ARTICLE
Stromelysin-3 (ST3) belongs to the metalloproteinase family [1]. Matrix
metalloproteinases are mediators of tissue remodelling which play a role
in various processes such as development, tissue repair and tumour progression
[2, 3]. These molecules are capable of degrading most macromolecular components
of the extracellular matrix. Nevertheless, no structural substrate in
the extracellular matrix has been identified for ST3 [4]. It has been
suggested that ST3 could have an anti-apoptotic activity, therefore enhancing
the survival of tumoral cells [5].
ST3-mRNA is expressed in the majority of human carcinomas [6], but the
expression is restricted to the fibroblastic cells surrounding the epithelial
part of these cancers. By contrast, ST3 has seldom been identified in
benign tumours [6]. Although the biological functions of ST3 are still
unclear, this protein could play an active role in the invasion of healthy
tissue by the malignant cells. It has been demonstrated that the level
of expression of ST3 is linked to the prognosis of breast carcinoma, as
an increased level of expression correlates with a poorer prognosis [7].
Such a link has also been shown in other types of carcinomas, such as
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [8].
ST3 is expressed in the skin during wound healing and in cutaneous carcinomas
[9], but not in normal fibroblasts. ST3-mRNA was demonstrated in the stroma
of basal cell carcinomas, especially in the most aggressive cases [9,
10]. In situ hybridisation methods showed an increased expression
in the areas where the cells had a tendency to loose their peripheral
palisading [9]. We have shown by immunohistochemistry that squamous cell
carcinomas express ST3 more frequently and more intensely than keratoacanthomas
[11]. Moreover, we also observed a correlation between the expression
of this metalloproteinase and the prognosis of squamous cell carcinomas
[11]. The expression of ST3 has already been demonstrated in the stroma
of basal cell carcinomas (BCC), either by in situ hybridisation,
or by immunohistochemistry [12, 13]. Nevertheless, the histological subtype
of BCC was not specified in some of these works [6, 14] and the staining
was not quantified in others [12]. Moreover, these studies did not take
into account the possibility of false positive results that could be due
to a previous biopsy. As ST3 is expressed in inflammatory scars and wound
healing, the biopsy could induce a transitory expression of ST3 which
would not be related to the carcinoma. Biopsies are very often carried
out in the most aggressive cases such as morpheiform BCCs, that were very
often described as ST3-positive [10].
The purpose of the present work was a systematic immunohistochemical
study of ST3 expression in the four major types of basal cell carcinomas,
including cases with deep invasion, in order to evaluate a possible link
between ST3 and the prognosis of those carcinomas.
Patients and methods
To avoid a possible bias due to changes induced by a previous partial
excision or biopsy we included in this study cases of primary BCCs that
were fully excised, without any previous biopsy. All cases included were
typical both clinically and histologically. We selected for the immunohistochemistry
study slides showing both the tumour and the healthy margins on both sides.
We excluded cases sent to us for advice, incompletely removed tumours
and those with regressive changes. All slides were obtained from the collection
of the Laboratoire d'Histopathologie Cutanée, between the period
1977-1999.
Therefore, 40 cases of Pinkus' fibroepithelial tumour, 40 cases of superficial
BCCs, 40 cases of nodular BCCs and 38 cases of morpheiform BCCs were included.
In addition, we also selected 10 cases of BCC showing a very deep invasion
in the fat tissue and/or in the underlying muscle. The patient characteristics
are detailed in table I.
The deeply invasive cases were of the nodular (5 cases) and the morpheiform
types (5 cases). Nine of the 10 cases were excised on the face, in areas
that are usually associated with a poorer prognosis (nasal, perioral and
periocular areas) and one case originated from the back. Invasion of the
underlying muscle was found in the 5 nodular BCCs and subcutis penetration
was noticed in the 5 morpheiform cases, one showing in addition a perineural
invasion.
The histological diagnosis of all tumours was established independently
by two of us (BC, EG), after the slides were selected according to the
diagnosis of the laboratory files and put in random order by GN.
Immunohistochemistry
We performed a conventional streptavidin-biotin technique, using the
commercial kit LSAB2 (Dako). The anti-ST3 monoclonal antibody (5ST-4A9
clone, IgG1, lambda) was kindly provided by Marie-Christine Rio, IGBMC,
Strasbourg France, as it is not commercially available. It was obtained
by immunisation of BALB/c mice with recombinant human ST3 that was extracted
from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli cells (BL 21) strain,
expressing cDNA inserted in a pET-3 vector [15]. The reactivity pattern
of the antibody is similar on frozen and formalin fixed biopsies, when
microwave antigen retrieval is performed. Since the antibody was characterized
[15] numerous studies have been carried out using the same method [11-13].
Five micron sections of each tumour were submitted to immunohistochemical
technique using Superfrost plus slides (Menzel, Gläser, Germany).
