic activity, through the induction of apoptosis and the inhibition of angiogenesis [15-19]. On the base of these observations, four patients affected by BCC, who refused conventional surgery, accepted to be experimentally treated with a cream containing 1% cidofovir.

Patients and methods

Patients signed a written informed consent before starting topical cidofovir. The cream was compounded as follows: 375 mg of cidofovir (Vistide, Pharmacia-Upjhon) were mixed with 32.5 g of a base cream (Dermobase grassa Restiva; Istituto Ganassini, Milano, Italy). They were told to apply the cream on and 5 mm all around their lesions once a day for 10 days, then every other day for another 50 days. During the study period, patients were seen weekly, and then entered a follow-up period for evaluating BCC recurrence. The follow-up is still in progress. Histopathologic confirmation of the diagnosis was requested at the beginning in order to confirm clinical diagnosis, and at the end of treatment to verify histological healing.

Patient 1

A 75-year-old man presented with a non-ulcerated 10 x 14 mm BCC on the right side of his head (Fig. 1a). After histological diagnosis confirmation, the patient initiated topical 1% cidofovir. Starting from day 5 he complained of the onset of erythema, a burning sensation and erosion on the site of treatment, which regressed within 10 days after therapy was over. Thirty days after the end of treatment, the BCC appeared clinically healed (Fig. 1b), but the entire neoplastic area was surgically excised. Histopathologic examination showed a normal aspect epidermis, and round nests of basaloid cells with a palisade arrangement located in the superficial and mid dermis. Numerous apoptotic bodies were detectable among the cells of neoplastic nests. A dense lymphocytic infiltrate, with a predominance of CD4+ cells, surrounded the neoplastic tissue.

Patient 2

A 52-year-old male presented with a BCC on the left aspect of his nose (Fig. 2a). Before undergoing surgery, the patient asked to be treated with a conservative technique, so topical cidofovir was proposed. After histological diagnosis confirmation, the patient carefully applied the cream following the same schedule, and clinically healed within 1 week from the end of application (Fig. 2b). A 3-mm punch biopsy on the previous pathologic area, was performed 3 months after the end of treatment and showed no evidence of residual malignancy. A 26-month follow-up did not reveal any relapses.

Patient 3

A 46-year-old woman presented with a history of BCC on the right side of her upper lip, which had been incompletely excised 1 year earlier. The lesion had relapsed about 3 months from surgery. On clinical examination, a BCC 14 x 13 mm in size was present at one border of the surgical scar. As a surgical approach was considered disfiguring, 1% cidofovir cream was proposed. From day 7 inflammation followed by erosion developed at the site of the cream application. The patient completed the therapy and the neoplastic area healed within 20 days from the end of treatment, leaving a very slight scar. A 4-mm punch biopsy, performed on the previous lesional area, 3 months after therapy was over, did not detect any residual neoplastic tissue. No recurrence has occurred after a 24-month follow-up period.

Patient 4

A 25-year-old nurse presented with a BCC on her sternum. In the attempt to avoid disfiguring scars to her neckline, she asked to be treated with a non-surgical technique. She refused histopathological diagnosis confirmation, but agreed to the experimental use of topical cidofovir. This patient also recorded local reactions at the site of application: erythema, itching and erosion, which were otherwise well tolerated. Clinical healing was obtained after 15 days from the end of treatment. A punch biopsy on previous pathological tissue, performed 3 months later the end of the therapy, confirmed healing. At a 20-month follow-up the patient is still free from disease.

Comment

The efficacy of topical cidofovir in the treatment of recurrent herpes simplex, molluscum contagiosum, and HPV infections has been reported by several authors [7, 12]. Intralesional administrations of cidofovir were found effective in the treatment of HPV-related neoplasms such as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [8], oesophageal or respiratory papillomatous tumours [9-11], and erythroplasia of Queyrat of the glans penis [19]. In addition, regression of HSV-8 related Kaposi's sarcoma [12], and Epstein Barr Virus associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma [13] were reported too. If confirmed, these observations might bring about new interesting therapeutic options for the treatment of such types of cancer in which DNA viruses act as inducers of malignant transformation. Recently, cidofovir has been found to be effective in the treatment of virus independent neoplasms such as squamous cell carcinomas of the lower eyelid in a man [14], melanoma and haemangioma in guinea pigs [15-17]. The mechanism of action of cidofovir as an antineoplastic agent is still under evaluation. There is evidence that cidofovir might act by inhibiting rapidly proliferating cells through a reduction in DNA thymidine incorporation, the activation of tumour suppressor genes and the induction of apoptosis [15-17]. In this report 4 patients who, for various reasons, refused conventional therapy for their BCC, were experimentally treated with 1% cidofovir cream.

