Home > Journals > Medicine > European Journal of Dermatology > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
European Journal of Dermatology
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version

Cellular allergen stimulation test in the diagnosis of intolerance to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 7, Number 5, 377-8, July - August 1997, Cas cliniques


Summary  

Author(s) : T.M. Zollner, C. Röder, R.J. Werner, S. Diehl, R. Kaufmann, Department of Dermatology, University of Frankfurt Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany..

Summary : We report a patient with urticaria and rhinoconjunctivitis as the major symptoms of intolerance to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The recently developed cellular allergen stimulation test revealed intolerance to diclofenac, ibuprofen and indomethacin indicated by an increased sulfidoleukotriene release by leukocytes in the presence of the above mentioned compounds compared to 10 healthy controls. In contrast, stimulation of leukocytes with acetyl-salicylic acid showed a sulfidoleukotriene release comparable to that of healthy controls. Double blind, placebo controlled provocation tests confirmed the results of the in vitro tests regarding diclofenac, ibuprofen, indomethacin and acetyl-salicylic acid. This case report clearly documents that the determination of sulfidoleukotriene release after stimulation of leukocytes is a major contribution to the diagnosis of intolerance reactions. However, because of the still limited experience this test with substances other than acetyl-salicylic acid, it cannot substitute provocation tests.

Keywords : cellular allergen stimulation test, intolerance, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, provocation test, pseudoallergy, urticaria, rhinoconjunctivitis, sulfidoleukotriene.

Pictures

ARTICLE

Pseudo-allergic reactions are inflammatory, immediate-type reactions with clinical symptoms such as rhinitis, asthma, or urticaria. IgE is not involved, but after provocation, histamine release and sulfidoleukotriene (sLT) production can be found in vivo in pseudo-allergic patients [1]. Since IgE is not involved in intolerance reactions, in vitro (e.g. RAST) and in vivo (e.g. prick tests) diagnostic procedures have not been available. However, a new diagnostic method has been developed over the last few years, which is based on the production of sulfidoleukotrienes (sLTC4, sLTD4 and sLTE4) upon challenge with antigens. It has been reported that the cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST-ELISA) provides a useful tool for the diagnosis of allergic as well as intolerance reactions, e.g. due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) [2, 3]. Here, we report one case which showed rhinoconjunctivitis, after ingestion of NSAID, as the major symptom of intolerance. The determination of the release of sLTs after stimulation of leukocytes as well as provocation tests clearly proved NSAID to be the cause of the rhinoconjunctivitis.

Materials and methods

CAST-ELISA (DPC Biermann GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) was performed as published earlier [4]. Briefly, leukocytes were isolated from whole blood via dextran sedimentation. Leukocytes were then incubated for 40 minutes at 37° C in a buffer containing interleukin 3 (16 ng/ml), and one of the following stimulants obtained from the supplier (DPC Biermann GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany): anti-IgE (100 ng/ml), ionomycin (150 ng/ml), or one of the non-steroidal analgesics, indomethacin (20 µg/ml), ibuprofen (200 µg/ml), diclofenac (20 µg/ml), or acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA; 200 and 20 µg/ml). In the case of ASA, tests in the presence or absence of C5a (10­ 7 M), Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany were performed since earlier in vitro and clinical studies demonstrated increased sLT release from leukocytes in the presence of C5a and IL-3 [4-6]. Supernatants were then analysed in duplicate using an ELISA technique with a monoclonal antibody that recognised sLTC4, sLTD4 and sLTE4 [7]. Furthermore, ten volunteers with negative provocation tests to NSAIDs (ASA, indomethacin, ibuprofen, diclofenac) served as controls. The patient and the controls had not taken any antiinflammatory drugs for eight weeks prior to the CAST-ELISA. Provocation tests were started after blood had been drawn for the CAST-ELISA. Total IgE and specific IgE was analysed using the CAP system from Kabi Pharmacia Diagnostics, Freiburg, Germany [8].

