Home > Journals > Medicine > Bulletin du cancer > Full text
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
Bulletin du Cancer
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
  Printable version
  Version PDF

Incidence of severe postoperative pain after cancer surgery despite intraoperative anticipation: a case controlled study


Bulletin du Cancer. Volume 97, Number 7, 10037-41, juillet 2010, Electronic journal of oncology

DOI : 10.1684/bdc.2010.1132

Summary  

Author(s) : C Motamed, G Salazar, J-L Bourgain , Institute Gustave-Roussy, Department of anesthesia, 39, rue Camille-Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France.

Summary : Background and methodsAnticipating postoperative pain is a routine practice in our institution. As part of a quality assurance program we used our computerized anesthetic record system database to evaluate incidence of patients having very severe postoperative pain (grade 4 on a subjective pain scale ranging from 0 to 4) in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit during a two year period. These patients were compared toacontrol group matched on age, type and date of surgery. Demographic characteristics, type and duration of the surgery, preoperative and intra-operative medications were compared between groups.Results78 patients out of 12,510 (0.6%) with a pain score of 4 were compared to another group of 78. No significant difference was observed with regards of demographic characteristics, duration, type of surgery, and operative pain medications. Pain scores and morphine consumption were significantly higher in the cases study group in comparison to the controlled group, 4 vs 1.6±1.1, (p<\;0.05) and 13.2±6 vs. 6.9±7mg (p<\;0.05). Patients in the cases study group had significantly more preoperative psychoactive medication: antidepressant and benzodiazepine 13 vs. 2, (p<\;0.05).ConclusionThe incidence of severe postoperative pain scores were less than 1% in our institution. In patients with preoperative opioid treatment, adaptation of analgesic treatment has probably prevented the occurrence of severe pain. Multimodal anticipation of postoperative pain should remain mandatory while efforts should focus to identify such patients before surgery.

Keywords : postoperative pain, severe postoperative pain, benzodiazepines, morphine consumption, postoperative care unit

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : C Motamed, G Salazar, J-L Bourgain

Institute Gustave-Roussy, Department of anesthesia, 39, rue Camille-Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France

Article reçu le 22 Octobre 2009, accepté le 10 Avril 2010

Introduction

In recent years, high importance is given to the prevention of postoperative pain including anticipated intra-operative pain management but also minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopy) [1-3]. There is still a percentage of patients (up to 80%) who still suffer from mild to severe postoperative pain especially upon arrival in the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) which need immediate intervention [4] while progress should also to be made on education of healthcare categories [5, 6]. Adverse effects of postoperative pain are well known: significant initial distress, negative effect on immune function, wound healing and perhaps even chronic post surgical pain syndrome in case of very high postoperative pain scores [7, 8].

Anticipated postoperative pain management protocol is our current clinical practice since several years. Inaddition, our department saves all anesthesia and PACU events into an important database (DEIO) including more than 57,000 cases since 2001. Therefore, as part of quality-assurance program, this study was designed to assess the incidence of patients having very high postoperative pain scores, in the PACU and to identify independent factors of severe postoperative pain by comparing these patients to another group of patients having a similar type of surgery in an adjacent period.

Methods

After anesthesia and PACU stay, all the information concerning events and monitoring trend curves are saved into a powerful data base fuelled with a computerized anesthesia record system (ARK DEIO-GE ™). Our primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of patients having severe postoperative pain in PACU despite anticipation and to assess their demographic characteristics. Our secondary objective was to detect significant factor contributing to these high postoperative pain scores by comparison to a similar population not having severe pain. Our local ethical board committee approved the use of our database to perform this retrospective case-controlled analysis. Patients approved these types of study by signing their acceptation to participate during one of the first consultations in our hospital.

About 6,000 patients transit in our PACU per year. As a routine care, all patients undergoing surgical or interventional radiology procedures under general or regional anesthesia transit via the PACU, in addition to these cases some patients having local anesthesia only might transit the PACU for surveillance in a case by case basis depending on the type of the procedure. All patients had a standardised evaluation: temperature, pain score in a 5 grades numerical scale at rest (0 no pain, 1 mild pain, 2 moderate pain, 3 severe pain, 4 very severe pain) and a 4 grades sedation scale (0 alert, 1 sometimes drowsy easily aroused, 2 often drowsy easily aroused, 3 often drowsy difficult to arouse). Nurses enter these data manually in our computerised record via predefined lists. Other criteria such as blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate are automatically stored.