All the patients achieved complete clinical regression of their BCC after treatment. In patient 1 the lesional area, although clinically cleared, was completely excised 30 days after therapy finished. Histopathologic inflammatory infiltrate, which was over expressed if compared with the former diagnostic biopsy, could be consistent with a cellular immune response against neoplastic tissue. In case 2, 3 and 4 histopathologic clearing verification was performed 3 months after the end of therapy because we hypothesized that histological regression could be slowness rather than clinical healing. Obviously, the use of a punch biopsy as evidence of histologic healing potentially limits the accuracy of these results, we are aware that the entire lesional area should have been removed and examined to ascertain healing. On the other hand, the complete clinical regression of BCC, and the absence of recurrences after an average 24-month follow-up period may be indicative of healing. The patients are, however, still kept under observation. No systemic side effects related to the treatment were noted. The final cosmetic results were excellent. Medication with 1% cidofovir requires good compliance because of the long duration of the treatment and the onset of discomforting local side effects, such as erythema, erosion, burning sensation, bleeding and crusting. Although the cases herein presented could hardly make up a series, this experience shows the potential effectiveness of 1% cidofovir in the non-surgical treatment of BCCs. We emphasise that surgical excision is the simplest, safest and usually curative technique for BCCs. Further experiences using controlled, blind studies are needed to confirm these very preliminary results.

Article accepted on 3/9/02

REFERENCES

1. MacKie RM. Epidermal skin tumours. In: Rook A, Wilkinson DS, Ebling FJG. Textbook of Dermatology. Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, Breathnach SM, eds. Blackwell Science Inc 6th ed. 1998: 1691-2.

2. Wennberg AM. Basal cell carcinoma: new aspects of diagnosis and treatment. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 2000; 209 (suppl.): 5-25.

3. Orenberg EK, Miller BH, Greenway HT, Koperski JA, Lowe N, Rosen T, et al. The effects of intralesional 5-Fluorouracil therapeutic implant (MPI 5003) for treatment of basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27: 723-8.

4. Cornell RC, Greenway HT, Tucker SB, Edwards L, Ashworth S, Vance JC, et al. Intralesional interferon therapy for basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 694-700.

5. Vander Straten M, Lee P, Weitzul S, Cockerell CJ, Tyring SK. Advances in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: the promise of pharmacologic therapy. Adv Dermatol 2000; 16: 299-318.

6. Beutner KR, Geisse JK, Helmann D, Fox TL Ginkel A, Owens ML. Therapeutic response of basal cell carcinomas to the immune response modifier imiquimod 5%. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 1002-7.

7. Zabawski EJ, Cockerell CJ. Topical and intralesional cidofovir: a review of pharmacology and therapeutic effects. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 741-5.

8. Snoeck R, Noel JC, Muller C, De Clercq E, Bossens M. Cidofovir, a new approach for the treatment of cervix intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III). J Med Virol 2000; 60: 205-9.

9. Van Cutsem E, Snoeck R, Van Ranst M, Fiten P, Opdenakker G, Geboes K, et al. Successful treatment of a squamous papilloma of the hypopharynx-esophagus by local injections of (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine. J Med Virol 1995; 45: 230-5.

10. Pranky SM, Magit AE, Kearns DB, Kang DR, Duncan NO. Intralesional cidofovir for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis in children. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 1999; 125: 1143-8.

11. Snoeck R, Andrei G, De Clercq E. Cidofovir in the treatment of HPV-associated lesions. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg 2001; 63: 93-12.

12. Fife K, Gill J, Bourboulia D, Gazzard B, Nelson M, Bower M. Cidofovir for the treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma in an HIV negative homosexual man. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 1148-9.

13. Murono S, Raab-Traub N, Pagano JS. Prevention and inhibition of nasopharyngeal carcinoma growth by antiviral phosphonated nucleoside analogs. Cancer Res 2001; 161: 7875-7.

14. Calista D, Riccioni L, Coccia L. Successful treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower eyelid with intralesional cidofovir. Br J Ophthalm 2002; 86; 932-3.

15. Redondo P, Idoate M, Galofre JC, Solano T. Cidofovir inhibits growth of B16 melanoma cells in vivo. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 741-8.

16. DeClercq E, Andrei G, Balzarini J, Hatse S, Liekens S, Naesens L, et al. Antitumor potential of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1999; 18: 759-71.

17. Liekens S, Andrei G, Vandeputte M, De Clercq E, Neyts J. Potent inhibition of hemangioma formation in rats by the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogue cidofovir. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 2562-7.

18. Liekens S, Neyts J, De Clercq E, Verbeken E, Ribatti D, Presta M. Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor-2-induced vascular tumor formation by the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate cidofovir. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 5057-64.

19. Calista D. Topical cidofovir for erythroplasia of Queyrat of the glans penis. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147: 399.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]