Case report

A 28-year-old, Caucasian woman who was admitted to our clinic had been suffering from recurrent, non-seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis for 3 years. The patient's and family medical history was negative for atopy. One occurrence of rhinoconjunctivitis had been associated with general urticaria. The patient had dysplasia of both hips which was the cause of repeated ingestion of NSAID. In several instances, rhinoconjunctivitis occurred about 30 minutes after ingestion of NSAID (diclofenac, indomethacin, ibuprofen and combined preparations which contained ASA). However, in a few instances of rhinoconjunctivitis, the history regarding intake of NSAID was unclear. Therefore, the patient was prick tested with a variety of typical aero-allergens (grass and tree pollen, house dust mites, latex) without any positive results. Prick tests and patch tests were negative for a broad panel of NSAID including paracetamol, indomethacin, ibuprofen, ASA, and diclofenac. Total IgE was within the normal range (26 kU/l). Furthermore, specific IgE was negative for various pollen allergens, house dust mites, yeasts and latex. CAST-ELISA was performed using the following pseudo-allergens: indomethacin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and ASA in the presence and absence of C5a. The test showed increased levels of sLT release after stimulation with diclofenac, ibuprofen and indomethacin compared to 10 provocation test-negative, age matched controls (Table I). In contrast, values of sLT release similar to provocation test negative controls were observed after stimulation with ASA in the absence or presence of C5a. To analyse the clinical relevance of these in vitro results, we performed double-blind, placebo controlled provocation tests with ibuprofen (cumulative amount: 1,500 mg), diclofenac (187.5 mg), indomethacin (75 mg), and ASA (1,900 mg), respectively. The patient developed rhinoconjunctivitis after ingestion of ibuprofen (cumulative amount: 300 mg), diclofenac (37.5 mg), and indomethacin (25 mg) within 30 to 90 minutes (Fig. 1). In contrast, provocation tests with placebo and ASA (cumulative amount: 1,900 mg) were tolerated.

Discussion

Allergic reactions of the immediate type result from the production and/or release of cellular inflammatory mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes, platelet activating factor or cytokines in response to IgE antibodies. Although specific IgE is not involved in pseudoallergic reactions, histamine and leukotrienes are the most important mediators responsible for inflammatory reactions and the symptoms of intolerance reactions. Because of their relatively cumbersome manipulation and their cost, histamine release tests are not used in routine allergologic investigations [3]. However, the newly developed CAST-ELISA allows the determination of the cellular sLT release from leukocytes in vitro. This is thought to be of major clinical relevance especially in the diagnosis of intolerance reactions. It has been shown that sLT4 concentrations are increased after NSAID challenge in NSAID-sensitive patients [9, 10]. In this case, history, conventional in vitro tests such as specific IgE-determination, as well as prick and patch tests to NSAID and aeroallergens gave no diagnostic clue. In general, challenge tests have to be performed for diagnostic purposes despite their risk to the patient. Therefore, predictive in vitro tests especially in cases of intolerance reactions are of major clinical importance since they are economical and safe. In our patient, the intolerance reaction to ibuprofen, diclofenac, and indomethacin and tolerance of ASA is unusual. However, the results of the in vitro tests confirmed the challenge tests. The reason for the uncommon incidence of intolerance to the above mentioned NSAID and tolerance to ASA remains unclear. A recently published study confirms the predictive value of the CAST-ELISA in the diagnosis of pseudoallergy to ASA [4]. However, to our knowledge there are no large scale prospective studies analysing the predictive value of sLT release from leukocytes in intolerance reactions to NSAID other than ASA. In our case report, clinical relevance of sLT determination in intolerance reactions to substances other than ASA is implicated. Further prospective studies to identify the predictive value of the sLT determination in the diagnosis of intolerance to NSAID other than ASA are ongoing.

REFERENCES

1. Schlumberger HD. Pseudoallergische Reaktionen durch Arzneimittel und Chemikalien. Allergologie 1982; 5: 183-9.

2. de Weck AL, Stadler BM, Urwyler A, Wehner HU, Bühlmann RP. Cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST) ­ a new dimension in allergy diagnostics. Allergy Clin Immunology News 1993; 5: 9-13.

3. de Weck AL. Diagnostic approaches to allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1993; 101: 346-51.

4. Czech W, Schöpf E, Kapp A. Release of sulfidoleukotrienes in vitro: its relevance in the diagnosis of pseudoallergy to acetylsalicylic acid. Inflamm Res 1995; 44: 291-5.

5. Kurimoto Y, de Weck AL, Dahinden CA. The effect of interleukin-3 upon IgE-dependent and IgE-independent basophil degranulation and leukotriene generation. Eur J Immunol 1991; 21: 361-8.

6. Mac Glashan DW, Hubbard WC. IL-3 alters free arachidonic acid generation in C5a-stimulated human basophils. J Immunol 1993; 151: 6358-69.

7. Reinke M, Hoppe U, Thomas R, Bestmann HJ, Mollenhauer J, Brune K. A monoclonal antibody against the sulfidopeptide leukotrienes LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991; 1081: 274-8.

8. Leimgruber A, Mosimann B, Claeys M, Seppey M, Jaccard Y, Aubert V, Peitrequin R, Nisoli M-P, Pecoud A. Clinical evaluation of a new in vitro assay for specific IgE, the immmuno CAP system. Clin Exp Allergy 1991; 21: 127-31.

9. Christie PE, Tagari P, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Charlesson S, Chee P, Arm JP. Urinary leukotriene E4 concentrations increase after aspirin challenge in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143: 1025-9.

10. Christie PE, Hawksworth R, Spur BW, Lee TH. Effect of indomethacin on leukotriene 4-induced histamine hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146: 1506-10.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]