After microwave antigen retrieval (17 min for formaldehyde-fixed samples
and 25 min for those fixed in Bouin's solution), the sections were incubated
with the antibody (1/4,000) for 24 hrs at room temperature. Positive control
consisted of ST3-positive breast carcinoma sections. Negative controls
consisted of sections that were similarly processed except that no primary
antibodies were used. Using this method, we never observed unwanted background
stain in the stroma of epithelial tumours, neither in the present study
nor in our previous work [11].
We quantified ST3 staining using a simple semiquantitative scale: 0
(absence of positive cells), 1 (few isolated positive cells), 2 (intermediate
between 1 and 3) and 3 (diffuse positivity or staining of multiple groups
of cells). The slides were processed in a random order and analysed by
two of us (BC and GN) to quantify the staining.
Results
Positively stained cells were present only in the stroma, but the tumoral
cells were ST3-negative in all cases. A reinforcement in positively stained
cells was observed around the most aggressive lobules (Fig.
1) or groups of neoplastic cells, mainly those located in the
deep dermis or in the subcutis. ST3 expression was present in the cytoplasm
of the stromal cells, which were most often located close to the malignant
epithelial cells (Fig. 2).
The proportion of positive cases was 27.5% of fibroepithelial tumours
(n = 11), 65% of superficial BCCs (n = 26), 72.5% of nodular BCCs (n =
31), 86.9% of morpheiform BCCs (n = 35) and 100% of deeply invasive BCCs
(n = 10). The semiquantitative results are detailed in table
I.
We observed an increase in the proportion of tumours exhibiting a strong
staining (class 2 and 3) in the most aggressive groups of BCCs. A strong
staining was noticed in 7.5% of fibroepithelial tumours, 20% of superficial
BCCs, 45% of nodular BCCs, 63.2% of morpheiform BCCs and 100% of deeply
invasive BCCs.
Discussion
This systematic study of the four major types of BCCs shows that ST3
expression is not only more frequent but also stronger in the most aggressive
cases.
We present for the first time a study of a homogeneous group of fully
excised tumours, with clear-cut characterisation of the histological subtypes
prior to immunohistochemical study. To the best of our knowledge, Pinkus'
fibroepithelial tumour has not been investigated in the previous studies
which included cases of BCCs. This is particularly interesting, as Pinkus'
tumour was considered as a precursor of BCCs for years and is now classified
among the most indolent forms of BCCs [16]. ST3 staining was weak and
inconstant in this group of well circumscribed BCCs. We observed an increasing
proportion of positively stained tumours in our five groups, the most
aggressive cases being constantly positive, especially the invasive morpheiform
type. A reinforcement of the staining was observed in the stroma surrounding
the invasive strands of tumoral cells in this type, which usually lack
peripheral palisading. This was already noticed in a small series of cases
studied by in situ hybridisation [9, 10].
The analysis of the literature shows that the
expression of ST3 in BCCs was analysed in 7 different studies [6, 9, 10,
12-14, 17], using both in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry.
The global rate of "positive" tumours was approximately 60% in these studies.
BCCs were often mixed together with other cancers or benign lesions, and
the staining was not quantified in the immunohistochemical studies. As
it was demonstrated that ST3 can be expressed in inflammatory scars [9],
the study of morpheiform BCCs should take into account the scar induced
by a biopsy prior to complete excision. This factor could be responsible
for false positive results in those carcinomas biopsied because of misleading
clinical appearance. To rule out this confusing factor, we included only
BCCs that were fully excised and that were not submitted to a previous
biopsy. We can therefore affirm that the higher expression of ST3 in morpheiform
BCCs is not artefactual.
Our study shows an increasing proportion of strongly positive cases
in the five groups of tumours. Moreover, the majority of 31 tumours with
the strongest staining (class 3) were found in the morpheiform and deeply
invasive groups (21 cases, 68%). These results suggest that a strong ST3
expression (i.e. numerous positive cells in the stroma) is associated
with a poorer prognosis of BCCs. In their study of various skin tumours,
Thewes et al. [12] also found a higher rate of positively stained
cases in their nodular BCCs compared to their superficial tumours (47%
vs 30%). The differences between the study of Thewes et al.
[12] and ours, i.e. a lower rate of positively stained tumours,
are probably not relevant and could be due only to the technique of immunohistochemistry,
as Thewes et al. did not use microwave antigen retrieval.
Our impression is that the level of expression of ST3 evaluated by the
number of positively stained cells in the stroma, is of greater importance
than the global rate of positivity, as the differences among the various
groups of BCCs were more clear-cut when analysing the semi-quantitative
results. We had already noticed that those squamous cell carcinomas which
led to metastasis exhibited the strongest ST3 expression [11], suggesting
once more a correlation between ST3 expression and prognosis. The present
study shows a link between the histological subtype of BCC and ST3 expression.
CONCLUSION
As such a link has been shown in so many types of human carcinomas, it
can be hypothesised that ST3 is not only a marker of poor prognosis, but
could play a direct role in tumour progression. The inhibition of apoptosis
by ST3 has already been demonstrated [5] and could be responsible for
a longer survival of malignant cells. Moreover, the transfection of both
sense and anti-sense ST3 in nude mice has shown that ST3 expression promotes
tumour take in nude mice [18]. Other experiments have demonstrated that
ST3 promotes, in a paracrine manner, homing of malignant epithelial cells
[19]. It was recently shown in an animal model that ST3 favours the cancer
cells survival, by decreasing cell death through both apoptosis and necrosis
[20]. A direct role of ST3 in human cutaneous carcinomas remains to be
established by further experiments.