Postoperative pain was anticipated by preoperative analgesic administration using standardised multimodal protocol as follows: systematic use of moderate pain killer such as paracetamol, tramadol, nefopam, and IV morphine in case of the use of remifentanil in surgery known to yield severe pain, but also the intraoperative injection of local anesthetics through epidural or perineural injection [9]. The dose of intraoperative morphine in our setting depends on the type of anticipated postoperative pain (none, moderate or severe) and varies from 0.05 to 0.2mg/kg, according to type surgery and preoperative opiate treatment [10], local anaesthetics through epidural and peripheral catheters for all patients was injected thirty minutes before the end of surgery. Other drugs such as ketamine or non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs were also used at the discretion of the anesthetistt in charge in the PACU in rescue situations. More than 99% of the patients are extubated in the operating room after control neuromuscular blockade (NMT Datex GE™) in addition to other criteria including temperature. For PACU discharge, the following parameters are systematically checked and recorded: pain score, sedation score, temperature and vital signs such as blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulsation, respiratory rate and postoperative nausea and vomiting status. Preoperative events, including preoperative anesthetic evaluation and patient's history are not linked to the data base. Morphine titration in PACU is started when patients has a pain score of 3 or 4. Titration starts with boluses of 2 or 3 mg (depending on age) and are renewed every 7min, it is stopped when pain scores decrease to 2 there is no limit of IV morphine titration.

During the period 2006-2007, patients were selected from the data base for having a numeric pain score-of 4. The control group was selected using similar age, type of surgery in an adjacent time period (before or after one week maximum).

Emergency surgical patients were not considered because most of them were directly managed in the intensive care unit upon completion of surgery.

Several parameters were compared between the two groups: pain scores at the arrival and before leaving PACU,

  • Morphine consumption defined as the total amount of morphine injected during anesthesia and recovery period.
  • Preoperative treatment classified into groups: cardiovascular, psychoactive, analgesic (opiates and non-opiates), anti-inflammatory.

Epidural failure was considered when additional IV morphine injection was necessary to decrease postoperative pain related to surgery as was peripheral nerve block failure. Student t test, Mann Whitney rank sum test, Χ2 test or Fischer exact test were used to compare data with Sigmastat statistical software for Windows V3 (USA).

Results

Data were obtained from a total of 12,510 patients, 6,495 in 2006 and 6,015 in 2007. Exhaustivity (number of patients with at least a record of one pain score divided by the number of procedures) was 91% in 2006 and 94% in 2007.

Demographic characteristics are represented in Table 1; no significant difference was detected between groups. Duration of surgery was not significantly different between groups (table 1).

A total of 78 patients (0.6%) had pain score of 4 upon arrival in the PACU, (33 in 2006 and 45 in 2007). All type of procedures performed in our institution were involved: oto-rhinolaryngology (21%), interventional radiology (15%), gynaecological (8%), abdominal (23%), breast surgery (17%) and other peripheral surgery (16%). The controlled group had an initial pain score of 1.6±1.1, (p<0.05). In PACU, morphine consumption 13.6±6mg was significantly higher in the cases study group compared to the controlled group 6.9±7mg (p<0.05) (table 2). Among preoperative treatment, consumption of psychoactive medication: (benzodiazepine and/or antidepressant) was the only risk factor of severe postoperative pain.

Intra operative parameters were comparable between the two groups: number of patients receiving remifentanil or sufentanil and the respective dosage. Anticipated analgesic treatment was not significantly different between the two groups, including at least two means of anticipated postoperative pain (paracetamol, tramadol or nefopam). Those having epidural or perineural analgesia had an injection at skin closure. No statistically significant difference was noticed comparing sedation and pain score when leaving the PACU, (table 3).
Table 1 Demographic characteristics.

Cases (n = 78)

Controlled (n = 78)

Age (yr)

50±13

50±11

Weight (kg)

65±12

65±16

Height (cm)

166±9

165±9

Sex (M/F)

38/40

40/38

Duration of surgery (min)

165±145

178±139

Type of surgery

2006

2007

2006

2007

Head and Neck surgery

9

7

9

7

Interventional radiology

5

7

5

7

Gynecology laparoscopy included (LI)

1

5

3

3

Hepato gastroenteral surgery LI

8

9

7

10

Breast surgery

6

8

6

8

Others (peripheral sarcoma and dermatology)

4

9

3

10

Sum

33

45

33

45


Table 2 Pre operative pain medication and intraoperative opioid requirements, and postoperative pain anticipation.

Cases (n=78)

Controlled (n=78)

Preoperative opiate treatment (n° patients)

3/78

4/78

Preoperative non opiate pain medication (n° patients)

5/78

4/78

Preoperative use of psychoactive medications: benzodiazepine, antidepressant (n° patients)

13

2*

Intraoperative sufentanil (n° patients)

16/78

16/78

Mean sufentanil consumption μg

19±7

15±4

Intraoperative remifentanil (n° patients)

62/78

62/78

Mean remifentanil consumption (μg)

2092 +/-1560

1829+/-1549

Intraoperative morphine (n° patients))

39/56

36/55

Mean intraoperative morphine (mg)

6±5

5.5±4.5

Epidural analgesia (n° patients) (started at skin closure)

6/78

7/78

Epidural analgesia failure (n° patients)

1/6

2/7

Intraoperative paracetamol (n° patients)

68/78

63/78

Intraoperative tramadol (n° patients)

69/78

62/78

Intraoperative nefopam (n° patients)

18/78

19/78


Table 3 PACU pain and sedation scores and analgesics requirements.

Cases

Control

Pain scores median/(min-max)

Upon assessment

4

1.6 (1-2)

When leaving PACU

1.7 (1-2)

1.1 (1-2)

Sedation score median (min-max)

Upon arrival

1.1 (1-4)

1.2 (1-4)

When leaving PACU

1.2 (1-3)

1.2 (1-3)

Morphine requirements in PACU (mg)

13.2±6*

6.9±7

Discussion

This study shows that severe postoperative pain in the PACU has a very low incidence (0.6%) in our institution thanks to systematic anticipation. In addition, this retrospective case-controlled study suggested that a significant independent factor to experience severe postoperative pain despite routine anticipation was the use of psychoactive medications in a chronic mode before surgery.

Several other factors are reported to be a significant predictor of severe postoperative pain including chronic pain medication [11], but also, gender, ASA status, alcohol dependence, type of intraoperative opioid [12]. Psychoactive chronic treatment was never reported to be a significant predictive factor of acute postoperative pain in the PACU however reports exists suggesting relation between anxiety and pain on postoperative day 2 [13] and also further up to three months [14].

A recent systematic review suggest that main predictors of postoperative pain are pre-existing pain followed by anxiety while postoperative analgesic consumption depends mainly on the type of surgery, age and psychological distress [8]. In another study preoperative midazolam decreased postoperative anxiety and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours [15] while another investigation found a decrease in anxiety and postoperative nausea and vomiting using mirtazapine [16].

Another recent retrospective study focused on a large cohort of patients having different types of surgery in which uni and multivariate analysis revealed multiple factors [4] in relation with postoperative pain scores needing immediate intervention (mainly above 4 in an 11 scale), these factors were respectively younger age, female gender, obesity, use of nitrous oxide, longer duration of surgery, location of surgery (musculo-skeletal and intra-abdominal) and ASA status I-II. Nevertheless our study concerned only cancer patients and was a case controlled study concerning patients having very high scores of postoperative pain.

In the present study sedation scores on arrival to PACU or upon exit from the ICU were not different between the two groups however our primary objective was to detect only the incidence of patients with high pain scores, in addition contradictions exist between sedation score and adequate analgesia [17, 18].

Aubrun et al. previously assessed the risk factor predicting postoperative pain and found that preoperative analgesics, general anesthesia procedures, and the amount of intraoperative analgesics being a risk factor of high postoperative pain scores [12], our study found different results probably because of different population which was cancer surgery but also the use of remifentanil in our institution which was not reported in other studies. Psychological distress has also been reported to be predictor of severe postoperative pain [8], we could not verify this hypothesis but indirect putative assumption for patients taking benzodiazepins and other psychotropes which were significantly more important in the cases study group in comparison to the controlled group could be in accordance with this study. Although VAS remains the gold standard for the follow up of postoperative pain, we used the numerical score since it was found to be more preferred by nurses [19] in daily practice and to be more reliable in the immediate period following anesthesia where patient frequently presents accommodation difficulties.

A major shortcoming of this study is the retrospective nature of it; however the large amount and almost exhaustive nature of the patients in the database decrease selective recruitment bias. Despite being an important predictor of postoperative pain [11] preoperative pain scores were not assessed because of the design of the study. The level of preoperative anxiety was not assessed because of the same methological flaw but we believe the level of anxiety is generally high in cancer patients [20].