Article accepted on 28/6/01
REFERENCES
1. Basset P, Bellocq JP, Wolf C, Noël A, Chenard MP, Wolf
C, et al. A novel metalloproteinase gene specifically expressed
in stromal cells of breast carcinomas. Nature 1990; 348: 699-704.
2. Matrisian LM. The matrix-degrading metalloproteinases. Bioessays
1992; 14: 455-63.
3. Stetler-Stevenson WG, Aznavoorian S, Liotta LA. Tumor cell
interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis.
Ann Rev Cell Biol 1993; 9: 541-73.
4. Pei D, Madmujar G, Weiss SJ. Hydrolytic inactivation of a
breast carcinoma cell-derived serpin by human stromelysin-3. J Biol
Chem 1994; 269: 25849-55.
5. Basset P, Bellocq JP, Lefebvre O, Noël A, Chenard MP,
Wolf C, et al. Stromelysin-3: a paradigm for stroma-derived factors
implicated in carcinoma progression. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1997;
26: 43-53.
6. Rouyer N, Wolf C, Chenard MP, Rio MC, Chambon P, Bellocq JP,
et al. Stromelysin-3 gene expression in human cancer: an overview.
Invasion Metastasis 1995; 14: 269-75.
7. Kawami H, Yoshida K, Ohsaki A, Kuroi K, Nishiyama M, Toge
T. Stromelysin-3 mRNA expression and malignancy: comparison with clinicopathological
features and type IV collagenase mRNA expression in breast tumors. Anticancer
Res 1993; 13: 2319-24.
8. Muller D, Wolf C, Abecassis J, Million R, Engelmann A, Bronner
G, et al. Increased stromelysin-3 gene expression is associated
with increased local invasiveness in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Cancer Res 1993; 53: 165-9.
9. Wolf C, Chenard MP, Durand de Grossouvre PM, Bellocq JP, Chambon
P, Basset P. Breast-cancer-associated stromelysin-3 gene is expressed
in basal cell carcinoma and during cutaneous wound healing. J Invest
Dermatol 1992; 99: 870-2.
10. Unden AB, Sandstedt B, Bruce K, Hedblad MA, Stahle-Bäckdahl
M. Stromelysin-3 mRNA associated with myofibroblasts is overexpressed
in aggressive basal cell carcinoma and in dermatofibroma but not in dermatofibrosarcoma.
J Invest Dermatol 1996; 107: 147-53.
11. Asch PH, Basset P, Roos M, Grosshans E, Bellocq JP, Cribier
B. Expression of stromelysin 3 in keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Am J Dermatopathol 1999; 21: 146-50.
12. Thewes M, Worret WI, Engst R, Ring J. Stromelysin-3 (ST3):
immunohistochemical characterization of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-11
in benign and malignant skin tumors and other skin disorders. Exp Dermatol
1999; 24: 122-6.
13. Thewes M, Worret WI, Engst R, Ring J. Stromelysin-3. A potent
marker for histopathologic differentiation between desmoplastic trichoepithelioma
and morphealike basal cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1998;
20: 140-2.
14. Majmudar G, Nelson BR, Jensen TC, Voorhees JJ, Johnson TM.
Increased expression of stromelysin-3 in basal cell carcinomas. Mol
Carcinog 1994; 9: 17-23.
15. Sanatavicca M, Noël A, Chenard MP, Lutz Y, Stoll I,
Segain JP, et al. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies against
stromelysin-3 and their use to evaluate stromelysin-3 levels in breast
carcinomas by semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry. Int J Cancer
1995; 64: 336-41.
16. Ackerman AB, De Viragh PA, Chongchitnant N. Neoplasms with
follicular differentiation. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993: 613-7.
17. Wagner SN, Ruhri C, Kunth K, Holecek BU, Goos M, Höfler
H, et al. Expression of stromelysin 3 in the stroma elements of
the human basal cell carcinoma. Diagn Mol Pathol 1992; 3: 200-5.
18. Noël AC, Lefebvre O, Maquoi E, Van-Hoorde L, Chenard
MP, Mareel M, et al. Stromelysin 3 expression promotes tumor take
in nude mice. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 1924-30.
19. Masson R, Lefebvre O, Noël A, El Fahime M, Chenard MP,
Wendling C, et al. In vivo evidence that the stromelysin 3 metalloproteinase
contributes in a paracrine manner to epithelial cell malignancy. Nature
1990; 348: 699-704.
20. Boulay A, Masson R, Chenard MP, El Fahime M, Cassard L, Bellocq
JP, et al. High cancer cell death in syngenic tumors developed
in host mice deficient for the stromelysin-3 matrix metalloproteinase.
Cancer Res 2001; 61: 2189-93.
|