In addition, our study confirms that high postoperative pain scores were not encountered only in complex and long surgery, but they were present in short and peripheral surgery [7] and in laparoscopic surgery as previously reported [21] but also in breast surgery which is known to yield moderate postoperative pain [22]. The proportion of patients with severe pain were probably lower than other reported series mostly because of our systematic anticipation of postoperative pain in a multimodal principle but also the fact that some surgeries known to be painful as orthopaedics are not performed in our institution. This study suggest that the incidence of patients having very severe postoperative pain in the PACU was very low (0.6%) albeit anticipating treatment while cancer patients having anxiolytic psychotropic treatment might be at more specific risk for severe postoperative pain scores, therefore effort should be made for prospective studies in the preoperative anaesthetic consultation to identify such patients and try to develop an adequate strategy to decrease severe postoperative pain [9].

Conflict of interest

none.

References

1 Webster TM, Baumgartner R, Sprunger JK, Baldwin DD, McDougall EM, Herrell SD. A clinical pathway for laparoscopic pyeloplasty decreases length of stay. J Urol 2005; 173: 2081-4.

2 Jensen K, Kehlet H, Lund CM. Postoperative recovery profile after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, observational study of a multimodal anaesthetic regime. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 464-71.

3 Kumar S. Laparoscopically guided ilioinguinal nerve block for groin hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16: 562-4.

4 Mei W, Seeling M, Franck M, Radtke F, Brantner B, Wernecke KD, et al. Independent risk factors for postoperative pain in need of intervention early after awakening from general anaesthesia. Eur J Pain 2010 ; 14 : 149e1-7.

5 Benhamou D, Viel E, Berti M, Brodner G, De Andres J, Draisci G, et al. PATHOS study on postoperative pain management in Europe: French data. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008; 27: 664-78.

6 Fletcher D, Fermanian C, Mardaye A, Aegerter P. A patient-based national survey on postoperative pain management in France reveals significant achievements and persistent challenges. Pain 2008; 137: 441-51.

7 Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber-Demore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Med 2009; 10: 708-15.

8 Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 657-77.

9 Savoia G, Gravino E, Loreto M, Erman A. Analgesia in PACU: indications, monitoring, complications. Curr Drug Targets 2005; 6: 755-65.

10 Minkowitz HS. Postoperative pain management in patients undergoing major surgery after remifentanil vs fentanyl anesthesia. Multicentre Investigator Group. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47: 522-8.

11 Gramke HF, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, Kessels AG, Peters ML, Sommer M, et al. Predictive factors of postoperative pain after day-case surgery. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 455-60.

12 Aubrun F, Valade N, Coriat P, Riou B. Predictive factors of severe postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1535-41; (table of contents).

13 Carr EC, Nicky Thomas V, Wilson-Barnet J. Patient experiences of anxiety, depression and acute pain after surgery: a longitudinal perspective. Int J Nurs Stud 2005; 42: 521-30.

14 Ene KW, Nordberg G, Johansson FG, Sjostrom B. Pain, psychological distress and health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months after radical prostatectomy. BMC Nurs 2006; 5: 8.

15 Bauer KP, Dom PM, Ramirez AM, O'Flaherty JE. Preoperative intravenous midazolam: benefits beyond anxiolysis. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 177-83.

16 Chen CC, Lin CS, Ko YP, Hung YC, Lao HC, Hsu YW. Premedication with mirtazapine reduces preoperative anxiety and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 109-13; (table of contents).

17 Lentschener C, Tostivint P, White PF, Gentili ME, Ozier Y. Opioid-induced sedation in the postanesthesia care unit does not insure adequate pain relief: a case-control study. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1143-7; (table of contents).

18 Aubrun F, Hrazdilova O, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. A high initial VAS score and sedation after iv morphine titration are associated with the need for rescue analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 969-74.

19 Aubrun F, Paqueron X, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. What pain scales do nurses use in the postanaesthesia care unit? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 745-9.

20 Bulfone G, Giavon L, Cedolin C, Bresadola V. Relation between information, anxiety and satisfaction in oncological and surgical patients. Prof Inferm 2006; 59: 3-7.

21 Ekstein P, Szold A, Sagie B, Werbin N, Klausner JM, Weinbroum AA. Laparoscopic surgery may be associated with severe pain and high analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 41-6.

22 Binhas M, Decailliot F, Rezaiguia-Delclaux S, Suen P, Dumerat M, Francois V, et al. Comparative effect of intraoperative propacetamol vs placebo on morphine consumption after elective reduction mammoplasty under remifentanil-based anesthesia: a randomized control trial [ISRCTN71723173]. BMC Anesthesiol 2004; 4: 6.


 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]